The last watched movie.
Page 1285 of 1492 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1284, 1285, 1286 ... 1490, 1491, 1492  Next
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sun, 24th Dec 2017 02:34    Post subject:
does netflix have any way of figuring out the value of the things the produce given you just pay a flat fee to watch a thing? do they bother figuring out if the content essentially 'paid for itself'?

or do they just set aside x-amount of millions to make 'content', and then check imdb ratings to see if people want to see more of it next time they start parceling out funds for new content, and they dont really care if the content brought in (or kept) enough value to justify its own creation... if you understand what im asking.

with movies its easy, you just look at the box office takings to see if you make a sequel.. with netflix, its clearly a different deal.


Back to top
Morphineus
VIP Member



Posts: 24883
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 24th Dec 2017 02:57    Post subject:
The way they are pumping out content, I think they look at as: New content for the platform, increasing overall products on offer. If it doesn't cost too much they'll throw money at it.

That being said, I'm sure they also look into how many people watched it. So anything that isn't outright bad that you turn it off is a win in those metrics.


Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sun, 24th Dec 2017 03:52    Post subject:
yeah but bright was apparently 90m? someone, somewhere has to justify that, and figure out IF they do a sequel, how much to invest in it. kinda curious how they make those decisions based purely on viewing numbers.. i mean just because someone watches it, doesnt mean its necessarily a worthwhile expense compared to instead making another 3 or 4 new shows. People might have watched it because it was there, and not felt it was a worthwhile reason to continue their subscription. I mean, im signed up to netflix (i got 12 month free from my isp), and i watched the full movie, but i sure as hell dont think content like bright is worth continuing to pay a subscription for (even IF i wasnt a dirty, dirty pirate!)


Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65097
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Sun, 24th Dec 2017 23:38    Post subject:
Bright - 5,9/10

What a shame. I really really wanted this to be great, the urban gritty Shadowrun-ish setting is such an unexplored land full of opportunities, yet the movie decided to ruin the very promising set-up and SmithEdgerton bromance by taking another direction entirely, focused on cringe instead, which made me lose interest in what the (paper-thin Sad Laughing) story had to offer.

The score would have been higher if the second half had not contained ridiculous action, cheesy lines, you touch my wand, overdramatization, you touch my tralala, awkward scenes and unintentionally comical tenso stares. I'd like to see more of this but...not like this. Whackedwalrus!



Random creations of an insane mind / Screens from Bulgaria [Early Access]


Last edited by ixigia on Mon, 25th Dec 2017 02:52; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Ghworg




Posts: 924

PostPosted: Mon, 25th Dec 2017 00:15    Post subject:
Bright 7/10 I did like the whole orc, elf human living together (xigia's calling it a shadowrun-ish setting is spot on) and it was entertaining to watch.
But also something to just as easy forget.

Justice league 6/10 It was ok, nothing special.
Back to top
freiwald




Posts: 6968

PostPosted: Mon, 25th Dec 2017 00:17    Post subject:
area 51 - 6/10
ok movie i guess if you are into those kind of movies. could have been alot better tho.
Back to top
Yuri




Posts: 11000

PostPosted: Mon, 25th Dec 2017 08:04    Post subject:
ixigia wrote:
Bright - 5,9/10

What a shame. I really really wanted this to be great, the urban gritty Shadowrun-ish setting is such an unexplored land full of opportunities, yet the movie decided to ruin the very promising set-up and SmithEdgerton bromance by taking another direction entirely, focused on cringe instead, which made me lose interest in what the (paper-thin Sad Laughing) story had to offer.

The score would have been higher if the second half had not contained ridiculous action, cheesy lines, you touch my wand, overdramatization, you touch my tralala, awkward scenes and unintentionally comical tenso stares. I'd like to see more of this but...not like this. Whackedwalrus!


The horrid dialogue and Will 'I'm numbah one' Smith spoiled it for me Laughing



1 and 2 are still amazing.
Back to top
VonMisk




Posts: 9472
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Mon, 25th Dec 2017 08:54    Post subject:
Bright

the most shitty thing was

 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Mon, 25th Dec 2017 09:03    Post subject:
Whole thing was a mess. It was a chase movie with no purpose. Everything only happened to necessitate maintaining the chase, rather than the chase being necessitated by the story.

Literarily nothing interesting happens, no matter how hard the movie threatened to actually go somewhere. They shouldn't have called it bright, they should have called it macguffin: the mediocre chase.

Interesting fact, bright is called blight in China.


Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Mon, 25th Dec 2017 12:08    Post subject:
Die hard 2 is one of those films I think gets treated really unfairly... It's historically been dismissed and underrated for no good reason. The character of McClane remains true, the comedy/light heartedness is spot on, the scenario is suitably outlandish and gives perfect scope for lots of worthwhile fun action set pieces... The villain isn't bad (granted, the least memorable of the trilogy), and it's solidly violent and worthy as a 90s action film (before Hollywood forgot how to make solid fun action films for adults)

I really like the film, and honestly given its tone, I'm generally more in the mood for watching die hard 2 over the original (not saying it's better, I just find it to be a more laid back action film that's easier to be in the mood for, compared to the more thriller style of the original), and consider the entire original die hard trilogy to be one of the best and most consistently awesome all-the-way-through "true trilogies" (my other favs being alien and lethal weapon)


Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Mon, 25th Dec 2017 13:14    Post subject:
Bright - 8/10 - I thought it was great, I liked the interaction between the two characters. They now have an excellent basis to work with, hopefully people will like it and Netflix will spend serious moniez to work it out.
Back to top
Yuri




Posts: 11000

PostPosted: Mon, 25th Dec 2017 14:03    Post subject:
VonMisk wrote:
Bright

the most shitty thing was

 Spoiler:
 

 Spoiler:
 



1 and 2 are still amazing.
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Mon, 25th Dec 2017 21:17    Post subject:
Yuri wrote:
VonMisk wrote:
Bright

the most shitty thing was

 Spoiler:
 

 Spoiler:
 



With a better story and writing this could have been a really (and I mean really) good flick, as it stands now it's just above mediocre (and that basically thanks to the setting).
I still gave it a thumbs up on Netflix but that because I want to see more of this type of setting (unfortunately they won't get that) and maybe the sequel will be better.


Back to top
Areius




Posts: 14858

PostPosted: Tue, 26th Dec 2017 11:12    Post subject: *****
*****


Last edited by Areius on Fri, 19th Sep 2025 16:24; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Kamikaze666




Posts: 3550

PostPosted: Tue, 26th Dec 2017 14:03    Post subject:
The Last Jedi Imax 3d - 8/10

not sure whats up the asses of the imdb people... Confused


Quote:
PC awesome button = Uninstall!
Back to top
thudo




Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
PostPosted: Tue, 26th Dec 2017 17:47    Post subject:
That would be a good debate, actually. More things that are pointed out to me about these modern SW movies: the more I super . The sum of everything becomes .


MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105

Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
Back to top
VonMisk




Posts: 9472
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Tue, 26th Dec 2017 21:27    Post subject:
Beyond Skyline - 2/10

1 point for bloopers and 1 for practical effects. The rest just don't bother.


sar·​casm | \ ˈsär-ˌka-zəm \
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b: the use or language of sarcasm
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Tue, 26th Dec 2017 22:04    Post subject:
more asia-town adventures... two movies im revisiting as i havent seen them in ages.


first up, ill get the most contentious one out of the way..

the man from nowhere. people love this movie, say its absolutely amazing, and the first time i watched it i remember really liking it... but if im honest, theres something about the pacing and maybe the logic that im not super happy about. Things seem to happen a bit unnaturally and quickly, things fall into place too easily, and sometimes im left wondering how our hero manages to figure out where he needs to go... like he just instinctively knows where certain characters hang out, or how to get in contact with them.. and for the life of me, i still cant figure out how he knew where the van the kid got into towards the end, would be. Either the film just glosses over things and shrugs, saying 'who cares', or it moves too quickly that it doesnt give these sequences a feel of natural, logical progression. So yeah, not quite as enjoyable as it was back when i was younger and didnt really care about that kind of shit. It bugs me now, though. The real shining aspect of the film though, is our hero and the little girl.. they work together really well and i think its the acting that makes the film. That, and the action sequences. So yeah, a good film - but to me? not a great film, sorry to say.

shadowless sword. I remember loving this film, but now? I have to admit its got a big problem. The positives are that i enjoyed the story/concept.. i was never bored, we move from location to location and theres always something enjoyable going on, from just simple dialog, to a flashback or some action. Its helped along by two (in my opinion) likeable core actors, portraying interesting characters. The thing that stops me loving it is that, i have to admit, an action film like this REALLY needs some great fight sequences. Having seen so many really decent fight scenes in movies, i have to say the fights in this are a big letdown. Its all close-up, quick cuts and bad wirework making it a bit dull and unsatisfying to watch. Also, the addition of bullshit magic flying really ruined it for me. I dont mind when these films accentuate ability to emphasize the mystical levels of skill these characters have, by allowing them to jump really high, or even 'glide' down to the ground. but when you have characters that just flat out spread their fucking arms and just fly away, or you have villainous characters that out of nowhere 'land' into the scene, when theres nothing for them to have jumped down from.. yeah its unfortunate, and i feel it didnt need to be there. It just spoils the film.


Back to top
h0rnyfavn
Serial Humper



Posts: 13881

PostPosted: Tue, 26th Dec 2017 23:46    Post subject:
Ak-Nyeo \ The Villainess (2017)

7.5/10

La Femme Nikita Korean style. It was a pretty good action flick,however certain story twists were badly written. If it wasn't for them I would give it 8/10.


1) Lenovo Legion 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, RTX 3080 16Gb, 32Gb DDR4, SSD 1TB +2TB

2) SFFPC (streaming via Moonlight+ Sunshine)
Back to top
freiwald




Posts: 6968

PostPosted: Wed, 27th Dec 2017 02:04    Post subject:
blade runner 2049 - 8,5/10

the movie was too long for my taste and a little bit too slow sometimes but i guess it was good afterall for the atmosphere.
atleast at home i could pause it and take a shit or smoke a cigarette. would have gone crazy in the cinema.

still for me it was one, if not THE best movie of 2017.
this is how blade runner should be like and not like this boring 80's crap.

ana de armas man!!! im still hard as fuck


Last edited by freiwald on Wed, 27th Dec 2017 03:12; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
h0rnyfavn
Serial Humper



Posts: 13881

PostPosted: Wed, 27th Dec 2017 02:15    Post subject:
@freiwald
Quote:
and not like this boring 80's crap.


Reaction


1) Lenovo Legion 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, RTX 3080 16Gb, 32Gb DDR4, SSD 1TB +2TB

2) SFFPC (streaming via Moonlight+ Sunshine)
Back to top
PickupArtist




Posts: 9935

PostPosted: Wed, 27th Dec 2017 03:06    Post subject:
sinner!!!
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23164

PostPosted: Wed, 27th Dec 2017 04:32    Post subject:
Laughing
Back to top
h0rnyfavn
Serial Humper



Posts: 13881

PostPosted: Wed, 27th Dec 2017 19:08    Post subject:
Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

8.5/10

It was great, but I expected a bit more interesting story. The atmosphere, soundtrack, acting and visuals were all top notch. One of the best sequels I've ever seen if not the best.


1) Lenovo Legion 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, RTX 3080 16Gb, 32Gb DDR4, SSD 1TB +2TB

2) SFFPC (streaming via Moonlight+ Sunshine)
Back to top
Areius




Posts: 14858

PostPosted: Wed, 27th Dec 2017 19:34    Post subject: *****
*****


Last edited by Areius on Fri, 19th Sep 2025 16:23; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Wed, 27th Dec 2017 20:43    Post subject:
The Hunt for Red October

Still the perfect submarine movie. Das Boot is amazing, but too long for a single sitting for me (naturally, the only way to watch that is the 5 hour version Razz).

I only read one Clancy book (Red Rabbit), and it was kinda meh, but it seems most people like THFRO in the original book form. I think I'll have to read it now, while I'm in the mood. Razz
Back to top
Immunity




Posts: 5628

PostPosted: Thu, 28th Dec 2017 09:35    Post subject:
Bright (2017) - 7.5/10

I may be in the minority here, but I really liked it. It's basically Shadowrun set in modern Los Angeles. All the races are there (even mention of dwaves), and all are represented fairly faithfully. Hell, there's even a split second cut of the city-scape at night with a dragon flying overhead, yet nobody bats an eye. The banter between Smith and his partner was great too. They meshed well.

Which begs the question - why aren't Microsoft and Topps suing the pants off the filmmakers? They basically took their IP and made a movie out of it - all that's missing is the future setting (cyberpunk).


I can never be free, because the shackles I wear can't be touched or be seen.
i9-9900k, MSI MPG-Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon, 32GB DDR4 @ 3000, eVGA GTX 1080 DT, Samsung 970 EVO Plus nVME 1TB
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Thu, 28th Dec 2017 09:54    Post subject:
I also somewhat enjoyed Bright, but I wished they would have gone all the way and actually summoned the Dark Lord and then had a big ass fight and what not.

The entire movie just seemed like it could have fit in a 30-minute "intro" to an actual movie with said ending Smile

7/10
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Thu, 28th Dec 2017 09:54    Post subject:
Because you can't copyright a world with orcs, humans and/or elves in it? The whole point of blights story is that it's generic. It commits to nothing, and is just a vague story that uses well known fantasy elements such as fantasy races, evil lords and magic. Any lawsuit would fail so hard. Because there's nothing unique in it that anyone could lay claim to as an original concept or idea.


Back to top
Il_Padrino




Posts: 7580
Location: Greece by the North Sea
PostPosted: Thu, 28th Dec 2017 12:07    Post subject:
Blade Runner 2049 8.5/10

Liked it a lot, and it didn't really feel too long (although some parts could have obviously been shorter, it didn't drag).
I was pleasantly surprised that it's an actual sequel and not an entirely new story in the same universe.
Shame Wallace was not in it more, he's clearly one of the most interesting characters. His movements and way of talking were done really well by Jared Leto, very eerie and you're never sure if he's still human, half-human or full machine.
One thing that started to annoy me as the movie progressed was some of the BWAAAAAP-'city' sound effects. It worked once or twice, but it was overused and were always the same effects. It felt a bit forced as a reference to the original.
The twist in the end was great as well.
Back to top
Page 1285 of 1492 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Movie & TV Sparks Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1284, 1285, 1286 ... 1490, 1491, 1492  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group