| Page 5 of 28 |
|
|
 Posted: Tue, 28th Jul 2009 00:27 Post subject: |
|
 |
Fahrenheit was awesome, there is no personal preference, u just have to be a dumb ass not to like/enjoy it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jul 2009 00:31 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mortibus wrote: | | Fahrenheit was awesome |
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jul 2009 00:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| garus wrote: | Fahrenheit was easy-peasy, try QTE in Mercenaries 2 on PC  |
I played it via gamepad and it was easy, Fahrenheit on the other hand was insane, I played that one with a keyboard, BIG mistake, you need a gamepad for that crap.
I always thought it was a cheap trick, Fahrenheit is such a great adventure game and it's half ruined by quick button time events or whatever they call it. The other half was ruined with that stupid ending |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lhzr
Posts: 3902
Location: RO
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jul 2009 00:55 Post subject: |
|
|
played it with the keyboard, had zero problems with the qtes. and yes, they dropped the ball with the story, but what people usually seem to forget is that all that aliens/robots/mayans/??? stuff was only tacked in towards the end. the rest was mucho excellente
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34995
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue, 25th Aug 2009 04:52 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34995
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 25th Aug 2009 05:49 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 25th Aug 2009 05:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Yes! If it doesn't have 96xAA and umpteen jilliion shader doohickies then it's crap graphics and that means it sux!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65086
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Tue, 25th Aug 2009 17:03 Post subject: |
|
|
Graphically wise is a decent game. Its problems are others ones.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Aug 2009 14:13 Post subject: |
|
|
Sabin came back with a cpu upgrade? 
dual core just fine thankyou, testiment to the fact my quad is still in its box gathering dust.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Aug 2009 14:13 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Aug 2009 14:19 Post subject: |
|
|
By "fine" I mean High texture settings, with 20 or so view distance, 45 detail distance, 45 vehicle density, no dynamic shadows.
Benchmark says 38 fps average, but it's bullshit.
I have around 32 average, measured with fraps. Lowest point- 18, highest point - 52.
Now sure, I'd rather have 40 or so FPS all the time, but it runs "fine". That, plus my GPU is old as hell (good ol GF 8800 GTS 640 mb), and though GTA IV is highly CPU dependant, it requires a lot of juice from GPU too.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeon
Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Aug 2009 14:21 Post subject: |
|
|
Is there a benchmark?
Intel i7 6700K, RTX470 Super, Kingston HyperX Fury 32GB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Aug 2009 14:22 Post subject: |
|
|
ahhh, ok good point. I get about the same (E7200 + 4870). It's still a mess though, you have to admit that. 30's average on high-end (quad-less) PCs is a joke, it really is. I have pretty much the same settings as you (though I keep dynamic shadows on, it's an ugly mess without them  )
| aeonfast wrote: | | Is there a benchmark? |
There's one built-in, but ignore it. Fixed setting, night-time, no pedestrians, no other cars, just you and three NPC/AI scooters driving through one street, shooting each other.
You'll get considerably higher framerate in the benchmark than you ever will in a true gameplay scenario.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeon
Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu, 27th Aug 2009 21:34 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, me too. Any releasedate of the Sith Edition?
Intel i7 6700K, RTX470 Super, Kingston HyperX Fury 32GB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 27th Aug 2009 21:36 Post subject: |
|
|
All I can find is "Christmas 2009"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 27th Aug 2009 21:38 Post subject: |
|
|
Most sources say Holiday season.
So i am guessing November-December range.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vurt
Posts: 13847
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
suprman
Posts: 651
Location: On Your mum!
|
| Posted: Thu, 27th Aug 2009 23:51 Post subject: |
|
|
AMD quads overclock beautifully, i noticed that when my mate bought an AM2 940 quad black edition
his top frame rate didnt go up and he was still running at an average of 30 FPS in GTA4 the only thing it seemed to do was stop the stuttering in areas where you get a little frame drop compared to my dual core setup, apart from that we had similar systems at the time and it didnt make a whole lot of difference. It helped me make my mind up on weather to buy a quad or hold off for a while, especially as I could achieve the same results simply by optimising my OS and switching off all the un-needed background tasks to have the game running on a lean system.
And if TFU turns out to be a CPU hog thats probably when I will upgrade my shit.
Disclaimer: Grammatical and spelling mistakes are purposely left in my posts to weed out anally retentive trolls.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Aug 2009 09:10 Post subject: |
|
|
| Cerian wrote: | | Ahh.. been waiting for a new Star Wars game with the same "style" as the Jedi Knight series.. really looking forward to this one.. :) |
this abomination is not worthy of beeing mentioned in the same sentence as jedi knight.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Aug 2009 12:06 Post subject: |
|
|
I was really looking forward to it and played it on the 360 and it was a huge disappointment.
It's cool in the beginning where you fight normal stormtroopers and stuff, but the further you get in the game the weaker you become, enemies get stronger and your force abilities are pretty much useless against most of them, so it simply stops beeing fun. it's just a chore.
even your lightsaber sucks for many enemies and you just end up spamming force lightning until everything drops dead.
maybe they fixed some of that in the pc version, who knows...
but if they didn't, there is not much to look forward to here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Aug 2009 12:12 Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Academy had the best lightsaber fights, this game is worth it if you are a SW fan, looking forward to the vsync tearing was awful probably because the graphics are great and the xbox can't handle it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vaifan1986
Posts: 4640
Location: Birthplace of the necktie.
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Sep 2009 13:43 Post subject: |
|
|
I so fucking hate this game.
FUCKING GREEN ORBS COME OUT OF DEAD ENEMIES!!!
And since when does a fucking stormtrooper or rebel need three hits with a motherfucking lightsaber to die? And no visible lightsaber damage, no dismemberment?
Fuck you Lucas Arts.
Micek:
i7 4790K @ 4.6GHz- Gigabyte Z97X-Gaming 3 - 980 WF3 \o/ - 16GB Corsair - WD 4TB - Mountain of SSDs - Dell UltraSharp U2414H 24''
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 5 of 28 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
