PC gaming dying?
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Frant
King's Bounty



Posts: 24650
Location: Your Mom
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Nov 2008 04:14    Post subject:
dakiller wrote:
Frant wrote:
PC gaming isn't dying or going to die. The simple fact is that there are still millions with PC's that want to play games, thus the market for PC gaming is there. We're currently in a transition phase (no idea how long it will last though) where practices, cross-platform development and other structural changes aren't optimal for the market. Part of this is due to consoles. It's a completely different market and publishers have better projections and statistics to guide them when it comes to planning projects. That's why there's a tendency to copy that strategy to the PC market, and we're stuck in the middle because the PC market isn't 1:1 compatible with the strategy of console development.

People tend to treat this subject with emotions instead of logic and common sense. If there's people willing to buy games for PC you'll have publishers and developers willing to develop games for us. We're just in the middle of a global financial crisis, big publishers are changing their mode of operation, developers have a hard time doing what they want since they have to conform to the wishes of the publishers. Things will change (and we're in the middle of that change now which is why everyone is so worried).



A well thought out reply,
i would agree with others in this thread that innovation is driven by vid card/ CPU tech...and that is in turn driven by more demanding apps...not just games

PC gaming is not dying
its a matter of weeding out the button mashing fodder that of course don't require a sophisticated input system (ie KB/Mouse)


I forgot to bring the aspect of GPU's/CPU's into my post. nVidia, AMD/ATI, Creative, Intel, name-any-vendor-selling-gfx, they need PC gaming even more than we do. It's why they keep building and researching ever faster and more advanced parts, and it's what makes them survive.

For the sake of the argument, let's compare how much nVidia/AMD makes from console users vs PC gamers. When people buy a console, they pay a one-time fee for the hardware, and the price of the GPU in a console isn't even close to that of a discreet gfx-card in the mid-high range. Meanwhile PC gamers replace their hardware fairly regular (annually, or bi-annually at the very least). We keep paying them, and they keep improving and manufacturing new cards that we will also buy.

Add to that the latest trend of GPGPU applications becoming widespread and more important whether it's for game physics, media conversion, scientific calculations etc. Even DirectX11 will have Compute Shaders, enabling GPGPU tasks on all DX11-compatible hardware regardless of who makes it. I see exciting times ahead.

There's also the approach iD Software is taking with iD Tech 5, making it truly cross platform while being completely transparent to the game developers. Tools, asset creation etc. will work on top of the Tech without the need to tailor everything for a specific platform. This will hopefully mean that future cross platform games will be of much higher quality (no sloppy ports, we really don't want them, they're an insult to every PC gamer).


Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
Back to top
GeorgeIvanovich




Posts: 361

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Nov 2008 04:59    Post subject:
Pc will never die as gamming platform.In fact it´s the only platform that keep going.
Back to top
rhagz
Banned



Posts: 1017

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Nov 2008 05:04    Post subject:
Frant wrote:
dakiller wrote:
Frant wrote:
PC gaming isn't dying or going to die. The simple fact is that there are still millions with PC's that want to play games, thus the market for PC gaming is there. We're currently in a transition phase (no idea how long it will last though) where practices, cross-platform development and other structural changes aren't optimal for the market. Part of this is due to consoles. It's a completely different market and publishers have better projections and statistics to guide them when it comes to planning projects. That's why there's a tendency to copy that strategy to the PC market, and we're stuck in the middle because the PC market isn't 1:1 compatible with the strategy of console development.

People tend to treat this subject with emotions instead of logic and common sense. If there's people willing to buy games for PC you'll have publishers and developers willing to develop games for us. We're just in the middle of a global financial crisis, big publishers are changing their mode of operation, developers have a hard time doing what they want since they have to conform to the wishes of the publishers. Things will change (and we're in the middle of that change now which is why everyone is so worried).



A well thought out reply,
i would agree with others in this thread that innovation is driven by vid card/ CPU tech...and that is in turn driven by more demanding apps...not just games

PC gaming is not dying
its a matter of weeding out the button mashing fodder that of course don't require a sophisticated input system (ie KB/Mouse)


I forgot to bring the aspect of GPU's/CPU's into my post. nVidia, AMD/ATI, Creative, Intel, name-any-vendor-selling-gfx, they need PC gaming even more than we do. It's why they keep building and researching ever faster and more advanced parts, and it's what makes them survive.

