| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
Posted: Thu, 9th Dec 2010 23:29 Post subject: What is Faster? |
|
 |
Dual Core 2 3ghz 6mb cache or a Dual Core Quad 2.50ghz 4mb cache...which is faster?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Thu, 9th Dec 2010 23:31 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Thu, 9th Dec 2010 23:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
Which is faster in the PC...for gaming, surfing, streaming, etc...etc....etc....
Gigabyte Z590 UD AC Motherboard - Intel i5-11600k 3.90 GHZ - 32 GB DDR 4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3600MHz- GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Windforce OC 12GB (Driver 566.03) Corsair GOLD 80 Plus RM750x PSU Gigabyte QS32Q 32" flat screen Gaming Monitor
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Slizza
Posts: 2345
Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Thu, 9th Dec 2010 23:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
| zellar wrote: | | Which is faster in the PC...for gaming, surfing, streaming, etc...etc....etc.... |
You mean core 2 right? not dual core quad.
Exactly what cpu models are you looking at?
Corsair 750D :: 750W DPS-G:: Asus x370 PRO :: R7 1800X ::16gb DDR4 :: GTX 1070::525gb SSD::Coolermaster 240MM AIO::
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Thu, 9th Dec 2010 23:47 Post subject: |
|
 |
For applications that use 2 threads a Core 2 Duo @ 3GHz will be faster. For applications that use 4 threads a Core 2 Quad @ 2,5GHz will be faster.
Satisfied? This is the best answer you can get, seriously.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Thu, 9th Dec 2010 23:54 Post subject: |
|
 |
Dual Core 2 E8400 @ 3 ghz or Dual Core 2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50 ghz
Gigabyte Z590 UD AC Motherboard - Intel i5-11600k 3.90 GHZ - 32 GB DDR 4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3600MHz- GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Windforce OC 12GB (Driver 566.03) Corsair GOLD 80 Plus RM750x PSU Gigabyte QS32Q 32" flat screen Gaming Monitor
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Fri, 10th Dec 2010 00:03 Post subject: |
|
 |
It really depends on the application. In some cases the Core 2 Quad will be almost twice as fast (video encoding), in other cases the Core 2 Duo will be 20% faster (most games available ATM).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Slizza
Posts: 2345
Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Fri, 10th Dec 2010 00:09 Post subject: |
|
 |
To be honest, buy neither.
LGA775 is a platform of the past and is not worth forking out cash on upgrading right now..
Save cash until you can afford to buy a new cpu and motherboard and ram.
What is your full system spec right now?
Corsair 750D :: 750W DPS-G:: Asus x370 PRO :: R7 1800X ::16gb DDR4 :: GTX 1070::525gb SSD::Coolermaster 240MM AIO::
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Fri, 10th Dec 2010 03:02 Post subject: |
|
 |
My spec is in sig
Gigabyte Z590 UD AC Motherboard - Intel i5-11600k 3.90 GHZ - 32 GB DDR 4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3600MHz- GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Windforce OC 12GB (Driver 566.03) Corsair GOLD 80 Plus RM750x PSU Gigabyte QS32Q 32" flat screen Gaming Monitor
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65123
Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri, 10th Dec 2010 03:28 Post subject: |
|
 |
Option 3: overclock the quad-core?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Slizza
Posts: 2345
Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Fri, 10th Dec 2010 08:20 Post subject: |
|
 |
Yeh, buying the faster dual core chip from what you have is not a good way to spend your cash.
Overclocking will give you some extra power. might need to spend on some cooling to get best results.
If you are not keen on that then a new more modern platform motherboard/cpu/ram is the most viable upgrade.
Corsair 750D :: 750W DPS-G:: Asus x370 PRO :: R7 1800X ::16gb DDR4 :: GTX 1070::525gb SSD::Coolermaster 240MM AIO::
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Dec 2010 03:05 Post subject: |
|
 |
| Slizza wrote: | | zellar wrote: | | Which is faster in the PC...for gaming, surfing, streaming, etc...etc....etc.... |
You mean core 2 right? not dual core quad. |
I lol'd 
ASUS Maximus XII Formula | Core i9 10900k @ 5.2Ghz | 32GB G.Skill DDR4 4200Mhz | EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper | ASUS ROG PG35VQ
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |