I would say... if someone "must" have high refresh rate and g-sync(which I both highly advise for pc gaming), TN or VA are both safer options. Tn especially since it's much cheaper(because of bad rep, it's tn "don't ever buy tn and so on") and the only drawback it has is tn viewing angles not suitable for graphics work. Which is hypocrisy since ips angles are fucking terrible on both bright and dark content. Ips glow ruins the image from any angle, even up front.
Aside for that, I think that TN has great performance/price ratio, good blacks(better than ips anyway), no ips/va glow and so on.

But it's not problem free too... Those TN monitors, even though they are MUCH better than 10 years ago, still can be problematic. Can have some/much clouding. Not as annoying as ips glow but can be visible on whole black screen. And plenty of g-sync TN monitors suffer from horrible gamma which results in washed out image.
That's why it is highly advised to AVOID dell tn monitors. They are cheap, good looking and so on but do not have osd gamma controls and the gamma is often like 1.7. Asus, Acer and Aoc all have excellent osd and all controls needed.
With low gamma, all image corruption (color banding) is easily visible. It is fault of both low gamma exposing dark areas which are not supposed to be visible to player and badly created textures/transparent textures without any dithering.

VA is more prone to dead pixels since most VA gaming panels are sadly curved. Not to mention bad ghosting/purple smearing issues, which are very dependent on overdrive used. I went through few 60zh va monitors to finally find that iiyama had best overdrive. It resulted in best motion clarity on va I've tested few years ago but still much worse than any other monitor type. 144hz samsung va monitors have purple smearing issue and fuzzy text issue due to bad curve or something...

I think viewing problems of TN are overblown and totally a non-issue (imo to me, please not attack me!) if I sit normally at my desk. When I had a tn monitor in 2006, it was very bad because I did not had a proper desk setup and was often watching movies from bed position and they were just too dark from below.
Tn also have fastest pixel response although ips nowadays is just as fast.
I just don't think ips is good to consume any kind of content with darker scenes. tv shows were terrible on any ips I've had. So were horror games of any kind. tn and va are just better for media consumption and games. Work might be different case. Since ips is "crushing blacks", content prepared on ips screen will be bright/overexposed on va and tn screens. Which shows in some games. Both va and tn show image very similarly, while IPS next to them or on mobile phone looks crushed.