| Page 554 of 848 |
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
 Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 13:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 13:12 Post subject: |
|
|
what are ur favourite weapons for each class? and which scope do u use on it?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 13:21 Post subject: |
|
|
| pfeiffchen wrote: | | what are ur favourite weapons for each class? and which scope do u use on it? |
assault m16a3/a4 with acog4x
engineer g36c/aksu74/a91 with acog4x
support m249saw with acog4x
recon m40/straight-pull bolt with ballistic 12x or 8x or acog4x (depends on map)
also pistols m9 & m1911
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 13:43 Post subject: |
|
|
straight pull is good for 4x , but for 12x i rather take bipod.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 13:55 Post subject: |
|
|
F2000 (or M416) w/IRNV
A-91 (or G36C) w/IRNV
M249 (or M27IAR) w/IRNV
M98B (or MK11/SVD) w/ACOG 4x
IRNV scope is ridiculously overpowered and I hope they remove it because it makes the game less fun. Usually anything with the most ROF is better for assault.
M98B does the most damage according to the excels I've seen. Using anything above a 4x scope makes you flash up like a christmas three. It's not scope glints it's a signal flare.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34197
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 13:56 Post subject: |
|
|
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:34; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:09 Post subject: |
|
|
| garus wrote: | | They won't remove it. But decreasing the IR range would be a proper thing to do. |
It is a bit OP, but I can't wait to get it on the SKS recon rifle. Went beast mode with it bare - on tdm last night.
Have IR on m416, m249, sv98, pdw-r, f2000 so far.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| Taffelost wrote: | F2000 (or M416) w/IRNV
A-91 (or G36C) w/IRNV
M249 (or M27IAR) w/IRNV
M98B (or MK11/SVD) w/ACOG 4x
IRNV scope is ridiculously overpowered and I hope they remove it because it makes the game less fun. Usually anything with the most ROF is better for assault.
|
Just wear the spec ops camo...and they won't be able to see you on their IRNV anymore
= win!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| StrEagle wrote: | | Men, a new laser good mouse is like 20$... |
Hey men, olpitcal is for aiming better THEN laz0r
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| Kurosaki wrote: | | Taffelost wrote: | F2000 (or M416) w/IRNV
A-91 (or G36C) w/IRNV
M249 (or M27IAR) w/IRNV
M98B (or MK11/SVD) w/ACOG 4x
IRNV scope is ridiculously overpowered and I hope they remove it because it makes the game less fun. Usually anything with the most ROF is better for assault.
|
Just wear the spec ops camo...and they won't be able to see you on their IRNV anymore
= win! |
Really? I mean really really? If that's true it almost makes me want to drop Skyrim for a bit and play BF3. Spec-ops camo is that DLC right?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:31 Post subject: |
|
|
Most people aren't using the IRNV anyway, there's so much better optics in the game. I only use IRNV for certain situations in the tunnel in Damavand and on Tehran Highway.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:34 Post subject: |
|
|
| pwr wrote: | | StrEagle wrote: | | Men, a new laser good mouse is like 20$... |
Hey men, olpitcal is for aiming better THEN laz0r |
your weird typing aside, i agree
optical beats laser.
(among the many reasons i kept my explorer 3.0 hehe)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:36 Post subject: |
|
|
| pfeiffchen wrote: | | what are ur favourite weapons for each class? and which scope do u use on it? |
Assault: AK74M no sights/attachments
Engineer: M4A1 + Acog 4x + heavy barrel + Grip
Support: M249 no attachments for now.
Recon: M39 EMR no sights + heavy barrel
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:38 Post subject: |
|
|
Assault: AEK/GRIP/SILENCER/IRON SIGHT
Engineer: A-91/GRIP/SILENCER/IRON SIGHT
Support: PECHENEG/GRIP/RED DOT/EXT MAG - OR - AS-VAL
Recon: NO THANKS.
