| Page 2 of 2 |
|
|
 Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 00:43 Post subject: |
|
 |
| LeoNatan wrote: | My old one did load in 30secs with Vista too... 
My current one does it even faster...
Why do you even argue with me? If it doesn't run faster for you, than don't run it. |
Wow a typical male ass hole , they never say they are wrong even if they knew they are .
OMIG i WILL install VISTA yes you convinced me NOW my M$WORD will run 0.5 s faster then ever ONENONEONOENONEONE!!!!!!!!111 and I will play games on win XP like YOU , THANK you for the 1337 words you truly enlight3n me , I will tell my husband to buy VISTA in the morning , MY WORD documents will praise your name !!!!1111111eleventhin .
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 00:57 Post subject: |
|
|
 How am I wrong if Vista runs faster for me and countless others?
Enough with, please... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kumkss
Posts: 4834
Location: Chile
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 05:28 Post subject: |
|
|
i've got a XPS Notebook Intel Core 2 Duo 2.16 Ghz, 2GB RAM, 512 Geforce 7950GTX, a 7200 rpm hdd; running vista was considerably slower than xp at startup. after it loads, all programs runs faster...
the main problem is that they arent still any drivers for the nvidia hardware, among other hardware.
disgusting was the "block system apps" that vista automaticaly discriminate what app blocks at startup. is so buggy that it even block windows components like the "gadgets".
STALKER ran like shit on vista (on xp, same computer, runs smooth)
Civ 4 got graphics glitches.
test drive unlimited played smooth and ok...
that fucking confirmation system in vista really sucks. toataly and completely useless...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 05:51 Post subject: |
|
|
Thankfully I ditched my 7900GT, with it's shitty drivers and bought myself an x1950xtx. Funny thing is, games actually run extremely well now, Stalker included.
Intel C2D 6400, 4GB GeiL DDR2 6400, Gigabyte 965P-DQ6, 4 x 320GB Barracudas, X1950XT-X 512MB, 32" Mirai LCD TV, Thermaltake Tai Chi Chasis, Vista Enterprise x64
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 06:29 Post subject: |
|
|
real funny bit here about Vista. i had a 6800GT and 1gb of mismatched ram 2x512 and my rating was 4.3
then i got a 7600GS and 2gb of corsair XMS 2x1gb and my rating was 3.6
LOL WTF????? yea...go vista, i still have no explanation for this one.
sad ad thing about vista is its labled the gaming OS but sucks bigtime for games atm. until thats fixed, i have no desire to try vista for a 3rd time.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 09:21 Post subject: |
|
|
6800 > 7600... One is 256bit card, the other 128bit.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 10:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| kumkss wrote: | | i've got a XPS Notebook Intel Core 2 Duo 2.16 Ghz, 2GB RAM, 512 Geforce 7950GTX, a 7200 rpm hdd; running vista was considerably slower than xp at startup. after it loads, all programs runs faster... |
Noticed that as well, Takes longer to start than XP but it runs a little better than XP once started. Considering the amount of RAM I have I'm sure this could be improved with more RAM.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GestaltO
Posts: 305
Location: omnipresent
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 12:53 Post subject: |
|
|
Down to personal preference i guess at the end of the day. peronsally as i said i used vista and i loved it. it did actually run faster than my XP on MOST things. i dont play games so i cant comment. however on saying that, i am waiting for a while before totally moving over, i think thats recommended for any OS dont forget XP was SHIT when it first got released. if it wasnt then why have updates and patches for the 769375849478573 security flaws.
End if the day it is literally down to personal preference people shouldnt be flamed for choosing or not choosing to use a particular OS.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 14:20 Post subject: |
|
|
| LeoNatan wrote: | | 6800 > 7600... One is 256bit card, the other 128bit. |
i know. but my games run better with the 7600. well not in vista of course. horrible horrible gaming os. they need to take that label off until it actually is one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 16:54 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 17:57 Post subject: |
|
|
| LeoNatan wrote: | | Who is they? |
M$ dummy , they say that all game with the label "games for windows" will run great on Vista but its only a big ass lie . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xenu
Posts: 8
Location: 3rd Planet from the Sun
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 17:59 Post subject: |
|
|
I tried Vi$ta on my notebook and i could not run my fav games, and some software wont work properly (slow)...untill micro$ucks decides to somehow make their new fancy whore of an operating system work (backwards compatible) both with all games and software that can be used on XP, including file system compatibility. I will not be donating anymore money to billys bank account.
Who put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp
Who put the ram in the ram-a-lam-a-ding-dong
Who put the bop in the bop-she-bop-she-bop
Who put the dip in the dib-de-dip-de-dip
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Apr 2007 18:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| damonika12 wrote: | | LeoNatan wrote: | | Who is they? |
M$ dummy , they say that all game with the label "games for windows" will run great on Vista but its only a big ass lie . |
That's what I was expecting, lol. How is it MS' fault that there is lack of drivers? I'd say it's nVidia's and AMD's fault. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phluxed
VIP Member
Posts: 4911
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Apr 2007 04:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| LeoNatan wrote: | | damonika12 wrote: | | LeoNatan wrote: | | Who is they? |
M$ dummy , they say that all game with the label "games for windows" will run great on Vista but its only a big ass lie . |
That's what I was expecting, lol. How is it MS' fault that there is lack of drivers? I'd say it's nVidia's and AMD's fault. |
Actually Leo, It's Microsofts fault for several reasons:
1. Microsoft changed the way drivers access hardware and thus pushing driver development into a hole - SEE CREATIVES LETTER TO MICROSOFT.
2. Microsoft was in a constant state of flux (don't even) while developing the OS and the specifics were changing pretty constantly (though it isn't uncommon to do this in software development, when you're developing an operating system, you need to bang out the foundations which Microsoft did NOT do with their driver support)
and of course 3
Microsoft has yet to admit it is causing anyone trouble in driver usage or application compatibility on a large scale. They will not do this because it lower sales.
I run Vista at home and support it at work, and I honestly don't think it's a bad OS, but your fanboism is just too much for me to swallow. There are faults in every single OS and Vista's major fault is driver and application compatibility. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TiHKAL
Posts: 2350
Location: The Pub
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Apr 2007 05:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| kumkss wrote: | i've got a XPS Notebook Intel Core 2 Duo 2.16 Ghz, 2GB RAM, 512 Geforce 7950GTX, a 7200 rpm hdd; running vista was considerably slower than xp at startup. after it loads, all programs runs faster...
the main problem is that they arent still any drivers for the nvidia hardware, among other hardware.
disgusting was the "block system apps" that vista automaticaly discriminate what app blocks at startup. is so buggy that it even block windows components like the "gadgets".
STALKER ran like shit on vista (on xp, same computer, runs smooth)
Civ 4 got graphics glitches.
test drive unlimited played smooth and ok...
that fucking confirmation system in vista really sucks. toataly and completely useless... |
You can turn the confirmation stuff off.
Start > msconfig > Tools > Disable UAC - Reboot
No more questions about every click you make.
Edit
Flux capacitor
PC: i7-4790k @ 4.4, 32GB @ 2400, Nvidia 1080TI FE, 2 TB Crucial MX500 SSD
Nintendo Switch SX OS Pro / PS4 Pro 5.05 Hen/Mira / PS3 Modded / Wii Modded / 360 Pre-Wave4 mod
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Apr 2007 08:25 Post subject: |
|
|
Who cares if Vista sucks, it's free
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Apr 2007 09:08 Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Noob, welcome back mate!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
$en$i
VIP Member
Posts: 3127
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 2 of 2 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
