We are all doomed... In a few dozens of billions of years...
Page 1 of 1
jemy_m
Banned



Posts: 49

PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 00:36    Post subject: We are all doomed... In a few dozens of billions of years...
Physics theorists believe that the cosmos .... have an expiration date...
The universe is unstable ... In a few dozen billion years ..... destroy the universe as we know.
"Without Warning" a vacuum bubble can form anywhere in the universe and expanding the speed of light. "Before we realize what has swept us, even though our proton decay,"
Somewhere in the cosmos arises an alternate universe, expand then and destroy everything.

http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/natur/higgs-boson-physiker-halten-universum-fuer-instabil-a-884216.html

we're all doomed, whats the use
fuck the world and pass the booze

.
Back to top
FusionDexterity




Posts: 1834

PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 00:43    Post subject:
We are all doomed in a hundred years or less who cares Laughing
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 00:44    Post subject:
lol we're all doomed from the day you're born
you're gonna die regardless. fuck it all. Very Happy


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
Nhiumewyn
Banned



Posts: 2705

PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 01:30    Post subject:
The OP not only is a scientific analphabet, as is unaware of the meanings of the words theory and hypothesis.
Back to top
pistolshrimp
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 11007

PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 01:46    Post subject:
Not me. I shall ascend into the cosmos.
Back to top
Shocktrooper




Posts: 4570

PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 01:49    Post subject:
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 02:07    Post subject:
pistolshrimp wrote:
Not me. I shall ascend into the cosmos.

In that case I want to be your cherub companion grinhurt
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 03:23    Post subject:
I preferred the heat death where everything decays into photons, but I guess this is also a way to go out. Smile
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 03:59    Post subject:
meh, jesus will save us.


Back to top
Frant
King's Bounty



Posts: 24642
Location: Your Mom
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 04:35    Post subject:
zmed wrote:
I preferred the heat death where everything decays into photons, but I guess this is also a way to go out. Smile


I prefer the black hole death of the universe. Every galaxy turns into a single giant black hole, floating alone in the cosmos until the Hawkins radiation have turned the universe into near total entropy death, still expanding while increasing entropy until either something totally unexpected happens (The Final Mind, ie. some other race's descendants in billions of years have ascended and become a final single mind that sacrifice all galaxies and matter/energy to end our universe in an orderly fashion to create a new one).


Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
Back to top
dingo_d
VIP Member



Posts: 14555

PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 08:23    Post subject:
Well, entropy will be the end of us all, that's just how the universe works (well at least what we understand so far Very Happy).

But human race will die even sooner (if not by our own hands, which is more likely), our Sun will go nova in about 5 billion years, so...

But 5 billion years is a looong loooooong time. By then, who knows what'll happen?! Interstellar travel, interdimensional travel?! The universe is our oyster!!! grinhurt


"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson
chiv wrote:
thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found.

Back to top
couleur
[Moderator] Janitor



Posts: 14360

PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 08:33    Post subject:
Nhiumewyn wrote:
The OP not only is a scientific analphabet, as is unaware of the meanings of the words theory and hypothesis.


And you do not seem so versed in sentence structure. Everyone has his limits. Laughing


"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the enlightenment."
Back to top
TSR69
Banned



Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 08:50    Post subject:
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 11:07    Post subject:
Frant wrote:
zmed wrote:
I preferred the heat death where everything decays into photons, but I guess this is also a way to go out. Smile


I prefer the black hole death of the universe. Every galaxy turns into a single giant black hole, floating alone in the cosmos until the Hawkins radiation have turned the universe into near total entropy death, still expanding while increasing entropy until either something totally unexpected happens (The Final Mind, ie. some other race's descendants in billions of years have ascended and become a final single mind that sacrifice all galaxies and matter/energy to end our universe in an orderly fashion to create a new one).
That's part of the heat death. Smile

What you described was known as the "Black Hole era". And since black holes evaporate into radiation (photons) and protons are thought to be unstable, thus any remaining free floating matter would also decay, eventually the entire universe would be nothing more than low energy photons whizzing around. That was called the "Dark era", which would have come after the BHe.
Back to top
Frant
King's Bounty



Posts: 24642
Location: Your Mom
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Feb 2013 15:19    Post subject:
zmed wrote:
Frant wrote:
zmed wrote:
I preferred the heat death where everything decays into photons, but I guess this is also a way to go out. Smile


I prefer the black hole death of the universe. Every galaxy turns into a single giant black hole, floating alone in the cosmos until the Hawkins radiation have turned the universe into near total entropy death, still expanding while increasing entropy until either something totally unexpected happens (The Final Mind, ie. some other race's descendants in billions of years have ascended and become a final single mind that sacrifice all galaxies and matter/energy to end our universe in an orderly fashion to create a new one).
That's part of the heat death. Smile

What you described was known as the "Black Hole era". And since black holes evaporate into radiation (photons) and protons are thought to be unstable, thus any remaining free floating matter would also decay, eventually the entire universe would be nothing more than low energy photons whizzing around. That was called the "Dark era", which would have come after the BHe.


The thing is, energy is never destroyed, it just disperses (well, entropy). Who knows, perhaps dark matter/energy someone nullifies the heat death, or the increasing lack of energy creates a negative charge in certain zones in the universe where tied-up wormholes are created, slowly sucking up all the low energy potential until it reaches a certain limit and the energy breaks through the knot and a new area (on the other side of the wormhole) starts a new part of the universe.. And this is a constant cycle? Which would/could explain a lot of things as well a be shot-down idea.

I've always viewed vacuum force as an inflating force, ie. inverted exhaling in a cosmic sense and perhaps even part of the reason why the universe keeps expanding, there's still a lot of negative vacuum (actually, vacuum isn't the right word, but never mind) that is actually PULLING the universe outwards and apart as opposed to some dark matter/energy force theory being behind the expansion of the room and the mega-verse.

Imagine a membrane. On one side is infinite energy.. On the other side is infinite lack of energy. The pressure potential on this membrane (dimensional membrane?) may for some reason break and the side with the infinite energy suddenly burst through the break in the membrane and voila, our universe. Equilibrium will never take place since it's infinity. On the other hand, if it's finite, then there will finally be two universes that will at one point reach equilibrium on both points and there is no more expansion on either side and cosmic radiation will bounce around while the room itself is expanding, slowing everything down and we still end up with heat death.


Oh how I love what if's, even if some of them are ludicrous.


Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
Back to top
Atropa




Posts: 878

PostPosted: Sat, 23rd Feb 2013 12:25    Post subject:
Nhiumewyn wrote:
The OP not only is a scientific analphabet, as is unaware of the meanings of the words theory and hypothesis.


Lets here your insightfull comments then and not just some quibbling about the difference of theory and hypothesis.
To me it sounds like they made the assumption that no new physics happens between the CERN energy scale and the planck energy scale. A bit far fetched to be honest Neutral.
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - The Useless Void
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group