Rainbow Six Vegas [No release yet]
Page 12 of 23 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 21, 22, 23  Next
BrokenCrow




Posts: 523

PostPosted: Mon, 11th Dec 2006 23:56    Post subject:
bill_the_one wrote:
Ok guys,

If you want to run this game on 16/10 ws resolutions, give a look to this thread

http://www.widescreengamingforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8072&sid=f96a0092fe6301edd47d20039600688b

I tried it for the 1680x1050 res and it works like a charm Very Happy


Cheers for that.

B
Back to top
mike-




Posts: 1510

PostPosted: Mon, 11th Dec 2006 23:59    Post subject:
BrokenCrow wrote:
mike- wrote:
Anthirs wrote:


Ment for me or Hfric?

i dont give a shit how you spoil yourself with new computer parts every 2 weeks, i care about the fact that youre a fucking retard for thinking your card is gonna be 100% supported, and if its not supported its nvidias fault


Whats funny is that you feel the need to comment when it has nothing to do with you. Salvation Army PC users need not apply. You can only understand the dilemma if you own the bloody card! Naturally you're not put out. You don't own one! You own an antique Wink Its very easy for you to sit there are tell us not to get upset. I'm very happy with my card at the end of the day, and as I said in my previous response, I'd rather run most things fast with a few problems than have a 6600. You started with the personal insults, I ended it. Now, seriously, just STFU. Lets not derail the thread anymore!

Cheers and Merry Xmas.

B

i'm just replying to your posts, since you're so stubborn you won't accept the fact that getting an 8800 now was a bad idea. :] i have a 6800gt, and it runs games fine, including this one, so i could care less how old it is. at least it works with all games out now basically, which you can't say. Wink
Back to top
A-A




Posts: 3154
Location: New york
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 00:02    Post subject:
http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/2718/1ic5.jpg

WHY THE FUCK DOES THIS KEEP HAPPENING IN MP!?!

Sp is fine Neutral
Back to top
JiGSaW
VIP Member



Posts: 4196

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 00:04    Post subject:
Quote:
How To Remove "Reload" and "Low Ammo" Messages - SP and MP

1) C:\Program Files\Ubisoft\Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas\KellerGame\Localization\INT

2) Open the following file with notepad:

R6Hud.int

3) Find the following lines:

[HudPlayerArea]
Reload=RELOAD
LowAmmo=LOW AMMO

4) Delete "Reload" and "Low Ammo" entries (leave blank):

[HudPlayerArea]
Reload=
LowAmmo=

5) Save the file.

You can also delete the "ENEMIES REMAINING" line for Terrorist Hunt mode to get rid of this message. It will simply display the number of remaining terrorists on the right side of your screen.

.........................................................................................

How To Disable Post Processing Effects to Increase Performance

The post processing effects (HDR; Motion Blurr; Eye Adpatation) puts extra processing cycles on to your GPU. If you eliminate them this should speed up your frames per second minus the added visual effects.

WARNING: This may adversely affect the entire game, SP and MP, and you might not be able to re-apply the post processing effects. The only way to re-apply them may be a full re-install of the game.

PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK AND ONLY AS A LAST RESORT TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE.


1) C:\Program Files\Ubisoft\Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas\Engine\Config

2) Find and open the file with Notepad:

BaseEngine.ini

3) Find the following line:

[Engine.RenderDevice]
bUsePostProcessEffects=True

4) Change from "True" to "False"

The game will look very basic (washed out). Thermal vision will become very blocky and consist of the basic colors of Red/Green/Blue. The Night Vision filter (green static) will also not function because it is a post processed effect.

..........................................................................................


Users MAY Not Need a Shader Model 3.0 Card

WARNING: This has not been tested.

Anyone who has a non-SM 3.0 card should edit the files below (after making backups) and see if the game starts up and what kind of performance and or in-game anomalies you encounter receive while playing.

WARNING: PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK. ALWAYS BACK UP FILES BEFORE EDITING.


1) Find the following files:

C:\Program Files\Ubisoft\Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas\Engine\Config

BaseEngine.ini

C:\Program Files\Ubisoft\Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas\KellerGame\Config

DefaultEngine.ini
PCKellerEngine.ini

C:\Program Files\Ubisoft\Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas\KellerGame\Config\PC

DefaultEngine.ini
PCKellerEngine.ini

2) Find the following entry in all the files:

[D3DDrv.D3DRenderDevice]
DisableShaderModel3=False

3) Change "False" to "True".

4) Save files and see if the game starts. Ideally, this should be done on a non-Shader Model 3.0 video card to confirm the game will start without using SM 3.0 if this parameter is active.
Back to top
madmossy




Posts: 62
Location: 50° 25' 59", -3° 34' 0"
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 00:18    Post subject:
bill_the_one wrote:
Ok guys,

If you want to run this game on 16/10 ws resolutions, give a look to this thread

http://www.widescreengamingforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8072&sid=f96a0092fe6301edd47d20039600688b

I tried it for the 1680x1050 res and it works like a charm Very Happy


Glad to see people appreciate my effort Very Happy
Back to top
A-A




Posts: 3154
Location: New york
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 00:50    Post subject:
Online is SO fucking awsome , its like swat...

But it keeps crashing online Sad
Back to top
Dazz99




Posts: 7301

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 00:53    Post subject:
i win


cockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcock
Back to top
A-A




Posts: 3154
Location: New york
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 00:59    Post subject:
Dazz99 wrote:
i win


Bullshit Very Happy Very Happy

My nigger was on a killing spree Very Happy
Back to top
JediJ




Posts: 29

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 01:19    Post subject:
Well a stupid reinstall fixed my problem, now I just have crappy performance on my 8800.
Back to top
Vortex420




Posts: 37

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 01:32    Post subject:
how many multiplayer maps has vegas got ? in one of the xbox 360 videos i think the guy said it had 30 maps (including the storyline in coop) how many has the pc version got ?


Last edited by Vortex420 on Tue, 12th Dec 2006 01:41; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
thyttel




Posts: 488
Location: Denmark
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 01:36    Post subject:
think I counted 8 maps....not sure......between 6 and 10 for sure
Back to top
NoLiMiTSoLDieR




Posts: 1038
Location: NL
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 02:22    Post subject:
If u got performance issues try this.
Open up the kellerengine.ini
And reduce the ShadowBufferResolution to something like 512
ShadowBufferResolution=512
Then i changed MaxShadowResolution to 512
it was 220 before.
Finally i lowered LevelOfAnisotropy to 2.

Now it's very playable for me,
My specs arent that high either.

P4 3ghz @ 3.30
Geforce 7800GS
1 Gig ram.

Let me know if it works for u guyz also.


Q6600/Club3D 4890/2GB DDR2/WiN7\XP/1.5 TB/23 Inch LCD
Back to top
thyttel




Posts: 488
Location: Denmark
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 02:41    Post subject:
Made a ingame movie using fraps. Just me messing about with the command system and not doing too good:-)

http://www.filefactory.com/file/077d20/
Back to top
KratosGOW2525




Posts: 142

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 02:47    Post subject:
NoLiMiTSoLDieR
i tried that, but no performance increase :/
Back to top
Teniak




Posts: 2602
Location: Tic Tac
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 03:36    Post subject:
Game is sweet.
Water effect Roxxx
Back to top
Dunge




Posts: 1201
Location: Québec
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 05:25    Post subject:
Damn I tough there would been a crack by now, should have grabbed the clone back then Wink. This game is securom, can't be that hard?
Back to top
pumbertot1




Posts: 254
Location: A Brit in Sydney
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 06:12    Post subject:
deelix wrote:
pumbertot1 wrote:
Parallax_ wrote:
Just read the 360 reviews. Game is identical to the console version anyway.

And graphics 6.5? Sure, the game doesn't look like Gears of War, but 6.5 is way too low man.


not really is you look at games such as oblivon, the depth of textures etc. some backdrops in this look like ps2. thats 6.5 compared to detailed gfx pcs are capable of imho.
fix your eyesight. Its its at least 8/10.


not my eyesight mate, just you must have lower expectations/taste. i give oblivion 9/10 for gfzx and the textures in this are much poorer, they arent much better than PS2 in terms of quality. very poor for high-end pc. I stick with 6.5 maybe 7 at a stretch because animations are excellent.

the rest of the game is kick ass though. Very Happy
Back to top
pumbertot1




Posts: 254
Location: A Brit in Sydney
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 06:14    Post subject:
JediJ wrote:
Well a stupid reinstall fixed my problem, now I just have crappy performance on my 8800.


yeah like where is drops to 30fps when you tunr to face a certina way but rotate another 4 degrees and you got 60 again. its unoptimized or coding error as its not even related to the number of polygons on screen. it can be faster when theres 4 enemies shooting at you than when you are in an emplty corrisor. very bizarre. Confused
Back to top
pumbertot1




Posts: 254
Location: A Brit in Sydney
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 06:17    Post subject:
mike- wrote:
BrokenCrow wrote:
mike- wrote:

i dont give a shit how you spoil yourself with new computer parts every 2 weeks, i care about the fact that youre a fucking retard for thinking your card is gonna be 100% supported, and if its not supported its nvidias fault


Whats funny is that you feel the need to comment when it has nothing to do with you. Salvation Army PC users need not apply. You can only understand the dilemma if you own the bloody card! Naturally you're not put out. You don't own one! You own an antique Wink Its very easy for you to sit there are tell us not to get upset. I'm very happy with my card at the end of the day, and as I said in my previous response, I'd rather run most things fast with a few problems than have a 6600. You started with the personal insults, I ended it. Now, seriously, just STFU. Lets not derail the thread anymore!

