|
Page 8 of 8 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zmed
Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:28 Post subject: |
|
 |
sausje wrote: | Quote: | A supermoon is the coincidence of a full moon or a new moon with the closest approach the Moon makes to the Earth on its elliptical orbit, resulting in the largest apparent size of the moon's disk as seen from Earth. The technical name is the perigee-syzygy of the Earth-Moon-Sun system. The term "supermoon" is not astronomical, but originated in modern astrology.[1] The association of the Moon with both oceanic and crustal tides has led to claims that the supermoon phenomenon may be associated with increased risk of events such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. However, the evidence of such a link is widely held to be unconvincing. [2] |
| As you can see on that picture in the article, the visual size difference in minimal. The picture in this thread is a very simple zoom trick, to make things that are far apart appear closer to each other.
It was shot far away from the buildings, and from that far, the Moon would appear normal size (or that minimally bigger during supermoon), while the buildings would look small. Zoom in, and both get bigger. If it was shot closer to the building, the moon would look smaller.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zmed
Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:32 Post subject: |
|
 |
zmed wrote: | sausje wrote: | Quote: | A supermoon is the coincidence of a full moon or a new moon with the closest approach the Moon makes to the Earth on its elliptical orbit, resulting in the largest apparent size of the moon's disk as seen from Earth. The technical name is the perigee-syzygy of the Earth-Moon-Sun system. The term "supermoon" is not astronomical, but originated in modern astrology.[1] The association of the Moon with both oceanic and crustal tides has led to claims that the supermoon phenomenon may be associated with increased risk of events such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. However, the evidence of such a link is widely held to be unconvincing. [2] |
| As you can see on that picture in the article, the visual size difference in minimal. The picture in this thread is a very simple zoom trick, to make things that are far apart appear closer to each other.
It was shot far away from the buildings, and from that far, the Moon would appear normal size (or that minimally bigger during supermoon), while the buildings would look small. Zoom in, and both get bigger. If it was shot closer to the building, the moon would look smaller. |
I wonder if I am in the same shoes as the thread starter. This is not a trick image or a hoax, I'VE SEEN THIS IN REAL IN MONTREAL 20 YEARS ago.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:32 Post subject: |
|
 |
its obviously
Spoiler: | planet x |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:35 Post subject: |
|
 |
zmed wrote: | As you can see on that picture in the article, the visual size difference in minimal. The picture in this thread is a very simple zoom trick, to make things that are far apart appear closer to each other.
It was shot far away from the buildings, and from that far, the Moon would appear normal size (or that minimally bigger during supermoon), while the buildings would look small. Zoom in, and both get bigger. If it was shot closer to the building, the moon would look smaller. |
Nah here are shots taken during the supermoon:
Spoiler: | |
Granted that they prolly use an extra zoom to make it look even bigger, but no doubt that they took it during that event.
When i reverse search that image, it shows that the pic was taken on the same date as these.
http://exileinportales.blogspot.nl/2012/05/super-moon.html
Quote: | A full moon as seen from West Orange, N.J., rose over the skyline of Lower Manhattan in New York. (Reuters) |
IF a planet would come THAT close to earth, no doubt we would notice it's gravitational pull, and would have SEVERE impact on the tides of the oceans..
Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zmed
Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:43 Post subject: |
|
 |
sausje wrote: | Nah here are shots taken during the supermoon: Spoiler: | | Granted that they prolly use an extra zoom to make it look even bigger, but no doubt that they took it during that event. | That's what I keep telling. It would be slightly bigger, granted, but not nearly as big as the pictures would imply. Those pictures are simple camera trickery. Professional photographers use this trick every day. Get some good distance between the foreground object and yourself, position it between the camera and the Moon, and boom, you have an image that makes the Moon look way bigger than it really is.
You yourself can see the comparison between the farthest and closest approaches of the Moon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Supermoon_comparison.jpg
The size difference is minimal, and photographers simply exploit this minimal difference to make it look ever so slightly bigger. sausje wrote: | IF a planet would come THAT close to earth, no doubt we would notice it's gravitational pull, and would have SEVERE impact on the tides of the oceans.. | Stop using common sense and logic! Using them against stupid ideas is cheating! 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:49 Post subject: |
|
 |
zmed wrote: | sausje wrote: | Nah here are shots taken during the supermoon: Spoiler: | | Granted that they prolly use an extra zoom to make it look even bigger, but no doubt that they took it during that event. | That's what I keep telling. It would be slightly bigger, granted, but not nearly as big as the pictures would imply. Those pictures are simple camera trickery. Professional photographers use this trick every day. Get some good distance between the foreground object and yourself, position it between the camera and the Moon, and boom, you have an image that makes the Moon look way bigger than it really is.
You yourself can see the comparison between the farthest and closest approaches of the Moon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Supermoon_comparison.jpg
The size difference is minimal, and photographers simply exploit this minimal difference to make it look ever so slightly bigger. |
Yeah, true that. But i was kinda trying to point out that this was made during a supermoon event, wich you can exploit to make even bigger then you can with the usual moon
zmed wrote: | sausje wrote: | IF a planet would come THAT close to earth, no doubt we would notice it's gravitational pull, and would have SEVERE impact on the tides of the oceans.. | Stop using common sense and logic! Using them against stupid ideas is cheating!  |
Me having common sense and logic?! WTF, what world do you live in?! 
Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zmed
Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 2nd Apr 2013 13:17 Post subject: |
|
 |
So talking about a conspiracy...
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.7476v1.pdf
The Universe is a lie!!!!
"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson chiv wrote: | thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73199
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Tue, 2nd Apr 2013 18:19 Post subject: |
|
 |
This thread is still alive? 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 8 of 8 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
 |
|