| Page 13 of 112 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 20th Jul 2008 12:48 Post subject: |
|
|
The most impressive game on this e3.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 20th Jul 2008 12:56 Post subject: |
|
|
No, the 4850 heat issue is driver related thanks to the fan.
There's a hotfix out for it last I heard. Hope they get it working since I plan on upgrading to that from my 8800 later this year.
Anyway, I preordered Oblivion, but after they raped their own series I am more than glad to don my pirate outfit.
Gustave the Steel
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 20th Jul 2008 13:55 Post subject: |
|
|
| LeoNatan wrote: | | Why? 4850 is better and price is about the same, no? |
got an SLI board so an ATI card would mean i wouldnt have the option of running X-fire or SLI. not upgrading my mobo untill the next intel socket. i prefer nvidia cards ne way. the 9800gtx is only about an extra £30-£40 and the benchmarks ive seen basically show both cards are about on par with each other..
and thinking about.. it just seems wrong having an ATI card in an nvidia board..
Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 20th Jul 2008 14:12 Post subject: |
|
|
Dude, why don't you just wait until Far Cry 2 comes out and then buy a GTX260? They're not THAT expensive?
"Also when the Prince of Persia movie they're making turns out good then I will upload pictures of me punching myself in my tiny unsatisfying penis" - Yahtzee
Athlon 64 X2 4600+
2GB DDR400 CAS2
GeForce 7900GT 256MB
4 x 250GB SATAII in RAID5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 21st Jul 2008 16:13 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, like I said, a hotfix is out.
Gustave the Steel
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
$en$i
VIP Member
Posts: 3127
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Karmeck
Posts: 3348
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu, 24th Jul 2008 18:26 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phluxed
VIP Member
Posts: 4911
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu, 24th Jul 2008 18:46 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Thu, 24th Jul 2008 20:23 Post subject: |
|
|
It looks good, but if you ask me, Far Cry, Crysis and Far Cry 2 would benefit immensely from online coop.
It must be so awesome to run around in the jungle (or savannah) with some friends, almost like in operation flashpoint or something and attack camps together and stuff like that...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Jul 2008 05:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| Surray wrote: | It looks good, but if you ask me, Far Cry, Crysis and Far Cry 2 would benefit immensely from online coop.
It must be so awesome to run around in the jungle (or savannah) with some friends, almost like in operation flashpoint or something and attack camps together and stuff like that... |
it would suck since after raiding a village I'd claim it mine and he'd claim it his
and then I'd have to kill him
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Jul 2008 09:21 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Jul 2008 20:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| Surray wrote: | It looks good, but if you ask me, Far Cry, Crysis and Far Cry 2 would benefit immensely from online coop.
It must be so awesome to run around in the jungle (or savannah) with some friends, almost like in operation flashpoint or something and attack camps together and stuff like that... |
yeap. hope they do that sometime..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 12:16 Post subject: |
|
|
Minimum requirements
CPU: Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz, Pentium D 2.66 Ghz, AMD Athlon 64 3500+ or better
RAM: 1 GB
Video card: NVidia 6800 or ATI X1650 or better
Shader Model 3 required
256 Mb of graphic memory
Media reader: DVD-ROM
Hard drive space: ~12 Gig or HD space. (tbd)
Recommended
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo Family, AMD 64 X2 5200+, AMD Phenom or better
RAM: 2 GB
Video card: NVidia 8600 GTS or better, ATI X1900 or better
512 Mb of graphic memory
Sound: 5.1 sound card recommended
Supported Video cards:
NVidia 6800, NVidia 7000 series, 8000 series, 9000 series, 200 series. 8800M and 8700M supported for laptops. ATI X1650 – 1950 series , HD2000 series , HD3000 series , HD4000 series .
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 12:17 Post subject: |
|
|
wow I guess I can max this bitch out
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 15:41 Post subject: |
|
|
maybe, maybe not, recommended = recommended minimum...
| Quote: | | PC awesome button = Uninstall! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 16:01 Post subject: |
|
|
hmmm 12gig for PC and on x360 it streams from a 7,5 gig dvd-9
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 16:02 Post subject: |
|
|
Recommended video card:
Not out yet
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 16:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mortibus wrote: | Recommended video card:
Not out yet |
Bwuahahaha!
Too bloody right! Although, to be fair, this is Ubisoft. Not Crytek. Ubi want people to play their games, unlike the bastards at Crytek that mainly do it to brag.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 17:33 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | | Mortibus wrote: | Recommended video card:
Not out yet |
Bwuahahaha!
Too bloody right! Although, to be fair, this is Ubisoft. Not Crytek. Ubi want people to play their games, unlike the bastards at Crytek that mainly do it to brag. |
yeah right like they did that stunt on PS3.0 , all Ati users where fucked (ps2.0 only at that time) and all nvidia also that did had ps3.0
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 17:37 Post subject: |
|
|
Crytek make me sick. They really do. The sooner that pathetic company files for bankruptcy, the better.
"oh woe is us! Crysis sold so poorly because of piracy!! It's not faaaaaair!"
No, it sold so poorly because no fucker could play it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 17:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| Spiderman wrote: | | hmmm 12gig for PC and on x360 it streams from a 7,5 gig dvd-9 |
Well there will probably be higher res textures on the PC version, doubt that accounts for a 4.5 gig difference though.
"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D
"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34994
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73219
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 18:46 Post subject: |
|
|
| Spiderman wrote: | | yeah right like they did that stunt on PS3.0 , all Ati users where fucked (ps2.0 only at that time) and all nvidia also that did had ps3.0 |
You mean, all those idiots that bought retarded 2 years old hardware because ATI told them the new hardware is useless?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 19:19 Post subject: |
|
|
I was with ATi for their 9700/9800 cards, but prior to that I was nVidia through and through. I was laughing my ass off at the GeForce-FX series owners while I was playing FarCry on my 9800Pro. Then ATi dropped the ball with their refusal to update to SM3.0. The X800/X850 were stupendously powerful cards (far more powerful in SM2.0 than any competeting nVidia card) but without SM3.0, they just couldn't keep up with the newer games.
Since then I switched over to the 6-series GeForces -- right up to the 8800GT, which I'm happy to say I got rid of pretty damned quick. Traded it for a 360-Elite and then bought a Radeon 4850, which is more powerful than pretty much any other GeForce under the new GTX-260 (and it even competes WITH the GTX-260 on many tests)
Seems every couple of generations we all have to switch over to the competitor, heh. I'll be using Radeon for a while, then no doubt they'll be a new killer card from nVidia in a couple of years and I'll switch back.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73219
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 20:30 Post subject: |
|
|
I had almost the same route... GF4200 -> 9800Pro -> 6600GT -> 8800GTX -> Probably 4870X2. nVidia are just not that worth the high money price they're asking (like it was with the 8800GTX).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Aug 2008 20:44 Post subject: |
|
|
GeForce 3, GeForce 4 TI, 9800pro, 6800gs, 8800gts, 4850
lol
Edit:
Also, Crytek is crap because a month or so after Crysis was released, their head honcho went on some interview talking about a sequel and what they'd change.
He basically said they were improving the graphics.
Really? REALLY?
FFS how about the writing? Or the gameplay? I don't give a shit about fucking graphics since I can't even fucking enjoy it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 13 of 112 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
.
(It's got partial installing, to help with file caching, but you can't install and run completely off the HDD)
