[XBOX360] Firm considers class action over Xbox Live banning
Page 4 of 8 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 16:10    Post subject:
Munkeee wrote:
Mantis2K9 wrote:
Munkeee wrote:
To those who keep citing its illegal

Will you actually go to the extent of trying to validate your argument instead of consistently repeating it like a broken record . Just because you believe it doesn't make your claim any more fucking legitimate


Why dont you.


Is it because you can't per chance ?


No, I'm asking you as you seem to be making statements as facts without any proof to validate it, people dont make lawsuits because they make them up and hope they will win, I'm pretty sure they went through all the legal routes and felt they had a chance.

Now bring use some proof of your claims.
Back to top
Munkeee




Posts: 1131

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 16:12    Post subject:
Mantis2K9 wrote:
Munkeee wrote:
Mantis2K9 wrote:


Why dont you.


Is it because you can't per chance ?


No, I'm asking you as you seem to be making statements as facts without any proof to validate it, people dont make lawsuits because they make them up and hope they will win, I'm pretty sure they went through all the legal routes and felt they had a chance.

Now bring use some proof of your claims.


See the funny thing is this hasn't been filed yet has it ?

Wonder why.....


sabin1981 wrote:
but you know what Chinese whispers are like; some newbie will read your comment and suddenly run and spread it all over the internet that the new 2010 Banwave disables all your XBLA games when you're banned.

Ironic Statement #4756 from sabin
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 16:26    Post subject:
Munkeee wrote:
Mantis2K9 wrote:
Munkeee wrote:


Is it because you can't per chance ?


No, I'm asking you as you seem to be making statements as facts without any proof to validate it, people dont make lawsuits because they make them up and hope they will win, I'm pretty sure they went through all the legal routes and felt they had a chance.

Now bring use some proof of your claims.


See the funny thing is this hasn't been filed yet has it ?

Wonder why.....


If it hasn't it means they are looking for as much evidence as possible and for people who have been banned to make statements.

Thats all.
Back to top
Munkeee




Posts: 1131

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 16:33    Post subject:
Mantis2K9 wrote:

If it hasn't it means they are looking for as much evidence as possible and for people who have been banned to make statements.

Thats all.


Ohh thats all . not a law firm jumping on a recent bit of publicity ? ( surprised Jack thompson never waved his member about , oops he got disbarred :/ )

Burden of proof is on you with this one

Regale us with tales of MS lawlessness and skulduggery of all cases xbox


sabin1981 wrote:
but you know what Chinese whispers are like; some newbie will read your comment and suddenly run and spread it all over the internet that the new 2010 Banwave disables all your XBLA games when you're banned.

Ironic Statement #4756 from sabin
Back to top
ShadowX




Posts: 1273

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 17:03    Post subject:
[quote="Mantis2K9"]
RMFX wrote:
You're not capable of having a proper conversation. See my last post wherein I quoted the level of "conversation" that you are capable of having Rolling Eyes You're clearly very young, possibly you've had too much sugar this morning I don't know but you're very exciteable and incredibly imature..


No, little man your a troll, a big fat poo poo one at that.

RMFX wrote:
You're not going to get your functionality back and the only way that your going to get a new 360 is if you purchase a new one. Stop crying about it..


Not crying about it, discussing it, your the one who cant accusing people of crying about it.

RMFX wrote:
Maybe if you're a good boy Santa might even bring you one for Christmas. Maybe you're mum can help you write a letter to him later..


Oh weally, do you thunk he wills I been a good little 35 years, I'm excited I am's I am's I am's.


RMFX wrote:
Now, I'm putting you on ignore. Silly child.


LOLZ, HAHAHAHAHAHAH. Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Laughing Laughing Laughing

RMFX wrote:
. Put me on ignore child.
[/quote]


You 35 and call him a kid ?
I would give you 13 with a reaction like that.
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 17:04    Post subject:
Munkeee wrote:

Ohh thats all . not a law firm jumping on a recent bit of publicity ? ( surprised Jack thompson never waved his member about , oops he got disbarred :/ )


We will find out, I'm pretty sure these aren't the only ones.

