AMD Now Worth Less Than What It Paid For ATI
Page 1 of 1
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73223
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 14:03    Post subject: AMD Now Worth Less Than What It Paid For ATI
Quote:
AMD reached its lowest share price for more than four years last week and, as a result, its market value dropped to around US$5 billion – that's $400 million less than it paid for ATI in July 2006.

Intel, AMD’s major competitor in the CPU business, has been on a roll for the past 18 months and is now worth around US$162 billion, which makes the chip giant more than 32 times the size of AMD in monetary terms.

Even worse for AMD is that its partner-cum-archrival, Nvidia, has a market cap of around $19 billion, which makes it almost four times as valuable as the struggling platform company.

It’s fair to say things haven’t been going well for AMD since the middle of last year, as its two major rivals launched products that remain largely uncontested even today. Neither the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 nor the GeForce 8800 GTX have been truly surpassed in terms of performance yet and it’s not going to happen until next year.

There are no two ways about it: the Phenom launch was a disappointment. This was largely down to the fact that the company found an erratum in the L3 cache Translation Lookup Buffer, which could cause serious system instabilities in certain scenarios and it prevented the company from launching a 2.4GHz Phenom CPU at the eleventh. AMD issued a TLB fix to motherboard manufacturers to implement into their BIOSes and when the results for the TLB fix came out, it wasn’t pretty.

This wasn’t all that disappointed us about the Phenom launch though, as AMD also prevented all but a select few publications from running their own independent benchmarks on the new CPUs before the launch. I don’t think there was any malice in that choice personally, but it didn’t really help AMD’s street cred when, come launch day, reviews were few and far between.

It’s not all doom and gloom though, because I consider the Radeon HD 3800-series’ launch to have been a success, even though there is a shortage of hardware in the channel at the moment.

Let’s hope that AMD’s fortunes in 2008 change for the better because as an industry we need AMD to continue to innovate and deliver great choice to consumers. In recent times, we wouldn’t have had great products like the GeForce 8800 and Core 2, if it wasn' for AMD's forward-thinking innovations like the Athlon 64 and Radeon X1900-series, which were class leading products at their time of introduction (and continued to be class-leading for much of their lives).

Source

Rolling Eyes Well, surprise surprise, they keep targeting low with their hardware (CPU and GPU) and what do they actually expect to reach?
Back to top
_SiN_
Megatron



Posts: 12108
Location: Cybertron
PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 14:11    Post subject:
Ouch Neutral


Watercooled 5950X | AORUS Master X570 | Asus RTX 3090 TUF Gaming OC | 64Gb RAM | 1Tb 970 Evo Plus + 2Tb 660p | etc etc
Back to top
dingo_d
VIP Member



Posts: 14555

PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 14:18    Post subject:
It hurts me to see that AMD has fallen so low... I always preferred AMD more than Intel, but now... I guess it's dual core do more with intel... Sad


"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson
chiv wrote:
thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found.

Back to top
$en$i
VIP Member



Posts: 3127

PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 14:21    Post subject: Re: AMD Now Worth Less Than What It Paid For ATI
LeoNatan wrote:
they keep targeting low with their hardware (CPU and GPU) and what do they actually expect to reach?
It was a consequence of the lack of money to put in their R&D and processing, until that Qatar -or dunno which emirate- recent invest, to be lame is hardly a target. Razz
dingo_d wrote:
It hurts me to see that AMD has fallen so low... I always preferred AMD more than Intel, but now... I guess it's dual core do more with intel... Sad
Excepting during the Pentium4 episode AMD was afair always behind, but i hope that it is only a bad pass too. I am also curious about the intel future -serious- graphic cards, hoping that they'll give some competition to nvidia too.
Back to top
dingo_d
VIP Member



Posts: 14555

PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 15:05    Post subject:
Well I would like to see sth interesting from AMD, but I don't think that will happen. Aside from that, it would be nice if there would be some more CPU, and graphic card producers. The competition always push the progress Wink


"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson
chiv wrote:
thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found.

Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 15:05    Post subject:
amd always had to kill their prices just to stay with intel

but after core2duo and 8xxx, bye bye
Back to top
gingerninjaaaaaa
Banned



Posts: 1998

PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 15:12    Post subject:
Mortibus wrote:
amd always had to kill their prices just to stay with intel

but after core2duo and 8xxx, bye bye


Nothing funny about that m8 Rolling Eyes
It just gives Intel power to sell there products at whatever price they want due to lack of competition.l
Obviuosly the prices will start getting dearer from now on in until amd sort something out.
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 15:15    Post subject:
gingerninjaaaaaa wrote:
Mortibus wrote:
amd always had to kill their prices just to stay with intel

but after core2duo and 8xxx, bye bye


Nothing funny about that m8 Rolling Eyes
It just gives Intel power to sell there products at whatever price they want due to lack of competition.l
Obviuosly the prices will start getting dearer from now on in until amd sort something out.


intel never droped their prices to compete with amd in a first place
Back to top
dingo_d
VIP Member



Posts: 14555

PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 15:30    Post subject:
Sadly but true! If only Intels CPUs would cost as AMD now... what a wonderful world would that be...


"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson
chiv wrote:
thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found.

Back to top
dingo_d
VIP Member



Posts: 14555

PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 15:45    Post subject:
I don't know if you know this one but: ATI cards are like buses... They're big, red and have bad drivers Smile


"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson
chiv wrote:
thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found.

Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73223
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 15:52    Post subject:
Why would they drop their prices when there's no competition to their products? Intel are not evil (Rolling Eyes), just no competition. Back when A64 showed up and were fantastic products, Intel did reduce prices on the crappy P4/PD/C ( and whatever in between). But since, everything AMD has shown CPU/GPU has been crap when compared to the high-end products of the competitors.
Back to top
dingo_d
VIP Member



Posts: 14555

PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 15:54    Post subject:
Yes that's true, there is no reason because they are not threaten by AMD, but a little price cut wouldn't hurt (imh)


"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson
chiv wrote:
thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found.

Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73223
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 15:58    Post subject:
Hah, I say make everything free, that wouldn't hurt anyone Razz
Back to top
swingman




Posts: 3602

PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 16:48    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Why would they drop their prices when there's no competition to their products? Intel are not evil (Rolling Eyes), just no competition.


And that's exactly what AMD did when they were leading in the cpu race. During the time of the FX series and the opterons, they kept their prices ridiculously high (talking $1099 here) for stupidly long times. Even the second tier procs were waaaay too expensive. No wonder intel looked cheap.

I really get bugged when people (I mean you Nouse and Spyke Razz) portray AMD as some benign cuddly underdog that needs to be supported. I am an AMD guy myself but truth be told, AMD behaved just like Intel at the top of their game. They had pretty much the same attitude towards their customers and did their best to screw them over. Oh yes, lets dump socket 939 (and all the customers who bought systems with it) and move to AM2. Mad

The situation now is not much different from Athlon period with AMD processors offering a better price-performance ratio compared to intel. So why aren't they increasing market share? It could be because not many people are rooting for AMD anymore. Their cpus still offer excellent value for money but that's only because they've lost the performance throne.To be honest, there is no difference between the two companies and people should just go for value or performance. Very Happy
Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 17:52    Post subject:
swingman wrote:
I really get bugged when people (I mean you Nouse and Spyke Razz) portray AMD as some benign cuddly underdog that needs to be supported


where did I say they were some underdog that needs to be supported? 1) I am a cheap bastard, and 2) I happened to end up with a computer with a motherboard that fit AMD processors Razz

I'd have no problem exchanging for intel stuff if you're buying Wink


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 18:25    Post subject:
nouseforaname wrote:
swingman wrote:
I really get bugged when people (I mean you Nouse and Spyke Razz) portray AMD as some benign cuddly underdog that needs to be supported


where did I say they were some underdog that needs to be supported? 1) I am a cheap bastard, and 2) I happened to end up with a computer with a motherboard that fit AMD processors Razz

I'd have no problem exchanging for intel stuff if you're buying Wink


u bought wrong mobo? Embarassed
Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 18:27    Post subject:
Mortibus wrote:
nouseforaname wrote:
swingman wrote:
I really get bugged when people (I mean you Nouse and Spyke Razz) portray AMD as some benign cuddly underdog that needs to be supported


where did I say they were some underdog that needs to be supported? 1) I am a cheap bastard, and 2) I happened to end up with a computer with a motherboard that fit AMD processors Razz

I'd have no problem exchanging for intel stuff if you're buying Wink


u bought wrong mobo? Embarassed


naw, I got my computer from an auction of some internet gaming cafe (did a small errand for the auction company and got the computer for free which was AMD64 3200+, I upgraded to X2 cpu)...


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
swingman




Posts: 3602

PostPosted: Mon, 10th Dec 2007 19:32    Post subject:
nouseforaname wrote:
where did I say they were some underdog that needs to be supported? 1) I am a cheap bastard, and 2) I happened to end up with a computer with a motherboard that fit AMD processors Razz

I'd have no problem exchanging for intel stuff if you're buying Wink


I thought you were a fan-boy. Embarassed

nouseforaname wrote:
I'd have no problem exchanging for intel stuff if you're buying Wink


I'm overdue for an upgrade (Athlon XP 2600+ ) but there's no rush. And besides socket 939 is almost eol.
Back to top
Lutzifer
Modzilla



Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
PostPosted: Wed, 12th Dec 2007 16:16    Post subject:
dingo_d wrote:
I don't know if you know this one but: ATI cards are like buses... They're big, red and have bad drivers Smile


hahahahahaahahahaha

best single-sentence ati-bashing i have seen Very Happy

I was always happy with the amd/nvidia combo, so i didnt understand why amd didnt buy nvidia back than instead of ati =)
Back to top
dingo_d
VIP Member



Posts: 14555

PostPosted: Wed, 12th Dec 2007 19:27    Post subject:
Look what happened to ati when amd bought it... but then again maybe we would have cool ati cards, and crappy nvidia Smile


"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson
chiv wrote:
thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found.

Back to top
Lutzifer
Modzilla



Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
PostPosted: Wed, 12th Dec 2007 20:04    Post subject:
i still hope for the best. The combination of cpu and gfx manufacturer could be synergetic, so if amd survives the next months, it could get interesting again. And the phenom doesnt look that bad on paper so newer versions may still deliver some punch
Back to top
dingo_d
VIP Member



Posts: 14555

PostPosted: Wed, 12th Dec 2007 20:10    Post subject:
I guess we have to wait and see


"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson
chiv wrote:
thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found.

Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group