Cheers and Merry Xmas.

B

i'm just replying to your posts, since you're so stubborn you won't accept the fact that getting an 8800 now was a bad idea. :] i have a 6800gt, and it runs games fine, including this one, so i could care less how old it is. at least it works with all games out now basically, which you can't say. Wink


your backside is wide open and sprouting bullshit. if iits poor on 8800 its even poorer on 6800gt. use your brain before typing rubbish. we arent trying to run the game on low res and low detail. and its not the 8800 that is at fault. this game isnt optimised for ANY gfx card.
JEEZ! Razz
Back to top
mike-




Posts: 1510

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 06:28    Post subject:
pumbertot1 wrote:
mike- wrote:
BrokenCrow wrote:


Whats funny is that you feel the need to comment when it has nothing to do with you. Salvation Army PC users need not apply. You can only understand the dilemma if you own the bloody card! Naturally you're not put out. You don't own one! You own an antique Wink Its very easy for you to sit there are tell us not to get upset. I'm very happy with my card at the end of the day, and as I said in my previous response, I'd rather run most things fast with a few problems than have a 6600. You started with the personal insults, I ended it. Now, seriously, just STFU. Lets not derail the thread anymore!

Cheers and Merry Xmas.

B

i'm just replying to your posts, since you're so stubborn you won't accept the fact that getting an 8800 now was a bad idea. :] i have a 6800gt, and it runs games fine, including this one, so i could care less how old it is. at least it works with all games out now basically, which you can't say. Wink


your backside is wide open and sprouting bullshit. if iits poor on 8800 its even poorer on 6800gt. use your brain before typing rubbish. we arent trying to run the game on low res and low detail. and its not the 8800 that is at fault. this game isnt optimised for ANY gfx card.
JEEZ! Razz

no its not dipshit, i can run it fine. your card isn't supported, which you should be expecting now. thats what you get for buying new technology so early. been saying this all along. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
pumbertot1




Posts: 254
Location: A Brit in Sydney
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 06:47    Post subject:
mike- wrote:
pumbertot1 wrote:
mike- wrote:

i'm just replying to your posts, since you're so stubborn you won't accept the fact that getting an 8800 now was a bad idea. :] i have a 6800gt, and it runs games fine, including this one, so i could care less how old it is. at least it works with all games out now basically, which you can't say. Wink


your backside is wide open and sprouting bullshit. if iits poor on 8800 its even poorer on 6800gt. use your brain before typing rubbish. we arent trying to run the game on low res and low detail. and its not the 8800 that is at fault. this game isnt optimised for ANY gfx card.
JEEZ! Razz

no its not dipshit, i can run it fine. your card isn't supported, which you should be expecting now. thats what you get for buying new technology so early. been saying this all along. Rolling Eyes


yeah whatever.so is x1900 not supported either?it had the same sudden fps drops with that as well, just slower overall than 8800gtx. it maybe runs fine for you with your obviously low standards-well anyone that thinks 6800gt runs everything obviously runs low details and is happy with crap gfx. rest my case.

edit:also i didnt call you by any abusive names. dont be an internet hardman, isnt funny or smart or brave.
Back to top
mike-




Posts: 1510

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 07:46    Post subject:
pumbertot1 wrote:
mike- wrote:
pumbertot1 wrote:


your backside is wide open and sprouting bullshit. if iits poor on 8800 its even poorer on 6800gt. use your brain before typing rubbish. we arent trying to run the game on low res and low detail. and its not the 8800 that is at fault. this game isnt optimised for ANY gfx card.
JEEZ! Razz

no its not dipshit, i can run it fine. your card isn't supported, which you should be expecting now. thats what you get for buying new technology so early. been saying this all along. Rolling Eyes


yeah whatever.so is x1900 not supported either?it had the same sudden fps drops with that as well, just slower overall than 8800gtx. it maybe runs fine for you with your obviously low standards-well anyone that thinks 6800gt runs everything obviously runs low details and is happy with crap gfx. rest my case.

edit:also i didnt call you by any abusive names. dont be an internet hardman, isnt funny or smart or brave.

i insult you guys because youre fucking idiots. read the game's readme. oh and i'm not playing it at low, and i still get very playable fps. tyvm.

also, to add another fact to the fucking idiots part, you bought new technology right when it came out.


e/ since "read the readme" is such a broad statement, and its SOOO hard to read it, let me copy and paste a little exert from said readme:

Code:

* Supported Video Cards at Time of Release

ATI RADEON X1600/X1800/X1900

NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT/6800/7300/7600/7800/7900



am i getting through your thick skull now?
Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 07:48    Post subject:
mike- wrote:
i insult you guys because youre fucking idiots. read the game's readme. oh and i'm not playing it at low, and i still get very playable fps. tyvm.

also, to add another fact to the fucking idiots part, you bought new technology right when it came out.


