| Page 3 of 4 |
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
 Posted: Wed, 17th Sep 2008 09:25 Post subject: |
|
 |
| Xtrem3X wrote: | | The way x264 works will make any movie @ 4000Kps much better quality then any DVD. The 720p septic releases may not be the best HDRips but they are way better then any DVDRip you'll get. I find it quite handy being able to put an HDRip onto DVD to save space on my pc. Dont get me wrong, it's not anywhere near the quality of an 8000Kbs rip but it's far better then the quality of a DVD you can buy in a store. |
Far better? I'd say not even hardly better at that bitrate 
Commercial bluray movies usually run at 25-30 mbps (there are quite some exceptions, though), and while a rip at 8000 kbps can look great to most people, because they have been watching DVDs all their life, it is nowhere near the retail quality.
If the scene foregoes the moronic DVD5 and DVD9 limits and aim for bitrates above the 10k mark, then we are starting to talk quality.
External harddrives are a better and cheaper solution than burning DVDs in the long run. I hope the x264 scene one day realizes this, and starts going for quality over speed. For people who like to burn to DVDs, you can always re-encode the movie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73238
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Sep 2008 11:09 Post subject: |
|
|
People tend to think that h264 is a miracle doer, it can do just about anything. It was the same when the MP4 ASP codecs (divx, later xvid,3vix) first came out.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Sep 2008 11:47 Post subject: |
|
|
x264 doesn't need 25 - 30 mbs
If you want retail copies download the 30Gb+ releases
After being re-encoded to x264 they only suffer minor quality loss, most people probably cant tell the difference at all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Sep 2008 12:21 Post subject: |
|
|
| Xtrem3X wrote: | x264 doesn't need 25 - 30 mbs
If you want retail copies download the 30Gb+ releases
After being re-encoded to x264 they only suffer minor quality loss, most people probably cant tell the difference at all. |
Depends on your TV I guess. I certainly can tell the difference between different bitrates. I wouldn't want to download a 30GB release, but a minimal bitrate of 10k should be a standard nowadays. Encoding faster probably has higher priority though.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Ăśber-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Sep 2008 15:05 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mister_s wrote: | | Xtrem3X wrote: | x264 doesn't need 25 - 30 mbs
If you want retail copies download the 30Gb+ releases
After being re-encoded to x264 they only suffer minor quality loss, most people probably cant tell the difference at all. |
Depends on your TV I guess. I certainly can tell the difference between different bitrates. I wouldn't want to download a 30GB release, but a minimal bitrate of 10k should be a standard nowadays. Encoding faster probably has higher priority though. |
The 1080p version of Ironman floating around is 8k, imo that's fine.
Any higher and you're looking at 15Gb+ per movie.
With a movie collection of over 500 XviDs slowly being replaced by HDrips 15Gb+ is too big.
If you only want a collection of 50 - 100 movies then ok, but if you want every good movie you've ever seen plus some sitty ones for your missus then you can't go only getting ones with a 10k minimum bitrate.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Sep 2008 15:21 Post subject: |
|
|
so 720p from iFILM sucks ?? 
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ♪ Viva La Vida ♪ <<<<<< <<<<< <<<<<< <<<
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73238
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Sep 2008 17:06 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 18th Sep 2008 02:14 Post subject: |
|
|
yay for the sound bug in iFILM release
oh well i still watched through and i must say it was b00mbastic
whoever says snorefest with Eric Bana was better is an idiot
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Ăśber-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 18th Sep 2008 11:18 Post subject: |
|
|
artistic bollox
action movies suppose to be filled with action not some rubbish dialogues with multiple screens
was so annoying like watching some lame documentary about nothing
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73238
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Thu, 18th Sep 2008 11:25 Post subject: |
|
|
Eliz go watch Fantastic Four. This is the movie for you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
| Posted: Thu, 18th Sep 2008 11:31 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mortibus wrote: | artistic bollox
action movies suppose to be filled with action not some rubbish dialogues with multiple screens
was so annoying like watching some lame documentary about nothing |
He throws a damn tank into a commanche chopper what more do you want? Comic Books arent necessarily about actions all the time there has to be dialogue to progress the story and I really felt The Hulk 2003 accomplish that. Still Nick Nolte's hulk dogs was just silly.
"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Ăśber-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 17:48 Post subject: |
|
|
waiting for Esir imo.
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ♪ Viva La Vida ♪ <<<<<< <<<<< <<<<<< <<<
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73238
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 18:09 Post subject: |
|
|
I'm reading good things about The Incredible Hulk 2008 1080p BluRay DTS x264-HD1080. Also scene, but has good quality.
There is no non-scene release yet.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Ăśber-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 18:19 Post subject: |
|
|
yeah, the bitrate of the 1080p scene release is 1920x816 @ 8624 kbit compared to the pathetic 720p scene release that is 1280x544 @ 4066 kbit :/
I'll probably leech that for now until I have a 720p Esir copy to archive.
asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zipfero
Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
|
| Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 22:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mutantius wrote: | | Mortibus wrote: | artistic bollox
action movies suppose to be filled with action not some rubbish dialogues with multiple screens
was so annoying like watching some lame documentary about nothing |
He throws a damn tank into a commanche chopper what more do you want? Comic Books arent necessarily about actions all the time there has to be dialogue to progress the story and I really felt The Hulk 2003 accomplish that. Still Nick Nolte's hulk dogs was just silly. |
We want MOAR DAMN YOU MOARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!11111
Teh movie was TEH SUCK mORTAn fFs OmG!;!;1,
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 23:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mutantius wrote: | | He throws a damn tank into a commanche chopper what more do you want? |
u protected that film so eagerly yet u don't even know the details, coz that scene never happend
he spits warhead from the rocket that was launched from commanche at commanche
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Oct 2008 01:15 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mortibus wrote: | | Mutantius wrote: | | He throws a damn tank into a commanche chopper what more do you want? |
u protected that film so eagerly yet u don't even know the details, coz that scene never happend
he spits warhead from the rocket that was launched from commanche at commanche |
Tomatoes, potatoes. It had action and a more comic-esque feeling compared to its sequel. I wouldnt say the 2003 version accomplished anything extraordinary but it did what it promised.
"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Oct 2008 01:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| nouseforaname wrote: | yeah, the bitrate of the 1080p scene release is 1920x816 @ 8624 kbit compared to the pathetic 720p scene release that is 1280x544 @ 4066 kbit :/
I'll probably leech that for now until I have a 720p Esir copy to archive. |
do you really need to see every skin hole , tiny scar , microscopic zit on an actor's face?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Ăśber-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Oct 2008 05:40 Post subject: |
|
|
i do too, it's just getting 1080p for 720p tele is kinda getting 20" rims for fiat panda
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73238
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Oct 2008 05:41 Post subject: |
|
|
I bet he's one of those that get the AXXO release and enjoy them like there's no alternative. He's probably tried a 720p release on his 17" monitor and didn't get what all the fuss is all about... 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Ăśber-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 3 of 4 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
There was so much potential in this one with the abomination and they could have made it a real amazing fight but it didn't go anywhere.