Munkeee wrote:
Burden of proof is on you with this one


Don't confuse the discussion, the burden of proof is on you to proof that Microsoft have NOT broken any laws when it comes to the tampering with the machines so that you cannot use certian functions like arcade games paid for, backwards compatibility etc, the banning of Xbox live contract is dubious at best.

Munkeee wrote:
Regale us with tales of MS lawlessness and skulduggery of all cases xbox


I think theres been enough examples of bill gates, monopolising, thieving bastard child.
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 17:06    Post subject:
ShadowX wrote:
Mantis2K9 wrote:
RMFX wrote:
You're not capable of having a proper conversation. See my last post wherein I quoted the level of "conversation" that you are capable of having Rolling Eyes You're clearly very young, possibly you've had too much sugar this morning I don't know but you're very exciteable and incredibly imature..


No, little man your a troll, a big fat poo poo one at that.

RMFX wrote:
You're not going to get your functionality back and the only way that your going to get a new 360 is if you purchase a new one. Stop crying about it..


Not crying about it, discussing it, your the one who cant accusing people of crying about it.

RMFX wrote:
Maybe if you're a good boy Santa might even bring you one for Christmas. Maybe you're mum can help you write a letter to him later..


Oh weally, do you thunk he wills I been a good little 35 years, I'm excited I am's I am's I am's.


RMFX wrote:
Now, I'm putting you on ignore. Silly child.


LOLZ, HAHAHAHAHAHAH. Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Laughing Laughing Laughing

RMFX wrote:
. Put me on ignore child.



You 35 and call him a kid ?
I would give you 13 with a reaction like that.


Its called sarcasm, sometimes you have to lower yourself to someones else level, dont thank me all at once.
Back to top
ShadowX




Posts: 1273

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 17:06    Post subject:
Mantis2K9 , you talk like you know it all so good , why havent you sue them yet , ow right big talk no balls.
Back to top
WankStaiNuK




Posts: 820
Location: England, UK
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 17:12    Post subject:
ShadowX wrote:
Mantis2K9 wrote:
RMFX wrote:
You're not capable of having a proper conversation. See my last post wherein I quoted the level of "conversation" that you are capable of having Rolling Eyes You're clearly very young, possibly you've had too much sugar this morning I don't know but you're very exciteable and incredibly imature..


No, little man your a troll, a big fat poo poo one at that.

RMFX wrote:
You're not going to get your functionality back and the only way that your going to get a new 360 is if you purchase a new one. Stop crying about it..


Not crying about it, discussing it, your the one who cant accusing people of crying about it.

RMFX wrote:
Maybe if you're a good boy Santa might even bring you one for Christmas. Maybe you're mum can help you write a letter to him later..


Oh weally, do you thunk he wills I been a good little 35 years, I'm excited I am's I am's I am's.


RMFX wrote:
Now, I'm putting you on ignore. Silly child.


LOLZ, HAHAHAHAHAHAH. Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Laughing Laughing Laughing

RMFX wrote:
. Put me on ignore child.



You 35 and call him a kid ?
I would give you 13 with a reaction like that.


fuck me shadow, u sound like a 2 year old, just suck on ur dummie and goto sleep,


Back to top
WankStaiNuK




Posts: 820
Location: England, UK
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 17:14    Post subject:
ShadowX wrote:
Mantis2K9 , you talk like you know it all so good , why havent you sue them yet , ow right big talk no balls.


do u work for ms or something? ur very protective of them, arguing like a bitch, just do 1, and go take ur face for a shit, ur posts are annoying, ignore time me thinks


Back to top
Munkeee




Posts: 1131

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 17:14    Post subject:
Mantis2K9 wrote:


Don't confuse the discussion, the burden of proof is on you to proof that Microsoft have NOT broken any laws when it comes to the tampering with the machines so that you cannot use certian functions like arcade games paid for, backwards compatibility etc, the banning of Xbox live contract is dubious at best.
.


Arcade games still work if its the console they where bought on and now your saying them banning you from xbox live is dubious . WTF they can't ban you from live ?

They haven't broken any laws , physically your machine is the exact same. All Restrictions are imposed by the Software which you agreed they have the right to modify when you first signed into live.
fuck sake When you actually put a functioning backup in you have broken the DMCA as well in the states.


sabin1981 wrote:
but you know what Chinese whispers are like; some newbie will read your comment and suddenly run and spread it all over the internet that the new 2010 Banwave disables all your XBLA games when you're banned.

Ironic Statement #4756 from sabin
Back to top
RMFX




Posts: 2107

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 17:26    Post subject:
Guys, please stop quoting this imbecile. Every time I see one of his posts it saddens me to know that there are people as thick as he is out there. Particularly now that I know that he's 35. If that's really true and this is how he behaves then I believe he should be in care. He's clearly got the mental age of an early teen at best, and that mixed with someone who exibits such aggressive traits can be very dangerous in an adult. It's probably best not to provoke him. He might end up hurting himself, or worse...someone else.

It's not his fault. He's been failed by the system.
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 18:40    Post subject:
Munkeee wrote:
Mantis2K9 wrote:


Don't confuse the discussion, the burden of proof is on you to proof that Microsoft have NOT broken any laws when it comes to the tampering with the machines so that you cannot use certian functions like arcade games paid for, backwards compatibility etc, the banning of Xbox live contract is dubious at best.
.


Arcade games still work if its the console they where bought on and now your saying them banning you from xbox live is dubious . WTF they can't ban you from live ?

They haven't broken any laws , physically your machine is the exact same. All Restrictions are imposed by the Software which you agreed they have the right to modify when you first signed into live.
fuck sake When you actually put a functioning backup in you have broken the DMCA as well in the states.


Well, my Xbox live games I bought have reverted to being trail games Rolling Eyes backwards compatibility has gone.

To regards to the " contract " its actually an agreement not worth the virtual paper its written on and the law firm knows this.
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 18:41    Post subject:
RMFX wrote:
Guys, please stop quoting this imbecile. Every time I see one of his posts it saddens me to know that there are people as thick as he is out there. Particularly now that I know that he's 35. If that's really true and this is how he behaves then I believe he should be in care. He's clearly got the mental age of an early teen at best, and that mixed with someone who exibits such aggressive traits can be very dangerous in an adult. It's probably best not to provoke him. He might end up hurting himself, or worse...someone else.

It's not his fault. He's been failed by the system.


Laughing
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 18:42    Post subject:
WankStaiNuK wrote:
ShadowX wrote:
Mantis2K9 , you talk like you know it all so good , why havent you sue them yet , ow right big talk no balls.


do u work for ms or something? ur very protective of them, arguing like a bitch, just do 1, and go take ur face for a shit, ur posts are annoying, ignore time me thinks


Hes a French kid who is a " fan boy " probably fights in the playground with PS3 " Fan boys ".
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 18:43    Post subject:
ShadowX wrote:
Mantis2K9 , you talk like you know it all so good , why havent you sue them yet , ow right big talk no balls.


Yeah, when my money tree gets big enough i'll sue the shit outta them Rolling Eyes
Back to top
mtj




Posts: 2315
Location: Austria / Finland
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 18:54    Post subject:
It's funny how personal people go in this thread.

I'm not on M$ side, but I also think that as they have the power to ban you and the EULA gives them the 'right' as long as no-one goes to court to say that their EULA (in addition that it's not law) actually gives them a right to break law (if they actually modify the box by sending a signal which causes the box to burn a NAND-gate or something). AND wins the court, there ain't really anything people can do and Microsoft hasn't done anything wrong in the eyes of current laws.

Like history, laws are in the hands of the winners (of the court cases). Razz

This thread should be more civil, less about personal attacks, more about... Microsoft and the lawsuit.


