| Page 5 of 16 |
|
|
 Posted: Fri, 22nd Oct 2004 14:09 Post subject: |
|
 |
so why everybody is crying that animation is so bad and slow? and loadings are soooooo looong.....? i will have it tommorow but when i'm reading this kind of stuff i'm a little worried :/
AMD 64 3800+ ~2.7Ghz, 2GB Ram, GF 7800gs + bliss 512 RAM...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 22nd Oct 2004 14:46 Post subject: |
|
|
| dredziol wrote: | | so why everybody is crying that animation is so bad and slow? and loadings are soooooo looong.....? i will have it tommorow but when i'm reading this kind of stuff i'm a little worried :/ |
No one is whining about that. Only 1 or two and they most likley use shit media or have a shit burner or a shit ps2.
Animations are exactly the same as in previous gta game so i dont see why anyone would whine about that. Maybe they havent played any gta game before.
So aslong as you dont have shit stuff you will be fine.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 22nd Oct 2004 16:03 Post subject: |
|
|
oh man... i hope that tommorow i'll be sucked to my tv set to enjoy it better. i'm asking all of this because there are so many different opinion and they made me so confuse that i'm worried about San Andreas. but i hope it's great as you say. one more question > is there ragdoll system implented (i dunno how to say that in Eng)
AMD 64 3800+ ~2.7Ghz, 2GB Ram, GF 7800gs + bliss 512 RAM...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 22nd Oct 2004 16:59 Post subject: |
|
|
I really dont see why some complain about loading times. it takes what? 2-3secs when something loads. That is nothing.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 22nd Oct 2004 17:38 Post subject: |
|
|
downloaded the game, played the game, and i will sure buy the game on oct the 29th
loading times are the same as the first gta and vice city, gameplay also
levels are huge have to play more to unlock the 2 other parts
i hope that when they unlocked there will be no loading times between parts of the levels
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 22nd Oct 2004 17:51 Post subject: |
|
|
why who gives a damn about loading times of like 5 seconds between maps... it loads when you're driving on a bridge its not like your gonna miss anything
you expect wonders from the PS2, fuckwits
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 22nd Oct 2004 18:24 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 22nd Oct 2004 18:48 Post subject: |
|
|
The graphics are not worse than in any previous gta game.
He problary haven't played any other gta game.
And if he have he have totally forgot about it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 22nd Oct 2004 20:05 Post subject: |
|
|
the first hour i played the game i though 'wtf, this is nothing that they said it would be, but the game grows on ya, now i cant stop playing it, sure its not the graphical experience like ZOE2 or FFX, but the gameplay is there and it rules =) so to all the people who think its not a good game, give it some time if you dont like it than then dont play. about the loading times ive never experienced long loads, must be bad media or a bad laser (as many other has said before me) but this is definitly a buy game. Good games shuld be bought and this is one of them, besides it will look nice with all the GTA's original. =)
still no sign of any rampages though and no 'car boostin' dude either :/
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 22nd Oct 2004 22:45 Post subject: |
|
|
Ok i only wanna know ONE thing. How is the FPS (frames per second) compared to GTAIII and GTA VC ? If i say that the FPS count for GTAIII/VC was pretty bad and you don't know what im talking about you shouldn't even consider answering this question.....
So is the game jerky like the previous 2 games ? or is it the same ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 22nd Oct 2004 23:34 Post subject: |
|
|
The game is most of the time at a steady 30fps but it dips at times but not that often so it doesn't destroy the gameplay.
And to be honest, the framerate for both gta3 and VC was also 30fps and 30fps on a tv is good enough since you get the blur effect of a tv and that makes 30fps alot more playable on a console than on a computer for example.
I think you are quite picky.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 23rd Oct 2004 00:14 Post subject: |
|
|
i cannot believe it ! just as the Freebird guitar solo gets going the song cuts ... what the hell were rockstar thinking!!!!!!!!! cheesy or not i was just getting into it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 23rd Oct 2004 00:37 Post subject: |
|
|
Well the gta games are extremely demanding games (they cant even be compared) and especially for a console so i dont think it's strange at all that it can dip below 30 at times. I mean, you can drive around in a HUGE and i mean a REALLY HUGE area before you get 1 single loading screen and thats not even something you see often on a pc game with way better hardware. But like i said, the framerate is at a steady 30fps most of the time. It can dip at times but usually it happens when it doesn't mather.
Why not try it? That way you will know if it's ok for you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 23rd Oct 2004 01:00 Post subject: |
|
|
If you've played GTA3 or VC on the PC, you're eyes will be in pain for the first 30 minutes. The graphics are very crude when compared.
It's tolerable, and not a big deal if you never got used to the PC version, but I finished VC again on the PC just to refresh my skills for this game and it was very hard to downgrade to the lower resolution and lower res textures.
Still a very fun game though, also, the sheer massiveness of the first city is hard to learn as well. I find myself using the player target a lot even to find my way back to a safehouse. A lot of the main part of Los Santos looks similar and it's easy to get lost.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hahe
Posts: 1685
Location: US
|
| Posted: Sat, 23rd Oct 2004 01:07 Post subject: |
|
|
Ohhh that reminds me. I would also rather get it for the PS2 now and not wait because for some reason Vice City for the PC has audio glitches for me. After a little bit everything turned into like chipmonk voices/sounds.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 23rd Oct 2004 01:13 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheGuvnor
Posts: 41
Location: Um......here ? No wait.....over here......hang on...............
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 23rd Oct 2004 02:11 Post subject: |
|
|
You're weak!
Oh sympathy, right.....erm....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wyhpower
Posts: 68
Location: Still at Vice City, Sometimes LC. Heading to SA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SirCez
Posts: 357
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Sat, 23rd Oct 2004 04:25 Post subject: |
|
|
To people who are moaning about the game's missing textures, sound etc. When i first burned the game with Alcohol I had the same problems, the game was unplayable. But then I burned the iso file again with DVD Dcyripter and it worked fine. Just to let you know.
And this is the best game in the trilogy. The graphics are a bit better than previous GTA games. Animations are done really good. When you press L1 shoulder button, CJ's stats comes up, which shows things like Respect, Stamina, Fat, and so on. Cars look and feel better but don't expect big difference. You can even hijack a train. The fighting and new targeting system works fluently. In my opinion this is the best GTA game yet. I will be definately buying this game when it comes out.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 23rd Oct 2004 05:03 Post subject: |
|
|
this game is terrible. i dont see how this is going to be a halo 2 killer. the animations are terrible. the voices are so off key with the players reactions. i played for 45 minutes riding a bike and driving a street sweeper. no where near as many glitches as vice city ( thats a good thing) but it doesnt help. then again, i didnt like any gta's. im no xbox fanboy. i give every system there fair shot. thats why i own them all. infact, im not all that excited about halo2 either. im excited about resident evil 4 more. but st andreas just isnt cutting it for me. sorry guys
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 5 of 16 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
but i read the same opinion on polish forum :/ so the only way i think is to play it by myself. palleburn what's your opinion about San Andreas? Is it so great as it was annouced? and does it really id on one layer dvd?
My ps2 had a lot of problems with Vice City 
i will play gta on saturday. damn! ;(
