If people disagree with you, is that offensive?
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next

People disagreeing with you is offensive?
yes
10%
 10%  [ 6 ]
no
81%
 81%  [ 45 ]
dunno
7%
 7%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 55

TSR69
Banned



Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 00:47    Post subject: If people disagree with you, is that offensive?
I think I was 16 years old, had a disagreement with my father and it turned out later I was right. I asked him why he didn't want to listen to what I had to say. He said: "You can really be stubborn in your views." Well that is not a nice thing to hear, but nonetheless it was useful feedback. I thought about it for a while and decided I should always give someone else the benefit of the doubt and give myself the disadvantage of the doubt.

Here on the humps sometimes it seems there are people who think they are entitled to claim their opinions as truth. You disagree with them and they become infuriated. How dare you to disagree.

So that is the question and given that someone disagrees with you in a non offensive way.
Back to top
Lutzifer
Modzilla



Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 00:58    Post subject:
i think i only get infuriated when people state opinions that are most obviously wrong to anybody with a minimum degree of education. Especially when a google or wikipedia search can reveal "the truth" in milliseconds nowadays.

other than that i think i follow the standard rule of getting offended when morality is concerned (and that being different to everybody, everybody has different hot topics or lines not to be crossed).
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29448

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 01:17    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 04:04; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
huxanomaly2




Posts: 2261
Location: Bucharest
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 01:22    Post subject:
Disagreeing personal opinions and beliefs is a thing, it's not at all infuriating or offensive, it's all about education and what you learn by your own, while stating wrong facts (as in something that only has one answer/option) on the other hand is sometimes pretty annoying. I might find something like that offensive, depends on the mood tho'. I usually try not to rage in such conditions and stay calm, while explaining why such a thing has a certain answer/solution/option etc, and why is it the only viable one.
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65079
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 02:29    Post subject:
Absolutely not, I'm not easily offended except of course when people with zero knowledge or explicitly wrong opinions act like diehard mad preachers. Fortunately I'm also quite good at dodging these kind of individuals Razz
Back to top
Nhiumewyn
Banned



Posts: 2705

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 02:52    Post subject:
Lutzifer wrote:
i think i only get infuriated when people state opinions that are most obviously wrong to anybody with a minimum degree of education. Especially when a google or wikipedia search can reveal "the truth" in milliseconds nowadays.

other than that i think i follow the standard rule of getting offended when morality is concerned (and that being different to everybody, everybody has different hot topics or lines not to be crossed).


It is not a matter of people agreeing with me or not that makes an argument offensive, it is their clinging to subjective opinions as truth and treat those as fact, when they are most clearly not.

And this lands exactly on the argument of morality Lutzifer brought forth, people treat morality as some sort of absolute, they forget that their subjective interpretation of right and wrong/good and evil, is entirely based on their personal experiences, desires, fears and emotions.

In truth, I regard those who treat morality as an absolute as being themselves offensive, for they attempt to shape and condemn the outer world with regards to their subjective views on certain issues and topics, and this, in essence, is probably the most elemental cause of interpersonal conflict and war.
Back to top
fisk




Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 04:49    Post subject:
Of course it is, the moment someone disagrees with you their view on the world is in conflict with yours. It is however how we deal with this conflict that shows who we are as human beings.


Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
Back to top
dingo_d
VIP Member



Posts: 14555

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 10:58    Post subject:
I only get offended when ppl disagree with me on something that I know it's a fact, and I know I am right about, but they won't even listen to what I have to say. Or when they have retarded arguments like: homosexuals are sick and they should be isolated on an island somewhere... In my mind I am killing that person xD

But when someone disagrees on something that you can disagree on, that's fine with me. For instance I can't stand raisins in chocolate, but others find that tasty. Ok. I don't and that's that.

With religion I get kinda subtly evil I guess Laughing

When someone has some stupid arguments for their believes, I try to ask them questions and throw suggestions that could make them doubt or question their believes Very Happy


"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson
chiv wrote:
thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found.

Back to top
Nhiumewyn
Banned



Posts: 2705

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 14:45    Post subject:
fisk wrote:
Of course it is, the moment someone disagrees with you their view on the world is in conflict with yours. It is however how we deal with this conflict that shows who we are as human beings.


And why should anyone care or bestow any credence to the emotional feedback between a person and their views?

If an argument, perspective or view can be dismissed as logically invalid, why should you allow the delusions or inconsistencies of others to persist? For the sake of their sensibilities and social norms?..
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34200

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 15:12    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:43; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
huxanomaly2




Posts: 2261
Location: Bucharest
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 15:21    Post subject:
That's megalomania, I'm afraid.
Back to top
Nhiumewyn
Banned



Posts: 2705

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 15:23    Post subject:
garus wrote:
Nhiumewyn wrote:
fisk wrote:
Of course it is, the moment someone disagrees with you their view on the world is in conflict with yours. It is however how we deal with this conflict that shows who we are as human beings.


And why should anyone care or bestow any credence to the emotional feedback between a person and their views?

If an argument, perspective or view can be dismissed as logically invalid, why should you allow the delusions or inconsistencies of others to persist? For the sake of their sensibilities and social norms?..


You just described everything that is wrong with you. Starting with the fact that YOU think everybody else's opinion is invalid.


No, everyone's opinions are invalid, including my own, that's why they are opinions.

And you're just distorting my argument, what I asked is why should you respect opinions, when there is data available that can dismiss them almost instantaneously..

If a premise or claim cannot resist the test of critical analysis, why should you respect it? (that's the only question I asked in the previous post)
Back to top
huxanomaly2




Posts: 2261
Location: Bucharest
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 15:27    Post subject:
Well, Ronhrin, you are too distorting people's arguments, so you can't blame him for something that you're doing too. With every single post related to such discussions, a la Ronhrin. I think this thread is about something else, not a SET SAIL FOR YET ANOTHER RONHRIN THREAD. Le's keep this clean, shall we? Finding someone's opinion offensive in a thread about.. oh well, I saw this coming.
Back to top
Nhiumewyn
Banned



Posts: 2705

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 15:32    Post subject:
huxanomaly2 wrote:
Well, Ronhrin, you are too distorting people's arguments, so you can't blame him for something that you're doing too. With every single post related to such discussions, a la Ronhrin. I think this thread is about something else, not a SET SAIL FOR YET ANOTHER RONHRIN THREAD. Le's keep this clean, shall we? Finding someone's opinion offensive in a thread about.. oh well, I saw this coming.


How am I distorting this argument?

We are discussing the offensiveness of conflicting opinions.

I offered nothing else than insight on that specific issue.
Back to top
huxanomaly2




Posts: 2261
Location: Bucharest
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 15:40    Post subject:
An opinion on a certain matter can't be invalid. It's a PERSONAL thought and insight on the matter. IT'S A PERSONAL THING. If I have an opinion, you can't change it, because of the way I'm thinking, because of the way I was educated and raised, because I have certain principles. Yes, we may share principles and opinions, and that makes it okay, right? But when we ain't sharing them? Why isn't that okay? That's a question that needs no answer, and I don't want to debate it.
Back to top
Nhiumewyn
Banned



Posts: 2705

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 15:51    Post subject:
huxanomaly2 wrote:
An opinion on a certain matter can't be invalid. It's a PERSONAL thought and insight on the matter. IT'S A PERSONAL THING. If I have an opinion, you can't change it, because of the way I'm thinking, because of the way I was educated and raised, because I have certain principles. Yes, we may share principles and opinions, and that makes it okay, right? But when we ain't sharing them? Why isn't that okay? That's a question that needs no answer, and I don't want to debate it.


There are subjective based opinions (taste, moral values, personal principles, etc) and there are objective based opinions (based on objective reality), when discussing issues and topics that are outside the domain of personal subjectivity, opinion is meaningless.

Also, people have this tendency to adhere to this notion that their subjective ideals have any value outside of their own mind. Or in other words, you may have a strong opinion about a certain issue, but when you have an expectation that other people act in accordance with your given opinion, you are by default wrong, quite simply because you are transporting a subjective ideal into objective reality.
Back to top
dingo_d
VIP Member



Posts: 14555

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 16:01    Post subject:
huxanomaly2 wrote:
An opinion on a certain matter can't be invalid. It's a PERSONAL thought and insight on the matter. IT'S A PERSONAL THING. If I have an opinion, you can't change it, because of the way I'm thinking, because of the way I was educated and raised, because I have certain principles. Yes, we may share principles and opinions, and that makes it okay, right? But when we ain't sharing them? Why isn't that okay? That's a question that needs no answer, and I don't want to debate it.


No no, I think you are missing a point.

For me there are different levels of 'opinions' if you will.

Opinions like: 'I like blood sausage', and 'I can't stand the taste of blood sausage' (try to guess which is my opinion xD)

And then there are opinions like: 'I think that gravity doesn't work and it's ridiculous', or 'I think that the Earth is flat'. These are opinions, which are based on wrong premise, or just plain old ignorance. And can be tested easily (jump from a 100 story building and let us see if you'll float upwards, or fall down, due to gravity, and splat like a bug on a windshield Very Happy).

I think that that was the case Ron was making.

EDIT: I didn't see he made the above post xD I think I understood what he was trying to say Very Happy


"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson
chiv wrote:
thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found.

Back to top
huxanomaly2




Posts: 2261
Location: Bucharest
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 16:09    Post subject:
I guess that's what I was trying to say too, but I'm full retard mode today, can't find my words to express what I'm thinking about. I think Yurina is messing with my mind Sad.
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 16:21    Post subject:
no. everyone have right to his own opinion as long as their opinion states that Alan Wake is fucking awesome Cool Face

no, rly. Each to his own, but not shoving his own down in my own... Crying or Very sad


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
MinderMast




Posts: 6172

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 16:56    Post subject:
dingo_d wrote:
huxanomaly2 wrote:
An opinion on a certain matter can't be invalid. It's a PERSONAL thought and insight on the matter. IT'S A PERSONAL THING. If I have an opinion, you can't change it, because of the way I'm thinking, because of the way I was educated and raised, because I have certain principles. Yes, we may share principles and opinions, and that makes it okay, right? But when we ain't sharing them? Why isn't that okay? That's a question that needs no answer, and I don't want to debate it.


No no, I think you are missing a point.

For me there are different levels of 'opinions' if you will.

Opinions like: 'I like blood sausage', and 'I can't stand the taste of blood sausage' (try to guess which is my opinion xD)

And then there are opinions like: 'I think that gravity doesn't work and it's ridiculous', or 'I think that the Earth is flat'. These are opinions, which are based on wrong premise, or just plain old ignorance. And can be tested easily (jump from a 100 story building and let us see if you'll float upwards, or fall down, due to gravity, and splat like a bug on a windshield Very Happy).

I think that that was the case Ron was making.

EDIT: I didn't see he made the above post xD I think I understood what he was trying to say Very Happy

It's kinda easier for me - I don't normally call something that can be factually proven or disproved an opinion Smile
Back to top
Nhiumewyn
Banned



Posts: 2705

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 17:04    Post subject:
MinderMast wrote:
dingo_d wrote:
huxanomaly2 wrote:
An opinion on a certain matter can't be invalid. It's a PERSONAL thought and insight on the matter. IT'S A PERSONAL THING. If I have an opinion, you can't change it, because of the way I'm thinking, because of the way I was educated and raised, because I have certain principles. Yes, we may share principles and opinions, and that makes it okay, right? But when we ain't sharing them? Why isn't that okay? That's a question that needs no answer, and I don't want to debate it.


No no, I think you are missing a point.

For me there are different levels of 'opinions' if you will.

Opinions like: 'I like blood sausage', and 'I can't stand the taste of blood sausage' (try to guess which is my opinion xD)

And then there are opinions like: 'I think that gravity doesn't work and it's ridiculous', or 'I think that the Earth is flat'. These are opinions, which are based on wrong premise, or just plain old ignorance. And can be tested easily (jump from a 100 story building and let us see if you'll float upwards, or fall down, due to gravity, and splat like a bug on a windshield Very Happy).

I think that that was the case Ron was making.

EDIT: I didn't see he made the above post xD I think I understood what he was trying to say Very Happy

It's kinda easier for me - I don't normally call something that can be factually proven or disproved an opinion Smile


By definition, that's exactly what an opinion is.
Back to top
fisk




Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 17:24    Post subject:
A lot of Ronhrin posts in this thread, is he doing his usual schtick that he was supposed to pull off in his own thread only?


Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
Back to top
Nhiumewyn
Banned



Posts: 2705

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 17:30    Post subject:
fisk wrote:
A lot of Ronhrin posts in this thread, is he doing his usual schtick that he was supposed to pull off in his own thread only?


I'm quite simply replying to this thread, stop attempting to read in and induce any other line of reasoning.
Back to top
MinderMast




Posts: 6172

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 17:36    Post subject:
fisk wrote:
A lot of Ronhrin posts in this thread, is he doing his usual schtick that he was supposed to pull off in his own thread only?

Not this time I think Smile

@Nhiumewyn
I reserve the word opinion only for personal views or beliefs which are purely subjective... but that's just my opinion of the word opinion (and don't you dare factually disproving it with dictionaries!) Razz
Back to top
Nalo
nothing



Posts: 13515

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 17:43    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Nalo on Wed, 3rd Jul 2024 06:34; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34200

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 17:47    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:43; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
TSR69
Banned



Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 17:54    Post subject:
Laughing Tsa you can have a discussion about the difference between facts and opinions. I guess we all know the difference between them but sometimes we posses certain information we perceive as facts but is merely fiction. The more information you have in your head the more nonsense you will also possess.


Formerly known as iconized
Back to top
fisk




Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 18:19    Post subject:
MinderMast wrote:
fisk wrote:
A lot of Ronhrin posts in this thread, is he doing his usual schtick that he was supposed to pull off in his own thread only?

Not this time I think Smile


Ahh, he tends to get worked up and post a lot when that topic is on hand so I figured he might've slipped again.


Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
Back to top
Atropa




Posts: 878

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 21:31    Post subject:
I tend to not really care. I have a quite specialized knowledge so it's ok if people think they know better. Sometimes it just not worth the trouble to try and explain my own point of view or sometimes I just lack communication skills.

Nalo wrote:
I can't give my opinion until I sprout a tangible differentiation into argumentative existence Laughing


Laughing
Back to top
niggasizedcock
Banned



Posts: 4

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jul 2012 21:33    Post subject:
na i just kick their teeth in
Back to top
Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - The Useless Void Goto page 1, 2  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group