| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Sat, 21st Jun 2008 20:07 Post subject: |
|
|
well...everyone will tell ya IL-2 Sturmovik , but i will be patient and wait for Tom Clancy's Hawx ..not a wwii sim, b ut will kick as i hope  (modern sim)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 21st Jun 2008 20:23 Post subject: |
|
|
Yea, that one does look good too.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MannyK
Posts: 1405
Location: Brazil
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 21st Jun 2008 21:26 Post subject: |
|
|
Is FS X really that good? It's like...12 gigs or something isn't it?
(I'm on a 1.5mbit connection...that's around 180k)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 21st Jun 2008 22:40 Post subject: |
|
|
This is something that i can't understand, i remember playing flight sims ever since the zx-48k days, and then on my first 486 pc. They were good considering the lack of processing power available but i would see simulators on tv which obviously used much more powerful dedicated hardware and think, i can't wait for home computers to run the simulations at that quality but even the best flight sims these days look crap.
Played the latest MS FS last year on a new computer and it was so choppy and slow it looked like i was playing something from 1997
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 22nd Jun 2008 01:02 Post subject: |
|
|
Take in concideration that the whole world is modeled in the MS Flight Sims.
In the future we'll have super graphics in the flight sims too.
I hope they build the new FS in a whole new engine which is more optimized than the one they are using now
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
.
