Gears of War
Page 11 of 56 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12 ... 54, 55, 56  Next
|IcedFreon|




Posts: 3700
Location: World 8-3
PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 18:56    Post subject:
Gormadok wrote:
this game will suck like most of games converted from consoles. beside it takes 6h to end this crap. 6h? it takes longer to download it and install than playing it. isnt stupid?

not the devs fault you have a slow ass connection lol. should take me about a little over 1hr to dl.


Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 19:22    Post subject:
should take me about a little over 1week to dl.


Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 19:28    Post subject:
|IcedFreon| wrote:
Gormadok wrote:
this game will suck like most of games converted from consoles. beside it takes 6h to end this crap. 6h? it takes longer to download it and install than playing it. isnt stupid?

not the devs fault you have a slow ass connection lol. should take me about a little over 1hr to dl.

devs fault Laughing devs wanted you to get it on DVD, not fast/slow net connection Razz
Back to top
hazen




Posts: 1228
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 20:36    Post subject:
NoFace. wrote:
hazen wrote:
Every time i try to take a screen ingame, it just pauses the game and snaps a pic of the menu.


??? The Game is not Released Confused



Oh my god.

At least read the thread before you post.

I got it on friday.
A shop sendt it out early.
Back to top
locoman001




Posts: 20

PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 20:44    Post subject:
i'm playing the CoD4 on my 360 until the GoW don't get releazed ...

I just can't wait anymore , i went to shop try get a copy .. and i had no luck !!!

hazen u lucky bastard Smile
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 21:55    Post subject:
Gormadok wrote:


3h of playing? with codes or at easy level?
6h gametime isnt the fault of developers? so who is responsible for that? its not the question of what platform is game designed for. its question about lazyness and effectiveness of scenario makers. most of pc and console "action" games took 6-12h of playing to complete them. its really not much. fps, tps, survival horrors, arcades, etc etc - all of them are shorter than thay should be. even action-rpgs are short now. 1 of the main reasons of downloading illegal games is the ammount of time needed to finish them. do they really believe that poor citizens from asia, eastern europe or south america will spend 10-50% of their monthly income to buy a game which can be completed in 1 day? what for?


Action games like this can't be made long, and it's common sense why. Games like this have little diversity as of what to do so people will start to lose interest due to the game getting repetitive. Short games don't make a shitty game, lack of quality and repetitiveness does. You want to do the same thing over and over again for a 24 hour game? Go play the sims than.

The game will have it's replay value, just because you beat it once on easy if your wimp in one day is no one elses fault, especially if you lack a life and sit in your room all day and play it till you beat it. Some of us only play our games for a couple hours at a time so it'll go on after 1 day. It'll prob take me a week to beat since I have other games to play as well. Not too mention the MP and replay value with co-op etc (assuming the replay value is good) will keep people coming back for more.

And no, the reason for illegal downloading of games is not because their short. It's 1) because idiots like you are cheap and want to find every little excuse not to have to pay for a game just because you know how to get it as a free loader and don't want to spend your xbox/pc magazine money on a game when you could get it for free. 2) A developer makes a shitty port or a shitty game period i.e. EA, UBIsoft


Back to top
bringiton




Posts: 3709

PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 22:04    Post subject:
Actually I prefer short games. I have so many things to do with my studiying, girlfriend, working and so on that I can only play for a few hours a week.
So a 30-40 hour game would take months for me to finish, and that's where I lose my interest. When I know that I can finish a game, it's worth playing and buying, as long as I have my fun.
Short (but intense) games ftw.
Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 22:33    Post subject:
bringiton wrote:
Actually I prefer short games. I have so many things to do with my studiying, girlfriend, working and so on that I can only play for a few hours a week.
So a 30-40 hour game would take months for me to finish, and that's where I lose my interest. When I know that I can finish a game, it's worth playing and buying, as long as I have my fun.
Short (but intense) games ftw.


yeah, I agree. Probably even ~80% of the games I download I don't have time to finish ... once I go a couple weeks without starting it up, chances are I'll never play it again Razz


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
CaptainCox
VIP Member



Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 22:40    Post subject:
But its nice just to know you have them on ur HD...isn't it Smile
I do something similar. I DL the games I think I will like, play, and then somet new comes, and if the previous game don't hold up, I usually flush it with in 1 week etc.
Still... keep most of the ISO's on a external drive or burn...if I feel like it.


Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 22:54    Post subject:
nouseforaname wrote:
bringiton wrote:
Actually I prefer short games. I have so many things to do with my studiying, girlfriend, working and so on that I can only play for a few hours a week.
So a 30-40 hour game would take months for me to finish, and that's where I lose my interest. When I know that I can finish a game, it's worth playing and buying, as long as I have my fun.
Short (but intense) games ftw.


yeah, I agree. Probably even ~80% of the games I download I don't have time to finish ... once I go a couple weeks without starting it up, chances are I'll never play it again Razz


Deus Ex and FEAR were prob one of the couple PC games I actually beat cause a lot of games are so damned long I get sick of playing it.


Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 23:31    Post subject:
SpykeZ wrote:
nouseforaname wrote:
bringiton wrote:
Actually I prefer short games. I have so many things to do with my studiying, girlfriend, working and so on that I can only play for a few hours a week.
So a 30-40 hour game would take months for me to finish, and that's where I lose my interest. When I know that I can finish a game, it's worth playing and buying, as long as I have my fun.
Short (but intense) games ftw.


yeah, I agree. Probably even ~80% of the games I download I don't have time to finish ... once I go a couple weeks without starting it up, chances are I'll never play it again Razz


Deus Ex and FEAR were prob one of the couple PC games I actually beat cause a lot of games are so damned long I get sick of playing it.


yeah, for me the last games I played to the end in the last year (when I finally got a new GFX card) were Brothers in Arms (1st one), C&C Generals, FarCry (2nd time), GTA:SA, Condemned, COD2, FEAR +expansion, and just yesterday Half Life 2 Razz


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
streetunder




Posts: 4125

PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 23:42    Post subject:
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 23:42    Post subject:
nouseforaname wrote:
SpykeZ wrote:
nouseforaname wrote:


yeah, I agree. Probably even ~80% of the games I download I don't have time to finish ... once I go a couple weeks without starting it up, chances are I'll never play it again Razz


Deus Ex and FEAR were prob one of the couple PC games I actually beat cause a lot of games are so damned long I get sick of playing it.


yeah, for me the last games I played to the end in the last year (when I finally got a new GFX card) were Brothers in Arms (1st one), C&C Generals, FarCry (2nd time), GTA:SA, Condemned, COD2, FEAR +expansion, and just yesterday Half Life 2 Razz


You give bioshock a run yet?


Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Sun, 4th Nov 2007 23:58    Post subject:
SpykeZ wrote:
nouseforaname wrote:
SpykeZ wrote:


Deus Ex and FEAR were prob one of the couple PC games I actually beat cause a lot of games are so damned long I get sick of playing it.


yeah, for me the last games I played to the end in the last year (when I finally got a new GFX card) were Brothers in Arms (1st one), C&C Generals, FarCry (2nd time), GTA:SA, Condemned, COD2, FEAR +expansion, and just yesterday Half Life 2 Razz


You give bioshock a run yet?


yeah, played it for a while ... stopped somewhere midway through the Arcadia level ... haven't played in in 3-4 weeks though ...

Definitely going to give GOW a good try though, hopefully it runs ok on my computer.


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
xarr




Posts: 119

PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 01:38    Post subject:
streetunder wrote:
Bringing Gears to PC: The Controls

http://www.1up.com/do/blogEntry?bId=8469535&publicUserId=5474264


nice, i just hope to god the "live" interface isnt gonna kill it for internet play.. need latency, dedicated servers etc imo.
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 01:41    Post subject:
nouseforaname wrote:
SpykeZ wrote:
nouseforaname wrote:


yeah, for me the last games I played to the end in the last year (when I finally got a new GFX card) were Brothers in Arms (1st one), C&C Generals, FarCry (2nd time), GTA:SA, Condemned, COD2, FEAR +expansion, and just yesterday Half Life 2 Razz


You give bioshock a run yet?


yeah, played it for a while ... stopped somewhere midway through the Arcadia level ... haven't played in in 3-4 weeks though ...

Definitely going to give GOW a good try though, hopefully it runs ok on my computer.


it'll beinf fine on medium, espeially if your ona dual core (can't remember if you were or not)


Back to top
Naish




Posts: 797

PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 01:49    Post subject:
Anyone else buying it? We might as well put that live stuff to use and do some co-op and TDM on it Very Happy.
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 01:51    Post subject:
Naish wrote:
Anyone else buying it? We might as well put that live stuff to use and do some co-op and TDM on it Very Happy.


im in between jobs atm but as soon as I get one I have a list of games I gotta go out and buy to catch up. I haven't wanted to buy this many games since my xbox 1


Back to top
Naish




Posts: 797

PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 01:55    Post subject:
Yea, November is always ridiculous for this kinda stuff.

I've got 2 definaitly(gears, ut3) and 2 maybe(cod4, guitarhero3) games on my list of to-buy this month, all depends whether or not I want to budget in that upgrade to a q6600 at xmas Smile.
Back to top
xarr




Posts: 119

PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 02:12    Post subject:
Naish wrote:
Anyone else buying it? We might as well put that live stuff to use and do some co-op and TDM on it Very Happy.


i'm leaning towards buying it atm, gonna wait and see how good the live stuff is. I was appalled at how incredibly sucky the mp and support was handled with r6 vegas. Although with this being a well-known and good developer I have my hopes up.
Back to top
Ashmolly




Posts: 1075
Location: Trump's Merica
PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 02:49    Post subject:
Naish wrote:
Anyone else buying it? We might as well put that live stuff to use and do some co-op and TDM on it Very Happy.



atm Im preparing to be deployed in a couple of days so ill have it, but ill be too busy to play Sad


Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 04:22    Post subject:
SpykeZ wrote:
nouseforaname wrote:
SpykeZ wrote:


You give bioshock a run yet?


yeah, played it for a while ... stopped somewhere midway through the Arcadia level ... haven't played in in 3-4 weeks though ...

Definitely going to give GOW a good try though, hopefully it runs ok on my computer.


it'll beinf fine on medium, espeially if your ona dual core (can't remember if you were or not)


nope, amd athlon 64 3200+, 1GB 400 mhz RAM and 256mb 8600 GT ...


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 06:02    Post subject:
nouseforaname wrote:
SpykeZ wrote:
nouseforaname wrote:


yeah, played it for a while ... stopped somewhere midway through the Arcadia level ... haven't played in in 3-4 weeks though ...

Definitely going to give GOW a good try though, hopefully it runs ok on my computer.


it'll beinf fine on medium, espeially if your ona dual core (can't remember if you were or not)


nope, amd athlon 64 3200+, 1GB 400 mhz RAM and 256mb 8600 GT ...


ya you should be fine on lower settings. What socket is that amd? if it's 939 you an pick up an x2 3800+ dirt cheap.

http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1526470&CatId=1948


Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 08:30    Post subject:
SpykeZ wrote:
nouseforaname wrote:
SpykeZ wrote:


it'll beinf fine on medium, espeially if your ona dual core (can't remember if you were or not)


nope, amd athlon 64 3200+, 1GB 400 mhz RAM and 256mb 8600 GT ...


ya you should be fine on lower settings. What socket is that amd? if it's 939 you an pick up an x2 3800+ dirt cheap.

http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1526470&CatId=1948


already made the decision not to spend another dime until the whole thing can be replaced Razz


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
Vodka-Redbull




Posts: 5134
Location: The Evil Empire
PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 15:13    Post subject:
nouseforaname wrote:
SpykeZ wrote:
nouseforaname wrote:


yeah, played it for a while ... stopped somewhere midway through the Arcadia level ... haven't played in in 3-4 weeks though ...

Definitely going to give GOW a good try though, hopefully it runs ok on my computer.


it'll beinf fine on medium, espeially if your ona dual core (can't remember if you were or not)


nope, amd athlon 64 3200+, 1GB 400 mhz RAM and 256mb 8600 GT ...


Seen it in action on the same config but video being a 7600gs. Played fine. So on 8600GT should be above average settings.

On my rig X2 4200+/2gb/8600GTS works perfectly on max
Back to top
katalux




Posts: 275

PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 15:25    Post subject:
really? i read on my newspaper about the game that require a NASA pc Very Happy eheheh


Last edited by katalux on Mon, 5th Nov 2007 15:26; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Vodka-Redbull




Posts: 5134
Location: The Evil Empire
PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 15:26    Post subject:
oh fuck, i thought it was the COD4 thread... lol @ me Very Happy


"Only one country can destroy NATO in 40 minutes - it's Russia"
Back to top
HiCZoK.Std




Posts: 273
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 16:35    Post subject:
Vodka-Redbull wrote:
oh fuck, i thought it was the COD4 thread... lol @ me Very Happy

i have that sometimes also Laughing


Look for Studio HiCZoK movies and arts !
AsusP5N-E SLI - Asus 8800 GT 512mb - C2D E6300 2.80ghz - 2x1gb GeiL Ultra 800mhz 4-4-4-12 - Sound Blaster Audigy Se - 500gb WD(always defragmented:D) - 11k 3dMark2006 - X360
Back to top
_SiN_
Megatron



Posts: 12108
Location: Cybertron
PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 16:45    Post subject:
Vodka-Redbull wrote:
oh fuck, i thought it was the COD4 thread... lol @ me Very Happy


But in any case, COD4 is very opimised then, cause i personally thinks it looks awesome on max settings. Smile


Watercooled 5950X | AORUS Master X570 | Asus RTX 3090 TUF Gaming OC | 64Gb RAM | 1Tb 970 Evo Plus + 2Tb 660p | etc etc
Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Mon, 5th Nov 2007 16:45    Post subject:
Vodka-Redbull wrote:
oh fuck, i thought it was the COD4 thread... lol @ me Very Happy


yeah, the COD4 demo runs great on my computer on medium/high @ 1024x768 ... not worried about that one Razz


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
Page 11 of 56 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12 ... 54, 55, 56  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group