What do you guys think about chemtrails??? No flame plz!
Page 8 of 8 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
MadSkillz33




Posts: 37

PostPosted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:25    Post subject:
zmed wrote:
MadSkillz33 wrote:
I've seen this in real while I was near the fleuve here in Montreal with my gf.

You gotta be kidding to tell me this is to moon or in my book, you really miss something here.

How could the moon be that big???????

Have you ever heard of the wonderful new invention in photgraphy called "zoom"?


Like I said, I saw that in real. Than I found that photo.
Back to top
MadSkillz33




Posts: 37

PostPosted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:27    Post subject:
sausje wrote:
MadSkillz33 wrote:
How could the moon be that big???????



Facepalm

I just linked it..


Quote:
A supermoon is the coincidence of a full moon or a new moon with the closest approach the Moon makes to the Earth on its elliptical orbit, resulting in the largest apparent size of the moon's disk as seen from Earth. The technical name is the perigee-syzygy of the Earth-Moon-Sun system. The term "supermoon" is not astronomical, but originated in modern astrology.[1] The association of the Moon with both oceanic and crustal tides has led to claims that the supermoon phenomenon may be associated with increased risk of events such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. However, the evidence of such a link is widely held to be unconvincing. [2]



wtf is this text?

It mean nothing for me, and I don't care what the tv or what the wiki is saying.

This is not the moon, this is a planet that we cross sometimes.
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:28    Post subject:
sausje wrote:
Quote:
A supermoon is the coincidence of a full moon or a new moon with the closest approach the Moon makes to the Earth on its elliptical orbit, resulting in the largest apparent size of the moon's disk as seen from Earth. The technical name is the perigee-syzygy of the Earth-Moon-Sun system. The term "supermoon" is not astronomical, but originated in modern astrology.[1] The association of the Moon with both oceanic and crustal tides has led to claims that the supermoon phenomenon may be associated with increased risk of events such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. However, the evidence of such a link is widely held to be unconvincing. [2]
As you can see on that picture in the article, the visual size difference in minimal. The picture in this thread is a very simple zoom trick, to make things that are far apart appear closer to each other.

It was shot far away from the buildings, and from that far, the Moon would appear normal size (or that minimally bigger during supermoon), while the buildings would look small. Zoom in, and both get bigger. If it was shot closer to the building, the moon would look smaller.
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:31    Post subject:
MadSkillz33 wrote:
This is not the moon, this is a planet that we cross sometimes.
Back to top
MadSkillz33




Posts: 37

PostPosted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:32    Post subject:
zmed wrote:
sausje wrote:
Quote:
A supermoon is the coincidence of a full moon or a new moon with the closest approach the Moon makes to the Earth on its elliptical orbit, resulting in the largest apparent size of the moon's disk as seen from Earth. The technical name is the perigee-syzygy of the Earth-Moon-Sun system. The term "supermoon" is not astronomical, but originated in modern astrology.[1] The association of the Moon with both oceanic and crustal tides has led to claims that the supermoon phenomenon may be associated with increased risk of events such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. However, the evidence of such a link is widely held to be unconvincing. [2]
As you can see on that picture in the article, the visual size difference in minimal. The picture in this thread is a very simple zoom trick, to make things that are far apart appear closer to each other.

It was shot far away from the buildings, and from that far, the Moon would appear normal size (or that minimally bigger during supermoon), while the buildings would look small. Zoom in, and both get bigger. If it was shot closer to the building, the moon would look smaller.


I wonder if I am in the same shoes as the thread starter. This is not a trick image or a hoax, I'VE SEEN THIS IN REAL IN MONTREAL 20 YEARS ago.
Back to top
The_Zeel




Posts: 14922

PostPosted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:32    Post subject:
its obviously

 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
MadSkillz33




Posts: 37

PostPosted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:33    Post subject:
zmed wrote:
MadSkillz33 wrote:
This is not the moon, this is a planet that we cross sometimes.


I do the same to your avatar Cool
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:35    Post subject:
zmed wrote:
As you can see on that picture in the article, the visual size difference in minimal. The picture in this thread is a very simple zoom trick, to make things that are far apart appear closer to each other.

