[R] Quantum.of.Solace.REPACK.DVDSCR.XviD-COALiTiON
Page 3 of 5 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Mutantius
VIP Member



Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 22:14    Post subject:
C'mon what made that teaser stand out compared to other action films?


"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
Back to top
Laurentiu315




Posts: 39

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 22:14    Post subject:
dark, moody, action-packed.What's not to love? Very Happy

Empire said it was "A whole new dark and dirty incarnation of Ian Fleming's suave super spy."

Total Film "The best trailer we've gawped at since the first Dark Knight full length."

BBC News website "A dramatic cocktail of action and stunts."

Mutantius > maybe you wanted more story?? this was the teaser. a second trailer should come in september.and we should see more of the plot.
what do you want?? hulk smashing tanks? this is bond. chases and hand to hand combat.this pretty much sums the action. Very Happy


Last edited by Laurentiu315 on Mon, 30th Jun 2008 22:16; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Mutantius
VIP Member



Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 22:15    Post subject:
Yea, lets see.


"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 22:30    Post subject:
blond , blue eye bond remembers me a hitler jugend operative , when every bond was brown haired so another suck crap hollywood loli chav crap

the same crap they did with Space Quest , from 1-3 brown hair , 4-6 blond hitler judend style
Back to top
Vodka-Redbull




Posts: 5134
Location: The Evil Empire
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 22:35    Post subject:
Spiderman wrote:
blond , blue eye bond remembers me a hitler jugend operative , when every bond was brown haired so another suck crap hollywood loli chav crap

the same crap they did with Space Quest , from 1-3 brown hair , 4-6 blond hitler judend style


Haven't heard anything more stupid since that time they tried to ban fairy tales beceuase they mentioned heterosexual marriage only.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73242
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 22:59    Post subject:
Vodka-Redbull wrote:
they tried to ban fairy tales beceuase they mentioned heterosexual marriage only.



Wait, you serious?
Back to top
Vodka-Redbull




Posts: 5134
Location: The Evil Empire
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 23:04    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Vodka-Redbull wrote:
they tried to ban fairy tales beceuase they mentioned heterosexual marriage only.



Wait, you serious?


Aye. It was in the news section too a year ago or so.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73242
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 23:06    Post subject:
Jesus! (< Figure of speech)

Let me guess, England? Rolling Eyes
Back to top
nouseforaname
รœber-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 23:09    Post subject:
Vodka-Redbull wrote:
Haven't heard anything more stupid since that time they tried to ban fairy tales beceuase they mentioned heterosexual marriage only.


you speak about 'they' when it is really a couple of retarded over the top (probably straight) PC people. Rolling Eyes


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
Vodka-Redbull




Posts: 5134
Location: The Evil Empire
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 23:13    Post subject:
nouseforaname wrote:
Vodka-Redbull wrote:
Haven't heard anything more stupid since that time they tried to ban fairy tales beceuase they mentioned heterosexual marriage only.


you speak about 'they' when it is really a couple of retarded over the top (probably straight) PC people. Rolling Eyes


It was the gay/lesbian community... Rolling Eyes
Back to top
nouseforaname
รœber-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 23:23    Post subject:
Vodka-Redbull wrote:
nouseforaname wrote:
Vodka-Redbull wrote:
Haven't heard anything more stupid since that time they tried to ban fairy tales beceuase they mentioned heterosexual marriage only.


you speak about 'they' when it is really a couple of retarded over the top (probably straight) PC people. Rolling Eyes


It was the gay/lesbian community... Rolling Eyes


I don't want to go O/T, but if you look through the news it was the govt in the UK actually adding some homo fairy tales to the curriculum to meet some new 'equity act' Wink You probably remember whatever spin the shitrag Daily Mail put on the story Wink


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73242
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Jun 2008 23:30    Post subject:
Off topic:
 Spoiler:
 


On topic:
After watching the trailer, it looks FUCKING AMAZING! Now, the long wait... Sad
Back to top
me7




Posts: 3942

PostPosted: Tue, 1st Jul 2008 00:06    Post subject:
Have to agree with Mutantius, generic trailer. Replace Bond with any other action hero and you could use it to promote any action movie since it doesn't contain anything specific to this film.

I do believe in the movie though. Casino Royale was the first watchable Bond film since Goldeneye (although Daniel Craig as Bond sucks Hilterjugend-balls Very Happy ).
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Tue, 1st Jul 2008 02:02    Post subject:
James Bond's trademark - allways cheesy humor and double entendre one-liners - have been replaced by a lot of frenzied chasing, leaping from immense heights and brutal bloody brawling.

There is so much running around in the first half of "Casino Royal" that it felt like a Jackie Chan movie.

New Bond Sucks Monkey Fuck
Back to top
Dazz99




Posts: 7302

PostPosted: Tue, 1st Jul 2008 02:50    Post subject:
I prefer the gritty bond, i've always enjoyed Daltons bond films too.


cockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcock
Back to top
Ace170780




Posts: 472

PostPosted: Tue, 1st Jul 2008 16:37    Post subject:
Good I dont feel so bad if I say I enjoyed Dalton as bond as well. Not the worse but he wasn't bad either. And this movie is going to rock. Daniel Craig as a more action Bond was a good choice. Who gives a flying fuck if he has blue eyes as opposed to brown. Dont discriminate bunch of racist bastards. He did good in Royal i'm sure he can hold his own on this one.
Back to top
swingman




Posts: 3602

PostPosted: Tue, 1st Jul 2008 16:48    Post subject:
These old/new Bond comparisons are not really valid since there was a very clear shift after Pierce Brosnan. The Bond movies coming out now are a kind of re-imagined version by people who thought it was time to go a different way. I was never a fan of the old cheesy bond but this new one isn't so great either. Too much (obvious) effort has been put to make him a more politically correct (more with the time kind of crap) Bond. Jason Bourne wannabe. Razz
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73242
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 05:53    Post subject:


Doesn't sound too bright. The dude compares this movie to a Jason Statham flick!
Back to top
nouseforaname
รœber-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 09:53    Post subject:
other reviews are better ...
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/quantum_of_solace/


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73242
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 11:09    Post subject:
Yeah, but still... Pretty mediocre, when compared to the first, no?
Back to top
me7




Posts: 3942

PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 12:21    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Yeah, but still... Pretty mediocre, when compared to the first, no?

The first one? I don't think it's fair to compare Daniel Craig to Sean Connery Wink
Back to top
Dazz99




Posts: 7302

PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 12:28    Post subject:
yeah sean connery can't act for shit but he's saved by the fact that he back hands women irl

daniel craig is actually good


cockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcock
Back to top
wawrzul




Posts: 2336
Location: Cracow, Poland
PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 13:31    Post subject:
Watched Casino Royale again lately (5th time i think) - Craig fucking owns. I respect Connery for being the first Bond and Brosnan just cause i like the guy. However i think Craig is the best so far. And Casino Royale is one of my fav 007 movies.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73242
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 13:32    Post subject:
me7 wrote:
LeoNatan wrote:
Yeah, but still... Pretty mediocre, when compared to the first, no?

The first one? I don't think it's fair to compare Daniel Craig to Sean Connery Wink

I hate idiots that do it, but I did it myself... Called a first in a current series as the very first of the entire series. Wink
Back to top
JahLux
Banned



Posts: 3705

PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 15:10    Post subject:
pierce is the shit
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 15:17    Post subject:
pierce of shit..
Back to top
JahLux
Banned



Posts: 3705

PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 16:17    Post subject:
 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
bringiton




Posts: 3723

PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 16:24    Post subject:
Pierce Brosnan is not a bad actor, but he was horrible as James Bond...


โ€œThe only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.โ€
- Albert Camus
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73242
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 16:29    Post subject:
Exactly. Some of his more recent (and more mature and serious) roles have been fantastic. He's just too much of a playboy in the Bond movies, that somehow doesn't seem to fit the whole superspy feel.
Back to top
Vodka-Redbull




Posts: 5134
Location: The Evil Empire
PostPosted: Thu, 30th Oct 2008 16:57    Post subject:
bringiton wrote:
Pierce Brosnan is not a bad actor, but he was horrible as James Bond...
Back to top
Page 3 of 5 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Movie & TV Sparks Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group