Schrader's Exorcist (Prequel) Gets May Release
Page 1 of 1
lobsterboy




Posts: 609

PostPosted: Fri, 15th Apr 2005 12:48    Post subject: Schrader's Exorcist (Prequel) Gets May Release
"Nearly three years after Paul Schrader began production on his prequel to The Exorcist, Morgan Creek Productions has decided to give the film a May 20th theatrical bow, one day after Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith is released.

Variety says Warner Bros. Pictures will handle the movie's distribution, under its former arrangement with the production company. Schrader's movie began production in November 2002 and Morgan Creek left the Warners lot for Universal Pictures in late 2003.

Morgan Creek's Jim Robinson pulled the plug on Schrader's nearly finished film in September 2003 over creative differences. The producer spent another $35 million to have Renny Harlin take another stab at it, with Stellan Skarsgård once again starring as troubled Father Merrin. Harlin's film earned $76.9 million worldwide."

link: http://www.comingsoon.net/news.php?id=9170

lets give it a try, i wanna see those new "old" version........must be pretty bad.....or a lot better.
Back to top
kurisu




Posts: 156
Location: EU
PostPosted: Mon, 18th Apr 2005 12:56    Post subject:
this is about exorcist the beginning?
- its been released for ages
- it sucks
- cool dinosaur jr avatar, i have that record on vinyl somewhere Wink


don't i need some magical illegal thing?
Back to top
Saner




Posts: 6877
Location: Uk
PostPosted: Mon, 18th Apr 2005 14:01    Post subject:
kurisu wrote:
this is about exorcist the beginning?
- its been released for ages
- it sucks
- cool dinosaur jr avatar, i have that record on vinyl somewhere Wink


Schrader's Exorcist (Prequel)


ragnarus wrote:

I saw things like that in here and in other "woman problems" topics so...... Am I the only one that thinks some authorities needs to be alerted about Saner and him possibly being a rapist and/or kidnapper ?Smile

Saner is not being serious. Unless its the subject of Santa!
Back to top
Benoyd




Posts: 468

PostPosted: Mon, 18th Apr 2005 16:23    Post subject:
is this a prequel to a prequel? Razz
Back to top
kurisu




Posts: 156
Location: EU
PostPosted: Mon, 18th Apr 2005 16:25    Post subject:
ah fuck me, so they salvaged schrader's work from the harlin disaster to make another disaster. i stand corrected, couldn't have imagined them brining the same crap out twice.


don't i need some magical illegal thing?
Back to top
hahe




Posts: 1685
Location: US
PostPosted: Mon, 18th Apr 2005 22:18    Post subject:
From what I heard the Schrader version is much better than the Harlin version so don't be so ignorant.
Back to top
kurisu




Posts: 156
Location: EU
PostPosted: Tue, 19th Apr 2005 08:34    Post subject:
from what i've heard they both suck donkey cock so don't be so arrogant. what does a guy with a stinking matrix avatar know about what makes a good movie anyways.


don't i need some magical illegal thing?
Back to top
Injurious




Posts: 4646
Location: Toronto
PostPosted: Tue, 19th Apr 2005 13:46    Post subject:
kurisu wrote:
from what i've heard they both suck donkey cock.

Don't all horror movies suck donkey cock these days?

kurisu wrote:
what does a guy with a stinking matrix avatar know about what makes a good movie anyways.


oh how professional Rolling Eyes Can't have something useful to say so you insult someone’s integrity. Couldn't leave it at the donkey suck cock joke. Well, I hope it made you fell good about yourself. Rolling Eyes

Harlin's version is a pg rated horror movie
Schrader's is an r rated scream fest
It takes the story of the exorcist seriously unlike Harlin’s version
It truly depicts spiritual evil
It terrifies the audience
and
and
and
and
It's not a movie that sucks donkey cock!

