| Page 160 of 183 |
|
|
 Posted: Thu, 6th Mar 2008 21:13 Post subject: |
|
 |
| tihkal wrote: | | Hrm, did you look at the pc in my sig? It's pretty damn close, sorry it's not a core 2 duo. I don't believe that the game runs smooth for you period. Post your rig.... |
Answering a question with another question never leads anywhere... So Ill wait for your answer.
But ofcourse, my current specs are :
C2Q 2.4 Ghz
2 Gb pc 7200 (I think) ram
8800 GT
Dunno mobo... And I dont think anything is OC´ed, I could be wrong thoug!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 6th Mar 2008 21:14 Post subject: |
|
|
On my specs which are below, the game runs at about 25-45 fps in 1440x900 2xAA, and HiGH settings, under DX9c.
ASUS M2N-E SLi , AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800 , 4 x 1 GB Kingston DDR2 800Mhz , Zotac 8800GT 512MB , Samsung 320GB + WD 500GB all this in a Raidmax Sagitta 2 with a 22" Acer AL2216W TFT , and a Genius SW 5.1 HT.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Thu, 6th Mar 2008 21:21 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | | Yes, at LOW and MED it is perfectly playable on many rigs -- the reason people are so antsy about the whole Crysis ..umm... crisis.. is because we have a game that NOBODY on this Earth can play as it was meant to be played. Is that fair? Or do you agree that the devs can't optimise for shit? |
That's not the reason. The reason for the crisis is this game is nothing more than a "whoop dee doo look at my fancy engine" demo, and if you can't do that right (= "as intended" by your words), what else is it worth for? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 6th Mar 2008 21:25 Post subject: |
|
|
| Photish wrote: |
And your "nobody on earth can play"-shit is lame... You dont know every person on earth do you? So think first... Speak/Write next! |
No, but I do know every high-end benchmark on this earth. NO PC of today's standards, regardless of hardware, can run Crysis at its maximum settings.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 6th Mar 2008 21:28 Post subject: |
|
|
and why doesnt it run the way they intended it? -i mean i get a pretty decent fps on my not HIGH END specs. so you must mean 1920x and 6xAA, and dx10 ultra high, but still even 2 8800GTX isnt enough to produce 30-40fps on those settings?
ASUS M2N-E SLi , AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800 , 4 x 1 GB Kingston DDR2 800Mhz , Zotac 8800GT 512MB , Samsung 320GB + WD 500GB all this in a Raidmax Sagitta 2 with a 22" Acer AL2216W TFT , and a Genius SW 5.1 HT.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 6th Mar 2008 21:32 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Thu, 6th Mar 2008 21:35 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pey
Posts: 5597
Location: Argentina
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 00:02 Post subject: |
|
|
Crysis.Update.1.2-ViTALiTY
Crysis_Patch_v1.2-HATRED
CPU : Intel i7 6900K | GC : Inno3D GTX 1080 FE | RAM : 128 GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200 | Case : Cooler Master COSMOS II | Mobo : Asus X99-DELUXE II | Cooler : Corsair H115i | PSU : Corsair HX1000i | Optical Drive : Asus BW-16D1HT | System Drive : Samsung 950 PRO M.2 PCIe 512Gb | HDD's : 7x ~ 28 Tb | OS : Win 10 Pro x64 | Monitor : Dell U2713HM
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 03:05 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 04:07 Post subject: |
|
|
The game is still utter shite when it comes to multiplayer. Absolutely no balance whatsoever.
I can never be free, because the shackles I wear can't be touched or be seen.
i9-9900k, MSI MPG-Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon, 32GB DDR4 @ 3000, eVGA GTX 1080 DT, Samsung 970 EVO Plus nVME 1TB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 08:14 Post subject: crysis ver? |
|
|
Which ver should I get that will let me install the patches with it?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 10:55 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand why all of you pretend to be able to play at ultra high settings smoothly, just because the ultra high setting IS THERE.
It's not like because it is there you MUST use it.
There are cars on the market that can reach 300 km/h, but nobody SANE would pretend to be allowed to drive at that speed just because his car CAN.
Why can't you just accept the ultra high option is there just as a "plus" that will be usable in the future.
The devs could just have removed that option and made high the max settings, and none of you would be here whining, because even at high it's still the best looking game on the market.
Instead you see the ultra high settings and you all go "OMGF I can't run the godamn thing @ uber settings even if I spent $999999 on my new rig, this game is shite". Try to be realistic instead and understand that ultra high settings WERE NOT MEANT FOR USE WITH THIS GENERATION OF VIDEO HARDWARE.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 12:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| The_Leaf wrote: | I don't understand why all of you pretend to be able to play at ultra high settings smoothly, just because the ultra high setting IS THERE.
It's not like because it is there you MUST use it.
There are cars on the market that can reach 300 km/h, but nobody SANE would pretend to be allowed to drive at that speed just because his car CAN. |
You win the price for most retarded analogy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 12:25 Post subject: |
|
|
Question for me is will Nvidia be able to market a new high-end video card that can't shit on Crysis at maximum graphics settings?
Especially given their current mid-range card can handle every other game out there....
Also kind of highlights what a waste of money SLI is?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 12:28 Post subject: |
|
|
Well nVidia seems to have been pouring a lot of effort into SLi lately, all the recent driver releases have been focused on increasing SLi performance .. and their new chipsets, along with GPUs, are all catered towards SLi PCs. Heck, you can get a 9600GT for less than £100 -- SLi those for an extremely nice performance boost.
ATi's CrossFire technology has always scaled better than nVidia, but lately nV seem to be pulling back.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 12:30 Post subject: |
|
|
I guess, just that if the only game that doesn't scale well is the only game that their $200 mid range 8800GT can't run really well, makes it seem pointless?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 12:36 Post subject: |
|
|
I get good performance out of my 8800GT, running on high at 1280 .. but my whole point, and argument, is against Crytek releasing a game that they KNOW nobody can run "as intended"
I'm not bitching that I can't run it in 1920 with ultra-super-wicked settings. I'm bitching because it's like, and to use that absolutely pathetic car analogy, someone has given me a Ferrari and said; "Here, you can have this. You can only drive it at 20mph because the engine isn't powerful enough, but in five years someone will make a better engine and THEN you can drive it faster. Oh and we're still charging you full price for the car. Have a nice day". It's an insult, is what it is.
The worst part? The game isn't even that good, lol. Tech demo with nothing to offer that hasn't already been done before.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 12:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| LeoNatan wrote: | | The_Leaf wrote: | I don't understand why all of you pretend to be able to play at ultra high settings smoothly, just because the ultra high setting IS THERE.
It's not like because it is there you MUST use it.
There are cars on the market that can reach 300 km/h, but nobody SANE would pretend to be allowed to drive at that speed just because his car CAN. |
You win the price for most retarded analogy. |
Maybe... but it's still the truth: the fact that the option is there, doesn't mean that you must use it, and that if you can't (because it was not meant for current hardware) the game is automatically a piece of shit.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 12:41 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I decided not to play it and wait........
Games like this you never play the actual game, just find yourself in an endless loop of restarting levels in different resolutions, with different settings and hunting for optimisation FAQs that do fuck all.........
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 12:45 Post subject: |
|
|
| The_Leaf wrote: | | Maybe... but it's still the truth: the fact that the option is there, doesn't mean that you must use it, and that if you can't (because it was not meant for current hardware) the game is automatically a piece of shit. |
The game is a piece of shit, not because of its engine, but because it's a fucking tech engine with stupid gameplay. And if you can't have the tech demo properly, then fuck it and fuck Crysis. Had they actually work on optimization rather then putting every last shader in the engine, things would have been different. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pey
Posts: 5597
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 12:47 Post subject: |
|
|
Well... i used to play quake 3 with my voodoo2 (low fps) and years after i was able to play at 125 (which are the proper fps to play mp). The game isnt a piece of shit, we are being too fussy about details and resolutions and all now a days because we own a 8800ultra in sli or whatever.
In fact i think crysis runs way better than some games like q3a and others in its time.
Wait one year -or less- and you will be able to play crysis at 100fps.
Seasonic 1000w Planitum - TT Level 10 GT - ASUS M5E - i7 2600k @ 5.0ghz - 16GB Patriot Viper 3 - Dell u3011 - EVGA GTX 980 @ SLI - SSD Samsung EVO 250GB - 16TB W.D. - G19/G13 @ Roccat Kone XTD - Razer Vespula - Xonar Phoebus @ Vulcan ANC/Corsair 2100 Vengeance - Logitech G51
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 7th Mar 2008 12:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| The_Leaf wrote: |
Maybe... but it's still the truth: the fact that the option is there, doesn't mean that you must use it, and that if you can't (because it was not meant for current hardware) the game is automatically a piece of shit. |
*sigh*
You're missing the point, Sir.
"Not meant for current hardware"? Then why release it at all! If the game is obviously too "powerful" to run on current hardware, then the devs are just scamming everyone! See my previous analogy. They should have just "locked" the highest settings -- until hardware was out that COULD cope with it.
.... *dons tinfoil helmet*
You want to know what I think...? I think it's a load of horseshit. The game was created, was it not? The devs coded it and ran it at those highest settings, did they not? We also saw the initial videos of the game, running with maximum settings, at a totally fluid framerate. MY belief is much simpler; they have DELIBERATELY coded the game so that it can't run optimally. It's a trap to force people to buy the best-of-the-best hardware that, apparently, doesn't even exist yet!
| Pey wrote: | Well... i used to play quake 3 with my voodoo2 (low fps) and years after i was able to play at 125 (which are the proper fps to play mp). The game isnt a piece of shit, we are being too fussy about details and resolutions and all now a days because we own a 8800ultra in sli or whatever.
In fact i think crysis runs way better than some games like q3a and others in its time.
Wait one year -or less- and you will be able to play crysis at 100fps. |
Strange, I used to run Quake3 on my Voodoo1 with an ATi Rage Pro ... on a P1-233Mhz and it ran gloriously.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 160 of 183 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
