| Page 48 of 70 |
swebarb
Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland
|
 Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 12:06 Post subject: |
|
 |
Wow this game uses over 600mb video memory on 1280x1024.. crazy usage.. but only 1 cpu core is really active 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
b0se
Banned
Posts: 5901
Location: Rapture
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 12:09 Post subject: |
|
|
i have managed to get a decent frame rate when i set the sun qquality and sun rays to medium , my fps growed from 15 to 40
[spoiler][quote="SteamDRM"]i've bought mohw :derp: / FPS of the year! [/quote]
[quote="SteamDRM"][quote="b0se"]BLACK OPS GOTY[/quote]
No.[/quote][/spoiler]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 12:19 Post subject: |
|
|
| swebarb wrote: | | Wow this game uses over 600mb video memory on 1280x1024.. crazy usage.. but only 1 cpu core is really active |
That sounds unoptimized to me. Maybe next time if they take 10 years to develop it  nice and slow, don't rush it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 12:38 Post subject: |
|
|
what's the use of earning fps by downscaling the video-options ? you'll only get..what...graphics of a 5 years old game ?
AMD Athlon 64 X2 dual-core 6000+
MSI K9N Neo V3
2 Gb Geil DDR2 PC6400 800 Mhz
Leadtek 9800 GT 512 Mb DDR3 256 bits
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
b0se
Banned
Posts: 5901
Location: Rapture
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 12:48 Post subject: |
|
|
| frasy-hyena wrote: | | what's the use of earning fps by downscaling the video-options ? you'll only get..what...graphics of a 5 years old game ? |
u mean five year old engine right ?
[spoiler][quote="SteamDRM"]i've bought mohw :derp: / FPS of the year! [/quote]
[quote="SteamDRM"][quote="b0se"]BLACK OPS GOTY[/quote]
No.[/quote][/spoiler]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 13:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| frasy-hyena wrote: | | what's the use of earning fps by downscaling the video-options ? you'll only get..what...graphics of a 5 years old game ? |
there's barely any graphical difference between medium and high sun settings. fact.
what's the use of your post?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
b0se
Banned
Posts: 5901
Location: Rapture
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 13:09 Post subject: |
|
|
oh jeez , why are my weapons and objects worth only a few money ? a full repaired gunn with improvements it's worth 450 , i wanna buy an armour but jeez ... can someone tell me how can i find artifacts ? i pressed O and only founded radiations but no artifacts
[spoiler][quote="SteamDRM"]i've bought mohw :derp: / FPS of the year! [/quote]
[quote="SteamDRM"][quote="b0se"]BLACK OPS GOTY[/quote]
No.[/quote][/spoiler]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 13:21 Post subject: |
|
|
i am sure it's been told in early posts allready that artifacts are found in anomalies...something like that
AMD Athlon 64 X2 dual-core 6000+
MSI K9N Neo V3
2 Gb Geil DDR2 PC6400 800 Mhz
Leadtek 9800 GT 512 Mb DDR3 256 bits
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 13:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| Vikerness wrote: | | frasy-hyena wrote: | | what's the use of earning fps by downscaling the video-options ? you'll only get..what...graphics of a 5 years old game ? |
there's barely any graphical difference between medium and high sun settings. fact.
what's the use of your post? |
don't get me wrong now, i didn't made any direct reference to sun-settings, but to downscaling video options in general
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 13:56 Post subject: |
|
|
so any ideas for playing the english version on vista 64?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:03 Post subject: |
|
|
| GeForce8 wrote: | | oh jeez , why are my weapons and objects worth only a few money ? a full repaired gunn with improvements it's worth 450 , i wanna buy an armour but jeez ... can someone tell me how can i find artifacts ? i pressed O and only founded radiations but no artifacts |
you have to actually equip your scanner so it shows you where to find artifacts. better scanner=easier to find.
and the prices you get for or have to pay for stuff are defind by your grade of friendship to the faction
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:14 Post subject: |
|
|
The retail version is out on 19 september right?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:17 Post subject: |
|
|
Stalker is boring. Period.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:22 Post subject: |
|
|
does it run better than the original STALKER?