I wonder where you heard that the movie sucked donkey cock.
I mean for a movie that isn’t out yet
That doesn’t even have a propper title yet
That can’t be viewed by anyone else than the studio crew and few selected members of the press

I mean I guess you must have friends in Hollywood then Rolling Eyes
Back to top
kurisu




Posts: 156
Location: EU
PostPosted: Tue, 19th Apr 2005 16:45    Post subject:
hi

glad you like my posts.

also you are full of shit, since the movie has already had some screenings, most notably in march in the brussels festival of fantasy films. ppl that saw it there say it was awful. there's a nifty little site called imdb that you might wanna check before acting like you know it all.

hope this helps you in your future forum trolling career!


don't i need some magical illegal thing?
Back to top
Mutantius
VIP Member



Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
PostPosted: Tue, 19th Apr 2005 17:15    Post subject:
kurisu wrote:
from what i've heard they both suck donkey cock so don't be so arrogant. what does a guy with a stinking matrix avatar know about what makes a good movie anyways.


lol u are indeed a fool... Hahe ain't stupid when we are talking about Movies and specially in taste.
and from your comment you may sound like a guy who would enjoy the great film: "You Got Served"


Starring:

Omarion Grandberry.... as David!
and
Marques Houston.... as Elgin!


"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
Back to top
Injurious




Posts: 4646
Location: Toronto
PostPosted: Tue, 19th Apr 2005 17:35    Post subject:
kurisu wrote:
hi

glad you like my posts.

also you are full of shit, since the movie has already had some screenings, most notably in march in the brussels festival of fantasy films. ppl that saw it there say it was awful. there's a nifty little site called imdb that you might wanna check before acting like you know it all.

hope this helps you in your future forum trolling career!


Kids on imdb know shit about movies
You look at imdb for info on the movie not to read the discussions

the ones who said they saw the movie and said it sucked didn't watch the movie

those who did watch it said it was awful and gave precise details why

Others who liked the movie said positive things about it

The one thing you should note is this “The movie succeeds where Harlin’s version fails”

So... call me a fool all you want but look where you're getting your sources.

I can easily go on imdb and paste you some positive shit about the worst movie ever. Does it mean the movie is good cause some people liked it?
Back to top
lobsterboy




Posts: 609

PostPosted: Tue, 19th Apr 2005 20:55    Post subject:
kurisu wrote:
hi

glad you like my posts.

also you are full of shit, since the movie has already had some screenings, most notably in march in the brussels festival of fantasy films. ppl that saw it there say it was awful. there's a nifty little site called imdb that you might wanna check before acting like you know it all.

hope this helps you in your future forum trolling career!


omg kurisu !

Music,Games,Movies,ect....... I (we) dont care about other peoples taste ! Especially not the IMDB tards.
Back to top
hahe




Posts: 1685
Location: US
PostPosted: Tue, 19th Apr 2005 21:47    Post subject:
LOL. I've had this avatar for a long time now. Second time I've been insulted about it and both times were within a month. BRING IT ON!!!
Back to top
Injurious




Posts: 4646
Location: Toronto
PostPosted: Tue, 19th Apr 2005 21:47    Post subject:
Neo sucks Razz
Back to top
Mutantius
VIP Member



Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
PostPosted: Tue, 19th Apr 2005 22:07    Post subject:
Injurious wrote:
Neo sucks Razz


nah only Keanu Reeves Razz


"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
Back to top
hahe




Posts: 1685
Location: US
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Apr 2005 00:46    Post subject:
Oh and let me guess. You just saw this post at imdb http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0449086/board/thread/16934963 and assumed it sucked.
Back to top
Mutantius
VIP Member



Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Apr 2005 06:27    Post subject:
Laughing simply luv Imdb's boards Very Happy


"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
Back to top
kurisu




Posts: 156
Location: EU
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Apr 2005 11:06    Post subject:
Injurious wrote:
kurisu wrote:
hi

glad you like my posts.

also you are full of shit, since the movie has already had some screenings, most notably in march in the brussels festival of fantasy films. ppl that saw it there say it was awful. there's a nifty little site called imdb that you might wanna check before acting like you know it all.

hope this helps you in your future forum trolling career!