It was shot far away from the buildings, and from that far, the Moon would appear normal size (or that minimally bigger during supermoon), while the buildings would look small. Zoom in, and both get bigger. If it was shot closer to the building, the moon would look smaller.



Nah here are shots taken during the supermoon:

 Spoiler:
 


Granted that they prolly use an extra zoom to make it look even bigger, but no doubt that they took it during that event.


When i reverse search that image, it shows that the pic was taken on the same date as these.

http://exileinportales.blogspot.nl/2012/05/super-moon.html

Quote:
A full moon as seen from West Orange, N.J., rose over the skyline of Lower Manhattan in New York. (Reuters)



IF a planet would come THAT close to earth, no doubt we would notice it's gravitational pull, and would have SEVERE impact on the tides of the oceans..


Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:43    Post subject:
sausje wrote:
Nah here are shots taken during the supermoon:
 Spoiler:
 
Granted that they prolly use an extra zoom to make it look even bigger, but no doubt that they took it during that event.
That's what I keep telling. It would be slightly bigger, granted, but not nearly as big as the pictures would imply. Those pictures are simple camera trickery. Professional photographers use this trick every day. Get some good distance between the foreground object and yourself, position it between the camera and the Moon, and boom, you have an image that makes the Moon look way bigger than it really is.

You yourself can see the comparison between the farthest and closest approaches of the Moon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Supermoon_comparison.jpg

The size difference is minimal, and photographers simply exploit this minimal difference to make it look ever so slightly bigger.
sausje wrote:
IF a planet would come THAT close to earth, no doubt we would notice it's gravitational pull, and would have SEVERE impact on the tides of the oceans..
Stop using common sense and logic! Using them against stupid ideas is cheating! Laughing
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:49    Post subject:
zmed wrote:
sausje wrote:
Nah here are shots taken during the supermoon:
 Spoiler:
 
Granted that they prolly use an extra zoom to make it look even bigger, but no doubt that they took it during that event.
That's what I keep telling. It would be slightly bigger, granted, but not nearly as big as the pictures would imply. Those pictures are simple camera trickery. Professional photographers use this trick every day. Get some good distance between the foreground object and yourself, position it between the camera and the Moon, and boom, you have an image that makes the Moon look way bigger than it really is.

You yourself can see the comparison between the farthest and closest approaches of the Moon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Supermoon_comparison.jpg

The size difference is minimal, and photographers simply exploit this minimal difference to make it look ever so slightly bigger.


Yeah, true that. But i was kinda trying to point out that this was made during a supermoon event, wich you can exploit to make even bigger then you can with the usual moon Razz


zmed wrote:
sausje wrote:
IF a planet would come THAT close to earth, no doubt we would notice it's gravitational pull, and would have SEVERE impact on the tides of the oceans..
Stop using common sense and logic! Using them against stupid ideas is cheating! Laughing


Me having common sense and logic?! WTF, what world do you live in?! Razz


Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Thu, 14th Mar 2013 16:56    Post subject:
sausje wrote:
Yeah, true that. But i was kinda trying to point out that this was made during a supermoon event, wich you can exploit to make even bigger then you can with the usual moon Razz
Also, with this zoom thing, you can make it look as big as the curvature of the Earth and the strength of the zoom on your camera would allow.

The reason why there are so many big-moon pictures from these supermoon events is simply because the sensationalist media are filled with retards who play up the doomsayer idea of the moon appearing extra large (remember the hubbub about Mars coming so close it would look as big as the full Moon? Quality reporting right there).

Clever photographers simply see the media idiocy coming, take a few very pretty photos like those and sell them to media outlets who pay some good money to use them as headline pictures.
Back to top
dingo_d
VIP Member



Posts: 14555

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Apr 2013 13:17    Post subject:
So talking about a conspiracy...

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.7476v1.pdf

Very Happy The Universe is a lie!!!!


"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson
chiv wrote:
thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found.

Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73199
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Apr 2013 18:19    Post subject:
This thread is still alive? Laughing
Back to top
Page 8 of 8 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - General chatter Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group