Hardware situation rant Q2' 2015.
Page 1 of 1
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18352

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 23:00    Post subject: Hardware situation rant Q2' 2015.
Hi all,

I must get something off my chest or else I die from frustration.

Sockel 2011/2011-3 motherboards and hexa-core CPUs from Intel, aswell as DDR4 memory suck ass.

First of all, they are all connected, meaning you need a 2011(-3) mobo for a hexa-core xeon or i7 and they all go with DDR4 memory, there is no backwards support for DDR3.

I have read a bit into it and I came to the conclusion, that it's FAR better to chose a current-gen Devil's Canyon i7-4790K on Sockel 1150 using DDR3 RAM on a Z97 mobo for example, then go OC.

At 4.7 Ghz the 4790K outperformes the very limited (OC-wise) i7 5930K by 2-5% in CPU-only benchmarks and in games the difference is even higher to the advantage of the 4790K.

Given that the 4790K costs half of a 5930K, the DDR3 RAM is 30% cheaper than the DDR4, and the Socket 1150 mobos start at 90€ where the 2011-3's start at a whooping 240€,
even when realistically speaking the 1150 Mobo I'd take is 160€ with builtin Wifi and SLI support, still 80€ cheaper than the cheapest 2011-3.

And that is only the situation with Mobo+CPU+RAM.

The Situation of the current GPU market is completely FOOBAR'ed.

A) It's not worth having a Titan X, because 980 SLI is more cost-efficient.

B) It's not worth having a 980, because (depending of which 980 you'd chose) it might be more cost-efficient to buy two 970 (EVGA SC ACX2.0 is 364€).

C) The price-range for a single 970 is from 300€ (shitmodels) over to around and less than 400€ (for GOOD models) up to 500€ for high-end models with Hybrid/WC and builtin OC.

D) Even when considering one single 970, it is (again) more cost-efficient to go 960 SLI, because good 960's with 4Gb VRAM (as quick as one single 680) start at around 250€.


I fucking HATE this situation, man.

I wanna upgrade my GTX 680, I have a 2600K that's >2 years old and still keeps up well, any change to the CPU requires me replacing the Mobo also, however I most definetly wanna keep my 16 fucking GB of DDR3-1600 CL9 RAM...

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK, YOU GUYS?



Here's some more...
 Spoiler:
 


"There will be no end to the troubles of humanity, until philosophers become kings, or kings become philosophers.", Plato.
"Hyperbole will destroy us all.", Matt Dillahunty.
"The hyperbole, the demonization of the other opinion and the unwillingness to even read the opposing opinion destroys the so important political discussions necessary for the well functioning of society.", Couleur


Last edited by paxsali on Fri, 10th Apr 2015 23:06; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73259
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 23:02    Post subject:
Back to top
StrEagle




Posts: 14059
Location: Balkans
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 23:10    Post subject:
Laughing


Lutzifer wrote:
and yes, mine is only average
Back to top
riptide77




Posts: 2114

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 23:41    Post subject:
Consider getting used graphics cards. Maybe you'll find some nutter who's replacing his 970.


-=the wandering pillow stuffer=-
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 23:43    Post subject:
what's happening
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 23:47    Post subject:
rgb#000 wrote:
what's happening


No idea, but whatever it is Paxi is upset. Surprised


Back to top
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18352

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 23:50    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:48; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 23:53    Post subject:
why are you comparing 980 to 780ti? you have 680, no? so compare it to that. i have a 780 so i'm waiting for 980Ti, but for you even 970 would be a big upgrade.
Back to top
(Nexus)




Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Apr 2015 23:54    Post subject:
paxsali wrote:
The Titan X's are a big step forward performance wise, but the pricing is ridiculous.


For quality you need to pay, look at the apple products Laughing
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 00:07    Post subject:
this whole rant is so stupid. maybe YOUR 2600K is only 2 year old, but platform 2600K is running on is 4+ year old (including CPU which is also 4+ years old). you can't possibly expect 4+ year old platform still support latest CPUs, especially extreme CPU's which are completely different "branch".

and why do you even consider 5930K, it's so not worth it. 5820K is great, overclocks like a beast and cost pretty much the same as 4790K. yes mobo and ram is more expensive, but 2 extra cores are totally worth it.

this is exactly what happened with dual core vs quad core. when dual core was past its prime and quad core started taking over, people who paid a little extra for quad core reapt the benefits, while people stuck on dual core saw that their computers are getting outdated fast.
Back to top
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18352

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 00:14    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:48; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 00:19    Post subject:
what? that link doesn't have a single word about how 5820K or 5930K overclocks. fail Very Happy

i have 5820K, so maybe i know how it overclocks a bit better than a site which didn't even test it? Laughing

anyway, rant on...
Back to top
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18352

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 00:33    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:48; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
scaramonga




Posts: 9800

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 01:26    Post subject:
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29477

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 01:30    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 01:01; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 02:03    Post subject:
Seems to me like you just wanna burn some cash Laughing
Back to top
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18352

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 02:05    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:48; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29477

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 02:12    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 01:01; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
CaptnNemo




Posts: 909

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 10:12    Post subject:
Well for me the 5930K was a great deal since I got it for the price of the 5920K...

As for overclock, I bumped it up to 4.5 ghz which is very satisfying for me.

I gained just by switching cpus ( previous was I5 3570 ) about 15-20 fps in every single game I tested... Thats AAA titles too!!

So yeah maybe its all a waste but it never stops. So instead of staying there watching shit change every 6 months and do nothng, at some point you need to make a decision and just buy the stuff and be happy with it!!..Simple!!

Btw...My 970 strix combined with my cpu = win for me. Might not be the same for others...

Everything in life is a question of perception my friend!! Smile


Lian-Li XL Dynamic ROG Black - EVGA 1000w - Lian-li Galahad 360 AIO - MSI X570 Meg Ace - Rysen 5950x - G.Skill 4x16GB CL14 3600@3800(14-15-15-34) - Samsung 960 Pro 512 - Samsung 960 Pro 1TB - Kingston HyperX SSD 120gb SATA 3 (6gb/s) - WD Black Caviar 2x 2TB SATA 3 (6gb/s) Raid 0 - WD Black Caviar 2 TB SATA 3 (6gb/s) - EVGA 3090 FTW3 - LG C1 48" 4k120hrz
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 10:53    Post subject:
paxsali wrote:
Any overclocked 4790K is quicker than your 5820K in games.

And even in some few synthetic benchmarks... rant complete.

what benchmarks? what games? show me links, graphs please. show me where 5820K at 4.7Ghz gets beaten by 4970K at 4.7Ghz.

you are so wrong and so confused on this subject. but whatever, enjoy side-grading to another dated 4 core junk instead of true upgrade to 6core cpu Laughing
Back to top
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18352

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Apr 2015 23:48    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:48; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Mon, 13th Apr 2015 11:23    Post subject:
you are delusional Laughing
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group