Dont know what everyones bsession is with acogs and scopes get good with irons and you can get through kills much quicker.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:42 Post subject: |
|
|
| adslmaster wrote: |
Dont know what everyones bsession is with acogs and scopes get good with irons and you can get through kills much quicker. |
Nah, actually iron sights on some weapons are pretty bad.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| Sin317 wrote: | | pwr wrote: | | StrEagle wrote: | | Men, a new laser good mouse is like 20$... |
Hey men, olpitcal is for aiming better THEN laz0r |
your weird typing aside, i agree
optical beats laser.
(among the many reasons i kept my explorer 3.0 hehe) |
Sorry was trying to imitate the style of a previous poster =(
I read that optical uses a camera of sorts to track movement on the pad, whereas a laser tracks the movements of the mouse itself and converts it to movements on the screen.
Seems like optical uses a more traditional approach than laser?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65092
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:48 Post subject: |
|
|
| madness wrote: | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuRcOVmppPc
 |
lol! finally the destruction 2.0 comes handy  (btw the guy killed is your namesake  ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 14:55 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zipfero
Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 15:20 Post subject: |
|
|
| 4treyu wrote: | | adslmaster wrote: |
Dont know what everyones bsession is with acogs and scopes get good with irons and you can get through kills much quicker. |
Nah, actually iron sights on some weapons are pretty bad. |
while that may be true using 4x scopes on assault rifles is seriously gimping your overview and if you are a that kind of twat who has bipod and 4x scope on an automatic and lying prone somewhere in the corner of the map you suck anyway
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 15:25 Post subject: |
|
|
Iron sights or red dot all the way, depends on how good or bad the iron sights are.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 16:15 Post subject: |
|
|
Done all the guns exxcept the coop ones and sniper rifles to atleast 1 service star myself the bestirons are the open pin ones ie the a-91 irons are great but i would say all are very easy to use maybe the g36c irons are much but neither is that gun imo.
Its the speed and visability you get with irons that makes them greatlis it makes you feel a little better than the norm seen as atleast 8 in 10 have an assault (f2000) with an acog.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 17:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| adslmaster wrote: |
Its the speed and visability you get with irons that makes them greatlis it makes you feel a little better than the norm seen as atleast 8 in 10 have an assault (f2000) with an acog. |
Yeah that's too much. I use ACOG mostly as engineer as that's the class I use on big maps. As assault I rarely use ACOG, my favourite weapon is the AK-74M which I really love and use with no attachments at all, sometimes I use the AEK with a grip and a nade launcher (smoke). The F2000 is good close-quarters but loses a lot of power in the mid-long distances, not worth it for me generally.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 18:21 Post subject: |
|
|
| Kurosaki wrote: | | Taffelost wrote: | | Kurosaki wrote: |
Just wear the spec ops camo...and they won't be able to see you on their IRNV anymore
= win! |
Really? I mean really really? If that's true it almost makes me want to drop Skyrim for a bit and play BF3. Spec-ops camo is that DLC right? |
you get the camo at lvl 43 ...or was it 45? ... mh.... something around 40~ xD
|
Even with that camo you still light up like a mini cristmas tree.Except for the engineer.Info taken from HERE
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 18:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| dabeastxxl wrote: | | Kurosaki wrote: | | Taffelost wrote: |
Really? I mean really really? If that's true it almost makes me want to drop Skyrim for a bit and play BF3. Spec-ops camo is that DLC right? |
you get the camo at lvl 43 ...or was it 45? ... mh.... something around 40~ xD
|
Even with that camo you still light up like a mini cristmas tree.Except for the engineer.Info taken from HERE |
It's all likely a bug anyway. DICE had supposedly said prior to release that the camos have no gameplay impact like reducing damage or anything, so having it negate the IRNV scope wouldn't fit in with what they said. in addition, the way only some random parts of the body seem to be affected doesn't make any sense so it's likely unintentional.
they probably screwed up somewhere in the code and forgot to give the materials used on those specops camos the flag to light up on the IRNV.
don't get me wrong though, I totally agree that the IRNV is overpowered and should be nerfed. Many people play with it exclusively and I can't blame them.
If DICE knows what they're doing I'm sure they'll nerf it somehow. Maybe decrease the range at which you can see shit with it then it's use becomes situational and it won't be sooo much better than everything else anymore.
Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 554 of 848 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