''The mind and body must be subjected to extreme stimulus, by means of drugs and music.'' - Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:26 Post subject: |
|
|
stalker overrated , i didnt like the phirst one , decide to try this one , really boring.
| Sin317 wrote: | | while you can't "turn gay", you can cut off your balls. believe me, you'll never think of women again. |
| zmed wrote: | | Or just a defense mechanism. If you fart, you'll most definitely smell it so your brain tells you it ain't bad as strangerfarts. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:31 Post subject: |
|
|
With Dx10 it runs alot worse. However, there's really just a tiny visual difference between Enhanced Full Dynamic Lighting( Dx10) and just the regular Enhanced Full Dynamic Lighting; personally I don't even notice it unless I look at screenshots( where Dx9 mode appears more 'washed-out' ).
I certainly notice the fps drop though. With Dx10 activated I will have 11'ish fps in one specific scene. If I switch off Dx10, my fps rise to 50 with an, as mentioned, almost unnoticeable difference visually.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:33 Post subject: |
|
|
who cares. its borring
/sarcasm
Last edited by Vikerness on Tue, 16th Sep 2008 15:26; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:38 Post subject: |
|
|
You know what else is boring? Trolls.
We care, by the way. I didn't expect a troll with a wrestler avatar to appreciate the game's finer points... Or do I come here and let you shove your opinion down my throat. I will decide what's boring and what's not boring. Mkay, there, champ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:45 Post subject: |
|
|
ok now, chill down spartans !
AMD Athlon 64 X2 dual-core 6000+
MSI K9N Neo V3
2 Gb Geil DDR2 PC6400 800 Mhz
Leadtek 9800 GT 512 Mb DDR3 256 bits
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:48 Post subject: |
|
|
| Frolsa84 wrote: | You know what else is boring? Trolls.
We care, by the way. I didn't expect a troll with a wrestler avatar to appreciate the game's finer points... Or do I come here and let you shove your opinion down my throat. I will decide what's boring and what's not boring. Mkay, there, champ? |
That was only his opinion, why are you so sensible?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:51 Post subject: |
|
|
do notice
| scarfacew3 wrote: | | Stalker is boring. Period. |
| scarfacew3 wrote: | | That was only his opinion, why are you so sensible? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:57 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 14:59 Post subject: |
|
|
Please, shut up. Thank you for your opinion. Bye now.
As for the performance, not it does not run better than SoC, because the engine's been improved to show improved DX9 and DX10 graphics which makes it a lot heavier to render. If you go for the "Enhanced Lighting" mode, expect to run @ 30fps avg without sun and around 25fps when the sun is shining and the sunshafts etc are showing.
If you stick to the "normal" DX9 mode, framerates are more acceptable. Around 100fps on my 3870CF setup. But then you'll have to miss al the graphical enhancements.
Got to Yantar yesterday, but shouldn't this be a prequel?  Spoiler: |
The scientist told me that Strelok had just run off with the anti-psy thingie. So you are basically following Strelok from the original Stalker, aren't you? |
"YARR! We be stealin' yer games an plundrin' yer gold!" sez the pirate.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 15:10 Post subject: |
|
|
| Vikerness wrote: | do notice
| scarfacew3 wrote: | | Stalker is boring. Period. |
| scarfacew3 wrote: | | That was only his opinion, why are you so sensible? |
|
What should I write "that was only opinion" ??? Come on, pls think a little bit.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
b0se
Banned
Posts: 5901
Location: Rapture
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Sep 2008 15:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| Flowmo wrote: | Please, shut up. Thank you for your opinion. Bye now.
As for the performance, not it does not run better than SoC, because the engine's been improved to show improved DX9 and DX10 graphics which makes it a lot heavier to render. If you go for the "Enhanced Lighting" mode, expect to run @ 30fps avg without sun and around 25fps when the sun is shining and the sunshafts etc are showing.
If you stick to the "normal" DX9 mode, framerates are more acceptable. Around 100fps on my 3870CF setup. But then you'll have to miss al the graphical enhancements.
Got to Yantar yesterday, but shouldn't this be a prequel? | Spoiler: |
The scientist told me that Strelok had just run off with the anti-psy thingie. So you are basically following Strelok from the original Stalker, aren't you? |
|
| Spoiler: | No , actually Strelok from Shadow of Chernobyl was YOU , u were strelok , so basically u are now chasing u'reself lol |
[spoiler][quote="SteamDRM"]i've bought mohw :derp: / FPS of the year! [/quote]
[quote="SteamDRM"][quote="b0se"]BLACK OPS GOTY[/quote]
No.[/quote][/spoiler]
Last edited by b0se on Tue, 16th Sep 2008 15:29; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 48 of 70 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
