Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spankie
VIP Member
Posts: 2958
Location: Belgium
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Aug 2007 17:17 Post subject: |
|
 |
SP1 should increase performance of explorer and file operations.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Aug 2007 17:59 Post subject: |
|
 |
Windows XP doesn't need these "fixes", just avoid VISTA.
I also think fisk should be unbanned.

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Aug 2007 19:22 Post subject: |
|
 |
2000 doesn't need them as well, plus it runs smoother than XP. Why use XP?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Aug 2007 19:28 Post subject: |
|
 |
to be honest, despite some vista lovers on this board, we have to be honest and confess that vista sucks donkey balls at the moment. everyone i know is going back to xp.
@spankie: does the belgian zelda site belongs to you?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Aug 2007 19:48 Post subject: |
|
 |
Why? never had ONE dam issue with VISTA!. Why is it so bad, i tell you why, cause most ppl that jumped on it when it came out did not have the rigs for it. And what did everyone get....ULTIMTE! and why they complained, cause it would not run all the goodies on their P4 CPU's
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spankie
VIP Member
Posts: 2958
Location: Belgium
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 25th Aug 2007 04:55 Post subject: |
|
 |
LeoNatan wrote: | 2000 doesn't need them as well, plus it runs smoother than XP. Why use XP? |
I did for a long time, but then games that came didn't work anymore. But they did on XP, and I had less lockups and problems with XP, so it was a natural choice. That's quite the contrary to VISTA... so yes, if I had to change from XP to something it would be 2000, since it works a hell of a lot better than the bloated resource-hog you call VISTA.
And CaptainCox, your tired argument never worked before, since it's a lie. Actually, since VISTA supports a lot of older hardware (it has an a lot bigger base driver support than XP) it's more likely that it's the contrary. You have a too old rig to have problems with VISTA dude... newer hardware isn't properly supported (if at all).
Which says it all, on a larger scale the developers realize that customers haven't jumped to VISTA yet, so they stay with what most people use.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Sat, 25th Aug 2007 11:15 Post subject: |
|
 |
ZOMG my 'newer hardware' P4 with FX5200 doesn't work well with Vista!!1 ZOMG!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 25th Aug 2007 16:32 Post subject: |
|
 |
LeoNatan wrote: | ZOMG my 'newer hardware' P4 with FX5200 doesn't work well with Vista!!1 ZOMG! |
You run VISTA with a P4 and a FX5200? Jeez... if you think VISTA runs well on that, then try it on something more recent.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Sat, 25th Aug 2007 16:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
Oh boy... Your intelligence amazes me every time I read your comments.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |