[HARDWARE] 360 is at its MAX
Page 2 of 4 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Reg67




Posts: 5432

PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 14:09    Post subject:
Never trust a guy who will leave the house with jeans and a suit jacket over a T-shirt
Back to top
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 14:12    Post subject:
This thread is so boring. PS3 has some great exclusives and that's all needed for me to want to buy this console.


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
Back to top
Cohen




Posts: 7155
Location: Rapture
PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 14:12    Post subject:
I just remember reading the chart of stats, like the 3dmax score for consoles.. the PS3 CPU is indeed more powerful.

And as for games, God Of War 3, Last Guardian, Forza 3, Heavy Rain, etc


troll detected by SiN
Back to top
_SiN_
Megatron



Posts: 12108
Location: Cybertron
PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 14:20    Post subject:
Uh, Forza 3 is X360 exclusive..


Watercooled 5950X | AORUS Master X570 | Asus RTX 3090 TUF Gaming OC | 64Gb RAM | 1Tb 970 Evo Plus + 2Tb 660p | etc etc
Back to top
Fractious




Posts: 206

PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 14:32    Post subject:
both systems are good in there own right, and i own them both but if i had to have just one then its the 360 everytime, for me it the more complete package and just seems a more enjoyable experience beit live or a better line of exclusive games this year and next.


As for framerate, the 360 version runs smooth, while the PS3 is a jaggy mess that chugs along in slow motion.
Not My Words But The Words Of IGN, But There True Wink
Back to top
azzman




Posts: 4059
Location: Australiiiaaa , maate
PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 14:33    Post subject:
this thread is a load of bullshit, code is always being optimized to get more out of set hardware. Both PS3 and 360 will continue to push the envelope on what is possible
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 16:48    Post subject:
azzman wrote:
this thread is a load of bullshit, code is always being optimized to get more out of set hardware. Both PS3 and 360 will continue to push the envelope on what is possible

There must be a limit though, both systems are getting old.
Back to top
Mantra2k




Posts: 124

PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 17:26    Post subject:
Well, as far as I know the 360 GPU is more powerful than the PS3's, but the Cell is more powerful than the triple core CPU that the 360 uses.

It pretty much even's the two out. I think the PS3 had less than a 1% advantage overall, but the 360 being so much easier to code for means it's easier to get more out of it.
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 17:40    Post subject:
Many devs have said the HW is comparable, some games will look slightly better on the Xbox some slightly better on the PS3. Not because one is better than the other, the game is just more optmized for the Xbox or the PS3. It's a useless debate, both consoles are equally old and I assume both companies have used the best HW possible for that time. If teh Xbox is at the end of its days HW wise, teh PS3 should be also.
Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 20:39    Post subject:
I called it!


Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
Back to top
s-b-l
Banned



Posts: 209

PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 22:07    Post subject:
_SiN_ wrote:
Uh, Forza 3 is X360 exclusive..


PWNED ! Very Happy
Back to top
zipfero




Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
PostPosted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 22:30    Post subject:
l0hl all newbs you is suck mayn!!1 SEGA SATURN ONLY CONSOLE IMO ATM.


8 out of 10 dentists prefer zipfero to competing brands(fraich3 and Mutantius)!
Back to top
Cohen




Posts: 7155
Location: Rapture
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 00:37    Post subject:
s-b-l wrote:
_SiN_ wrote:
Uh, Forza 3 is X360 exclusive..


PWNED ! Very Happy


Yeah , my bad Smile

But still, both consoles are worthy as each other. I dont get why fanboys even exist.


troll detected by SiN
Back to top
dezztroy




Posts: 6590
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 01:30    Post subject:
Both consoles are pretty horrible compared to any modern gaming-pc.
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 02:08    Post subject:
dezztroy wrote:
Both consoles are pretty horrible compared to any modern gaming-pc.

and you know what they just said xbox360 will end its life cycle in 2014 Laughing yeay dx9c ports till 2014 LULZ , but yeah when you look at M$ they are now rehashing the xbox360... new arcades now have build in 512mb flash and in 2010 there will be a rehash of Elites with build in the box a motion camera and a new drive lite-on drive model thats flash prof, some new liteon revisions are now spotted in Germany
Back to top
dizturbd




Posts: 335
Location: Right Here!
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 02:10    Post subject:
This topic is like a rollercoaster. "Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii". "Wiiiiii", "Wii" Oh, sorry. I used to own all 3, then sold the Wii. The PS3 will be next if GoW III isn't released soon. So, therefore, Xbox 360 for the win.


Back to top
Ashmolly




Posts: 1075
Location: Trump's Merica
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 03:00    Post subject:
dizturbd wrote:
This topic is like a rollercoaster. "Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii". "Wiiiiii", "Wii" Oh, sorry. I used to own all 3, then sold the Wii. The PS3 will be next if GoW III isn't released soon. So, therefore, Xbox 360 for the win.


