| Page 5 of 6 |
Ankh
Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 21:36 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
$en$i
VIP Member
Posts: 3127
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 21:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| Anthirs wrote: | | Cos if 1 nuke is used, more countries will realize they can be the next target (like korea, china) and attack too. We also have russia which I concider to be a ticking bomb. |
If one of these two entities, US & EU, attack the other one, others countries would do better to realize quickly that they can be the next target, because not a single country would be out of the range of the belligerents, with nuclear or conventional warheads over ICBM and SLBM, and would thus be potentially directly threatened.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SirCez
Posts: 357
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 21:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| Jenni wrote: | | SirCez wrote: | | Well, Turkey alone will eat US but they'r not in Europe so : ) US seems to show off alot but they are nothing but machine dependent. US can only bully poor countries peh. |
Will they whip us to death with olive trees? |
Probably yes! You don't completely rely on your technology now do you? DO YOU? Because that alone won't help you win a war. You need more than that.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jenni
Banned
Posts: 9526
Location: England.
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 21:45 Post subject: |
|
|
HEHEH! No I rely on the British troops.
Best trained in the world.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 21:49 Post subject: |
|
|
Too many tea-breaks for the british 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 21:51 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
$en$i
VIP Member
Posts: 3127
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 21:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| Jenni wrote: | HEHEH! No I rely on the British troops.
Best trained in the world. |
How to start a nationalist flame war. ^^
BTW, on which side do you think the british would be Jenny? I am perplexed.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 21:54 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 21:58 Post subject: |
|
|
| $en$i wrote: | | Jenni wrote: | HEHEH! No I rely on the British troops.
Best trained in the world. |
How to start a nationalist flame war. ^^
BTW, on which side do you think the british would be Jenny? I am perplexed. |
Im 100% sure they would be on the EU side even though their current leader is a lapdog to the united states.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 21:59 Post subject: |
|
|
| Anthirs wrote: | | Im 100% sure they would be on the EU side even though their current leader is a lapdog to the united states. |
Or they could break off and be on their own side. With the "best" trained tea/biscuit-soldiers in the world I am sure they would win it all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 22:00 Post subject: |
|
|
hey, we don't have much of an armed forces, but I wonder what would canada do in this situation ... join USA or fight them ...
 Spoiler: | probably get invaded by USA  |
asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 22:13 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SirCez
Posts: 357
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 22:15 Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone wants Jaffa Cakes? lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 22:57 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Jan 2007 23:31 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TSR69
Banned
Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 11th Jan 2007 00:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| nouseforaname wrote: | hey, we don't have much of an armed forces, but I wonder what would canada do in this situation ... join USA or fight them ...
| Spoiler: | probably get invaded by USA |
|
LOL.
My somewhat sarcastic take on Canada’s role.
I think Canada would claim to be neutral. Then we would open our doors to all the displaced and angry refugees from EU and USA. These displaced refugees with similar ideas, experiences, and anger would then band together to form gangs and continue the war on the streets. Soon some smart ass figures out you can finance the war overseas with drug money. So that is what happens.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu, 11th Jan 2007 00:43 Post subject: |
|
|
remind me again, why is teh USA and EU going to war?
asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 11th Jan 2007 01:28 Post subject: |
|
|
| nouseforaname wrote: | | remind me again, why is teh USA and EU going to war? |
I think it has something to do with the e-penis.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jenni
Banned
Posts: 9526
Location: England.
|
| Posted: Thu, 11th Jan 2007 01:51 Post subject: |
|
|
| GLHF wrote: | | AnimalMother wrote: | | GLHF wrote: |
lol! So true!  |
Yeah, too many burger breaks for the americans.  |
The americans don't take breaks in their killings. ;O
They eat their burger while killing and raping civilian ppl. |
That's if you turn up in time. You know like you didn't for ww1 and ww2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 11th Jan 2007 04:22 Post subject: |
|
|
@clagon
Where are you from?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 11th Jan 2007 04:33 Post subject: |
|
|
This thread is an amusing one. While I would like to think the USA would win, I think it would depend on a number of factors:
1) Would the combatants use nuclear weapons or would this be a purely conventional war?
2) Would both sides mobilize all of their capabilities unselfishly (i.e. would Poland be able to contribue to the EU war effort as well as Britain and France could? Would other states chip in to help the poorer countries mobilize?)
3) Would the EU generals take into account that some countries' forces would be weaker and less trained than others, or would they be politically correct and risk losing battles to appease the politicians?
4) What neutral parties (China, Russia, India, Africa, Canada, Mexico, etc.) would involve themselves and what sort of support would they provide?
5) Would one or both parties resort to the no-holds-barred kind of warfare needed to dominate an enemy or would they fight the war politically?
I think the most important questions are #1 and #2. I don't see either side winning a nuclear war. As for EU mobilization and commitment of troops, the EU as a country would have to worry that specific member states would ignore the demand for troops to appease their own citizens, particularly if they felt their country's troops were dying/being sent to the most dangerous places unfairly. If the EU truly combined in the face of a common threat, you could be an awesome force. Right now, the EU lacks the unity to win a struggle. The EU reminds me of the Austro-Hungarian Empire fighting in WW1, and their diversity and lack of unity hurt their combat effectiveness.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 11th Jan 2007 05:00 Post subject: |
|
|
| Siddhartha wrote: | This thread is an amusing one. While I would like to think the USA would win, I think it would depend on a number of factors:
1) Would the combatants use nuclear weapons or would this be a purely conventional war?
2) Would both sides mobilize all of their capabilities unselfishly (i.e. would Poland be able to contribue to the EU war effort as well as Britain and France could? Would other states chip in to help the poorer countries mobilize?)
3) Would the EU generals take into account that some countries' forces would be weaker and less trained than others, or would they be politically correct and risk losing battles to appease the politicians?
4) What neutral parties (China, Russia, India, Africa, Canada, Mexico, etc.) would involve themselves and what sort of support would they provide?
5) Would one or both parties resort to the no-holds-barred kind of warfare needed to dominate an enemy or would they fight the war politically?
I think the most important questions are #1 and #2. I don't see either side winning a nuclear war. As for EU mobilization and commitment of troops, the EU as a country would have to worry that specific member states would ignore the demand for troops to appease their own citizens, particularly if they felt their country's troops were dying/being sent to the most dangerous places unfairly. If the EU truly combined in the face of a common threat, you could be an awesome force. Right now, the EU lacks the unity to win a struggle. The EU reminds me of the Austro-Hungarian Empire fighting in WW1, and their diversity and lack of unity hurt their combat effectiveness. |
What about the Canadian Role???? 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 11th Jan 2007 05:51 Post subject: |
|
|
Whata stupid topic you can discuss USA vs Mars in case aliens attack with same luck.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 5 of 6 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
