I am intrigued by the game's structure though. Forcing you to make choices to advance the narrative and keep the game's pacing up is something these games, at this point in MY life at least, sorely need. More of that and less looking at fuckin question marks on the game map ideally
With this aspect, I fully agree. What I find super strange, though, is that side activities do NOT advance time, only the main stroy quests. Dafuq?
Plus, I suppose you can rest to change the time of day.
The game might look 'cool', but it feels... too static.
It's like it's devoid of energy / life.
I had the same problem in CP2077. Besides of main quest and some side quests, whole world was so dead, sterile and not interesting.
Not everyone has got RDR2 budget I guess...
harballaz wrote:
Hey dont be so hard the little console eunuchs, they need time to aim their lil vibratin thumbstick.
Combat looks weak- at least, as weak as Witcher. That means the characters, world, side quests, exploration and treasure finding, all that RPG stuff... need to be on point.
I remember one of the first videos, there was a scene were was a priest, deep in scene's background and his feet was deformed in few frames. - Framegen was having some trouble to stabilise image. I had a bad feeling that performance will be a problem, when dev should have made a good first impression and for sure they did not play that on 1080Ti...
harballaz wrote:
Hey dont be so hard the little console eunuchs, they need time to aim their lil vibratin thumbstick.
Why are we actually discussing console performance in the pc section??
We have to wait after release to see how the game performs, there is no point discussing this now. It will probably run fine with some tweaking.
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
