Page 5 of 6 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
$en$i
VIP Member



Posts: 3127

PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 19:46    Post subject:
@JBeckman

yep this was a bit tedious to apply the patch several times, even if with a full directory backup reverting was rather quick.

@ Nui

Actually I use the pc xbox 360 controller and it is far better with it than with the keyboard+mouse, that game is really made for gamepads, and to play it otherwise would be like trying to play a FPS with the latter. Wink
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 20:47    Post subject:
$en$i wrote:
Actually I use the pc xbox 360 controller and it is far better with it than with the keyboard+mouse, that game is really made for gamepads, and to play it otherwise would be like trying to play a FPS with the latter. Wink
I can imagine, that a lot of people prefer a gamepad for this game. I'm not one of them, because i'm way more used to a keyboard - play Mario 64 way better with a keyboard for example Laughing
And I don't really see a significant argument pro gamepad, as i can prolly do anything just as good with a gamepad or just avoid a problem. Its not like the keyboard+mouse config is less precise. You just have to make use of your mouse to look in the direction you want to go and your set. Although this way obviously eliminates a precise movement in every other direction, but i don't care to much about that Wink

Anyway, the 'gamepad vs. keyboard mouse' was just about the togglefeature in the control settings, i think.
Back to top
WalkerBoh




Posts: 522
Location: Rome, Italy
PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 20:49    Post subject:
|IcedFreon| wrote:
its going to be beyond hilarious when all you (sorry i cant come up with a nicer word) morons complaining about "black bars" will see the same thing in the final since its a 16:9 game running on either 16:10, 5:4 or 4:3 resolutions.


The fact that is a 16:9 means nothing. All pc games are made to support every format.
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 20:59    Post subject:
Ah forgot that i also wanted to talk about the b² (blackbars Razz)

So as long a dev actually thought about it and wants to have certain aspect ratio to provide a better ... something (atmo maybe Razz) i will gladly accept it,
BUT as far as i can see there is no game on the market where my stated condition actually applies and given the fact that is most likely relatively easy to provide the user with a choice in this regard, they should just implement every standard ratio for satans sake. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
|IcedFreon|




Posts: 3700
Location: World 8-3
PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 20:59    Post subject:
WalkerBoh wrote:
|IcedFreon| wrote:
its going to be beyond hilarious when all you (sorry i cant come up with a nicer word) morons complaining about "black bars" will see the same thing in the final since its a 16:9 game running on either 16:10, 5:4 or 4:3 resolutions.


The fact that is a 16:9 means nothing. All pc games are made to support every format.

..........


Back to top
D3mon_Hunt3r




Posts: 17

PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 21:35    Post subject:
Yes Freon morons is the correct word...
@ WalkerBoh
What part of Port do you not understand? They don't give a damn about PC Version, Port and it's done.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 21:45    Post subject:
Ahahaha can't believe the blackbars (b²) drama still goes on...
Back to top
CaptainCox
VIP Member



Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 21:46    Post subject:
Ditto, waist of energy and OUR time!


Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 22:25    Post subject:
not to speak of all the server bandwidth!
Back to top
odraciRRicardo




Posts: 16

PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 22:36    Post subject:
|IcedFreon| wrote:
its going to be beyond hilarious when all you (sorry i cant come up with a nicer word) morons complaining about "black bars" will see the same thing in the final since its a 16:9 game running on either 16:10, 5:4 or 4:3 resolutions.

How is a shitty port hilarious? And what the hell is a "16:9 game"? Are games bounded by screen ratio now? Rolling Eyes
Sorry, but you are the moron (that's actually a good word to describe you).
Back to top
|IcedFreon|




Posts: 3700
Location: World 8-3
PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 22:48    Post subject:
ugh. its hilarious that the people complaining think it will change in the final. and yes its a 16:9 game since its a console port and TV's arent 16:10 duh. so if youre in that OMG WHY DO I HAVE BLACK BARS crowd then you sir are the moron.




Last edited by |IcedFreon| on Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 22:49; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 22:48    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Ahahaha can't believe the blackbars (b²) drama still goes on...

then go the the condemned topic it was the beginning of the bitching bar saga Laughing damn whats wrong with the sheepeople today don't they love the cinematic look
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 22:49    Post subject:
And some of you are pretty mean
I will laugh with Freon if this b² drama continues after release Very Happy
Back to top
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 23:01    Post subject:
I can understand people with crappy 5:4 monitors whining about extra huge bars, but on a 16:10 they are tiny so it's ok.


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
Back to top
fawe4




Posts: 1774

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 00:43    Post subject:
In what way are 16:10 superior to normal monitors?
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 00:48    Post subject:
fawe4 wrote:
In what way are 16:10 superior to normal monitors?

They have smaller black bars in AC? Laughing
Back to top
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 00:49    Post subject:
fawe4 wrote:
In what way are 16:10 superior to normal monitors?

What's a normal monitor? Because for me 16:10 is normal.

If you meant 16:10 vs 5:4 then there are some significant advantages:

-In games with proper widescreen support you see more than nubs with their 5:4 or 4:3 boxes. Especially nice in multiplayer.

-In movies and tv shows you see very little bars because it's very close to 16:9

-Horizontal human eyesight is wider than vertical.