Kids on imdb know shit about movies
You look at imdb for info on the movie not to read the discussions

the ones who said they saw the movie and said it sucked didn't watch the movie

those who did watch it said it was awful and gave precise details why

Others who liked the movie said positive things about it

The one thing you should note is this “The movie succeeds where Harlin’s version fails”

So... call me a fool all you want but look where you're getting your sources.

I can easily go on imdb and paste you some positive shit about the worst movie ever. Does it mean the movie is good cause some people liked it?


listen, your going round telling the movie is not out and no-one except press and crew can watch it, that was bullshit

secondly, schrader has a reputation for boring movies AND i have seen the other exorcist prequel which was so bad i almost turned it off, something i never do normally, so i'm taking an educated guess this one won't win me over either, especially since the ending sucks so bad (even the positive reviews admit that). also i'm not pasting stuff from imdb, i've read some reviews and some user's comments and based on that, together with the original movie which i've seen and the director's most recent othger movies, i think i'm more informed than you, who's claimin 'only crew and press can see this movie so nobody dare comment on it!!!'. tool.


don't i need some magical illegal thing?
Back to top
Injurious




Posts: 4646
Location: Toronto
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Apr 2005 14:29    Post subject:
kurisu what are you trying to prove? That you read some comments on imdb and believe that you are well educated about the movie? I wasn't aware of public screenings so I was wrong about that. Let it go. You're judging a movie based on others opinion.


\\ Schrader has a reputation for boring movies \\
According to you… I happen to enjoy his movies Razz

\\ I have seen the other exorcist prequel which was so bad i almost turned it off \\

Same story... two different directors... totally different movies Rolling Eyes it’s not like this movie will be a 1:1 clean copy of Harlin’s version with just a few added scenes from Schrader’s version Rolling Eyes

\\ so i'm taking an educated guess this one won't win me over either \\

Schrader makes boring movie(s)(1) + Harlin's version sucked donkey cock(1) = this movie will suck(3)?

what? How can make a guess like that?

\\ especially since the ending sucks so bad \\
Rolling Eyes

--------
\\i've read some reviews and some user's comments and based on that, together with the original movie which i've seen and the director's most recent othger movies, i think i'm more informed than you\\

and this

// who's claimin 'only crew and press can see this movie so nobody dare comment on it!!!'. tool.//

1) Like I said I was not aware of any public screenings of the movie
2) Just because you read some user’s comments based on the movie doesn’t mean you know how bad the movie is… there are a lot of kids on IMDB that, like here, enjoy trolling/ lying/ bullshiting. Have you looked in the games thread in a while? You’ve seen how much bull shit goes on there? So according to you I should believe everything I read on the internet? I mean come on… imdb? Rottentomates has more educated and pleasurable discussion Smile
3) You’ve seen the original Rolling Eyes should that mean something? Harlin’s version and Schrader’s version are two totally different movies Very HappyVery Happy
4) And the directors most recent movies// since most of them were all talky-walky and less action-waction means that they were boring?

May I ask what are your top three favorite movies of all time?
Just so I’ll know what you look for in a movie.
Back to top
kurisu




Posts: 156
Location: EU
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Apr 2005 14:41    Post subject:
i don't really have 'top 3 movies' as i find it difficult to compare a movie like i.e. casshern with a movie like i.e. paris, texas. two movies i like a lot tho, but completely different in style, subject, and era they were made in.

check the other thread where i quote some other ones i like.


don't i need some magical illegal thing?
Back to top
Injurious




Posts: 4646
Location: Toronto
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Apr 2005 15:17    Post subject:
which other thread? Very Happy
Back to top
kurisu




Posts: 156
Location: EU
PostPosted: Wed, 20th Apr 2005 16:41    Post subject:
http://www.nfohump.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10222


don't i need some magical illegal thing?
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Movie & TV Sparks
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group