Samsung S24D390HL VS Dell P2414H
Page 1 of 1
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Thu, 9th Apr 2015 15:07    Post subject: Samsung S24D390HL VS Dell P2414H
I can't make up my mind between these 2 monitors its making me crazy.

On one hand the Samsung has a cheaper build and flimsy stand, and limited conectivity, but its 30 bucks cheaper.

On the other the Dell is more apealing to me visually and has lots of interfaces and an awesome ergonomic stand BUT, i keep reading complaints about them , backlight bleeding, excessive glow on the lower side, turning on and off randomly , and its 30 dollars more expensive, what do you guys say ?
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Thu, 9th Apr 2015 15:51    Post subject:
in that price and size range i would go with Dell U2414H
Back to top
Breezer_




Posts: 10833
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Thu, 9th Apr 2015 15:52    Post subject:
Samsung has PLS panel and Dell has IPS, both has their strong points. Both can also have backlight bleeding, every monitor is different. Its really a panel lottery in that price range (tho seems to apply even to expensive monitors these days).
Back to top
Shocktrooper




Posts: 4585

PostPosted: Thu, 9th Apr 2015 15:57    Post subject:
Samsung PLS coating is slightly lighter/less grainy than LG AH-IPS coating.
On the other hand the Dell P2414H is supposed to be able to do 80hz overclock via DisplayPort, that makes it a big plus if you also play games. (the U2414H uses a different panel and cannot do 80hz)
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Thu, 9th Apr 2015 16:41    Post subject:
Shocktrooper wrote:
Samsung PLS coating is slightly lighter/less grainy than LG AH-IPS coating.
On the other hand the Dell P2414H is supposed to be able to do 80hz overclock via DisplayPort, that makes it a big plus if you also play games. (the U2414H uses a different panel and cannot do 80hz)


Yeah, but itsn't that dangerous for long term use ? Or is it risk free these days ?

Im not planing on overclocking them, im mostly interested in the PWM free backlights and IPS/PLS tech, i have a 5 year old Acer H235H and its kinda shitty.

I was leaning over to the Dell since i like the design more and the build quality looks solid compared to the Samsung, but i don't know if im gonna get the shaft in terms of bleeding and other panel issues.
Back to top
Shocktrooper




Posts: 4585

PostPosted: Thu, 9th Apr 2015 17:17    Post subject:
Should not be a problem...refresh rates around ~76hz are even within the specification of many 1080p panels if you look at datasheets (the 30-page ones) but depending on the display they are often locked out/skip frames/can only be reached with custom timings. I overclocked my monitor, and play games at 75hz whenever its possible.

Bleed is a lottery with many panels thats why you order somewhere with a good return policy.
The IPS and TN subpixels when displaying black don't block light as good as VA panels and if the monitor is not assembled well enough there will be lightbleed.
All IPS glow to some degree, that is inherent to the panel technology. The glow should disappear if you move back far enough.

edit:
looks like prad.de had more luck with this LG compared to the Samsung

http://www.prad.de/new/monitore/test/2015/test-lg-24mb56hq-b-teil6.html
http://www.prad.de/new/monitore/test/2014/test-samsung-s24d390hl-led-teil3.html#Bildqualitaet
here it looks better
https://pcmonitors.info/reviews/samsung-s24d390hl/

http://wecravegamestoo.com/forums/monitor-reviews-discussion/15723-monitor-questions-read-1st-post-post-questions-here-send-me-private-message.html#post1359160


Last edited by Shocktrooper on Tue, 5th May 2015 15:49; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Thu, 9th Apr 2015 18:45    Post subject:
Shocktrooper wrote:
Should not be a problem...refresh rates around ~76hz are even within the specification of many 1080p panels if you look at datasheets (the 30-page ones) but depending on the display they are often locked out/skip frames/can only be reached with custom timings. I overclocked my monitor, and play games at 75hz whenever its possible.

Bleed is a lottery with many panels thats why you order somewhere with a good return policy.
The IPS and TN subpixels simply block too much light, thats why a strong backlight is needed and if the monitor is not assembled well enough there will be lightbleed.
All IPS glow to some degree, that is inherent to the panel technology. The glow should disappear if you move back far enough.

edit:
looks like prad.de had more luck with this LG compared to the Samsung

http://www.prad.de/new/monitore/test/2015/test-lg-24mb56hq-b-teil6.html
http://www.prad.de/new/monitore/test/2014/test-samsung-s24d390hl-led-teil3.html#Bildqualitaet
here it looks better
https://pcmonitors.info/reviews/samsung-s24d390hl/

http://wecravegamestoo.com/forums/monitor-reviews-discussion/15723-monitor-questions-read-1st-post-post-questions-here-send-me-private-message.html#post1359160


But would it make any perceivable difference a 75-80 hz overclock ? on these types of IPS/PLS monitors ?
Back to top
Shocktrooper




