CRYSIS
Page 37 of 183 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 36, 37, 38 ... 181, 182, 183  Next
swebarb




Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland
PostPosted: Fri, 20th Jul 2007 18:06    Post subject:
doesnt say anything about demo.
Back to top
evilmonkey




Posts: 2402

PostPosted: Fri, 20th Jul 2007 21:00    Post subject:
watergem wrote:
[16:34] Topic is * CRYSIS DEMO - AUGUST 1st 2007! www.incrysis.com


Theres nothing there now, was it taken off? funny there arnt any topics in their forums about the news post either. What happened?
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Fri, 20th Jul 2007 21:05    Post subject:
either someone leaked the info when they shouldnt have, or it was taken off because it was a bullshit rumor... so come august 1st, im either going to be very very happy, or Im going to be very upset and hope watergem gets banned for getting my hopes up Sad


Back to top
Naish




Posts: 797

PostPosted: Fri, 20th Jul 2007 21:08    Post subject:
Well, it'd be a really nice birthday present for me. July has been a draught for gaming (World in Conflict beta is pretty good though).

It'd be smart for them to pump Crysis into people's veins before Bioshock gets out, so they can grab the "I can only buy 1 game" crowd.
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Fri, 20th Jul 2007 23:48    Post subject:
to be honest, i dunno of crysis could grab the attention of that crowd. bioshock looks like its got everything... lower quality graphics, but probably more reasonably system specs... im just glad i dont have to pick only one game Very Happy


Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Fri, 20th Jul 2007 23:50    Post subject:
chiv wrote:
to be honest, i dunno of crysis could grab the attention of that crowd. bioshock looks like its got everything... lower quality graphics, but probably more reasonably system specs... im just glad i dont have to pick only one game Very Happy


Crysis had everyone attention but I think ever since they revealved more about that stupid nano suite people stopped caring including myself


Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 20th Jul 2007 23:52    Post subject:
While my opinion of Crysis (as a game, not the tech marvel) has degraded with every movie they have release over the last months, everytime I watch a new movie of Bioshock just makes me want it more and more.
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 00:56    Post subject:
maybe thats the reason i dont understand why so many of you ppl hate crysis... ive watched like 4 vids in total, and i still think the games going to be excellent.


Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 00:57    Post subject:
Cause Crysis is an eye-candy vanilla shooter. Bioshock is in a totally different league.


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
Freakness
Banned



Posts: 3583

PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 00:58    Post subject:
chiv wrote:
to be honest, i dunno of crysis could grab the attention of that crowd. bioshock looks like its got everything... lower quality graphics, but probably more reasonably system specs... im just glad i dont have to pick only one game Very Happy
Sm3 minimum where Crysis sm2 minimum.
SpykeZ wrote:
Crysis had everyone attention but I think ever since they revealved more about that stupid nano suite people stopped caring including myself
You notice the stupid nanosuit in Crysis and you fail to see a stupid genetical modification in Biochoke?
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 01:03    Post subject:
Shocked ZOMGZ Bioshock requires SM3.0 in 2007... Shocked What a (bio) shock! Shocked
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 01:04    Post subject:
Parallax_ wrote:
Cause Crysis is an eye-candy vanilla shooter. Bioshock is in a totally different league.


The freedom offered in Crysis is fairly unique itself, just in terms of how interactive and open the environment is.


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
Freakness
Banned



Posts: 3583

PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 01:06    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
ZOMGZ Bioshock requires SM3.0 in 2007... What a (bio) shock!
Its an indoor shooter with +-Doom3 visuals and spells or something. The question was which one requires more power, stupid.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 01:09    Post subject:
Freakness wrote:
Its an indoor shooter with +-Doom3 visuals and spells or something.

LaughingLaughingLaughing

Yeah, I'm stupid... Razz
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 01:13    Post subject:
Freakness wrote:
chiv wrote:
to be honest, i dunno of crysis could grab the attention of that crowd. bioshock looks like its got everything... lower quality graphics, but probably more reasonably system specs... im just glad i dont have to pick only one game Very Happy
Sm3 minimum where Crysis sm2 minimum.
SpykeZ wrote:
Crysis had everyone attention but I think ever since they revealved more about that stupid nano suite people stopped caring including myself
You notice the stupid nanosuit in Crysis and you fail to see a stupid genetical modification in Biochoke?


bah who cares, your definately going to be getting higher quality with lower system requirements from bioshock overall.

i mean seriously, who the shit is going to be interested in running crysis at anything below high settings?

and second thing - i dont understand the nanosuit hate.. what gives?
Back to top
Freakness
Banned



Posts: 3583

PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 01:16    Post subject:
I played Far Cry on my GF2. I was happy with it, it ran fine. Then I bought an SM2 card and again it ran fine. Same will be with Crysis.


Last edited by Freakness on Sat, 21st Jul 2007 01:17; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 01:22    Post subject:
chiv wrote:


and second thing - i dont understand the nanosuit hate.. what gives?


