CRYSIS
Page 129 of 183 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 128, 129, 130 ... 181, 182, 183  Next
BrokenCrow




Posts: 523

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:36    Post subject:
Lunabel wrote:
Well, although i like the game a lot, have to say that its way too heavy in hardware needs.
my pc:
core2quad q6600 @ 3ghz
2gig ddr2 @ 1066
gf 8800 ultra 768.

If i run the game at very high settings with no AA, at 1680x1050, i cant get more than 25fps, maybe 35 if i look the ground.
Haven't checked other resolutions cause thats the native res for my 22" tft and if i go lower it just sucks.

Also i tried running both with xp x86 dx9 (very high settings) and vista x64 dx10 (very high settings) nothing changes at performance, graphics are the same, fps are the same.
Its strange that when i press the optimal auto config inside game, it puts all the settings at very high, but i cant really play with 25fps max... i guess very high settings are only intended for sli/crossfire systems.

ps r_displayinfo 1 still works.
ps2 people are talking about tweaking ingame settings etc, any guide or links around?


K, one last time for the cheap seats. There isn't a PC available in the retail market that can run this game @ 60 FPS etc. Its been said over and over again. Far Cry was EXACTLY the same when it was released.

I wouldnt expect to play Crysis on Very high detail at playable levels until AT LEAST the next gen (Nvidia 9800 etc). For now, you'll just have to lower your res and/or detail settings and deal with it Smile

B
Back to top
SOL




Posts: 13

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:37    Post subject:
Quote:

COD4's strengh is purely its package, awesome Singleplayer combined with the most addictive multiplayer ever... Crysis' multiplayer is rather dull and non-inspiring.


disagree on C0D4 SP still the same silly AI that focusing on the player , freindly AI is dull and dangerous, the sniper bit at the ferris wheel dont get me started me 450 kills my partner 2 kills or that fact that the ai bunched up 20 strong beside me and could not see through that uber railing 1 ft from them, the enviroment is stale and lacks interaction i mean helicopters slamming missles and gun fire in to wooden buldings that seem to be uber invincible, and still the get to X to stop spawning was old in MOH nevermind COD4.

Mp agreed Crysis is very dull , but also very very moddable through sandbox , COD4 on the other hand is not, and still think COD4 mp is good but then again there are lots of good MP fps out there ET QW i like better personaly.

Crysis the developers hyped ,COD4 and BIOSHOCK the reviewers hyped again all good games, but awesome is not how I would discribe any of them.


Last edited by SOL on Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:39; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
gulizard




Posts: 33

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:38    Post subject:
BrokenCrow wrote:
Lunabel wrote:
Well, although i like the game a lot, have to say that its way too heavy in hardware needs.
my pc:
core2quad q6600 @ 3ghz
2gig ddr2 @ 1066
gf 8800 ultra 768.

If i run the game at very high settings with no AA, at 1680x1050, i cant get more than 25fps, maybe 35 if i look the ground.
Haven't checked other resolutions cause thats the native res for my 22" tft and if i go lower it just sucks.

Also i tried running both with xp x86 dx9 (very high settings) and vista x64 dx10 (very high settings) nothing changes at performance, graphics are the same, fps are the same.
Its strange that when i press the optimal auto config inside game, it puts all the settings at very high, but i cant really play with 25fps max... i guess very high settings are only intended for sli/crossfire systems.

ps r_displayinfo 1 still works.
ps2 people are talking about tweaking ingame settings etc, any guide or links around?


K, one last time for the cheap seats. There isn't a PC available in the retail market that can run this game @ 60 FPS etc. Its been said over and over again. Far Cry was EXACTLY the same when it was released.

I wouldnt expect to play Crysis on Very high detail at playable levels until AT LEAST the next gen (Nvidia 9800 etc). For now, you'll just have to lower your res and/or detail settings and deal with it Smile

B


Then why does his system put it to very high as does mine? 60 FPS no, but maybe 30-35 would be nice...
Back to top
WalkerBoh




Posts: 522
Location: Rome, Italy
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:38    Post subject:
How can i run the game in dx9? There is no ingame option and it automatically starts with dx10.
Back to top
matisto21




Posts: 154

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:38    Post subject:
can someone tell me when we can expect the new nvidia 9800 gtx? (offtopic)
Back to top
ilovebooze




Posts: 116
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:43    Post subject:
25.03.2012, 12:31:55 CET
Back to top
Lunabel




Posts: 23
Location: Greece
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:48    Post subject:
gulizard wrote:

Then why does his system put it to very high as does mine? 60 FPS no, but maybe 30-35 would be nice...


Well yeah, i dont want 60 fps Razz 30-35 are just fine... and whats the point to play in 64bit with vista, if i don't see any performance boost at all? its exactly the same as winxp dx9 with custom very high settings.

P.s for WalkerBoh at vista if u right click the icon inside the games folder u can choose to run dx9 or 10 (dunno if it works)
Back to top
gulizard




Posts: 33

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:53    Post subject:
WalkerBoh wrote:
How can i run the game in dx9? There is no ingame option and it automatically starts with dx10.


either through games explorer by right clicking start as dx9 or you can add -DX9 you need to make a short cut in bin64 or bin32 whatever one u use of the crysis.exe file and then add to it -DX9
Back to top
evil_commie




Posts: 23

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:55    Post subject:
does the nanosuit in the game get a better powersource as the game advances ?
it was mentioned ages ago in previews that you could but i would like to know if its still in the game.

the nanosuit in the demo runs out of juice way too fast for my taste.
Back to top
streetunder




Posts: 4125

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:55    Post subject:
for the people saying crysis sucks, and calling this generic crap...


Review Gamespot 9.5 editors choice

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/crysis/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary&tag=summary;review

"Crysis is visually stunning, packed with intelligent, thrilling gameplay, and easily one of the greatest shooters ever made."


Review IGN 9.4 editors choice

http://pc.ign.com/articles/834/834614p1.html


Crysis - Eurogamer - 9/10



Smile


Last edited by streetunder on Tue, 13th Nov 2007 16:02; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
GeorgeIvanovich




Posts: 361

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 15:55    Post subject:
Cod 4 it´s awesome ,too fucking short Smile

The storiline it´s the same booring thing but anyways it´s fun the sniper and infrared level are way cool.

Crysis it´s a tech demo like many people agreed but man, way cool

I would love another cod with that engine and a cool story(but thats too much to ask).
Back to top
Karmeck




Posts: 3347
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 16:12    Post subject:
evil_commie wrote:
does the nanosuit in the game get a better powersource as the game advances ?
it was mentioned ages ago in previews that you could but i would like to know if its still in the game.

the nanosuit in the demo runs out of juice way too fast for my taste.


Finisht the game now and the answer is: NO
Back to top
aoe2fan




Posts: 45

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 16:14    Post subject:
streetunder wrote:
for the people saying crysis sucks, and calling this generic crap...


Review Gamespot 9.5 editors choice

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/crysis/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary&tag=summary;review

"Crysis is visually stunning, packed with intelligent, thrilling gameplay, and easily one of the greatest shooters ever made."


Review IGN 9.4 editors choice

http://pc.ign.com/articles/834/834614p1.html


Crysis - Eurogamer - 9/10



Smile


Yes, everyone knows that all reviews are perfect. Especially for hyped games.
Back to top
_SiN_
Megatron



Posts: 12108
Location: Cybertron
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 16:15    Post subject:
Exactly, scores like that was expected.


Watercooled 5950X | AORUS Master X570 | Asus RTX 3090 TUF Gaming OC | 64Gb RAM | 1Tb 970 Evo Plus + 2Tb 660p | etc etc
Back to top
WalkerBoh




Posts: 522
Location: Rome, Italy
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 16:18    Post subject:
gulizard wrote:
WalkerBoh wrote:
How can i run the game in dx9? There is no ingame option and it automatically starts with dx10.


either through games explorer by right clicking start as dx9 or you can add -DX9 you need to make a short cut in bin64 or bin32 whatever one u use of the crysis.exe file and then add to it -DX9


Thanks. 10 fps more in perfomance and apparently no quality loss.
Back to top
necros0




Posts: 46

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 16:25    Post subject:
It's possible to play online with beta keys if you edit your reg Very Happy
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 16:27    Post subject:
_SiN_ wrote:
Exactly, scores like that was expected.