Calm down and stop acting like a retard, your entitled to your opinion but there is no need for name calling imo.

Anyway, as I said earlier the game worked quite good on my 7800 card, with everything (apart from resolution) on max. The graphics are actually pretty damn good, and even if it might be in some peoples eyes - the physics and amount of objects in some maps would still make it impressive.


shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
Back to top
mike-




Posts: 1510

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 08:06    Post subject:
Anthirs wrote:
mike- wrote:
i insult you guys because youre fucking idiots. read the game's readme. oh and i'm not playing it at low, and i still get very playable fps. tyvm.

also, to add another fact to the fucking idiots part, you bought new technology right when it came out.


Calm down and stop acting like a retard, your entitled to your opinion but there is no need for name calling imo.

Anyway, as I said earlier the game worked quite good on my 7800 card, with everything (apart from resolution) on max. The graphics are actually pretty damn good, and even if it might be in some peoples eyes - the physics and amount of objects in some maps would still make it impressive.

blow me, if youve been reading their thick skulled ingorant replies you shouldnt be giving me shit for insulting them
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 08:12    Post subject:
Mike, you do know that 1024x768 with 15fps on high isn't all that high right? A slideshow isn't considered a smooth gameplay.
Back to top
Malveous




Posts: 138
Location: Montreal
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 08:32    Post subject:
the dudes in the basement didn't even get a 8800 to play around in keller.

I second Mike, getting a 8800 is not a good choice.

I definitely would wait until June or July.

Thus the reason why I bought a standard video card (x1900xt) just to sit a wait for ATI to fix what NVIDIA didn't then release the better card.

Everyone knows they have been doing that for ages. NVIDIA releases a high end card but problems pop up. You wait a bit then ATI releases just about the same thing but it truly works.

keller is not badly optimized and it's a very good game. it is also the last game I got to play around with before leaving the studio.
Back to top
Bart1983




Posts: 1020
Location: Netherlands
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 08:35    Post subject:
lnatan25 wrote:
Mike, you do know that 1024x768 with 15fps on high isn't all that high right? A slideshow isn't considered a smooth gameplay.


HMzz i'm playing on a GF6800GT OC and ah amd 3500+ and 1GB of memory. My settings are resolution: 1280x960 shadows and blur on low/off and the rest on. I'm playing on about 20 FPS. It isnt a die hard FPS so the 20 is fine for me(and it is no slide show)!

When i set my options on the highest level then i got 10-15 and that is a little bit to low. But the difference between every thing on the highest and the settings i am using is not very high. The basix graphix are almost the same every time!
Back to top
Immunity




Posts: 5626

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 08:37    Post subject:
Was bored so made some ingame vids -

(Tango Shakedown)
(A Tango Christmas)

And, before anyone asks, yes, it is very difficult to have any sort of aim when running at 5 frames per second with fraps running


I can never be free, because the shackles I wear can't be touched or be seen.
i9-9900k, MSI MPG-Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon, 32GB DDR4 @ 3000, eVGA GTX 1080 DT, Samsung 970 EVO Plus nVME 1TB
Back to top
romul22
Banned



Posts: 188

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 08:37    Post subject:
ppl WTF!
i told you not once!
for all securom games,first thing to do:
1.mount with latest daemon tools
2.start->run->regedit->hkey_local_machine->system->mounted_devices->rename_your_mounted_device(\dosdevices\G.l: or whatever you want).
no need for any loaders like asr or yasu AND no need for crack.runs like a charm


Last edited by romul22 on Tue, 12th Dec 2006 08:40; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
CaptainCox
VIP Member



Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Dec 2006 08:38    Post subject:
JUST FRACKING GIVE IT UP ALLREADY!
This thread is just spammed up with crap about FPS and the never ending story regarding the 8800. IT DON'T MATTER!...believe me. If your ok playing with your rig please DO!, if not GET NEW GEAR!. Take this discussion to the fracking tech section or something, or just go on MSN and rant. Never seen a more pointless discussion, and believe me I have seen some crap here on NFOrce.




Last edited by CaptainCox on Tue, 12th Dec 2006 08:46; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Page 12 of 23 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 21, 22, 23  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group