Personal preference on my end, can't speak for the others. It was cool to begin with but all a sudden the suitmakes you super man. Super Jump, Super Speed, Super cloaking no one can see me in front of them, Super Accuracy, Super Strength...they over did it. Watching the videos you have somewhat of a "energy bar" before you can use it again and doesn't seem like it takes very long to come back before you can use something again. Some of the abilities are just ridiculous. There better damn well be an ending sex scene with a super facial


Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 01:24    Post subject:
Super Jump, Super Speed, Super Cloaking, Super Accuracy, Super Strength, Super... Shit?
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 01:28    Post subject:
well i agree that if i were making a game, id probably make it a bit more realistic by toning down the suit effects and not making them so over the top, but come on... atleast its not the usual 'pick up the glowing invisibility orb', 'youve found some steroids that give you super strength!' or 'grab the unlimited ammo powerup' rubbish... im pretty sure that there will be some kind of limits imposed or the enemies will be suitably tough to balance it out.. should atleast reserve final judgement till youve played it, not just seems some demos... give it a chance Very Happy


Back to top
Freakness
Banned



Posts: 3583

PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 01:29    Post subject:
Back to top
Naish




Posts: 797

PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 05:01    Post subject:
Bioshock looks like it'll be fun, but the main reason I'm going to like Crysis is simple. Sandbox gameplay Smile.
Back to top
Van.Helsing




Posts: 591

PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 07:44    Post subject:
Definately will be buying it, no matter how many people hate the nano suit, it's personal opinion, not a fuckin bitch fest of who can give as much shit to the Super-abilities(people try to hard for a cookie these day's), but i'm personally waiting for Assasin's Creed, 3 Finger's 1 Thumb, and a fucking switchblade For The Win!,

Peace V.H.
Back to top
evilmonkey




Posts: 2402

PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 14:24    Post subject:
Bioshock has never interested me, This is my opinion it looks far too cartoony for my liking. Theres another thing that bothers me about Bioshock, I really cant describe it but its like first person viewin the game feels so .....confined, I cant fully describe what I mean, its just a sense really. I'll take picking up a korean by the neck and chucking him into the beautiful ocean and watch him get eaten by a shark than a corridor doom 3esque shooter with magic powers anyday.
Back to top
hafriski
Banned



Posts: 315

PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 15:28    Post subject:
evilmonkey wrote:
Bioshock has never interested me, This is my opinion it looks far too cartoony for my liking. Theres another thing that bothers me about Bioshock, I really cant describe it but its like first person viewin the game feels so .....confined, I cant fully describe what I mean, its just a sense really. I'll take picking up a korean by the neck and chucking him into the beautiful ocean and watch him get eaten by a shark than a corridor doom 3esque shooter with magic powers anyday.

in other words you don`t like claustrophobic FPS
Back to top
Lutzifer
Modzilla



Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 16:41    Post subject:
AnimalMother wrote:
Parallax_ wrote:
Cause Crysis is an eye-candy vanilla shooter. Bioshock is in a totally different league.


The freedom offered in Crysis is fairly unique itself, just in terms of how interactive and open the environment is.


well, the PR for Farcry also tried to use that reasoning and when playing the game it seemed more open than it really was as you also had to do things pretty much in a certain way to get to the next objective. I guess with Crysis it ll be kinda the same, that there is a lot more freedom in comparison to the super linear shooters of the past, but will also be somewhat linear too despite the fact, that it gives one the feeling of more subjective freedom. Else too many degrees of openess would be very problematic considering the narrative structure of a game like that.
But since Farcry was a great game and i hugely enjoyed it, i cant imagine how they d not make an even better game with Crysis =)
Back to top
SergeantBear
Banned



Posts: 39

PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 19:49    Post subject:
Damn this game will be great Smile I hope it'll be out in october, latest! Let's hope so Smile

I mean if Far Cry 2 comes out in the beginning of 2008....then Crysis has to be out this year Smile

Damn suck my cock Smile
Back to top
xardas96




Posts: 275

PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 20:37    Post subject:
SergeantBear wrote:
Damn suck my cock Smile

Go play 3D Gay Villa Laughing
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 21:00    Post subject:
chiv wrote:
Freakness wrote:
chiv wrote:
to be honest, i dunno of crysis could grab the attention of that crowd. bioshock looks like its got everything... lower quality graphics, but probably more reasonably system specs... im just glad i dont have to pick only one game Very Happy
Sm3 minimum where Crysis sm2 minimum.
SpykeZ wrote:
Crysis had everyone attention but I think ever since they revealved more about that stupid nano suite people stopped caring including myself
You notice the stupid nanosuit in Crysis and you fail to see a stupid genetical modification in Biochoke?


bah who cares, your definately going to be getting higher quality with lower system requirements from bioshock overall.

i mean seriously, who the shit is going to be interested in running crysis at anything below high settings?

and second thing - i dont understand the nanosuit hate.. what gives?


Rightttttttttttttt so port from xbox 360(bioshock) will run bettar and give bettar visual on lower system then game thats made for PC from scratch.Plz tell me then why there are no screenshots or videos of Bioshock for PC? Rolling Eyes
Back to top
shimec




Posts: 1214
Location: Serbia
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 21:15    Post subject:
Because both versions are the same Smile
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Sat, 21st Jul 2007 21:27    Post subject:
shimec wrote:
Because both versions are the same Smile




Lmfao right. You should really check developers site and forum and you will see they are avoiding all questions about PC videos and pics.They will have same story but the question is, why not show PC version of the game? What they have to hide? Btw port cant and never will run bettar then game made for one system. No one in their right mind can compare these 2 games. Open world with life vs indoor linear world. And for all those people who dont read whole posts im not bashing Bioshock im only saying you cant compare these two games because they are world apart. And if Crysis sucks, atleast it will run great on PC which is +4 on my score sheet.
Back to top
Page 37 of 183 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 36, 37, 38 ... 181, 182, 183  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group