[PS3] Uncharted Drake's Fortune
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
hiatus_gsw
Banned



Posts: 807

PostPosted: Thu, 29th Nov 2007 17:01    Post subject: [PS3] Uncharted Drake's Fortune
Anybody playing this one...I got it this monday and so far the game has been a blast...This could be PS3 game of the year

I am having a hard time deciding which one to keep, this or ratchet and Clank, another kickass game...any suggestions
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Thu, 29th Nov 2007 17:17    Post subject:
Well watch the reviews
Ratchet & Clank (PS3)
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/26714.html
Uncharted: Drake's Fortune(PS3)
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/28089.html

Ratchet & Clank has more replay ability then Drake
Back to top
headshot
VIP Member



Posts: 35815
Location: UK
PostPosted: Thu, 29th Nov 2007 17:42    Post subject:
My Dad is eagerly awaiting the UK release and I have to say it does look damn good. Shame its a PS3 exclusive coz I only have an Xbox 360 lol.


May the NFOrce be with you always.
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Thu, 29th Nov 2007 20:05    Post subject:
Definitely one of the better PS3 games. But 'best graphics on a console' is hardly accurate I think.

I'd say about 85%, just an extremely well done Tomb Raider style game with the recently popularized 'duck and cover' shooting mechanic.


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
Big_Gun




Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
PostPosted: Thu, 29th Nov 2007 23:06    Post subject:
Looks like I need to wait a while longer to get a PS3 if this is one of the better games on it.
Not too impressed myself.
Especially with no multi player, and what appears to be a short game. Guy on the video said experienced players would be lucky to get 10 hours out of it.

Meh.
Back to top
dirtymurt




Posts: 1030

PostPosted: Thu, 29th Nov 2007 23:41    Post subject:
Big_Gun wrote:
Looks like I need to wait a while longer to get a PS3 if this is one of the better games on it.
Not too impressed myself.
Especially with no multi player, and what appears to be a short game. Guy on the video said experienced players would be lucky to get 10 hours out of it.

Meh.


Twice Halo 3 then?
Back to top





Posts: 3074
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Thu, 29th Nov 2007 23:47    Post subject:
why do you have to try and bring a console flame war in here? it just has absolutely 0 relevance, its not even the same genre.
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 01:23    Post subject:
dirtymurt wrote:
Big_Gun wrote:
Looks like I need to wait a while longer to get a PS3 if this is one of the better games on it.
Not too impressed myself.
Especially with no multi player, and what appears to be a short game. Guy on the video said experienced players would be lucky to get 10 hours out of it.

Meh.


Twice Halo 3 then?


Halo has a fairly extensive multiplayer though.

Ok, so Uncharted is only of moderate length and has no multiplayer, that doesn't make it a bad game. Just not particularly good value for money.


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
Who-CareZ




Posts: 676

PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 01:46    Post subject:
It is a rent game, just like Heavenly Sword. Not good if you're a PS3 owner. Seems like all PS3 games are merely rent games, I think that was his point. If it had multiplayer then it might be worth a buy.
Back to top
fizzelopeguss




Posts: 436

PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 02:05    Post subject:
My copy's just been dispatched. MP doesn't interest me anymore so i couldn't give a toss if it's there or not. Unless it's a game that's built entirely around it like the battlefield titles, warhawk etc.
Back to top
the_legend2k7




Posts: 327
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 02:48    Post subject:
Ratchet and Clank, imho, was an absolute blast to play and I am currently playing through it all over again on challenge mode. It may be even easier second time through, but it's still damn fun. But nonetheless, this is to be expected, as they all have been pretty great. As for uncharted, probably going to pick it up after Christmas since there is more than enough games to play right now, but liking what I hear about it.
Back to top
LFMartins




Posts: 157

PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 10:46    Post subject:
I don´t get people whining about no multiplayer options.It´s a freaking adventure game!That´s like saying Tomb Raider or Max Payne should have multiplayer.This constant need to make everything with online modes is stupid.Some things were meant to be played alone.
Back to top
mcmanic




Posts: 1440

PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 10:50    Post subject:
have it on Pre-order for next Friday UK release, plenty of replay value if your after all the hidden items and there is always the unlockable crusher mode.

