| Page 10 of 20 |
|
|
 Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 16:37 Post subject: |
|
 |
sound level in video (ubisoft,cinematic..) is very very low !!
and for you ?
thanks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 16:45 Post subject: |
|
|
What, skidrow is back? aren't those the guys from the commodore amiga era?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 17:29 Post subject: |
|
|
hey..really wanna play this but i suppose i have no chance at running this game..inspiron 9300 with pentium m 1.73ghz, 1024mb ram, and 256 mb geforce go 6800? any thoughts? lol
werd.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 17:43 Post subject: |
|
|
hmmm thought id try demo to check that still ok and that is messed up too !!
so it must be down to the 162 drivers from nvidia...as i put these on 2 days ago for lost planet.
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300
Asus P5N-E SLI
Asus ENGTX 480
4GB 6400
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 17:44 Post subject: |
|
|
The EXE isnt retail, the game has Securom so its either a press exe or some other.
dust.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 17:49 Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone else having problems getting past the second mission? I finished that mission, but it doesn't continue to next mission. Hmm...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 18:03 Post subject: |
|
|
discworld are u retarded? simple question needed simple answer.
There are engines that have been rewritten and now also support dx10( coh or call of juarez for instance).
Why bother if u don't know what u are talking about?
Haswell 4771
Z87-D3HP
16 GB DDR3 RAM
Sapphire Vega 64 water cooled
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 18:29 Post subject: |
|
|
Yup confirmed, the 162.15 are ok here too.
Blame! don't act!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 18:29 Post subject: |
|
|
i was using 162.15 on my 7800gtx... and it messed up. Gone back to the 160.03 which ran the demo fine before.
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300
Asus P5N-E SLI
Asus ENGTX 480
4GB 6400
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 18:45 Post subject: |
|
|
| BrokenCrow wrote: | | ciaspook wrote: |
Works with 162.15 on 8800 here. But doesnt help much since I cant get past the second mission in the quarry. |
It will not advance if you lose any guys (Team must all survive). Personally I think the .EXE is f**ked because there is corruption in some of the text and a fair bit of crashing. I really dont like having to install those ghey ass Aegia drivers. I thought that shi**y tech died out ages ago. I really shouldnt have to have those drivers installed if I am not running the card. |
Have all guys alive. Not even injured. Get a S and 2 "medals". Oh well, guess there is a bug or has someone else gotten past this mission?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 18:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| ciaspook wrote: | | BrokenCrow wrote: | | ciaspook wrote: |
Works with 162.15 on 8800 here. But doesnt help much since I cant get past the second mission in the quarry. |
It will not advance if you lose any guys (Team must all survive). Personally I think the .EXE is f**ked because there is corruption in some of the text and a fair bit of crashing. I really dont like having to install those ghey ass Aegia drivers. I thought that shi**y tech died out ages ago. I really shouldnt have to have those drivers installed if I am not running the card. |
Have all guys alive. Not even injured. Get a S and 2 "medals". Oh well, guess there is a bug or has someone else gotten past this mission? |
I got past it, I was doing the Juarez mission and then I got a phone call, will get back to it this evening. Like I said, it feels bugged to me but it did advance.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 19:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| asbogdan wrote: | discworld are u retarded? simple question needed simple answer.
There are engines that have been rewritten and now also support dx10( coh or call of juarez for instance).
Why bother if u don't know what u are talking about? |
i know that there are "dx10 patches" for some games but there have been no news about Graw2 getting one this far... and these dx10 patches suck... its not the "real" dx10. Want dx10? wait and get crysis... And the dx10 patch doesn't add anything new but some shit ass bloom and shiny latex textures (y)
its just stupid to ask some dumb question over and over again... use google...
-----------------------------
Dam the sounds are sometimes fucked up on the game. Hopefully there will be a patch soon  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 19:30 Post subject: |
|
|
why you people are running the 162.15 ? nvidia already released new fixed beta driver 162.18 XP!
If you are using Vista then format, Vista is crap for games
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 19:35 Post subject: |
|
|
Game is ok now ive goen back to 160.03 drivers..but somethin about it dont feel right.
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300
Asus P5N-E SLI
Asus ENGTX 480
4GB 6400
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 19:38 Post subject: |
|
|
yeah, still volume is very low in movies...in game its low too but not as low as it is in movies. Demo was fine tho.. all sound volumes in that was good
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300
Asus P5N-E SLI
Asus ENGTX 480
4GB 6400
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 19:39 Post subject: |
|
|
| streetunder wrote: | why you people are running the 162.15 ? nvidia already released new fixed beta driver 162.18 XP!
If you are using Vista then format, Vista is crap for games |
when was the 162.18 released m8?
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300
Asus P5N-E SLI
Asus ENGTX 480
4GB 6400
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 19:47 Post subject: |
|
|
Might just be me but this game seems to crash ALOT. This is with the 162.18 drivers in Win XP - 8800 GTX.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 19:49 Post subject: |
|
|
i had sound problems with the demo... sometimes some of the sounds would not work and are to low....
seems theres going to be a patch after the game is officially released
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 20:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| streetunder wrote: | why you people are running the 162.15 ? nvidia already released new fixed beta driver 162.18 XP!
If you are using Vista then format, Vista is crap for games |
Why that, you installed it and found your rig could not cope or?...or did you not even install it and just read somewhere that its crap? Cause my end, VISTA out guns XP like nothing else. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 20:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| CaptainCox wrote: | | streetunder wrote: | why you people are running the 162.15 ? nvidia already released new fixed beta driver 162.18 XP!
If you are using Vista then format, Vista is crap for games |
Why that, you installed it and found your rig could not cope or?...or did you not even install it and just read somewhere that its crap? Cause my end, VISTA out guns XP like nothing else. |
Errr, not true. Maybe for some (very few things) but XP has a very clear performance advantage over Vista in games (For the moment). Thats just a fact. Vista wont come into its own for months. I run both and just as an example, ArmA is crippled in Vista compared to XP (8800s anyway). On top of that, most games are still being written for XP (DX9), so there is no reason why they would perform better under Vista. This will change, but it hasnt yet.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 20:17 Post subject: |
|
|
Never ran ARMA, but as far as I can see running SH4  and GRAW2, Lost Planet...what else...MTW II, i find VISTA just runs faster. My experience, but what the heck.
EVGA 680i, EVGA 8800GTX, 2GB OCZ NV SLI, WDRx2 0R, X-Fi fatality Extreme, G5, G15, etc etc. Again, can't say I feel anything that slows down my world using VISTA.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 20:35 Post subject: |
|
|
| CaptainCox wrote: | Never ran ARMA, but as far as I can see running SH4 and GRAW2, Lost Planet...what else...MTW II, i find VISTA just runs faster. My experience, but what the heck.
EVGA 680i, EVGA 8800GTX, 2GB OCZ NV SLI, WDRx2 0R, X-Fi fatality Extreme, G5, G15, etc etc. Again, can't say I feel anything that slows down my world using VISTA. |
Good reading here :
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3029
I doubt any of the games you mentioned run faster under Vista and Lost Planet is about 1.5 FPS faster in Vista and that is not noticeable. Not trying to be confrontational, just that the facts are not backing up your statements.
QX6800, ASUS Striker Extreme, 2 x Leadtek 8800 GTX (SLI), 4 Gig Corsair 6400, 2 x 150 10K Raptor, 2 x 1TB Hitatchi Storage, X-Fi Elite Pro, G5, Enermax KB, G25 wheel etc etc.
Vista & XP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 7th Jul 2007 20:43 Post subject: |
|
|
i run Vista 32 Ultimate, use Black Vipers new Vista service tweaks, turned of some elements of Aero (the biggest disappointment so far in Vista), turned off the widgets bar... and Vista is fine as a gaming platform and i like some of the new features as an OS. its just not worth $400 and never will be. even older games work fine... been playing lots of Diablo 2 lately.
anyways...
so is anyone recommending waiting to grab this? im curious if its gonna get nuked.
“There's nothing an agnostic can't do if he doesn't know whether he believes in anything or not”
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 10 of 20 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
