Colin Mcrae Dirt
Page 5 of 26 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 24, 25, 26  Next
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73227
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2007 21:10    Post subject:
Than he has a bad monitor... I played on my 17" screen @ 1280x960. 1024 is for 15".

I wasn't laughing at the res. though. I was laughing at that crappy game that require 8800GTX to run it at Ultra at 1024 res. Talk about unoptimized shit.
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2007 22:57    Post subject:
I made a video of me playing this game. So if anyone is interested how this game plays you can check it.
Back to top
msnes




Posts: 398
Location: Greece
PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2007 23:08    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Than he has a bad monitor... I played on my 17" screen @ 1280x960. 1024 is for 15".

I wasn't laughing at the res. though. I was laughing at that crappy game that require 8800GTX to run it at Ultra at 1024 res. Talk about unoptimized shit.

I have philips 19" crt but i am using 1024 because the refresh rate is 100 and bigger resolutions have lower refresh rate.But with ultra settings + AA of this game the graphics are superb.So why change the res and hurt my eyes? Laughing
35-40 with all max
if i set the shadows and some other useless settings lower i have 55-60 fps.
Of course the game is too heavy for old cards so the better would be buying a gtx card (not gts)
And the game isnt crappy........(you cant run a 360 or ps3 game with old cards at 100fps...)


Core2duo 6600 / 8800gtx / 2gb ddr2 667
Back to top
hdtv00




Posts: 80

PostPosted: Sun, 27th May 2007 01:57    Post subject:
OnBoard wrote:
[
This type of post is almost always found in some racing game. There are setting to tune the sensitivity, use them! Smile (now they are a bit hidden, you have to press right on the control setup screen acouple of times). Defauls is just what you said, but move couple (or just one slider a bit) and it's great.



Whatever never in any racing game period have I ever seen such shit control while driving. I went into the menu's and changed settings still utter shit control. Clearly reading through the thread seems many agree. K your turn, where you point out how I suck at racing games(which isn't the case). I just hope it'll only be an issue with the demo, which I think it probably will be. I'll also go back into the menu's and dig around some more just to be sure.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73227
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sun, 27th May 2007 05:58    Post subject:
msnes wrote:
LeoNatan wrote:
Than he has a bad monitor... I played on my 17" screen @ 1280x960. 1024 is for 15".

I wasn't laughing at the res. though. I was laughing at that crappy game that require 8800GTX to run it at Ultra at 1024 res. Talk about unoptimized shit.

I have philips 19" crt but i am using 1024 because the refresh rate is 100 and bigger resolutions have lower refresh rate.But with ultra settings + AA of this game the graphics are superb.So why change the res and hurt my eyes? Laughing
35-40 with all max
if i set the shadows and some other useless settings lower i have 55-60 fps.
Of course the game is too heavy for old cards so the better would be buying a gtx card (not gts)
And the game isnt crappy........(you cant run a 360 or ps3 game with old cards at 100fps...)

Dude, if a game runs like that on a 8800GTX like that, it's not optimized.

BTW, I have that card as well. Wink
Back to top
RMFX




Posts: 2110

PostPosted: Sun, 27th May 2007 10:12    Post subject:
My specs:

AMD 64 X2 5400+
8800 GTS 640MB
2 x 1GB Kingston 667
150GB WD Raptor

This game runs pretty poorly for me. Unfotunately in this case, my monitor has a native resolution of 1680x1050. Being that this game runs as poor;y as it does on my machine and that I am unwilling to drop the resolution I have most settings on high, but a few on low, wind effects and blurring off. Only 2x AA and even still I can barely muster 25 - 35FPS. What a joke. I guess I'll just hold out for the 360 version instead.
Back to top
OnBoard




Posts: 2012

PostPosted: Sun, 27th May 2007 10:21    Post subject:
hdtv00 wrote:
Whatever never in any racing game period have I ever seen such shit control while driving. I went into the menu's and changed settings still utter shit control. Clearly reading through the thread seems many agree. K your turn, where you point out how I suck at racing games(which isn't the case). I just hope it'll only be an issue with the demo, which I think it probably will be. I'll also go back into the menu's and dig around some more just to be sure.


Hmm, where did I say you suck at racing games? Anyways, I used linearity at 0 and the saturation slider at 80% with keyboard and it was fine. Try those and if it still sucks, then I can't help Smile


LG 27UD58 27" 4K IPS | ASRock Z87M Extreme4 | i7-4770K @4.2GHz delid/reseal | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Palit GTX 1070 Super JetStream coming! - Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 | 16GB G.Skill Sniper 1866Mhz | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB + Kingston UV400 480 GB | 2TB HDD | Fractal Design Newton R3 600W Platinum | Aerocool DS Window White | Logitech G9x | Corsair K70 Cherry MX Brown (MX Clear spacebar mod) | W10 Pro x64
Back to top
RMFX




Posts: 2110

PostPosted: Sun, 27th May 2007 10:41    Post subject:
I've been playing this with a 360 controller and the game controls fine to me.
Back to top
arlon




Posts: 211
Location: Evrope
PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 09:03    Post subject:
this game could be great, but WHY THE FUCK does it play at 2fps???
Back to top
twingo




Posts: 154

PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 14:47    Post subject:
It's one of the frist next gen game... I mean when did you last see a racing game taking 12GB of HDD space!!!

The PS 3.0 make it that the MINIMUM spec for this game is 6800 GT Smile

If you want next gen gaming, expect it to require next gen hardware... simple as that!

Actually the elite part with this game, is that it runs with high resolution, so the game will still look good in two years with Geforce 9 or 10 , at 2048*1600 or some similiar high resolution! Smile

If you want to attack a game that requires too much; attack HALO which is DX 10 only so it requires a 300 euros card like 8800 gts or so, and also requires you to buy Windows Vista which cost 200-300 euros as well!