Y but this game is more 9 then Halo 3, Assassins Creed and Gears of war put together.
Back to top
streetunder




Posts: 4125

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 16:30    Post subject:
necros0 wrote:
It's possible to play online with beta keys if you edit your reg Very Happy


are you telling the truth?
Back to top
tiedie




Posts: 680
Location: Florida
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 16:38    Post subject:
i was able to login after editing out rzr's key and putting the beta key in the reg, didnt try joining though
but i saw servers (72 of them)
when i went into the chat someone was like "and here comes more bastards"
Back to top
RainyDay




Posts: 2212
Location: Bulgaria
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 16:49    Post subject:
i just finished it... i was expecting to be more of it... kinda disappointing. Anyway,it was quite nice, with some stunning moments and views and good story (kinda) But still it feels incomplete...


Per aspera ad astra
Back to top
compubrain3000




Posts: 4094
Location: Egypt
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 17:01    Post subject:
tiedie wrote:
i was able to login after editing out rzr's key and putting the beta key in the reg, didnt try joining though
but i saw servers (72 of them)
when i went into the chat someone was like "and here comes more bastards"


You don't need to edit out anything, the game even installs using the beta key. You can play on any server for the time being, even using the keygen serials Wink
Back to top
streetunder




Posts: 4125

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 17:20    Post subject:
Nvidia forceware driver 169.09 OUT (Crysis driver)

http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/winxp_169.09_uk.html

Version: 169.09
Release Date:13.11.2007
Operating System:Windows XP, Windows XP Media Center Edition
Language:English (International)
File Size:69.2 MB

Beta driver for GeForce 6, 7, and 8 series GPUs.
Recommended driver for Crysis.
Several game and application compatibility fixes. Please read the release notes for more information on product support, features, driver fixes and known compatibility issues.
Users without English US operating systems can select their language and download the International driver here.
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 17:26    Post subject:
Nakitu wrote:
_SiN_ wrote:
Exactly, scores like that was expected.



Y but this game is more 9 then Halo 3, Assassins Creed and Gears of war put together.


Only if you don't have a console. Though i'll agree that it's definitely better then Halo 3.


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 17:35    Post subject:
AnimalMother wrote:
Nakitu wrote:
_SiN_ wrote:
Exactly, scores like that was expected.



Y but this game is more 9 then Halo 3, Assassins Creed and Gears of war put together.


Only if you don't have a console. Though i'll agree that it's definitely better then Halo 3.


Why? Shocked What has console have to do with this? Played Halo 3 on xbox and its crap for me like it was halo 1 and 2, Gears of war is on rail shooter with no options to do anything except run in predefined route, and my impression on AC is based on reading on it from people who played it. Ill try it in few days but it is like i thought it will be. Simple action game with no depth. Is GOW 100 times bettar on console? Does it have open spaces and more options on what can you do? Didnt play it on x 360, only pc edition.
Back to top
rullstolskalas




Posts: 70

PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 17:46    Post subject:
streetunder wrote:
Nvidia forceware driver 169.09 OUT (Crysis driver)

http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/winxp_169.09_uk.html

Version: 169.09
Release Date:13.11.2007
Operating System:Windows XP, Windows XP Media Center Edition
Language:English (International)
File Size:69.2 MB

Beta driver for GeForce 6, 7, and 8 series GPUs.
Recommended driver for Crysis.
Several game and application compatibility fixes. Please read the release notes for more information on product support, features, driver fixes and known compatibility issues.
Users without English US operating systems can select their language and download the International driver here.


i have nvidia 7800gtx, will this driver work for me? and one more thing, when i search for latest nvidia drivers for my card on nvidia.com the 163.75 update comes up. Is that driver not the latest? Why is the driver you mentioned not coming up when i search for latest driver?
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 17:47    Post subject:
Nakitu wrote:
AnimalMother wrote:
Nakitu wrote:



Y but this game is more 9 then Halo 3, Assassins Creed and Gears of war put together.


Only if you don't have a console. Though i'll agree that it's definitely better then Halo 3.


Why? Shocked What has console have to do with this? Played Halo 3 on xbox and its crap for me like it was halo 1 and 2, Gears of war is on rail shooter with no options to do anything except run in predefined route, and my impression on AC is based on reading on it from people who played it. Ill try it in few days but it is like i thought it will be. Simple action game with no depth. Is GOW 100 times bettar on console? Does it have open spaces and more options on what can you do? Didnt play it on x 360, only pc edition.

You're comparing games that have only minor similarities, one doesn't necessarily have to be better then the other.

It looks like you have some soft of pathetic vendetta against consoles, if you're just another ignorant PC fanboi I can't be bothered getting drawn into a discussion.


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 17:51    Post subject:
AnimalMother wrote:
You're comparing games that have only minor similarities, one doesn't necessarily have to be better then the other.

It looks like you have some soft of pathetic vendetta against consoles, if you're just another ignorant PC fanboi I can't be bothered getting drawn into a discussion.



You are completly off. If you bothered to read what was said then you would notice that talk was about how hyped games get 8 or above scores. I wasnt comparing games based on their genre, it was based on scores they got and did they deserve it. Next time read the whole part. I dont have anything about consoles but i do have against stupid people. Like i said in Mass Effect thread , i would buy x360 for that game. Only thing thats stoping me atm is high failure rate.
Back to top
zerstorer




Posts: 1410
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 17:56    Post subject:
rullstolskalas wrote:
streetunder wrote:
Nvidia forceware driver 169.09 OUT (Crysis driver)

http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/winxp_169.09_uk.html

Version: 169.09
Release Date:13.11.2007
Operating System:Windows XP, Windows XP Media Center Edition
Language:English (International)
File Size:69.2 MB

Beta driver for GeForce 6, 7, and 8 series GPUs.
Recommended driver for Crysis.
Several game and application compatibility fixes. Please read the release notes for more information on product support, features, driver fixes and known compatibility issues.
Users without English US operating systems can select their language and download the International driver here.


i have nvidia 7800gtx, will this driver work for me? and one more thing, when i search for latest nvidia drivers for my card on nvidia.com the 163.75 update comes up. Is that driver not the latest? Why is the driver you mentioned not coming up when i search for latest driver?


It's an better Driver



DAMN i got a fucking big problem
yesterday Crysis worked finde
but today i'm getting a black screen with the mouse cursor
and te intro trailers got sound

does someone has the same problem an a fix for this


Last edited by zerstorer on Tue, 13th Nov 2007 17:59; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 17:59    Post subject:
Nakitu wrote:
AnimalMother wrote:
You're comparing games that have only minor similarities, one doesn't necessarily have to be better then the other.

It looks like you have some soft of pathetic vendetta against consoles, if you're just another ignorant PC fanboi I can't be bothered getting drawn into a discussion.



You are completly off. If you bothered to read what was said then you would notice that talk was about how hyped games get 8 or above scores. I wasnt comparing games based on their genre, it was based on scores they got and did they deserve it. Next time read the whole part. I dont have anything about consoles but i do have against stupid people. Like i said in Mass Effect thread , i would buy x360 for that game. Only thing thats stoping me atm is high failure rate.


You said Crysis is 'better' then Halo 3, Gears or War and Assassins Creed put together. It doesn't matter whether you're comparing the scores they deserve or comparing the games directly it's the same thing.

I'm sure it was just a coincidence those games are three of the most hyped titles on the 360. You don't seem to realise that games are rated differently depending on their platform Rolling Eyes


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Tue, 13th Nov 2007 18:04    Post subject:
AnimalMother wrote:
Nakitu wrote:
AnimalMother wrote:
You're comparing games that have only minor similarities, one doesn't necessarily have to be better then the other.

It looks like you have some soft of pathetic vendetta against consoles, if you're just another ignorant PC fanboi I can't be bothered getting drawn into a discussion.



You are completly off. If you bothered to read what was said then you would notice that talk was about how hyped games get 8 or above scores. I wasnt comparing games based on their genre, it was based on scores they got and did they deserve it. Next time read the whole part. I dont have anything about consoles but i do have against stupid people. Like i said in Mass Effect thread , i would buy x360 for that game. Only thing thats stoping me atm is high failure rate.


You said Crysis is 'better' then Halo 3, Gears or War and Assassins Creed put together. It doesn't matter whether you're comparing the scores they deserve or comparing the games directly it's the same thing.

I'm sure it was just a coincidence those games are three of the most hyped titles on the 360. Rolling Eyes


Right thats why i play Gears of war on PC like i will play AC in 2 months or Halo3 in one year or so on PC too. Youre point would be valid if these games were x box only but they are not, they are PC games too. My thought about GOW is based on PC version like i said and score it got for PC not xbox.http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/gearsofwar/index.html The PC version of Gears of War is everything the 360 version was and more. Laughing Oh and i forgot about Stalker which is for me very poor game but got great scores based on hype.
Back to top
Page 129 of 183 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 128, 129, 130 ... 181, 182, 183  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group