| Page 4 of 9 |
|
|
 Posted: Sat, 14th Feb 2009 12:48 Post subject: |
|
 |
It's like everyone want's to be the next WoW, make your game appeal to the majority of players..
Haven't they noticed yet that games like that usually tank though?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34995
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu, 23rd Apr 2009 19:24 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 23rd Apr 2009 19:36 Post subject: |
|
|
as usual as the case nowadays it's coming to the consoles first.. have they forgotten it was PC gamers that made the franchaise what it is today?. tossers
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 23rd Apr 2009 20:47 Post subject: |
|
|
Look's just like battlefield 2 but with different skined units and models.
I say ripoff, fuck u dice, you're games are officially a rip off and fraud, go hang yourselfs....
TWATS...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 23rd Apr 2009 20:51 Post subject: |
|
|
| gingerninjaaaaaa wrote: | Look's just like battlefield 2 but with different skined units and models.
I say ripoff, fuck u dice, you're games are officially a rip off and fraud, go hang yourselfs....
TWATS... |
How is it a rip-off, when they made BF 2 also?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 24th Apr 2009 00:28 Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like shit to be honest , did i read it right there are only 3 maps ?
They should have just updated BF2 ffs they really know how to crap out on a good game
Heroes so far is shit
1943 looks shit
boohoo
well at least it saves me money
Today it is my turn to be AN knobhead
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 24th Apr 2009 00:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| scouse wrote: | Looks like shit to be honest , did i read it right there are only 3 maps ?
They should have just updated BF2 ffs they really know how to crap out on a good game
Heroes so far is shit
1943 looks shit
boohoo
well at least it saves me money |
It's (most likely) gonna be 10 or 15 bucks, and it looks better than most games in that price range.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 24th Apr 2009 03:40 Post subject: |
|
|
strange the CoD series killed BF... unbelievable but im sold. i find it hard to believe since CoD has always been sort of console friendly (which i despise).
i cant imagine going back to BF after CoD4 and WaW. they are gonna have to bring it and i just dont see it happening.
“There's nothing an agnostic can't do if he doesn't know whether he believes in anything or not”
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 24th Apr 2009 07:29 Post subject: |
|
|
| Banelord wrote: | strange the CoD series killed BF... unbelievable but im sold. i find it hard to believe since CoD has always been sort of console friendly (which i despise).
i cant imagine going back to BF after CoD4 and WaW. they are gonna have to bring it and i just dont see it happening. |
Bullshit. BF2 is as populated as it was 2 years ago. Has about 20k players every night and Bad Company has tons of player too.
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 24th Apr 2009 09:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| dezztroy wrote: | | scouse wrote: | Looks like shit to be honest , did i read it right there are only 3 maps ?
They should have just updated BF2 ffs they really know how to crap out on a good game
Heroes so far is shit
1943 looks shit
boohoo
well at least it saves me money |
It's (most likely) gonna be 10 or 15 bucks, and it looks better than most games in that price range. |
Yes but with extra maps that can be downloaded at extra cost no doubt , which if it matches the previous games of around 9 maps would make it 30-45 and thats if its any good and people buy it, just because its cheap doesnt mean its allowed to be shit or look crap we are not setting the price they are and if that is how low they value their game........................ Personally i want it to be a good game , i like BF2 and its addons/mods they just need to stop fucking around update the graphics and bring it up to todays visual standard instead of using kiddie cartoony graphics with terrible score systems ala heroes, which im glad i signed up for the beta as thats one game i wont be wasting my money on now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 24th Apr 2009 15:05 Post subject: |
|
|
| scouse wrote: | | dezztroy wrote: | | scouse wrote: | Looks like shit to be honest , did i read it right there are only 3 maps ?
They should have just updated BF2 ffs they really know how to crap out on a good game
Heroes so far is shit
1943 looks shit
boohoo
well at least it saves me money |
It's (most likely) gonna be 10 or 15 bucks, and it looks better than most games in that price range. |
Yes but with extra maps that can be downloaded at extra cost no doubt , which if it matches the previous games of around 9 maps would make it 30-45 and thats if its any good and people buy it, just because its cheap doesnt mean its allowed to be shit or look crap we are not setting the price they are and if that is how low they value their game........................ Personally i want it to be a good game , i like BF2 and its addons/mods they just need to stop fucking around update the graphics and bring it up to todays visual standard instead of using kiddie cartoony graphics with terrible score systems ala heroes, which im glad i signed up for the beta as thats one game i wont be wasting my money on now. |
I'm sorry, but that post is made of fail. BF: Heroes is a F2P game.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 24th Apr 2009 15:11 Post subject: |
|
|
Wow i said i wont be wasting my money on it , its free to play wow shoot me for making a mistake , luckily it is free to play then eh cos it is shite.
