Rome Total War
Page 3 of 31 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 29, 30, 31  Next
Clevesa




Posts: 3694

PostPosted: Mon, 23rd Aug 2004 18:00    Post subject:
ForeverIBurn wrote:
guys the demo is out. go to www.fileplanet.com to get it.
if you dont like the wait line then just search google for the demo.
i got mine last night, midnight and had to only wait 2 minutes Smile. very nice game. hotdamn


Embarassed Embarassed
Old news pal Surprised
Back to top
ForeverIBurn




Posts: 5
Location: the crimson dreams
PostPosted: Mon, 23rd Aug 2004 18:01    Post subject:
haha my bad


Metalfxckingcore.
Back to top
Wihl




Posts: 62

PostPosted: Mon, 23rd Aug 2004 18:48    Post subject:
http://www.fz.se/filarkiv/?file=spel/rometotalwar/rometw_demo_5.5.zip

Another mirror, a swedish one... really fast.
Back to top
fizzelopeguss




Posts: 436

PostPosted: Tue, 24th Aug 2004 00:47    Post subject:
Playing the romans is a LOT better, you're attacking rather than sitting on your arse waiting for them to come to you. Very Happy
Back to top
eRaideR




Posts: 102
Location: Toronto, THAT'S RIGHT! EH!?
PostPosted: Tue, 24th Aug 2004 01:51    Post subject:
really good, solid gameplay.
LOTR battle for middle earth will be better though. better graphics and gameplay and also better A.I.
Rome is so very good though.


If you wear a selafone suite, people clearly see your nuts.
Back to top
Sayko




Posts: 286
Location: Pless
PostPosted: Tue, 24th Aug 2004 12:39    Post subject:
Straight from 'TotalWar Center' :
PlayAsGaulsTutorialMod.zip
it ROXZ!


I find it kind of funny, I find it kind of sad, The dreams in which I'm dying are the best I've ever had.
Back to top
saddamhussein




Posts: 691
Location: not where I'm supposed to be
PostPosted: Tue, 24th Aug 2004 13:14    Post subject:
eRaideR wrote:
really good, solid gameplay.
LOTR battle for middle earth will be better though. better graphics and gameplay and also better A.I.
Rome is so very good though.



you can't know that, can you?

Imho the only advantage Battle for middle earth will have are is a more effectfull graphical presentation (more effects). Which doesn't mean that Rome doesn't look as good. its a fact that rome will be able to display a much bigger number of soldiers than the total war engine (which is just an updated cc generals engine), so battles will look more epic.

And in terms of gameplay... We cant say for sure. But everything points out that rome will have the far better gameplay, higher complexity etc. And the interface can't be done much better than its solved in rome.
Back to top
eRaideR




Posts: 102
Location: Toronto, THAT'S RIGHT! EH!?
PostPosted: Tue, 24th Aug 2004 14:45    Post subject:
saddamhussein wrote:
eRaideR wrote:
really good, solid gameplay.
LOTR battle for middle earth will be better though. better graphics and gameplay and also better A.I.
Rome is so very good though.



you can't know that, can you?

Imho the only advantage Battle for middle earth will have are is a more effectfull graphical presentation (more effects). Which doesn't mean that Rome doesn't look as good. its a fact that rome will be able to display a much bigger number of soldiers than the total war engine (which is just an updated cc generals engine), so battles will look more epic.

And in terms of gameplay... We cant say for sure. But everything points out that rome will have the far better gameplay, higher complexity etc. And the interface can't be done much better than its solved in rome.


yeah i guess you can say thats rights. but from what ive seen in the video diary's on their website, LOTR a.i. seems a tad more better, example a troll comes running up gondor soldiers, the soldiers back away and are afraid, while in ROME 12 elephants are coming at you and they charge head on.
the gameplay will aslo be more efficient. if you see the videos they have these cools menus that pop up when you need them and hide when you dont. Just watch the videos you will know what i mean
www.lordoftherings.ea.com


If you wear a selafone suite, people clearly see your nuts.
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Tue, 24th Aug 2004 14:53    Post subject:
Combat in Rome Total War is meant to be abstract so those kind of immersion factors wouldn't be needed, though welcome.

Having said that, I do see the men running away from the Elephants amid all the chaos that ensues, and with particularly weak or broken troops they will run even on sight of the beasts.

LOTRs artificial intelligence doesn't seem better, all you have been privy to is media blurb - it's their favourite tactic - buzzwords and easily packaged features that inspire, but I doubt they add anything significant to the overall gaming experience that it changes mine opinion - it's fluff.

All they have done is program it so when they come into vicintity they do this scripted routine. Big deal - it's not intelligent.

I don't think the AI is perfect in Rome Total War either, certainly not from the demo, but I will wait until it's released before making a final conclusion - historical scenarios are rigid battles in my experience... and this one wasn't a particularly good example - have to wait for the campaign to really get a feel for how the generals respond as there will be no predifined movements there.


Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Tue, 24th Aug 2004 20:23    Post subject:
it's impossible to say what BFME will be like.
The videos they got out showed prettied up stuff that has been cut together and makes no sense at all.
Westwood is indeed known for making their games look much better than the actually are before the release. Like those Tiberian Sun screenshots that really looked nice and that game looked so crappy in game.
They probably just took it to the next level by creating modified videos instead of screenshots.

And about the AI, I mean...what the hell..I can see why a group of 10 soldiers runs away from a troll. But would an army of 2000 soldiers run away from 10 trolls? I think not unless they already took heavy casualties or are outnumbered overall in which case your army would also run away from elephants in Rome.
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Tue, 24th Aug 2004 23:35    Post subject:
yeah, I remember when Tiberian suns enviroment was touted as being highly interactive & integral to the gameplay. My experience was fairly different I'll say Wink


Back to top
eRaideR




Posts: 102
Location: Toronto, THAT'S RIGHT! EH!?
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 01:51    Post subject:
its not 2000 troops. have you even seen the videos?
and no its not buzzwords either..
OMG looks its a video oh shit thats an awsome way to get me to buy the game..pffff.
And no its not programed either. If you read prieviews and hands-on material then you would know what you are talking about.
And its not impossible to see what a game will be like, again by reading reviews and hands-on material (and believe me their are a lot out there) you would have a general idea of what it has to offer compared to other stradegy games. Thats with every game you read about.
But lets not make this forum out BFME..
nonetheless i think ROME will be a solid stradegy game...but in my mindnot worth spending the money..so far.


If you wear a selafone suite, people clearly see your nuts.
Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 02:00    Post subject:
eRaideR wrote:
its not 2000 troops. have you even seen the videos?
and no its not buzzwords either..
OMG looks its a video oh shit thats an awsome way to get me to buy the game..pffff.
And no its not programed either. If you read prieviews and hands-on material then you would know what you are talking about.
And its not impossible to see what a game will be like, again by reading reviews and hands-on material (and believe me their are a lot out there) you would have a general idea of what it has to offer compared to other stradegy games. Thats with every game you read about.
But lets not make this forum out BFME..
nonetheless i think ROME will be a solid stradegy game...but in my mindnot worth spending the money..so far.


I just meant that rome is a little bigger than BFME. I didnt say that there 2000 troops in BFME, but there are 2000 in Rome from time to time. I was just saying that you can't expect 2000 trained soldiers to cower in fear when they see an elephant. You can expect 10 soldiers to cower in fear when they see a troll like it is in BFME but not 2000.

And Previews are done on Preview versions that are far from final versions and only offer very restricted gameplay that's set up. Like the preview version that most mags have consists of 3 missions based on the movies, however you dont know how you manage the soldiers on the tactical map, what you can do on the tactical map, how the amount of soldiers you get from start of a battle is determined, how you get the ability to summon the balrog,....

We have a demo of Rome here, we can all see how it is, but we don't have a demo of BFME.
We have videos, we have screenshots, but we don't have a demo.
So until I get a chance to play a game I won't let previews and videos done by the developers tell me how great it's gonna be.

Black and White also got great previews and we had screenshots and videos of it showing how awesome it is and it sucked in the end...

Reviews can be trusted as review copies are basically the final game. But Previews only give you very very rough info and anything in a preview copy is subject to changes.
Back to top
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member



Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 05:39    Post subject:



Imho it will be game of the year.. but HL2 will get game of the year just for the hype
Back to top
goot
Banned



Posts: 739

PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 09:58    Post subject:
RTW will kick HL2's ass!!!!!! And anyo ther game's ass this year imho
Back to top
Clevesa




Posts: 3694

PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 10:07    Post subject:
Damn, it's probably hard to contorl such an amount of men.
Back to top
Sublime




Posts: 8615

PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 11:30    Post subject:
it is hard but once u get hold of the shortcuts its a great game. they do neatly arrange nice and always stay in the right formation i.e archers backoff when they can. this game is so damn good even though the camera can be a lil bit of a pain its still spectacular. idk if this can live up to HL2 but its a damn good rts, i think bfme is gonna struggle to keep up with this. the sound is also great and the dust that rises is amazing too. only things i dont like are things like "329 BC" etc. kinda spoils it in a way but its still great.


Stealth88 and Lod|_Dod| wrote:
"And the winner is.... Sublime!" That fucking kid is always right. Sublime FTW!

http://artpad.art.com/?irqy7s4162w <3 you too
Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 13:50    Post subject:
Clevesa wrote:
Damn, it's probably hard to contorl such an amount of men.


That's why you will be able to let the AI control parts of your army. That way you can focus on your most important troops while the AI handles the basic stuff and acts according to what you do. (at least that's what I read, gotta wait and see if it's really like that)
Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 13:53    Post subject:
Sublime wrote:
only things i dont like are things like "329 BC" etc. kinda spoils it in a way but its still great.


I hope this game will be moddable. A Lord of the Rings mod would rock!
BFME is a little different and you can't really compare em, rome also has more troops on the battlefield and is a lot bigger overall.
Would love to see 5000 Uruk Hai assaulting helm's deep
Back to top
San_Lopez




Posts: 59

PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 14:20    Post subject:
cant wait to get my hands on the full game...the demo rocked Very Happy
Back to top
eRaideR




Posts: 102
Location: Toronto, THAT'S RIGHT! EH!?
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 15:03    Post subject:
Surray wrote:
Sublime wrote:
only things i dont like are things like "329 BC" etc. kinda spoils it in a way but its still great.


I hope this game will be moddable. A Lord of the Rings mod would rock!
BFME is a little different and you can't really compare em, rome also has more troops on the battlefield and is a lot bigger overall.
Would love to see 5000 Uruk Hai assaulting helm's deep


Oh you will see more than 5000 Uruk Hai my friend. Smile


If you wear a selafone suite, people clearly see your nuts.
Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 15:13    Post subject:
San_Lopez wrote:
cant wait to get my hands on the full game...the demo rocked Very Happy


yeah, I really wanna see the tactical map with my own eyes. It supposedly looks pretty nice in 3D and I wanna see all the units (didnt they say there are more different units than in Medieval?) and take over europe!

I wonder if there will be more diplomacy. In the earlier Total War games diplomacy was pretty useless, alliances did nothing. Would be cool if you could get your allies to aid you in an assault or defence by sending an emissary over or get higher levels of friendship towards other governments and get a right of passage treaty like in Civilization 3 Smile
Back to top
Anticasper




Posts: 1128
Location: Paul's Boutique
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 16:14    Post subject:
I wonder if my system can handle this stuff Confused

But it sure does look amazing...



Per Ardua Ad Astra
Back to top
fisk




Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 16:17    Post subject:
They should make a mod for this and do "Attack of the clones", at least there would be a good excuse for having every texture looking exactly the same.


Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 16:17    Post subject:
holy crap
I suppose the latest generation of graphics card doesnt have a problem with rendering a few models many, many, manymanymany times.
Just wonder if the Radeon 9xx0 and FX 5xx0 can handle those really
end-game big battles with several thousands soldiers.
Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 16:19    Post subject:
fisk wrote:
They should make a mod for this and do "Attack of the clones", at least there would be a good excuse for having every texture looking exactly the same.


that's not funny, it's simply not possible with todays hardware to display up to 10000 units where each of em looks different.
We'll probably see that in the next Total War game.
Back to top
HubU
VIP Member



Posts: 11357

PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 16:31    Post subject:
Activision are "men of the people".
They maked a game that can run smoothly on every average comp.

You, stupid rich american, think that the whole world is rich,happy, and fat.
But some people are poor, and cant afford a "w00t P4 800 3800mhz 5000mb ram w/ 6800ultra !!1!!oneone".

No "elite" game. And try (I think I ask too much for your minor intelligence) to accord more importance for the game itself, instead of its look.

Play Hearts of Iron, and try to say somethin different than "Aaah ugly like 45453453 yo, pass"


"Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life." ~Berthold Auerbach
Back to top
Sublime




Posts: 8615

PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 17:01    Post subject:
on the install you need a p3 1ghz sumthin sumthin. i have a p4 3.06 1536mb ram and a 4200Ti. i only experienced minimal lag when ALLLLLL my troops were fighitn ALLLLLLL of the enemy on my screen. i had all my settings on the highest except the res which was 1024 x32. Still a great game and in the tutorial part there was an alliance and you couldnt atack the allied members which was good but woulda added a nice twist. only a few things i would change about this and that would be the realism and blood. for instance arrows dont harm team mates neither does horses running through your footmen. overall id give this game a 9/10 on the basis that there are more tropps and deployable tactics in the final relase which im certain. as of now its still a 7/10. and i compared it to BFME because thats what everyone else is comparin it to and with release dates so close u cant help but talk about them. I wouldnt be surprised if this game does get overlooked by a lot of the public yet gets awards from all the top magazines.


Stealth88 and Lod|_Dod| wrote:
"And the winner is.... Sublime!" That fucking kid is always right. Sublime FTW!

http://artpad.art.com/?irqy7s4162w <3 you too
Back to top
Anticasper




Posts: 1128
Location: Paul's Boutique
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 17:04    Post subject:
I am sure ther is friendly fire in the demo.

I have been shooting way to many of my own troops with my archers.

Indeed it would be really nice to see blood and gore in this game.


Per Ardua Ad Astra
Back to top
saddamhussein




Posts: 691
Location: not where I'm supposed to be
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 17:40    Post subject:
Anticasper wrote:
I am sure ther is friendly fire in the demo.

I have been shooting way to many of my own troops with my archers.

Indeed it would be really nice to see blood and gore in this game.



Friendly fire is indeed implented. You must be careful using those war elephants, since once givena direction and running, they dont take the time look for a way around every single soldier. SAme with archers, arrows kill everyone.

As for engine handling many troops. So far I haven't experienced a single performance problem, even during the greatest fights everything runs smooth.

and try out this mod:

http://home.earthlink.net/~axel44/PlayAsGaulsTutorialMod.zip

you play tutorial war as gauls. Battle rocks;)
Back to top
Page 3 of 31 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 29, 30, 31  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group