Posts: 4585

PostPosted: Thu, 9th Apr 2015 19:00    Post subject:
yeah its a bit better than 60hz but certainly not as big a jump as 120hz. an additional 15-20 frames per second and the display persistence decreases from 16ms to 12-13ms. (slightly less motion blur)
you can leave the desktop at 60 and use higher refresh rates only in games
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Thu, 9th Apr 2015 22:18    Post subject:
Dell U2414H is IPS monitor with the least amount of IPS glow probably ever. But it seems you care more about Hz than picture quality so why are you even bothering with 60Hz monitors expecting to overclock them slightly, just get high refresh monitor and be done with it.
Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31974
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Thu, 9th Apr 2015 22:29    Post subject:
None of them, instead Iiyama X2483HSU-B1 or Iiyama XB2483HSU-B1

I had the Dell U2414H too. Sadly mine had a yellow tint which i was not able to remove. That "perfect calibration" certificate in the box was a fucking joke Laughing
Instead of bothering with sending it back, i just kept the Iiyama which impressed me the moment i turned it on. Got nearly perfect picture quality in a few minutes of tuning it. Good enough reaction time in games and great black and white levels and


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Thu, 9th Apr 2015 22:44    Post subject:
Bob Barnsen wrote:
None of them, instead Iiyama X2483HSU-B1 or Iiyama XB2483HSU-B1

I had the Dell U2414H too. Sadly mine had a yellow tint which i was not able to remove. That "perfect calibration" certificate in the box was a fucking joke Laughing
Instead of bothering with sending it back, i just kept the Iiyama which impressed me the moment i turned it on. Got nearly perfect picture quality in a few minutes of tuning it. Good enough reaction time in games and great black and white levels and


I was interested in that Iiyama VA but i read the reviews on hardware.info and the response time was pretty nasty.

In the end i think ima go with the Samsung, looks like a great upgrade over my 5 year old TN, and if i really think about it, i don't need the dell stand, the extra connectivity etc Smile

Also it leaves me with some nice pocket change to blow on something else Smile

 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
Shocktrooper




Posts: 4585

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 03:08    Post subject:
rgb#000 wrote:
Dell U2414H is IPS monitor with the least amount of IPS glow probably ever. But it seems you care more about Hz than picture quality so why are you even bothering with 60Hz monitors expecting to overclock them slightly, just get high refresh monitor and be done with it.


http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_u2414h.htm

"As you change your line of sight the white, silvery glow appears across the panel. This wasn't actually too bad at all on this screen, much like we'd seen from the P2414H as well in fact, and in normal lighting conditions didn't seem to be a problem at all. "

youtube.com/watch?v=N3Zh2vnQA3k - U2414H glow
youtube.com/watch?v=aDzJiTthX88 - P2414H glow

the camera has higher exposure in the second video - otherwise I don't see a big difference

Shakabutt wrote:
...but i read the reviews on hardware.info and the response time was pretty nasty.


http://uk.hardware.info/comparisontable/products/211842-211841-197766

vs. 2 AD-PLS panels - the 20%-80% rise time is slower by 3-4ms. The black-white transition is almost twice as fast and there is less overshoot (6% vs. 13% vs. 19%)
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 04:23    Post subject:
VA has that gamma shift when changing angles....the worst thing i hate about my TN Sad
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 09:04    Post subject:
on most recent VAs gamma shift is almost 0 (and it was never like TN), compared to shitty black levels and glow on IPS. Laughing

IPS is great for work and productivity, but for gaming it's poor, especially dark games. I now game on Sony HDTV with 0.03 black levels and around 5000:1 contrast ratio. every time i try to play something on IPS it just looks horrible Sad
Back to top
Shocktrooper




Posts: 4585

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 12:53    Post subject:
nah, VA still has a gamma shift, but its true it looks completely different than on TN.
Its noticeable only on dark greys/dark colours - moving your head left/right makes them change brightness and causes a mild "shimmering".
Maybe its not as visible on a TV compared to a monitor since one sits farther away.
Its annoying in its own unique way - I'm not a fan of it but its the lesser evil for me since I prefer to use screen in a dark/dimly lit room.
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 15:52    Post subject:
Went ahead and ordered the Samsung, in the end the budget was stretching too much for the Dell and the IIyama sounds nice but it was the same budget stretch with possible downsides.

Thanks for the help guys, hope this flicker free thing is actually worth it Smile, if its not, then the viewing angles should make a whole lot of difference, i hate it in dark games when i have to stretch my neck so i can see something lol on my TN.
Back to top
Shocktrooper




Posts: 4585

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 16:09    Post subject:
good luck, hope you get a nice panel!
is your screen tiring to your eyes? The Acer H235H is a CCFL screen (as all were once), people report more problems with LED-based PWM, especially at low frequencies.
But many are also completely unaffected. I did not have problems with my old CCFL but it became noticeably dimmer after a couple of years.
The flicker-free I have now is more pleasant but coming from a CCFL the illumination of WLED backlit panels will take some getting used to.

