Blackwater mercenaries
Page 1 of 1
FreeDiver




Posts: 748
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Oct 2007 23:36    Post subject: Blackwater mercenaries
what is the difference between them to the US army?
seems like they can do what ever they want in iraq...


Feel free to visit my flickr page :
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21040443@N08/
Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Oct 2007 23:40    Post subject:
try this:

Blackwater: Shadow Army


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
FreeDiver




Posts: 748
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Wed, 10th Oct 2007 00:09    Post subject:
their casualties are not caculated...

I wonder how many of them have been killed in action... (blackwater mercenaries)


Feel free to visit my flickr page :
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21040443@N08/
Back to top
tainted4ever
VIP Member



Posts: 11336

PostPosted: Wed, 10th Oct 2007 00:18    Post subject:
They get paid more
less discipline
But military contractors make up around 40% of the US army so they are reported as a part of its overall strength. There really is no need to differentiate the two, since both are armed groups that represent the interests of the United States government.


Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly
Back to top
FreeDiver




Posts: 748
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Wed, 10th Oct 2007 00:33    Post subject:
tainted4ever wrote:
They get paid more
less discipline
But military contractors make up around 40% of the US army so they are reported as a part of its overall strength. There really is no need to differentiate the two, since both are armed groups that represent the interests of the United States government.


they have a pretty awesom gear.. (from the clip)
I wish I had that when I was in the army... Laughing


Feel free to visit my flickr page :
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21040443@N08/
Back to top
tainted4ever
VIP Member



Posts: 11336

PostPosted: Wed, 10th Oct 2007 01:45    Post subject:
FreeDiver wrote:
tainted4ever wrote:
They get paid more
less discipline
But military contractors make up around 40% of the US army so they are reported as a part of its overall strength. There really is no need to differentiate the two, since both are armed groups that represent the interests of the United States government.


they have a pretty awesom gear.. (from the clip)
I wish I had that when I was in the army... Laughing


They get a lot of money from the US government, more than the military should be able to afford. Their very existence is proof of the fact that the executive branch of our government have been siphoning off funds dedicated towards other things and dumping them into "black ops" projects (CIA ops or secret research programs...).

This is a big deal because it just shows how Bush and his cronies blatantly do whatever they want with money that Congress gives them, even though Congress should be the ones telling Bush how much money he can waste on what. It goes against the entire system of checks and balances.

What pisses me off the most though comes from a combination of two things.
a) the cover story of Time magazine 2 weeks ago:
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1665835,00.html

Quote:

It's hard to imagine an American weapons program so fraught with problems that Dick Cheney would try repeatedly to cancel it — hard, that is, until you get to know the Osprey. As Defense Secretary under George H.W. Bush, Cheney tried four times to kill the Marine Corps's ungainly tilt-rotor aircraft. Four times he failed.


Quote:

V-22 crashes have claimed the lives of 30 men — 10 times the lunar program's toll — all before the plane has seen combat. The Pentagon has put $20 billion into the Osprey and expects to spend an additional $35 billion before the program is finished. In exchange, the Marines, Navy and Air Force will get 458 aircraft, averaging $119 million per copy.


b) Bush's 3rd (or fourth?) veto
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14938419

Quote:

The Democrats who control Congress, with significant support from Republicans, passed the legislation to add $35 billion over five years, allowing an additional 4 million children into the program. It would be funded by raising the federal cigarette tax by 61 cents to $1 per pack.


Quote:
President Bush on Wednesday vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have dramatically expanded children's health insurance, after saying the legislation was too costly and had strayed from its original intent.


Just shows what a fucking disgrace this country has become. With the 25 billion dollars put into the Osprey program, you could provide healthcare for 4 million children, feed all the starving people in America for 2 years, or reform a failing educational system. Instead, we try to find new ways to kill people, and even fail at that.
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - General chatter
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group