For the sake of the argument, let's compare how much nVidia/AMD makes from console users vs PC gamers. When people buy a console, they pay a one-time fee for the hardware, and the price of the GPU in a console isn't even close to that of a discreet gfx-card in the mid-high range. Meanwhile PC gamers replace their hardware fairly regular (annually, or bi-annually at the very least). We keep paying them, and they keep improving and manufacturing new cards that we will also buy.

Add to that the latest trend of GPGPU applications becoming widespread and more important whether it's for game physics, media conversion, scientific calculations etc. Even DirectX11 will have Compute Shaders, enabling GPGPU tasks on all DX11-compatible hardware regardless of who makes it. I see exciting times ahead.

There's also the approach iD Software is taking with iD Tech 5, making it truly cross platform while being completely transparent to the game developers. Tools, asset creation etc. will work on top of the Tech without the need to tailor everything for a specific platform. This will hopefully mean that future cross platform games will be of much higher quality (no sloppy ports, we really don't want them, they're an insult to every PC gamer).


High end hardware sells nothing compare to budget and mainstream hardware. You know who ships the most graphic units? Intel. That's right. Integrated graphics. By nearly double the competitors.

PC sales were actually up recently. The problem? They were all budget wal mart computers in a box.
Back to top
Freakshow




Posts: 410

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Nov 2008 12:36    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:


as marked above, you clearly said "in medium" and thats what my argument was based upon. For 1000$ , you get a highend pc these days, if you know how to buy properly.


Is medium in 6months and old in 18 anzwaz. its still the same. 600$ more then next gen console.
Back to top
Neon
VIP Member



Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Nov 2008 16:25    Post subject:
I have bought my PC almost 2 years ago and I still can run most games on highest details with little or no framerate hiccups

So freakshow,your argument is ass.
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10810
Location: UK
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Nov 2008 16:42    Post subject:
Neon25 wrote:
I have bought my PC almost 2 years ago and I still can run most games on highest details with little or no framerate hiccups

So freakshow,your argument is ass.


I agree. If u have a gaming PC now that can play all the ports at better gfx than the consoles, there will be no 'need' to upgrade until the next gen consoles appear.


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Nov 2008 23:09    Post subject:
Freakshow wrote:
Sin317 wrote:


as marked above, you clearly said "in medium" and thats what my argument was based upon. For 1000$ , you get a highend pc these days, if you know how to buy properly.


Is medium in 6months and old in 18 anzwaz. its still the same. 600$ more then next gen console.


Remind me not to buy my pc parts in the same store you do, its clearly overpriced ...

oh and also, i always resell parts i exchange in my system. And usually for a good price (at least 50% of what i payed for). E.g. i sold my 2 old 8600 GT's for 100$ a piece and bought a 9600GT for 150$ ....

so i got a better (way better) GPU AND 50 BUCKS ...


thats what i call business sense
Back to top
csebal




Posts: 455

PostPosted: Tue, 25th Nov 2008 11:05    Post subject:
rhagz wrote:
And if online distribution was that big do you think we would be stuck with D2D and Steam and that's it? Companies would be scrambling to jump on the bandwagon. As it is, it takes a miracle to get a non-Valve game on Steam.

HELLOOOOO!!! WAKE UP!!!

Almost every freaking major title that came out this fall was available in digital form from one distributor or the other. Sure you might still have a few that you cant get digitally, but luckily that number decreases every day. Even if its not available digitally right from the start, one of the major players will make sure to get their hands on it within a few weeks of its launch.

So what exactly are we talking about?

DD is slowly but surely taking over and moving ahead, which is a really good thing in my eyes.

As for sale stats: do you think valve are stupid? If they would release proud reports how they kick everyone's ass with their DD, they would only create incentive for competitors to start up their own DD service essentially cutting their own profits. Why do you think are there no clear reports of steam's success rate?

I can tell you this: i have plenty of friends who rarely every bought a game before DD, but since steam was launched they buy games that come out of it pretty regularly. Hell.. i myself own way more DD titles than boxed ones, and when i say way more, i mean like5x or more.

Now if that small pattern is just an indicator of whats going on all around the world, then we can safely say, that DD might indeed rock, although its unlikely we will ever get confirmation of that..
Back to top
Page 3 of 3 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group