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/articles/content/pulse_width_modulation.htm#side_effects
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 16:27    Post subject:
Yep the thing that made me go for a buy was eye strain.

I think its more to do with me aging since in the past i could go for long gaming stints without feeling eye sore, headaches, but these days i cant play for more than a couple of hours without loosing focus and getting eye sore.

My monitor was also in the shop when the backlight went bad, maybe its something about that too, before that i never really noticed flickering of any kind.

Also my monitor has terrible grayscale, like you can't really make out dark greys and blacks at all. My color gamma is also weird, with the blue band blending at way over 2.2 and my colors are murky.
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 35042
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 13:54    Post subject:
What about the Dell U2515H?
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_u2515h.htm
(Smaller version of the U2715H - http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_u2715h.htm - but keeps the same resolution of 2560x1440)

There's the Eizo Foris as well if you're interested in 120Hz (Well 240) - http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/eizo_fg2421.htm - not very pricy either for a Ezio monitor, VA panel though instead of IPS.
(I would probably get this one to replace the aging SA850 I'm currently using if it wasn't for G-Sync and FreeSync monitors coming out later this year which I want to see how those do.)


EDIT: Should have read the rest of the posts first before replying, didn't see this, whoops.

Shakabutt wrote:
Went ahead and ordered the Samsung, in the end the budget was stretching too much for the Dell and the IIyama sounds nice but it was the same budget stretch with possible downsides.

Thanks for the help guys, hope this flicker free thing is actually worth it Smile, if its not, then the viewing angles should make a whole lot of difference, i hate it in dark games when i have to stretch my neck so i can see something lol on my TN.
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2015 15:53    Post subject:
So to update this thread, got my Samsung today, beatiful display, so bright and vivid ....except for a dead fucking pixel in the top left.

Sigh...now back in the box it goes and to wait from Samsung on the replacement.

Going back to my old TN was jarring, like it was soooo dim and fuzzy lol
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2015 15:54    Post subject:
That's what you get for going Samsung Cool Face Razz


Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2015 16:29    Post subject:
Lol, but if they refuse to replace it its gonna get worse with time ? I never had dead pixels, i had once a chinese LCD TV with a stream of stuck pixels that got worse every day.
Back to top
Shocktrooper




Posts: 4585

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2015 17:02    Post subject:
depends on the dead pixel policy and goodwill whether Samsung take it back if there is one dead pixel
you can instead tell them there is dirt stuck beneath the panel
Back to top
tonizito
VIP Member



Posts: 51456
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2015 17:14    Post subject:
Shiiet, you can tell them that it was simply not what you expected, if you aim *only* to return it. Not sure about the replacing part.


boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2015 20:32    Post subject:
If you live in Europe, you got the 2 weeks return policy anyway, they NEED to accept it back without questions and refund you full amount.


Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2015 21:28    Post subject:
Store rep sent me an email saying they are waiting word from Samsung.

If they don't want to replace im gonna ask for the cash back.

I was thinking maybe il try that pencil pressure thing on it, but it seems it only works for stuck pixels, and maybe im gonna dmg it Smile.

Damn what a shitty day, first my power supply went belly up in the morning, then this thing hit, and my car battery died.

How the fuck Rage
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2015 21:31    Post subject:
sausje wrote:
If you live in Europe, you got the 2 weeks return policy anyway, they NEED to accept it back without questions and refund you full amount.


Yep but won't they make me pay for return shipping ?

Fucking cunts sent it from their warehouse all the way in Hungary to Romania, who knows how much they gonna charge.
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 35042
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2015 22:37    Post subject:
Samsung should have a zero tolerance for dead pixels so there should be no problems with that plus the return policy too but this was when I got my monitor some years ago so it might have changed recently, others apparently have one or two dead pixels as the limit so it varies from one manufacturer to the next unfortunately.
(It can also vary between if it's a dead pixel - black - or a stuck pixel - red - from what I've read but to me they should be treated the same, fault in the monitor.)
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Fri, 15th May 2015 16:24    Post subject:
After 1 month of threatening to sue i finally got my refund, bought the same Samsung from a local store, and after 3 days its a thing of beauty.

Now i see how shitty my old TN was, besides the piss filter i got used to, the colors i was missing and the amount of detail in dark shades holy shit.

Porn never looked better So Much Win .

But yeah, im so happy i don't have to stretch my neck to see things in dark areas in games due to gamma shifts Reaction .

Also ive been noticing that tough alot more bright....eye strain is almost gone, this flicker free thing is nice Smile

Cons not so much, except for PLS glow and black deph, but im not bothered at all, the glow is only visible at extreme angles from the left/right.I actually expected the glow to be worse, pleasently suriprised by this, compared to the horrible shifts in my TN.
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group