Roll on next Friday as i have the mighty SINGSTAR on order also, lol
Back to top
Big_Gun




Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 14:53    Post subject:
dirtymurt wrote:
Big_Gun wrote:
Looks like I need to wait a while longer to get a PS3 if this is one of the better games on it.
Not too impressed myself.
Especially with no multi player, and what appears to be a short game. Guy on the video said experienced players would be lucky to get 10 hours out of it.

Meh.


Twice Halo 3 then?


Nice try.
I hate the Halo franchise.
Sorry to burst your bubble.

I am not an XBOX 360 fan, I am simply a video game fan.
I like PC's, and consoles.
I own a PS 2, 5 computers, Nintendo Game Cube, Nintendo Wii, Xbox, Xbox 360, nintendo 64.

I simply haven't bought a PS 3 because there aren't any games on it that appeal to me. So, don't try to start a flame war with me. There's no war to be had.
Back to top
dirtymurt




Posts: 1030

PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 15:27    Post subject:
MasterJuba wrote:
why do you have to try and bring a console flame war in here? it just has absolutely 0 relevance, its not even the same genre.


Talking out of your arse again Jabba. Sorry Jubbly

What I was saying is that if the game is indeed 10 hours that is pretty good these days. i finished Halo 3 in about 5-6 hours and COD4 in just over 4. So 10 seems bang on.

I'm not trying to start anything, just expressing my views in a public forum.
Back to top
richbambam




Posts: 211

PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 15:58    Post subject:
COD 4 in 4 hours,I call BS if you where playing it on veteran & completed in 4 hours,& with veteran the only level that gives you a real challenge the other levels are a waste on time in fact I would go to say the easier levels are for people to that want tocomplete the game quickly,like say in 4 hours
Back to top
Big_Gun




Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 16:23    Post subject:
dirtymurt wrote:
MasterJuba wrote:
why do you have to try and bring a console flame war in here? it just has absolutely 0 relevance, its not even the same genre.


Talking out of your arse again Jabba. Sorry Jubbly

What I was saying is that if the game is indeed 10 hours that is pretty good these days. i finished Halo 3 in about 5-6 hours and COD4 in just over 4. So 10 seems bang on.

I'm not trying to start anything, just expressing my views in a public forum.


In that context, I agree wih you.
Sorry to have taken it out of context.

Games now a days, for the most part, are short as shit.
Back to top
dirtymurt




Posts: 1030

PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 17:21    Post subject:
richbambam wrote:
COD 4 in 4 hours,I call BS if you where playing it on veteran & completed in 4 hours,& with veteran the only level that gives you a real challenge the other levels are a waste on time in fact I would go to say the easier levels are for people to that want tocomplete the game quickly,like say in 4 hours


Some are better gamers than others I guess
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Fri, 30th Nov 2007 17:35    Post subject:
You seem to be ignoring the fact that both COD4 and Halo 3 both have extensive multiplayer modes, so a short single player is far less of an issue.

10 hours and no multiplayer is not good enough value for money for alot of gamers. I guess people with PS3's will buy it anyway though as they have nothing else to play.

Personally if it's an intense 10 hours I would be fairly satisfied though.


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
cousinvinnie7




Posts: 75

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Dec 2007 08:33    Post subject:
Great game for sure as is R&C, the scenery in drakes is worth it alone, another note the console war has just begun , PS3 hasn't been out that long , things take time to develop, every console has it's start up time and a 1% failure rate but that might be a sore subject for some consoles.... nuff said


[AMD XP 2500 BARTON] [ASUS A7N8X-E NForce 2] [1GiG XMS CORSAIR DC PC-3200] [BFG 6600GT 500@1000] [SB AUDIGY 2 ZS PLATINUM]600wps SEAGATE 36GIG 15,000 RPM SCSI ADAPTEC ULTRA 160 SCSI controller [LITEON DVD/RW-pioneer dvd/cd-rom
Back to top
kryon




Posts: 1345

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Dec 2007 12:24    Post subject:
Looks at us, human beings, sticking the word WAR even at things which supposed to be pure fun and entertainment. shame on us! shame!