Obiously of course that doesnt include the "pay for battle funds" tab
Last edited by scouse on Fri, 24th Apr 2009 15:36; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34995
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BKarza
Posts: 536
Location: /lazurus mode 1
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Apr 2009 11:26 Post subject: |
|
|
| Namarie wrote: | BF2142 suprisingly also has quite a few players still.. Never got that one..  |
I got it and was royally ripped off! I tried the EA download thingamabob (ala their version of Steam) played it for a month I actually bought it twice so my Son could go online with me. I think it was 50 bucks each. I didn't mind that because I always misplace disks and Steam has been a pretty good experience for me thus far. BUT, this EA bullshit only allows you to download a game for 6 fucking months! After that you are beat. Now they offer a two year extended download time for I think 10 bucks. But when I got the game a couple years ago that wasn't an option. I installed Vista and BF2142 had/has issues on 64 Vista Ultimate so I waited for it to get resolved. I just assumed it was like Steam and I could get it whenever I wanted to play again. So this brings up the question. Is there a time limit for Steam? So far I have had no issues getting Half Life 2 whenever, wherever I want. But I never read the fine print (if there is any that is.)
/rant
| Nui wrote: | | Because digital shipping takes time. Think of all the digital boats and their digital captains. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Apr 2009 11:57 Post subject: |
|
|
| JBeckman wrote: | http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/58354
Seems the PC version might be a bit different than the console one. |
It's ok, if they keep their promise. Will be interesting to see how frostbite performs on PC.
| BKarza wrote: | | Namarie wrote: | | BF2142 suprisingly also has quite a few players still.. Never got that one.. |
I got it and was royally ripped off! I tried the EA download thingamabob (ala their version of Steam) played it for a month I actually bought it twice so my Son could go online with me. I think it was 50 bucks each. I didn't mind that because I always misplace disks and Steam has been a pretty good experience for me thus far. BUT, this EA bullshit only allows you to download a game for 6 fucking months! After that you are beat. Now they offer a two year extended download time for I think 10 bucks. But when I got the game a couple years ago that wasn't an option. I installed Vista and BF2142 had/has issues on 64 Vista Ultimate so I waited for it to get resolved. I just assumed it was like Steam and I could get it whenever I wanted to play again. So this brings up the question. Is there a time limit for Steam? So far I have had no issues getting Half Life 2 whenever, wherever I want. But I never read the fine print (if there is any that is.)
/rant |
I have EA Downloader version of BF2124 too but I also got a cdkey with it. I can use that cdkey with clone DVD version of the game so I don't have to use EA Downloader.
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
Last edited by Glottis on Tue, 28th Apr 2009 11:59; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Apr 2009 15:28 Post subject: |
|
|
| dezztroy wrote: | | gingerninjaaaaaa wrote: | Look's just like battlefield 2 but with different skined units and models.
I say ripoff, fuck u dice, you're games are officially a rip off and fraud, go hang yourselfs....
TWATS... |
How is it a rip-off, when they made BF 2 also? |
It just looks like re modelled ww2 units still using an old shitty battlefield 2 engine does it not?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Apr 2009 04:55 Post subject: |
|
|
| gingerninjaaaaaa wrote: | | dezztroy wrote: | | gingerninjaaaaaa wrote: | Look's just like battlefield 2 but with different skined units and models.
I say ripoff, fuck u dice, you're games are officially a rip off and fraud, go hang yourselfs....
TWATS... |
How is it a rip-off, when they made BF 2 also? |
It just looks like re modelled ww2 units still using an old shitty battlefield 2 engine does it not? |
No, not really.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Apr 2009 18:15 Post subject: |
|
|
| Glottis wrote: | | Banelord wrote: | strange the CoD series killed BF... unbelievable but im sold. i find it hard to believe since CoD has always been sort of console friendly (which i despise).
i cant imagine going back to BF after CoD4 and WaW. they are gonna have to bring it and i just dont see it happening. |
Bullshit. BF2 is as populated as it was 2 years ago. Has about 20k players every night and Bad Company has tons of player too. |
true, but that may only be because BF2 sells for $10 or less. im glad its still very much alive online, but for me i would not prefer BF2 online over CoD4. i tried some of the great mods for BF2, just not many others were trying them at that time. and cheating seemed much more rampant in BF2 imo than CoD4, but that may just be because CoD4 has the kill view that helps my opinion of a legit kill, lol.
they both have their perks, no doubt, im just saying having played them all i find CoD superior online, ymmv.
“There's nothing an agnostic can't do if he doesn't know whether he believes in anything or not”
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23348
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Apr 2009 18:36 Post subject: |
|
|
| gingerninjaaaaaa wrote: | | dezztroy wrote: | | gingerninjaaaaaa wrote: | Look's just like battlefield 2 but with different skined units and models.
I say ripoff, fuck u dice, you're games are officially a rip off and fraud, go hang yourselfs....
TWATS... |
How is it a rip-off, when they made BF 2 also? |
It just looks like re modelled ww2 units still using an old shitty battlefield 2 engine does it not? |
No, its using another engine. Everything is btw destructable.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Apr 2009 23:55 Post subject: |
|
|
so they made a remake of the best mp game ever on BC engine
fuck yeah, its like playing Red faction in WW2, cover what cover
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 1st May 2009 02:41 Post subject: |
|
|
| Spiderman wrote: | so they made a remake of the best mp game ever on BC engine
fuck yeah, its like playing Red faction in WW2, cover what cover |
Did you really just compare Frostbite's "destruction" to GeoMod? Really?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 1st May 2009 03:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| dezztroy wrote: | | Spiderman wrote: | so they made a remake of the best mp game ever on BC engine
fuck yeah, its like playing Red faction in WW2, cover what cover |
Did you really just compare Frostbite's "destruction" to GeoMod? Really? |
don't twist my words m'kay
read it again
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 1st May 2009 03:36 Post subject: |
|
|
| dezztroy wrote: | | Spiderman wrote: | so they made a remake of the best mp game ever on BC engine
fuck yeah, its like playing Red faction in WW2, cover what cover |
Did you really just compare Frostbite's "destruction" to GeoMod? Really? |
Oh please, GeoMod has tons of flaws too. Let's take Red Faction 3 for example, while structures have nice destruction nothing else does. Ground is completely indestructible in RF3, and vehicles are either completely fine or explode into pieces, you can't tear them apart like buildings. In some cases GeoMod in RF3 is quiet a downgrade after RF1 and 2 (no more tunnel digging). Frostbite engine doesn't have as good building destruction as in GeoMod, but at least you get a hole in a ground after a powerful tank shell explodes. In RF3 buildings look like boring empty cardboard boxes waiting to be destroyed, in BC at least they look like buildings.
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
Last edited by Glottis on Fri, 1st May 2009 13:52; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 1st May 2009 04:14 Post subject: |
|
|
Glottis ahemm ??? you know that RF3 its from ground up a console game, consoles would not handle the stress if buildings+ground+wind+derbits+shaders+etc was at the same time on the screen, they allready masking the low 25fps or lower in RF3 with motion blur... plus ehem RF2 didn't had no geomode deforming because of it being a ps2 title!!!
but if it was from ground up a PC game then you would have seen your holes
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 1st May 2009 04:27 Post subject: |
|
|
| Spiderman wrote: | | plus ehem RF2 didn't had no geomode deforming because of it being a ps2 title!!! |
Red Faction 1 was a PS2 game first, dumbass. It was ported to PC months later.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23348
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Fri, 1st May 2009 10:38 Post subject: |
|
|
| Cedge wrote: | | Spiderman wrote: | | plus ehem RF2 didn't had no geomode deforming because of it being a ps2 title!!! |
Red Faction 1 was a PS2 game first, dumbass. It was ported to PC months later. |
It wasnt ported if im not all wrong. It was just being made for 3 platforms simultaniously while ps2 was the first one to be finished.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 4 of 9 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
