| Page 3 of 4 |
|
|
 Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 14:31 Post subject: |
|
 |
| Hierofan wrote: |
and about 80 kilos .. used to weigh 56-60 in the good old days  |
Wait what? Tell me that in the 'good old days' you were smaller... Because even @ 180cm 80kg seems skinny...
I would say form 85 to 95 is ok at that height...
"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson | chiv wrote: | | thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
_SiN_
Megatron
Posts: 12108
Location: Cybertron
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 14:34 Post subject: |
|
|
80kg is 12st (or 176lbs)... and that's not skinny for someone who's 6ft, that's about average really :\ 56-60 is skinny, which is what I used to be >_< I've put on a lot of weight lately, luckily it spreads nice and even all over. Now I'm 6' and weigh around 82kg.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
helvete
Posts: 2727
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 15:09 Post subject: |
|
|
why not do the whole BMI thing while we're at it?
REPOST
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 15:16 Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon25 wrote: | | _SiN_ wrote: | wat? 
i'm 180 cm and 65 kg.. not saying im not skinny, 'cause i am |
fuuu-
I'm 176cm and I'm 78 kilos.. |
I'm close to you, I'm 175cm and around 75-78kg 
But 180cm, and 65kg... you guys need to eat more 
@sabin: Here they say you get some 15kg when you get married (it comes with your wife )
"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson | chiv wrote: | | thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wawrzul
Posts: 2336
Location: Cracow, Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
helvete
Posts: 2727
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 15:25 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 15:28 Post subject: |
|
|
| helvete wrote: | http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fil:Body_mass_index_chart.svg
many of you are overwheight, not many are underweight. |
I've always had a pretty decent BMI. My last checkup revealed a BMI of 22.5, which is pretty much in the middle of "ideal weight"
^_^
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TSR69
Banned
Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 15:36 Post subject: |
|
|
i read somewhere that the weight of the skeleton of 2 similar build persons can differ up to 10 kg
meaning that guidebook rules about skinny or overweight are nuts
best way to check if you are to fat:
grab your skin in the waist: pick an inch and you're too fat
Formerly known as iconized
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 15:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| iconized wrote: |
best way to check if you are to fat:
grab your skin in the waist: pick an inch and you're too fat |
What complete and utter fucking nonsense.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 15:51 Post subject: |
|
|
| iconized wrote: | i read somewhere that the weight of the skeleton of 2 similar build persons can differ up to 10 kg
meaning that guidebook rules about skinny or overweight are nuts
best way to check if you are to fat:
grab your skin in the waist: pick an inch and you're too fat |
Who told you that? That's hilarious...
"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson | chiv wrote: | | thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
_SiN_
Megatron
Posts: 12108
Location: Cybertron
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 16:56 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
_SiN_
Megatron
Posts: 12108
Location: Cybertron
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 17:01 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
helvete
Posts: 2727
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 17:04 Post subject: |
|
|
just look at those flabby arms!
REPOST
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 17:09 Post subject: |
|
|
lol bmi really means shit. When I was 86 kilos it looked alright, no belly and so on. I just needed a little bit more training to shape my body up.
My legs are very strong and muscular and I'm sure that a big portion of my weight is coming from there 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
helvete
Posts: 2727
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 17:22 Post subject: |
|
|
yeah BMI is a general guideline at best.. but remember it's body mass index, not body fat.
REPOST
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zipfero
Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 17:31 Post subject: |
|
|
BMI is borderline useless when comparing single individuals that represent an extreme. This should be obvious to anyone with a brain. However it is the only adequate, and adequate it is at least, tool for measuring health in relation to weight on a broader demographic.
8 out of 10 dentists prefer zipfero to competing brands(fraich3 and Mutantius)!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
helvete
Posts: 2727
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 17:33 Post subject: |
|
|
| zipfero wrote: | | BMI is borderline useless when comparing single individuals that represent an extreme. This should be obvious to anyone with a brain. However it is the only adequate, and adequate it is at least, tool for measuring health in relation to weight on a broader demographic. |
excellent point.
REPOST
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 17:49 Post subject: |
|
|
| zipfero wrote: | | BMI is borderline useless when comparing single individuals that represent an extreme. This should be obvious to anyone with a brain. However it is the only adequate, and adequate it is at least, tool for measuring health in relation to weight on a broader demographic. |
true dat. my posts were aimed at those above talking about being over/underweight based on height and weight alone.
the whole weight talk is useless anyway - a good look in the mirror is all it takes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
helvete
Posts: 2727
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 17:55 Post subject: |
|
|
hmm I feel like you're talking to(about) me here bushwacka so I'll let you know that I was far from 100% serious when I linked the bmi chart and said most of you are overweight. My own damn fault since text is hardly the best medium to convey dry humour or sarcasm..
REPOST
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 18:49 Post subject: |
|
|
well I'm getting to be a fat fuck, 195lbs/88kg/BMI=28 ... but really I guess I only need to lose 20-25 lbs...
asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hierofan
Banned
Posts: 3807
Location: Internets
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Nov 2009 20:07 Post subject: |
|
|
| dingo_d wrote: | | Hierofan wrote: |
and about 80 kilos .. used to weigh 56-60 in the good old days |
Wait what? Tell me that in the 'good old days' you were smaller... Because even @ 180cm 80kg seems skinny...
I would say form 85 to 95 is ok at that height... |
well , i was pretty fat ,88 kilos and lost in 3-4 months 30 kilos , i felt way better , from 2006 on i started to put that weight back .
i don't consider it skinny , my twin is 2 cm shorter and way more fitter than i'll ever be , gym-running-steady diet and shit and he has 65-67kg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65134
Location: Italy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wawrzul
Posts: 2336
Location: Cracow, Poland
|
| Posted: Thu, 19th Nov 2009 16:22 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 3 of 4 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
)