If you bought a PS3 for GOW 3 you wasted your money...


Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 10:16    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
Many devs have said the HW is comparable, some games will look slightly better on the Xbox some slightly better on the PS3. Not because one is better than the other, the game is just more optmized for the Xbox or the PS3. It's a useless debate, both consoles are equally old and I assume both companies have used the best HW possible for that time. If teh Xbox is at the end of its days HW wise, teh PS3 should be also.


This post pretty much means the thread should be locked, any further debate is pointless. Razz


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 13:10    Post subject:
AnimalMother wrote:
Mister_s wrote:
Many devs have said the HW is comparable, some games will look slightly better on the Xbox some slightly better on the PS3. Not because one is better than the other, the game is just more optmized for the Xbox or the PS3. It's a useless debate, both consoles are equally old and I assume both companies have used the best HW possible for that time. If teh Xbox is at the end of its days HW wise, teh PS3 should be also.


This post pretty much means the thread should be locked, any further debate is pointless. Razz

My word is law Very Happy
Back to top
Fractious




Posts: 206

PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 16:47    Post subject:
dezztroy wrote:
Both consoles are pretty horrible compared to any modern gaming-pc.


id have to agree im playing my consoles in the comfort of my living room sat on a leather couch having to stare hard at the 50inch sony HD picture while struggling to hear the 5.1 being deliveried by the yamaha A1 through the mission's in 5.1 , thanks for pointing out how horrible that actually is. both consoles or parrable to a pc from 4-5 yrs ago.


As for framerate, the 360 version runs smooth, while the PS3 is a jaggy mess that chugs along in slow motion.
Not My Words But The Words Of IGN, But There True Wink
Back to top
Breakneck




Posts: 839
Location: Canuckland
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 17:00    Post subject:
bushwacka wrote:
x360 = ps2 of the current generation.


+1
Back to top
me7




Posts: 3942

PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 17:06    Post subject:
Breakneck wrote:
bushwacka wrote:
x360 = ps2 of the current generation.


+1


What? The PS2 was heavily underpowered (4 MB VRAM, no shaders) while the X360 is an efficient performance beast that the PS3 can't overtake although it is a whole year newer.
Back to top
Breakneck




Posts: 839
Location: Canuckland
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 17:36    Post subject:
I was thinking about the game library not the hardware.
Back to top
_SiN_
Megatron



Posts: 12108
Location: Cybertron
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 17:52    Post subject:
dezztroy wrote:
Both consoles are pretty horrible compared to any modern gaming-pc.


Hm, yeah, about that..

If i'd bought a PC for $400 (X360 Premium launch price) back in 2005, do you honestly think it would've handled todays X360 (or PS3) games, graphics wise?

Of course it wouldn't.


Watercooled 5950X | AORUS Master X570 | Asus RTX 3090 TUF Gaming OC | 64Gb RAM | 1Tb 970 Evo Plus + 2Tb 660p | etc etc
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 18:10    Post subject:
With that ridiculous comparison, you forget one thing: PC is much more than a machine for playing games. If you take a cheap PC's price plus a console's price, you get to the price of a better PC than a console.

BTW, how did this turn into PC vs Console all over again? Laughing
Back to top
dezztroy




Posts: 6590
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 18:19    Post subject:
I'ts pretty funny when people try to deny PCs being more powerful than consoles.

Also, I don't see a computer from 2005 as being "modern".
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 18:34    Post subject:
me7 wrote:
What? The PS2 was heavily underpowered (4 MB VRAM, no shaders) while the X360 is an efficient performance beast that the PS3 can't overtake although it is a whole year newer.

Both concoles are equally old. The PS3 was delayed because there were problems with the Bluray laser manufacturing.
Back to top
Breakneck




Posts: 839
Location: Canuckland
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 18:38    Post subject:
I can't wait for the next gen consoles to arrive when finally the gaming will be identical in every aspect on both, consoles and PCs.
On a side note, Ubisoft CEO Says Next-Gen Game Budgets Will Average $60 Million.
Back to top
Big_Gun




Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 18:41    Post subject:
Breakneck wrote:
I can't wait for the next gen consoles to arrive when finally the gaming will be identical in every aspect on both, consoles and PCs.


Consoles will always be stuck at whatever point they are created while PC's move beyond them unless new hardware is no longer developed for PC.
I think people said this would happen with THIS generation... actually... it has been said every time a new gen comes out.


1 stripe purple belt in JiuJitsu (good grief this takes FOREVER hahah)
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sun, 21st Jun 2009 18:53    Post subject:
console [360]: dLd, burn, play
pc: dLd, mount, try to install [lately devs manage to fuk up the installers ] , struggle to find good setting even tho u have modern pc, change drivers, dance by the fire then play and hope it won't crash/slash/smash

so the verdict is if u want to relax and play the damn games console is your choice
if u want to have occasional pain in the ass spend certain amount each year pc is all yours
Back to top
Page 2 of 4 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Console Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group