To Admin why dont we have Q...
Page 1 of 1
LoopDeMack




Posts: 15

PostPosted: Thu, 14th Oct 2004 11:19    Post subject: To Admin why dont we have Q...
To Admin why don't we have Q HDTV in nfo releases, they got best TV series xvid's ever, I saw:
dhwives101-qhr
blegal101-qhr
csi501-qhr
lost101-qhr -lost102-qhr -lost103-qhr
csiny101-qhr
...

Its best XVID's ever 1800-2000 kb/s xy=960x528 (1.82:1) [=20:11]
0.150-0.169 bits/pixel
384 kb/s (6 ch) CBR

You just need to watch it in this quality.
Its only double sized.
Back to top
DeepRed




Posts: 158
Location: :noitacoL
PostPosted: Fri, 15th Oct 2004 17:55    Post subject:
"Its only double sized." ...indirectly, there's your reason!
Back to top
LoopDeMack




Posts: 15

PostPosted: Fri, 15th Oct 2004 18:55    Post subject:
But with superb quality, Its 2 class better than DVD and its still 2,5 times smaller than DVD.
enterprise401-qhr.avi
Source : 1080i 29.97fps, 19.2Mbit ATSC Stream
Total Size : 735,36,024 bytes
Video Resolution : 960x528 (16/9)
Video Bitrate : 2143458 bps Avg
Back to top
LoopDeMack




Posts: 15

PostPosted: Fri, 15th Oct 2004 19:05    Post subject:
With logic like, "if its bigger than 350mb" and its in avi we should nuke it or banned it from scene. Its wrong.
I would nuked all svcd hdtv versions of all TV series, its wasted bandwidth and it cant compare to any "q" avi version in any options and its still smaller ("q" releases) than any shity svcd version.
Man watch it and than tell me, is it best thing on the market.
Let me remind you, I got access to every thing on the planet and indirectly I checked all of it and I think that I have experience in the scene.
Back to top
Pfizer




Posts: 24

PostPosted: Fri, 15th Oct 2004 19:20    Post subject:
Personally, I hate 2disc releases. Can't stand them. I actually re-encode 90% of them into one disc. And I don't think alone either.

P
Back to top
LoopDeMack




Posts: 15

PostPosted: Fri, 15th Oct 2004 21:32    Post subject:
WHAT!!! You re-encode encoded materials, if its true than its misery, even if you re-encode it to uncompressed than compress it back to compressed.
Only true en-coding could or should be done from dvd-mpeg2, HDTV-TS or from natively uncompressed materials.
Compressed than compressed again, its catastrophic and pathetic.
This is year 2004-2005 its era of HDTV, DVD as last resort and 2 or 3 disk XVID's encoded from HDTV TS.

And man you replied to wrong post!
Back to top
Lutzifer
Modzilla



Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
PostPosted: Fri, 15th Oct 2004 22:26    Post subject:
sounds cool, havent grabbed one of those yet, as i didnt know if it would be worth it, but i ll check it out for sure now Wink
Back to top
Flark




Posts: 874
Location: Trrism
PostPosted: Fri, 15th Oct 2004 22:31    Post subject:
I've watched the Lost-q releases and they are superb, i don't mind downloading MB episodes as long as its in great quality, as for me its only another 5 - 10Min of downloading (bragging)
Back to top
bacon




Posts: 142

PostPosted: Sat, 16th Oct 2004 00:49    Post subject:
Yeah the quality is superb on these releases. Not only is the video incredible, but the audio is untouched...unlike the other HDTV releases we see...
Back to top
LoopDeMack




Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sat, 16th Oct 2004 02:44    Post subject:
Bacon what do you think is Q nfo's worth to be mentioned on all nfo news pages, nforce,isonews,...
I think its worth.
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Movie & TV Sparks
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group