| Page 2 of 3 |
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter
Posts: 7449
Location: USA
|
 Posted: Tue, 28th Sep 2004 12:11 Post subject: |
|
 |
The letters hold some significance.. if you look in one of their threads one of the admins has this to say in a sort of "teaser" thread:
| Quote: | Fact #9:
The first letter in the countdown is "O". The second is "W".
Cheers,
Nick |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rzooq
Posts: 536
Location: "Mexico of Europe"
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Sep 2004 13:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| sTo0z wrote: | The letters hold some significance.. if you look in one of their threads one of the admins has this to say in a sort of "teaser" thread:
|
| wickedsun wrote: | Third is N.
O W N |
Was there "E" ? If yes, we have word OWNED , if not we have OWND, and there is no letter now, so 50%  that now is the last countdown  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Sep 2004 13:30 Post subject: |
|
|
Can't wait for this, I love Futuremark benchmarks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 15:09 Post subject: |
|
|
i did watch the last seconds of the countdown
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rzooq
Posts: 536
Location: "Mexico of Europe"
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 15:09 Post subject: |
|
|
It's out!!!
I was watching end of last countdown and after it I got:
"Download 3DMark05 here"
But I have a little problems with connecting to futuremark site 
FireFox says "Conection refused"
Edit 1:
Ok, I can see list of avalible mirrors with 3DMark05, searching for working one...
Edit 2:
I couldn't download .torrent from futuremark, but i Managed to grab one from MajorGeeks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 16:29 Post subject: |
|
|
My christ, how can you get that excited!?
You need to get out more mate..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 17:11 Post subject: |
|
|
You can have an active social life and still be excited about the release of software.
I bet you think he should get excited about something more masculine, like the start of a football league or the release of a new sports car?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dunge
Posts: 1201
Location: Québec
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 18:24 Post subject: |
|
|
mhh ok let's wait for a PRO release
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter
Posts: 7449
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 19:30 Post subject: |
|
|
| AnimalMother wrote: | You can have an active social life and still be excited about the release of software.
I bet you think he should get excited about something more masculine, like the start of a football league or the release of a new sports car? |
Well said.
And start posting your scores people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jojox
Posts: 124
Location: 0x486f6d65
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rzooq
Posts: 536
Location: "Mexico of Europe"
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 20:37 Post subject: |
|
|
Same results:
http://techreport.com/etc/2004q3/3dmark05/index.x?pg=1
When I set to Quality in drivers I get 2140 
When I set to Max performance i get 2577...
Tomorrow I will start tweaking things in bios (especially memory timings)...
What is my spec?
See below.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 20:42 Post subject: |
|
|
omg it's takes 1500 mb of HD space, I hope my 120 gb HD can handle that !!!111
| Quote: | | PC awesome button = Uninstall! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rzooq
Posts: 536
Location: "Mexico of Europe"
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 21:49 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I will start checking everthing tomorrow.
I used last official - 61.77.
But no doubt - In same tests Radeons beat Gfs (according to TechReport), with X800 XT PE on top.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 22:00 Post subject: |
|
|
no with normal drivers (4,9) x800 XT PE gets normally 4500 or so while on on beta drivers released recently it gives 5800(!)..... i used those betas but to *OLD* R300/R360 core they give really little boost (20-30 marks) so comon use betas those official are already old and alot slower.. u shud get like umm 3k atleast (yeah and remember Athlon 64 is slower in 3dmark 2003/5 comparing to P4 on P4 results are higher abit......)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 22:40 Post subject: |
|
|
1552 marks
P4E 3.0Ghz
1 Gb Ram
Radeon 9500Pro
Catalyst 4.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Embiz0n
Posts: 36
Location: Your mom`s panties
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 23:18 Post subject: |
|
|
Just ran it..
got 994 marks
HW..
AMD Xp 1800+
512 mb ddr PC3200
GForce FX 5950 ultra..
I LOVE STARWARS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter
Posts: 7449
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 23:23 Post subject: |
|
|
God, this proggy kicked my ass.
Scored a 905...
GFX: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900XT
CPU: Pentium 4 3.20 GHz
OS: Windows XP
RAM: 1.0 GB DDR PC-3200
How depressing.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Sep 2004 23:36 Post subject: |
|
|
Geforce FX line is really slow in Pixel Shader 2.0 processing and new games and 3dmark 2005 is all about that...... 05 is a massive stress test for PS 2.0 so thats why all FX cards are owned there 9600 PRO is faster then 5950 ultra etc.......
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Sep 2004 02:17 Post subject: |
|
|
3766 with Athlon XP 3000+ and X800 Pro @ 16 pipes but Pro clocks.
This benchmark really scares me, FPS are so low with one of the best graphics cards to date. I just hope games that use up that much power take their time to show up...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Sep 2004 02:36 Post subject: |
|
|
| Drop^Da^Bass wrote: | | no with normal drivers (4,9) x800 XT PE gets normally 4500 or so while on on beta drivers released recently it gives 5800(!)..... i used those betas but to *OLD* R300/R360 core they give really little boost (20-30 marks) so comon use betas those official are already old and alot slower.. u shud get like umm 3k atleast (yeah and remember Athlon 64 is slower in 3dmark 2003/5 comparing to P4 on P4 results are higher abit......) |
what new beta drivers are you talking about? I thought 4.9 were the newest...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Sep 2004 05:31 Post subject: |
|
|
Got 2499 on XP2800 w/ 9800pro and 1gig ram
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Sep 2004 10:56 Post subject: |
|
|
if i have a amd 2500+
i can run this ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Sep 2004 13:02 Post subject: |
|
|
4400 point...
6800 gt @ ultra
xp 3200+
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member
Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Sep 2004 13:18 Post subject: |
|
|
2106
2.8ghz P4
1gig ram
9800 Overclocked...
D:!!!!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rzooq
Posts: 536
Location: "Mexico of Europe"
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Sep 2004 13:47 Post subject: |
|
|
Want pro? Check it
Futuremark.3DMark05.Pro.v1.0.Keygen.Only-ORiON
After a bit of tweaking and with 66.32 drivers (from 3D Guru) I get
2925. Enough for me.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 2 of 3 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
