| Page 2 of 5 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StarSpeak
Posts: 423
Location: Fascism's Paradise
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat, 20th Sep 2014 07:24 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zipfero
Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 20th Sep 2014 16:49 Post subject: |
|
|
I tried Tixati once too. I dislike that the download speed on the torrents was not shown like for example 2.5 mb/s but instead something like 2545K
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65073
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sat, 20th Sep 2014 19:12 Post subject: |
|
|
I'm an oldass uTorrent user too, currently on the latest version which has optional ads (some tweaking was required before). Can't complain really. 
Though I don't use torrents as much as I used to before, since private sites hate my 0.3KB/s upload speed and the various firedrive/bu have become quite the handy alternative for a peasant like me.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 20th Sep 2014 20:31 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:57; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 20th Sep 2014 20:49 Post subject: |
|
|
Deluge.
The way I see it, every life is a pile of good things and bad things. The good things don’t always soften the bad things, but vice versa, the bad things don’t always spoil the good things and make them unimportant.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 20th Sep 2014 20:50 Post subject: |
|
|
| IamAWESOME wrote: | | Deluge. |
This one.
I've been using it since microtorrent started with all their adds and shit.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 20th Sep 2014 21:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| Vechter wrote: | | uTorrent 2.2.1, everything works smoothly for me. |
and i use latest version with ads removed for a tracker which banned 2.2.1
both version works fine.
tried qbittorrent but is not working as well like utorent from my pov.
for example same 17gb torrent from tpb with 0 seeders was completed on utorrent (1 week) when qbittorrent manage to get only ~43%. same box, same uptime both.
will try tixati to.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 03:14 Post subject: |
|
|
| paxsali wrote: | Aren't torrents dangerous nowadays?
(Read: I have fucking tourettes you fucking cunt chopper twats) |
depends where you are and what you're getting. I'm in the states and the only time I ever got letters was from random porn I got. Never movies or games lol. I'm on a private tracker now though that's pretty strict with it's privacy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65073
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 04:13 Post subject: |
|
|
| SpykeZ wrote: | | paxsali wrote: | Aren't torrents dangerous nowadays?
(Read: I have fucking tourettes you fucking cunt chopper twats) |
depends where you are and what you're getting. I'm in the states and the only time I ever got letters was from random porn I got. Never movies or games lol. I'm on a private tracker now though that's pretty strict with it's privacy. |
Hah damn..didn't know that they actually care about our porn stash, them nasty voyeurs :S
I guess though when someone downloads 20GB of HD squirrels mating sessions, things do get a lil' bit suspicious indeed xD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 08:23 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 08:48 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HIz
Posts: 2187
Location: Wrong_Timeline
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 08:51 Post subject: |
|
|
utorrent (since ever)3.2.2 no ads.etc.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 09:55 Post subject: |
|
|
my point is that 1.7 was not that great. 1.8.1 was greatly improved vs 1.7 aswell.
from my pov 2.2.1 is the best in the series, but is still have problems with disk cache.
and utorrent added utp like 2 years before transmission. (afaik).
on my ubuntu vm i use transmission aswell. but if utorrent would had a native client which would work aswell on linux like on windows i would use utorrent.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 11:47 Post subject: |
|
|
kinda funny. I started "warezing" on the "top" so to say (xdcc scene*, after 2 weeks i was admin and "got bots and ftps hihi" and then racing on topsites for years and i end up ...
downloading all my stuff with utorrent from piratebay ^^.
*nsane-warez anyone ? yeah, i was a part of that legend lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Morphineus
VIP Member
Posts: 24883
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 12:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| skx7 wrote: | | MORPHINEUS wrote: | | skx7 wrote: | transmission too over here
utorrent... seriously  |
Oh stop being so full of yourself. Are you still in your teens? 
Sounds the same like those idiots that go: loel windows I use linux. Even though they never even got close to working properly with different clients other than their favourite one. |
Seriously, stop making stupid comments to hide your ignorance or incompetente on this subject. Utorrent was great until it was sold, around version 1.7
|
And my point was stop being a silly twat.
It's your childish behaviour, of putting people down because of your own insecurity.
I don't give a toss about your windows vs linux rhetoric or your whine about which client is superiour or the chosen one by you.
My advice: drop the attitude and learn to be humble, since you are far from being the god you think you are. Fucking sound like me when I was 16 ffs... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 12:36 Post subject: |
|
|
You're just a jealous Winblows user that can't get all the awesome WINux software. Suck it Morph Gates.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 13:52 Post subject: |
|
|
I'm using the piratebay with the bittorrent client. Gets the series and movies no problem.
Good enough for me.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tonizito
VIP Member
Posts: 51393
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 15:39 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | | You're just a jealous Winblows user that can't get all the awesome WINux software. Suck it Morph Gates. |
| boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote: | | i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 15:57 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand this talk about utorrent bloat.
I'm using version 3.3 build 29625, disabled the ads/promos in the advanced settings. The executable filesize is 784kb and Process Hacker reports that it's using 14.3 mb private memory when idling.
I mean, sure there are other very good clients I'm sure, feel free to use them but why spread bullshit about utorrent?
EDIT: Why isn't this on Applications like all the other "which torrent client" threads?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HIz
Posts: 2187
Location: Wrong_Timeline
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 16:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| VGAdeadcafe wrote: | | but why spread bullshit about utorrent? |
because...haters 
Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 17:00 Post subject: |
|
|
| VGAdeadcafe wrote: | I don't understand this talk about utorrent bloat.
I'm using version 3.3 build 29625, disabled the ads/promos in the advanced settings. The executable filesize is 784kb and Process Hacker reports that it's using 14.3 mb private memory when idling.
I mean, sure there are other very good clients I'm sure, feel free to use them but why spread bullshit about utorrent?
EDIT: Why isn't this on Applications like all the other "which torrent client" threads? |
the actual true benchmarks ever done show transmission working with less resources than utorrent, but hell yeah, it's just 16 year oldish bull shit
that's why it works when companies buy software with once a good reputation. you can completely fuck up and still have positive credits for years. same reason why facebook preferred buying whatsapp instead of pushing their own solution.
i am not here to convince you all, but the kind of replies of the Belgian Swedish god explain pretty well why utorrent is still the number 1 client worldwide
how can you discuss if someone even doesn't understand that ads, rss feeds, search feature, etc.. are non-added value bloat? hell, we even do not take into account all other crap which can be active under the hood. the binary multiplied by 5 size wise! i expect the installed version even bigger in size.
just the knowledge that utorrent is maintained by a US company should already be a huge red flag for average intelligent people, taking into account all the NSL crap which was discovered with the Snowden leaks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Morphineus
VIP Member
Posts: 24883
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 17:26 Post subject: |
|
|
Did I ever talk about utorrent? No. I said I used utorrent 2.2.1 and Deluge, the only time I mentioned utorrent in this thread.
I have been commenting on your condescending attitude towards people using utorrent (and that attitude has been shown on other subjects, reason my outburst here. Sometimes one can get fed up with it...).
So take the bullshit of | Quote: | | the actual true benchmarks ever done show transmission working with less resources than utorrent, but hell yeah, it's just 16 year oldish bull shit |
elsewhere. I have only attacked the shitty attitude of yours.
But hey you know everything better than everyone else ey... So maybe you already know your attitude stinks most of the time 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Morphineus
VIP Member
Posts: 24883
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Sep 2014 17:51 Post subject: |
|
|
Nah it was the last drop, your past behaviour was the reason that made that silly post into a "oh ffs, not that shit again" moment.
Any who, I said my thoughts.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 2 of 5 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