That's insane!
Back to top
Kamikaze666




Posts: 3550

PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 14:56    Post subject:
next gen graphics...

shite gameplay Smile


Quote:
PC awesome button = Uninstall!
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73227
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 15:20    Post subject:
twingo wrote:
It's one of the frist next gen game... I mean when did you last see a racing game taking 12GB of HDD space!!!

The PS 3.0 make it that the MINIMUM spec for this game is 6800 GT Smile

If you want next gen gaming, expect it to require next gen hardware... simple as that!

Actually the elite part with this game, is that it runs with high resolution, so the game will still look good in two years with Geforce 9 or 10 , at 2048*1600 or some similiar high resolution! Smile

If you want to attack a game that requires too much; attack HALO which is DX 10 only so it requires a 300 euros card like 8800 gts or so, and also requires you to buy Windows Vista which cost 200-300 euros as well!

That's insane!

NOOB ALERT! NOOB ALERT!

Halo 2 is not a DX10 game ffs. Just because it's Vista only doesn't make it a DX10 game... Rolling Eyes

And since when is SM3.0 considered next-gen? Laughing
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 17:04    Post subject:
Dx 10 + SM 4 is next gen -_-

P.s. There is no need to emphasise he is noob, he knows it. Laughing
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73227
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 17:20    Post subject:
Haha, I was emphasizing it for all others... Wink
Back to top
Consument




Posts: 110

PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 17:46    Post subject:
Back to top
Sad-persona
Banned



Posts: 355

PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 19:12    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Haha, I was emphasizing it for all others... Wink

because you love to give people names
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73227
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 19:18    Post subject:
No, I love stating the truth.
Back to top
Sad-persona
Banned



Posts: 355

PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 19:47    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
No, I love stating the truth.

Then shout that on MS with they stupid marketing camping why halo2 is only for Vista Rolling Eyes

We know its a dx9c title it writes in the resource.dll but should others know blah .... thats how advertising works chum
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73227
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 20:47    Post subject:
If you really want to be precise, it's a DX9L, as it uses some of the advantages found in it. And lol, why do you think they made it Vista only? Certainly not because of DX9L... It's a dumb marketing ploy, duh. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
KrAzY-KaMeL




Posts: 2248
Location: City Of Compton
PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 22:38    Post subject:
This game is only good for it's replay's. I can watch them all day.
Back to top
chaingang23




Posts: 893

PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 22:49    Post subject:
KrAzY-KaMeL wrote:
This game is only good for it's replay's. I can watch them all day.



So true lol Laughing i keep watching my crash replays its pretty funny.
Back to top
KrAzY-KaMeL




Posts: 2248
Location: City Of Compton
PostPosted: Mon, 28th May 2007 23:44    Post subject:
We might as well start a fastest lap thing. I think the Subaru track is most accessible since it's so short. My fastest was 1:05.60. BEAT THAT! Laughing
Back to top
matija14




Posts: 151
Location: Slovenia
PostPosted: Tue, 29th May 2007 07:16    Post subject:
I agree with Subaru track. When i come home from scholl i'll beat your record!
Back to top
nLight




Posts: 388
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 29th May 2007 09:29    Post subject:
KrAzY-KaMeL wrote:
We might as well start a fastest lap thing. I think the Subaru track is most accessible since it's so short. My fastest was 1:05.60. BEAT THAT! Laughing


upload screen to proof your times. Otherwise its no idea.
Back to top
Leftos




Posts: 1159
Location: Patras, Greece
PostPosted: Tue, 29th May 2007 11:12    Post subject:
Neither a screen is a valid source of track times. Trainers can alter the time. You'd have to watch a whole replay in order to know.


[ i5 2500K (@4.2GHz) / GIGABYTE Z77MX-D3H / 8GB Corsair XMS / GIGABYTE GTX460 1GB OC / 640+750 GB WD Caviar Black ]
Back to top
KrAzY-KaMeL




Posts: 2248
Location: City Of Compton
PostPosted: Tue, 29th May 2007 11:29    Post subject:
DarkLeftos wrote:
Neither a screen is a valid source of track times. Trainers can alter the time. You'd have to watch a whole replay in order to know.


I'll upload a screen, let's just trust my honesty! Smile
Back to top
cnZ
Banned



Posts: 3091

PostPosted: Tue, 29th May 2007 11:34    Post subject:
this game runs pretty crappy on 2x 8800ultra @ 1680x1050

(fps between 45 - 60)


yes
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 29th May 2007 11:52    Post subject:
cnZ wrote:
this game runs pretty crappy on 2x 8800ultra @ 1680x1050

(fps between 45 - 60)
Thats not that bad. The game is unoptimized as hell.
Back to top
swebarb




Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland
PostPosted: Tue, 29th May 2007 12:14    Post subject:
And it has fucking starforce too doesnt help either.
Back to top
Leftos




Posts: 1159
Location: Patras, Greece
PostPosted: Tue, 29th May 2007 13:22    Post subject:
KrAzY-KaMeL wrote:
DarkLeftos wrote:
Neither a screen is a valid source of track times. Trainers can alter the time. You'd have to watch a whole replay in order to know.


I'll upload a screen, let's just trust my honesty! Smile


I hope you didn't take any offence. I wasn't talking about your honesty, I was just being general. You wouldn't believe the top times on TDU's single-player challenges.


[ i5 2500K (@4.2GHz) / GIGABYTE Z77MX-D3H / 8GB Corsair XMS / GIGABYTE GTX460 1GB OC / 640+750 GB WD Caviar Black ]
Back to top
Page 5 of 26 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 24, 25, 26  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group