970 GT...meh
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous  1, 2
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18352

PostPosted: Mon, 16th Feb 2015 13:40    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:51; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
me7




Posts: 3942

PostPosted: Mon, 16th Feb 2015 15:11    Post subject:
paxsali wrote:
... with constant 30fps ... this Tru Motion feature, everything looked like 60fps.


Killercrocker, is that you Laughing
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34197

PostPosted: Mon, 16th Feb 2015 15:13    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:42; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
PumpAction
[Schmadmin]



Posts: 26759

PostPosted: Mon, 16th Feb 2015 15:20    Post subject:
Well that tru motion interpolation really looks great. The only problem I see is that it can produce some artefacts and it delays the output a bit, which would be bad for twitch shooters and similar.


=> NFOrce GIF plugin <= - Ryzen 3800X, 16GB DDR4-3200, Sapphire 5700XT Pulse
Back to top
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18352

PostPosted: Mon, 16th Feb 2015 15:57    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:51; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
MinderMast




Posts: 6172

PostPosted: Mon, 16th Feb 2015 16:45    Post subject:
PumpAction wrote:
Well that tru motion interpolation really looks great. The only problem I see is that it can produce some artefacts and it delays the output a bit, which would be bad for twitch shooters and similar.

I never had any artifacts with motion interpolation on my TV. The biggest problem with these things for gaming is always input lag. With slower games it seems like you can deal with it, but for me it eventually becomes annoying even with those.
It doesn't look like such a huge delay, but it just feels off and with time it starts to get on my nerves Very Happy
Back to top
evilmonkey




Posts: 2402

PostPosted: Thu, 19th Feb 2015 09:08    Post subject:
sausje wrote:
Seriously, having a 2600k but still on 3.4GHz and then complains about not noticing GPU upgrade Laughing

OC that cpu to 4.1-4.2GHz (and turn off the turbo boost) with just the multiplier (which is 110% safe) and you will see improvement.


never overclocked a cpu before (i know right) any good guides? apparently the 2600k is a piece of piss to oc?

edit: after reading a little I bumped it up to 4.2 using the multiplyer option, didnt touch anything else, prime95 ran solid for 20 mins with no errors and cpu temps didnt exceed 65 with stock cooling.
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu, 19th Feb 2015 13:44    Post subject:
Yep that's good. With custom cooler temps will be lower ofc (especially with summer on it's way again i would recommend one).
But it was really easy huh, just the multiplier value in the bios and that's it Razz
So how are your benchmarks looking now? Wink

(tho keep an eye on your OC, for some odd reason, every now and then, my OC tends to reset itself back to stock for no reason..)


Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
Back to top
evilmonkey




Posts: 2402

PostPosted: Thu, 19th Feb 2015 14:39    Post subject:
sausje wrote:
Yep that's good. With custom cooler temps will be lower ofc (especially with summer on it's way again i would recommend one).
But it was really easy huh, just the multiplier value in the bios and that's it Razz
So how are your benchmarks looking now? Wink

(tho keep an eye on your OC, for some odd reason, every now and then, my OC tends to reset itself back to stock for no reason..)


seems ok but I dunno if I'm just getting a placebo effect (ie: if anything its marginal, perhaps time will tell) the voltage is still on the stock setting (auto, it goes up to 1.35 ish when the 4.2 kicks in (again in cpu-z this goes up and down? this some intel feature? ) in games/ apps It stays up on 4.2ghz

bit of a newbie but got some more bang for my buck, though not convinced Im doing it right, also my bios didnt have a straight corevoltage setting, a few different weirdly named ones.
Back to top
Breezer_




Posts: 10833
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Thu, 19th Feb 2015 14:57    Post subject:
since your auto voltage is at 1.35V and your temps are good, put manually 1.35V and try like 45X multiplier. I had 2700K which did 4700mhz with 1.35V.
Back to top
Page 2 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone Goto page Previous  1, 2
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group