Interinactive wrote:
Achievement unlocked: More unoptimised than a Ubishit game


No worries. The Division is just around the corner. Devil Troll
Back to top
hiatus_gsw
Banned



Posts: 807

PostPosted: Sun, 2nd Dec 2007 07:07    Post subject:
what the hell...I am keeping both...both are too good to give away without finishing...

kryon buddy, why r u never online on the ps3...could give warhawk a shot if some of u guys are on!!!!
Back to top
Big_Gun




Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
PostPosted: Sun, 2nd Dec 2007 15:01    Post subject:
cousinvinnie7 wrote:
Great game for sure as is R&C, the scenery in drakes is worth it alone, another note the console war has just begun , PS3 hasn't been out that long , things take time to develop, every console has it's start up time and a 1% failure rate but that might be a sore subject for some consoles.... nuff said


The only people who give a rats ass about the console war are people like yourself. I could care less. i like good games. PS3 just doesn't have any that appeal to me at the moment. nuff said.

The console wars begin in each developers development rooms. Xbox just managed to get the first shot off this time. Depends on how well Sony can take a punch I suppose... but to me, it looks like they are going the same route with this as they did with the PSX and the PSX bombed. So, I am waiting a bit longer (everyone says next year, last year they said this year) to see if a lot more better games come out for it. I am not going to pick one up for Blue Ray because we still don't know if Blue Ray or HDVD is going to be the standard and when one does become teh standard, the players are going to drop like a rock anyway in price. I am, thankfully, a pretty patient person.
Back to top
Big_Gun




Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
PostPosted: Sun, 2nd Dec 2007 15:03    Post subject:
kryon wrote:
Looks at us, human beings, sticking the word WAR even at things which supposed to be pure fun and entertainment. shame on us! shame!


I agree with this statement.
Hell i like it when there's 2 good consoles on the market. Good consoles = competition = good games and lower prices.
Back to top
rmariani




Posts: 342

PostPosted: Tue, 11th Dec 2007 12:50    Post subject:
great game!!!
Finally some use for my ps3 (this and ratchet)
Hope that next year can bring us more good ps3 stuff Smile


Back to top
BigBasher
Banned



Posts: 520

PostPosted: Tue, 11th Dec 2007 16:46    Post subject:
i bought this. to me, it is my game of the year i loved it!!
Back to top
Grale
Banned



Posts: 3321
Location: Invert
PostPosted: Tue, 11th Dec 2007 17:06    Post subject:
This is good news Smile hopefully next year will see a big increase in games for the PS3..

I'm holding of buying one until there are more games like this available, just can't justify the expense atm as i already have an xbox360
Back to top
timechange01
VIP Member



Posts: 6650

PostPosted: Tue, 11th Dec 2007 21:16    Post subject:
Whatever happened with Killzone? that game looked insanely sweeeet from that killzone video.



ASUS Maximus XII Formula | Core i9 10900k @ 5.2Ghz | 32GB G.Skill DDR4 4200Mhz | EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper | ASUS ROG PG35VQ
Back to top
fizzelopeguss




Posts: 436

PostPosted: Tue, 18th Dec 2007 08:55    Post subject:
Fuck me i say, fuck me....what an outstanding game. By far and away my GOTY.
Back to top
ThOMaZ




Posts: 809
Location: Here
PostPosted: Tue, 18th Dec 2007 19:18    Post subject:
game is indeed great. Way better than this overhyped Assassins Creed game (really regret buying that one)


Back to top
Page 1 of 3 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Console Arena Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group