-You can have two application windows side by side with reasonable amount of workspace for each.

-Widescreen is now and future. 5:4 and 4:3 is yesterdays technology.


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox


Last edited by Glottis on Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 01:04; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
fawe4




Posts: 1774

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 00:57    Post subject:
Glottis wrote:
fawe4 wrote:
In what way are 16:10 superior to normal monitors?

What's a normal monitor? Because for me 16:10 is normal.


A joke? Rolling Eyes

Just explain in what way are crappy monitors superior to your normal ones.
Back to top
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 00:58    Post subject:
fawe4 wrote:
Glottis wrote:
fawe4 wrote:
In what way are 16:10 superior to normal monitors?

What's a normal monitor? Because for me 16:10 is normal.


A joke? Rolling Eyes

Just explain in what way are crappy monitors superior to your normal ones.

I did, learn to read please. And no it's no joke, for me 16:10 is normal.


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
Back to top
fawe4




Posts: 1774

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 01:12    Post subject:
Quote:
I did, learn to read please. And no it's no joke, for me 16:10 is normal.


I did, I replied to your unedited post.

Glottis wrote:
In what way are 16:10 superior to normal monitors?
If you meant 16:10 vs 5:4 then there are some significant advantages:

In games with proper widescreen support you see more than nubs with their 5:4 or 4:3 boxes. Especially nice in multiplayer.


And there are almost no games with 'proper widescreen' suport, are they?

Quote:
-In movies and tv shows you see very little bars because it's very close to 16:9


That's true, even most tv shows are in ws now.

Quote:
-Horizontal human eyesight is wider than vertical.


Last time I checked text in books and newspapers were in portrait orientation, human apparently reads better when columns are narrower.

Now, what about web browsing? Or about old games? Or about desktop publishing?
Back to top
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 01:21    Post subject:
fawe4 wrote:
Now, what about web browsing? Or about old games? Or about desktop publishing?

Your questions are ridiculous. Have you never used a widescreen monitor? School? Job? Friends? no?

Once you go widescreen you don't go back.


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
Back to top
thyttel




Posts: 488
Location: Denmark
PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 01:25    Post subject:
70 pages with a childish discussion about widescreen or not......wtf?......can you guys get over it.....either way!!
Back to top
fawe4




Posts: 1774

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 01:29    Post subject:
Glottis wrote:
fawe4 wrote:
Now, what about web browsing? Or about old games? Or about desktop publishing?

Your questions are ridiculous. Have you never used a widescreen monitor? School? Job? Friends? no?

Once you go widescreen you don't go back.


I'm just saying it's not so bloody superior as some like to portray them.

Anyway, thyttel is right.
Back to top
Xeinon




Posts: 221

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 01:30    Post subject:
The reason for the black bars are simple. SO they would NOT have to redo the HUD and all the menu art and stuff, which is originally made to be in 16:9. In 16:10 or 4:5 and whatever, the HUD and menus would be stretched out. Since the resolution cannot be changed on those things.
Back to top
Cohen




Posts: 7155
Location: Rapture
PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 01:52    Post subject:
Glottis wrote:
fawe4 wrote:
Now, what about web browsing? Or about old games? Or about desktop publishing?

Your questions are ridiculous. Have you never used a widescreen monitor? School? Job? Friends? no?

Once you go widescreen you don't go back.


Actually, I tried Crysis on a widescreen monitor then went back to my 15 inch TFT :/


troll detected by SiN
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 02:10    Post subject:
fawe4 wrote:
Quote:
In games with proper widescreen support you see more than nubs with their 5:4 or 4:3 boxes. Especially nice in multiplayer.


And there are almost no games with 'proper widescreen' suport, are they?

Most do have. Maybe you played only one game in your life?


My IMDb Ratings | Fix NFOHump Cookies | Hide Users / Threads | Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) | The Derps Collection

Death smiles at us all; all we can do is smile back.


Last edited by LeoNatan on Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 02:12; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
odraciRRicardo




Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 02:10    Post subject:
Glottis wrote:
fawe4 wrote:
Now, what about web browsing? Or about old games? Or about desktop publishing?

Your questions are ridiculous. Have you never used a widescreen monitor? School? Job? Friends? no?

Once you go widescreen you don't go back.

They are actually very pertinent, ever noticed while browsing in a widescreen, all that blanc space in the sides? It's just a waste. For normal web browsing and office work 4:3 or 5:4 are still better. in gaming and specially in movies 16:10 is better. But that's all beside the point. We, as pc gamers, with different cpu's, graphic cards and monitors should be able to select the best settings for us. Like we choose graphic details etc.
I don't see how someone can disagree with that, and that only a shitty port would restrict to 16:9, I suspect you are not actually morons, just trools, not that different but...
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 02:13    Post subject:
Don't know what sites you guys are surfing in, but on my laptop all sites take full advantage of the WS monitor...

This is seriously getting ...
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 02:16    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Don't know what sites you guys are surfing in, but on my laptop all sites take full advantage of the WS monitor...

This is seriously getting ...

plus i can read 3 pages at once in Word Very Happy
Back to top
snakes3x




Posts: 12

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 02:16    Post subject:
Here's another post about black bars.
Back to top
Page 5 of 6 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games - Technical Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group