Intel Core I-9 9900K @ stock, ASUS Z 390A MoBo, 32GB 3.6GHz, Zotac 3090 | BeQuiet 1000W PSU, Be Quiet Dark Base Pro 900 case, 49" Samsung G9
Back to top
dirtymurt




Posts: 1030

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 18:59    Post subject:
ms has crossed the line this time. the fact that a lawfirm is even considering taking on the might of the giant is testament to that fact.

if those goes through in europe, most likely, ms if fucked and we'll see a u turn. however ms will fight it for years and the next console will be out.

it's time games companies got real and started to charge a reasonable amount for thei games £5 to £10 and sell them online, no mechanical sales needed, therefore no stock to dump if something doesn't sell, and I and many other so called 'pirates' would buy a lot more games. the business model is fucked, same with cd's. Games don't cost any more to make than a movie, yet we don't and won't pay £40 to see/own one.


No advertising.
Back to top
Munkeee




Posts: 1131

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 19:01    Post subject:
Mantis2K9 wrote:
Munkeee wrote:
Mantis2K9 wrote:


Don't confuse the discussion, the burden of proof is on you to proof that Microsoft have NOT broken any laws when it comes to the tampering with the machines so that you cannot use certian functions like arcade games paid for, backwards compatibility etc, the banning of Xbox live contract is dubious at best.
.


Arcade games still work if its the console they where bought on and now your saying them banning you from xbox live is dubious . WTF they can't ban you from live ?

They haven't broken any laws , physically your machine is the exact same. All Restrictions are imposed by the Software which you agreed they have the right to modify when you first signed into live.
fuck sake When you actually put a functioning backup in you have broken the DMCA as well in the states.


Well, my Xbox live games I bought have reverted to being trail games Rolling Eyes backwards compatibility has gone.

To regards to the " contract " its actually an agreement not worth the virtual paper its written on and the law firm knows this.


Again your argument goes back too omg they revoked my rights which they can't do. Back your fucking argument up, Without posting 4 times in a fucking row you complete cunt

The arcade games don't go back to trial if you bought it on that console. I've spoken to 2 banned people who's games haven't reverted to trials and seen countless reports on x-s of peoples dlc / xbla's games still working...

dirtymurt wrote:
ms has crossed the line this time. the fact that a lawfirm is even considering taking on the might of the giant is testament to that fact.
.


They have had lawsuits over the scratching of cd's and red rings , even the downtime of live at christmas 2 years ago. doesn't really say anything

Lutzifer: No need for name-calling. People usually get an argument without being called a cunt or that their arguments need to be fucking. Temp-ban.


sabin1981 wrote:
but you know what Chinese whispers are like; some newbie will read your comment and suddenly run and spread it all over the internet that the new 2010 Banwave disables all your XBLA games when you're banned.

Ironic Statement #4756 from sabin


Last edited by Munkeee on Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 19:02; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 19:02    Post subject:
mtj wrote:
It's funny how personal people go in this thread.

I'm not on M$ side, but I also think that as they have the power to ban you and the EULA gives them the 'right' as long as no-one goes to court to say that their EULA (in addition that it's not law) actually gives them a right to break law (if they actually modify the box by sending a signal which causes the box to burn a NAND-gate or something). AND wins the court, there ain't really anything people can do and Microsoft hasn't done anything wrong in the eyes of current laws.

Like history, laws are in the hands of the winners (of the court cases). Razz

This thread should be more civil, less about personal attacks, more about... Microsoft and the lawsuit.


I agree with you, Microsoft has/had the right to ban people from using Xbox live 100% but not to disable stuff you paid for.

I'm not getting personal, I'm just fucking about, theres a few idiots on here being assholes and I'm treating them that way.
Back to top
mtj




Posts: 2315
Location: Austria / Finland
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 19:06    Post subject:
Just a side note: Steam also does this. There was the thread here just a while ago where someone got banned from steam (luckily for him he got the account back) thus leading him to lose all the games he had legally bought from Steam.

It's totally wrong, but unless enough people gather up (or some f-ing rich bastard stands up) nothing will change. So actually, maybe there is now enough people gathering up for this case to get something done.


Intel Core I-9 9900K @ stock, ASUS Z 390A MoBo, 32GB 3.6GHz, Zotac 3090 | BeQuiet 1000W PSU, Be Quiet Dark Base Pro 900 case, 49" Samsung G9
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 19:09    Post subject:
Munkeee wrote:


Again your argument goes back too omg they revoked my rights which they can't do. Back your fucking argument up, Without posting 4 times in a fucking row you complete cunt


Your making the claims, you back it up, oh and for the last part. Laughing does mommy and Daddy know your being rude to adults.

Munkeee wrote:
The arcade games don't go back to trial if you bought it on that console. I've spoken to 2 banned people who's games haven't reverted to trials and seen countless reports on x-s of peoples dlc / xbla's games still working...


For the last time, my Xbox live arcade games HAVE reverted back to being trail games AND my backwards compatibility is not working.

Munkeee wrote:
dirtymurt wrote:
ms has crossed the line this time. the fact that a lawfirm is even considering taking on the might of the giant is testament to that fact.
.


They have had lawsuits over the scratching of cd's and red rings , even the downtime of live at christmas 2 years ago. doesn't really say anything


They dont compare to this do they.
Back to top
Munkeee




Posts: 1131

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 19:17    Post subject:
Mantis2K9 wrote:
Munkeee wrote:


Again your argument goes back too omg they revoked my rights which they can't do. Back your fucking argument up, Without posting 4 times in a fucking row you complete cunt


Your making the claims, you back it up, oh and for the last part. Laughing does mommy and Daddy know your being rude to adults.


You can't argue your point because as you have the mental capacity of a 6 year old down syndrome

your use of smilies and attitude sums you and that other cock jockey up , Fuck all substance

Mantis2K9 wrote:

Munkeee wrote:
dirtymurt wrote:
ms has crossed the line this time. the fact that a lawfirm is even considering taking on the might of the giant is testament to that fact.
.


They have had lawsuits over the scratching of cd's and red rings , even the downtime of live at christmas 2 years ago. doesn't really say anything


They dont compare to this do they.


Again you miss the point completely , Why bother if you can't comprehend exactly what I'm saying ?


sabin1981 wrote:
but you know what Chinese whispers are like; some newbie will read your comment and suddenly run and spread it all over the internet that the new 2010 Banwave disables all your XBLA games when you're banned.

Ironic Statement #4756 from sabin
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 19:22    Post subject:
Munkeee wrote:

You can't argue your point because as you have the mental capacity of a 6 year down syndrome

your use of smilies and attitude sums you and that other cock jockey sabin up , no substance and just opinion


Well that's gone and told me, dammit he didnt back up his claims but yet he blew me out of the water by asking for me to back up my claims, when I didnt claim jack diddly apart from the fact that I felt that what Mircoshit had done was out of order and maybe illegal in terms of disabling the BC and live games.

My attitude, I'll tell ya if your mum and dad knew what you were saying you would have no Internet for a month and your be grounded to.
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 19:23    Post subject:
Munkeee wrote:

Again you miss the point completely , Why bother if you can't comprehend exactly what I'm saying ?


Probably because your talking utter ass.
Back to top
Munkeee




Posts: 1131

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 19:34    Post subject:
Mantis2K9 wrote:
Munkeee wrote:

You can't argue your point because as you have the mental capacity of a 6 year down syndrome

your use of smilies and attitude sums you and that other cock jockey sabin up , no substance and just opinion


Well that's gone and told me, dammit he didnt back up his claims but yet he blew me out of the water by asking for me to back up my claims, when I didnt claim jack diddly apart from the fact that I felt that what Mircoshit had done was out of order and maybe illegal
.


I did back my claims up to some extent , you just seem to be an illiterate cunt who can't read , perfect example below

Mantis2K9 wrote:
Munkeee wrote:

Again you miss the point completely , Why bother if you can't comprehend exactly what I'm saying ?


Probably because your talking utter ass.


You can't notice the simple contradiction I posted ? he said it must be serious for someone to file a suit against ms and I point the first 3 that sprung to mind out when it came to the 360 , 1 of which was ridiculous .
( by no means a dig at dirtymurt , he's actually contributing useful information to the thread, I agree that dd's should and probably will be the main line of distribution in the future )

I'm also completely dumbfounded by this opinion that everyone you argue with is a child , yet you consistently show child like tendencies with your arguments and claim it's sarcasm


sabin1981 wrote:
but you know what Chinese whispers are like; some newbie will read your comment and suddenly run and spread it all over the internet that the new 2010 Banwave disables all your XBLA games when you're banned.

Ironic Statement #4756 from sabin
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 20:22    Post subject:
Munkeee wrote:

I did back my claims up to some extent , you just seem to be an illiterate cunt who can't read , perfect example below


No, you didnt.


Munkeee wrote:
You can't notice the simple contradiction I posted ? he said it must be serious for someone to file a suit against ms and I point the first 3 that sprung to mind out when it came to the 360 , 1 of which was ridiculous .
( by no means a dig at dirtymurt , he's actually contributing useful information to the thread, I agree that dd's should and probably will be the main line of distribution in the future )


Quite honestly I couldn't care less if it succeeds or not, I wasnt even arguing the point apart from that this case isnt as petty as the three you stated, and I felt what Microsoft have done was overstepping the mark and that there could be a case for illegal activity.

Munkeee wrote:
I'm also completely dumbfounded by this opinion that everyone you argue with is a child , yet you consistently show child like tendencies with your arguments and claim it's sarcasm


You are tho.

And yes its Sarcasm, you honestly dont expect me to take you seriously do you.
Back to top
ILLStid




Posts: 5

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 20:38    Post subject:
Oh man just look at all those people crying: Microsoft is the big bad boogy man and he can't ban or disable my Xbox because that is not fair waaah!!!!

Seriously you people need to get a grip.
You want to modify your xbox? Great go ahead.
You want to cry about being banned/lose gamerscore/hd-installs? Cry a river and then be a man and suck it up.

This whole "It's mah propertah!!! So I cun do whut I wan!!!" is not cutting it. Yes the box is your property. You can modify it. Guess what? The software on the box is Microsoft's property and if you can't use your console responsible they can change the features all they want. You own the box right and a box is all you will ever own if you keep up with that cry-baby attitude.
Back to top
WHEATTHlNS




Posts: 1137

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 20:47    Post subject:
Quote:
To those who keep citing its illegal


I've only seen one person explicitly say its "illegal". I do not understand how anyone can see the act as anything but aggressive and potentially liable for (in court at least). No, purchasing another console should not be an option. As has been stated - countless time - banning from live is a risk anyone takes when modding their consoles for ANY reason (and as someone pointed out there is more to modding than playing pirated games); the loss of functionality for a purchased piece of hardware. . .thats something else entirely.

What this is effectively saying, is that MS (and really any corporation) has the ability to hobble the software on your piece of hardware - sure you still own the hardware, but you still "lease" the software from MS and they are saying "It's time to pay the piper". That, is a pretty amazing position to take, and I am surprised anyone here - who so vociferously howls at the thought of DRM - is totally and completely fine with this.


"Get the hell out of me" - [ex]girlfriend[s]
Back to top
ShadowX




Posts: 1273

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Nov 2009 21:04    Post subject:
WankStaiNuK wrote:
ShadowX wrote:
Mantis2K9 , you talk like you know it all so good , why havent you sue them yet , ow right big talk no balls.


do u work for ms or something? ur very protective of them, arguing like a bitch, just do 1, and go take ur face for a shit, ur posts are annoying, ignore time me thinks



Maybe
Back to top
Page 4 of 8 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Console Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group