yeah now i remember, just the lighting and hands reminded me of it . is the doom engine opensource nowadays ? if u would trow it up on steam it would be ok to make some bucks with it ?
yes its open source, Selaco uses it for example.. almost any game that uses it uses a modified version. i use UZDoom. so yes you are allowed to sell games with that engine, i think you have to share the source code (code, not graphics etc).
It's all a form of AI, yes even simple deterministic rule based NPC scripts. "Artificial Intelligence" refers to any system engineered to emulate intelligent behavior or decision-making, whether it is sentient or not. Stop being definition nazis.
Sentient AI has never been a thing, that is something else entirely beyond AI. It's not how the Geoffrey Hinton ("Godfather of AI") describes it, and he 100% agrees that LLM's are AI.
LLM's has by far surpassed the original meaning of artificial intelligence. If someone doesn't understand that he likely never read what an AI is, he watched blade runner and thought it would be sentient Replicants who walks among us A child's take or a just a very low IQ take basically by someone who just isn't interested in the subject, not in any serious way at least.
It's all a form of AI, yes even simple deterministic rule based NPC scripts. "Artificial Intelligence" refers to any system engineered to emulate intelligent behavior or decision-making, whether it is sentient or not. Stop being definition nazis.
That's not what "intelligence" means. The term has been abused (mostly by idioturts). "Sentience" has nothing to do with "intelligence".
OpenAI and Anthropic have gone all in with the moralfagging it seems. The era of restrictions, lectures and LLMs refusing to do assignments is upon us.
i am not a fan of the people running these companies. yes, some of what they say is good and makes sense, but some of what they do is quite infuriating.
Anyways, it matters little because there is china, and there is open source too.
...on another subject. two interesting videos i watched this morning.
@vurt
See I think thats where we differ on it vurt.
The "Appeal to Singular Authority" angle doesn't do anything for me.
The founder, inventor, and lead innovator/researcher of anything could claim something. They do a lot, sometimes they are right, sometimes they are wrong.
And until its peer confirmed, and/or the majority of that field accepts it. I don't take any single scientists/engineers/whatever claims with any weight.
This is how we grew up believing so many wrong scientific things. Someone an 'expert' in a field claimed a thing. And people just went with it:
- Vitamin C prevents colds
- We only use 10% of our brains
- Sharks don’t get cancer
- Stress main causes of stomach ulcers
- Different parts of your tongue taste different things
That doesn’t mean expertise has no value. It means “a leading expert believes this” and “this has been proven” are two different statements.
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum