It was well worth all the visual Oscars it got, as it was a beauty to watch. It's a good movie just to sit down and watch on a dull day. Simple plot, good enough acting. Never the best movie of the year, but a decent one.
Immortals - 6/10 - weak script, bad acting at times (especially from the lead, casting fuckup imo) and the movie drags at some points. Visuals however were good, gods were depicted nicely (though a bit too dramatic) and the last 30 minutes were very good. If the whole movie would've been as good as the last 30 minutes, it would've been worth an 8.
Immortals - 6/10 - weak script, bad acting at times (especially from the lead, casting fuckup imo) and the movie drags at some points. Visuals however were good, gods were depicted nicely (though a bit too dramatic) and the last 30 minutes were very good. If the whole movie would've been as good as the last 30 minutes, it would've been worth an 8.
The only actor I enjoyed in the whole thing was Mickey Rourke. Everyone else was below par . IMHO of course.
stupid shit children's film. I've not got a problem with kids films, loved Up etc, but the child actor was shit, there's minimal story, too many boring arty scenes, lots of shit obviously just there for the 3d - just generally disappointing and shit.
stupid shit children's film. I've not got a problem with kids films, loved Up etc, but the child actor was shit, there's minimal story, too many boring arty scenes, lots of shit obviously just there for the 3d - just generally disappointing and shit.
stupid shit children's film. I've not got a problem with kids films, loved Up etc, but the child actor was shit, there's minimal story, too many boring arty scenes, lots of shit obviously just there for the 3d - just generally disappointing and shit.
Children's film? Not sure what the fuck you talking about. For me, it was one of the most beautiful films of the last few years. Sure, children might like it because its colorful nature, but they wouldn't be able to understand any of it. (Seems like neither did you.)
It is a beautiful homage and thank-you to film creators and film lovers, just like The Artist. 10/10 from me.
stupid shit children's film. I've not got a problem with kids films, loved Up etc, but the child actor was shit, there's minimal story, too many boring arty scenes, lots of shit obviously just there for the 3d - just generally disappointing and shit.
Children's film? Not sure what the fuck you talking about. For me, it was one of the most beautiful films of the last few years. Sure, children might like it because its colorful nature, but they wouldn't be able to understand any of it. It is a beautiful homage and thank-you to film creators and film lovers, just like The Artist. 10/10 from me.
Let's agree to disagree. IMO its a kids film, and a boring one at that. I appreciate the homage to film, among other things, but I just didn't find the film/story entertaining..
What was exactly "kid's film"? Give me some points where the story was geared toward children, like say Muppets or Smurfs.
(Psst, Up is not a children's film either, and most of Pixar's films - there are complexities in these films that children just can't comprehend. That is the mastery of Pixar, they can create lovely films that the entire family would love - the children get the animation and colorful nature, while the grown-ups get a beautiful story.)
Hah it was wierd watching them again after all these years..I remembered them all and it was fun.
I never watched but have been told by others that also never saw the muppets thats it's still pretty entertaining... Should I bother?
Well you didn't like Hugo..you have puppets here so Im not sure..
Hugo is an arthouse film in a colorful shell. Perhaps this is why some might not like it. That is why it wasn't successful in the box office, because it was portrayed incorrectly in the trailers. It is also somewhat different than the book as well.
entertaining. had a smile on my face all the way through this feel good movie. nice songs, comedy. Jason Segel good. Amy Adams delightful as always.
but BUT it felt too rushed. like lets show this scene, now this and now this..without any buildup. so yeah.. some extra 15-20 minutes would have been great.
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> โช Viva La Vida โช <<<<<< <<<<< <<<<<< <<<
stupid shit children's film. I've not got a problem with kids films, loved Up etc, but the child actor was shit, there's minimal story, too many boring arty scenes, lots of shit obviously just there for the 3d - just generally disappointing and shit.
Children's film? Not sure what the fuck you talking about. For me, it was one of the most beautiful films of the last few years. Sure, children might like it because its colorful nature, but they wouldn't be able to understand any of it. It is a beautiful homage and thank-you to film creators and film lovers, just like The Artist. 10/10 from me.
Let's agree to disagree. IMO its a kids film, and a boring one at that. I appreciate the homage to film, among other things, but I just didn't find the film/story entertaining..
I thought it had w very weak plot, weak dialogues, annoying acting by everybody (esp. the two children overemphasizing everything). And the hommage fell out out of place, because all the rest was so weak. Sometimes visually very nice on the upside. But that's my only plus.
I would call it a family film : 12 years and up More aimed to children I suppose, to teach them the art of cinema making in the old days.
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum