What the hell?! No Sopranos Final Episode thread?!!!
Anyway, this is it!
I think Tony's gonna live, AJ will kill some rivals and get shot in the process, Paulie will also live. Silvio will survive another assassination attempt. Phil is going down big time, and doctor Melfi will blame herself for abandoning Tony at such a rough patch.
AJ kill someone? In his current state? Fuhgeddaboudit. I think Tony will get whacked and Phil will be uberboss. Clearing the way for a spin-off series called "The Leotardos". Or maybe the Leonardos.
The way I see it is someone has to rat out on their boss now since both sides don't know where their holed up. I don't think Paulie is going to rat out Tony because he doesn't have anybody else.
The audience want to see Tony go because he's whacked way too many crowd favorites like Adriana and Chris. But the story writer might want to go some other way to leave his mark or do the unexpected.
Carlo flipped
Harris (FBI) is giving Tony information
Phil got clipped, nothing was said or done about it, i thought they worked it out
2 random fuck wads are scoping Tony out in a diner then boom...credits....i just cant believe it
im glad i didn't invest 8 years of my life in that show...jesus
At first I was like wtf with the ending. Then I've grown to like it. Everyone needs to be spoon fed these days. They need things to go out with a bang or a big conclusion. I'm glad Sopranos did something different.
At first I was like wtf with the ending. Then I've grown to like it. Everyone needs to be spoon fed these days. They need things to go out with a bang or a big conclusion. I'm glad Sopranos did something different.
I absolutely agree! The ending was brilliant!!!
And:
Spoiler:
About the black screen at the end, the cut to black is exactly what Bobby and Tony were talking about in the first episode of this half-season when they were discussing what it's like when your number is up. Except that Tony isn't the one who gets whacked - the audience is. Tony's story continues, but we no longer get to see any of it.
At first I was like wtf with the ending. Then I've grown to like it. Everyone needs to be spoon fed these days. They need things to go out with a bang or a big conclusion. I'm glad Sopranos did something different.
I absolutely agree! The ending was brilliant!!!
And:
Spoiler:
About the black screen at the end, the cut to black is exactly what Bobby and Tony were talking about in the first episode of this half-season when they were discussing what it's like when your number is up. Except that Tony isn't the one who gets whacked - the audience is. Tony's story continues, but we no longer get to see any of it.
Did anyone else think one of the patrons in the diner looked like Robert Patrick (the guy who lost his sporting goods business to Tony due to his gambling addiction)? Anyway, my thoughts on the show:
Spoiler:
I thought the ending signified Tony getting whacked. The whole scene in the diner was filmed from Tony's point of view, looking up to see who is coming in and generally scoping the other customers out. Unless I miss my guess, Robert Patrick, a "friend" Tony screwed over mercilessly, killed Tony. If you think about how Phil Leotardo died, he was shot and killed mid-sentence. It could have happened just as suddenly to Tony. By not clearly killing him in the show, the writers could always bring the character back later if they wanted to.
At first I was like wtf with the ending. Then I've grown to like it. Everyone needs to be spoon fed these days. They need things to go out with a bang or a big conclusion. I'm glad Sopranos did something different.
I absolutely agree! The ending was brilliant!!!
And:
Spoiler:
About the black screen at the end, the cut to black is exactly what Bobby and Tony were talking about in the first episode of this half-season when they were discussing what it's like when your number is up. Except that Tony isn't the one who gets whacked - the audience is. Tony's story continues, but we no longer get to see any of it.
Did anyone else think one of the patrons in the diner looked like Robert Patrick (the guy who lost his sporting goods business to Tony due to his gambling addiction)? Anyway, my thoughts on the show:
Spoiler:
I thought the ending signified Tony getting whacked. The whole scene in the diner was filmed from Tony's point of view, looking up to see who is coming in and generally scoping the other customers out. Unless I miss my guess, Robert Patrick, a "friend" Tony screwed over mercilessly, killed Tony. If you think about how Phil Leotardo died, he was shot and killed mid-sentence. It could have happened just as suddenly to Tony. By not clearly killing him in the show, the writers could always bring the character back later if they wanted to.
You are wrong my friend. Read the spoiler:
Spoiler:
It wasn't Tony's POV. If that was the case the last shot before the black screen would have been from Tony's eyes, like it has been done for ages in cinema. And it wasn't Robert Patrick. The guy who goes to the bathroom is probably a fed, who keeps an eye on Tony, now that he is up for trail, and the two niggas are just browsing for food - they used them just to show how ignorant people are! The way I see things, either the audience got whacked or the show got whacked - that's why the sudden silent black frame is there.
I think it was a pathetic attempt to be different just for the sake of being different. Yes, I am not a genius and have to be spoon-fed everything and I don't get the deeper meaning of this ending. A good story should have a good end. None of this fancy 'make up your own' crap.
A slip of the tongue has finally confirmed a lingering question about one of the most famous TV endings of all time – “The Sopranos”.
Quote:
Now The Independent reports that”The Sopranos” creator David Chase let the answer slip during an interview for his book “The Sopranos Sessions”. Chase has been asked about that ending numerous times in the past and has always chosen his words carefully and played it very ambivalent – leaving the moment up to interpretation.
In a new roundtable discussion though, co-author Alan Sepinwall asked Chase: “When you said there was an end point, you don’t mean Tony at Holsten’s [the diner], you just meant, ‘I think I have two more years’ worth of stories left in me.'”
Chase responded: “Yes, I think I had that death scene around two years before the end … But we didn’t do that.” Co-author Matt Zoller Seitz caught that distinction and said: “You realize, of course, that you just referred to that as a death scene.” Chase, realising his mistake, quickly replied: “F - - k you guys.”
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum