| Page 45 of 55 |
|
|
 Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 15:52 Post subject: |
|
 |
SC1 had no AA either ya know......
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 16:01 Post subject: |
|
|
No crashes in the Xbox 360 version and it was fucking great on it! PC Version looks like motherfucking bullshit or what the fucking fuck?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jazza
Posts: 183
Location: my skin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 18:42 Post subject: The Evolution of Sam Fisher |
|
|
Last edited by |IcedFreon| on Fri, 10th Nov 2006 19:21; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 18:44 Post subject: |
|
|
24 FPS...CRAP! I SAY!
You used the same rig for all 4 or? its sort a dropping from 58 down to 24 
Nice retrospect presentation but. Shows what a fracking kick ass franchise SC is.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 19:04 Post subject: |
|
|
yes the same rig.
xp 3000+ 1gb ram 6800gt oc
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swebarb
Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 19:32 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah i can do the same 60fps on all previous games here i get 15-25 on x1900xt  fuck this sucks bigtime.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 19:37 Post subject: |
|
|
its a stealth game man....youre never moving fast so whats it matter if you dont get 60fps
its not a shooter.....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 19:50 Post subject: |
|
|
you don't even need 60fps for a shooter :|
cockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcock
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 19:51 Post subject: |
|
|
Well the difference is big but 28FPS in SC4 ....
With a 7900GTX I have about 50-70FPS....bullcard!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 22:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| phylum22 wrote: | | All this frame rate crap is a load of nonsense, the human eye can only see about 25fps, anything above that is superfluous. 28-30fps is adequate in any game. |
That is the funniest thing I read all day. Then how do you explain that we can perceive the difference between 30 and 60 fps, and 60 and 120? The answer should be obvious. 30 is not enough in any game, only at 60 does it feel really smooth, and that's the truth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73329
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 22:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| phylum22 wrote: | | All this frame rate crap is a load of nonsense, the human eye can only see about 25fps, anything above that is superfluous. 28-30fps is adequate in any game. |
READ BEFORE POSTING SHIT! (<- this should be my sig.)
http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rekof
Banned
Posts: 72
Location: Croatia someday
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 22:42 Post subject: |
|
|
of corse ,.. but having a constant 26fps or 1334 fps would not make much difference, in sc.. would it
Last edited by rekof on Fri, 10th Nov 2006 22:48; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73329
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 22:46 Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, it would. Because games don't have the motion blur that occures in film, the eye catches the little pause between the frames.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rekof
Banned
Posts: 72
Location: Croatia someday
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73329
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 22:52 Post subject: |
|
|
And that matters how? You *can* play any game in 15fps. Why does it matter the type of the game? If it doesn't work for one type of games, it doesn't work at all.
[EDIT] You edited the post. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 22:52 Post subject: |
|
|
That SCPT map looks way better than you captured.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 22:54 Post subject: |
|
|
uh hows it look better? thats everything on max possible
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rekof
Banned
Posts: 72
Location: Croatia someday
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 22:55 Post subject: |
|
|
edit it again,.. so have a laugh.//
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 23:45 Post subject: |
|
|
| |IcedFreon| wrote: | | uh hows it look better? thats everything on max possible |
Well it looks better on the 360 thats for sure.
"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D
"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 10th Nov 2006 23:51 Post subject: |
|
|
SC4 looks better on Xbox 360 than on pc or what the?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 11th Nov 2006 00:27 Post subject: |
|
|
| AnimalMother wrote: | | |IcedFreon| wrote: | | uh hows it look better? thats everything on max possible |
Well it looks better on the 360 thats for sure. |
he said SCPT...no one was talking about DA |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 11th Nov 2006 00:29 Post subject: |
|
|
| Parallax_ wrote: | | phylum22 wrote: | | All this frame rate crap is a load of nonsense, the human eye can only see about 25fps, anything above that is superfluous. 28-30fps is adequate in any game. |
That is the funniest thing I read all day. Then how do you explain that we can perceive the difference between 30 and 60 fps, and 60 and 120? The answer should be obvious. 30 is not enough in any game, only at 60 does it feel really smooth, and that's the truth. |
30 is fine... 30 is smooth.
cockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcock
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73329
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Sat, 11th Nov 2006 01:00 Post subject: |
|
|
Mhm, maybe for the blind...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sat, 11th Nov 2006 01:55 Post subject: |
|
|
Are the install suppose to use 2 years on the file MAPS.SMO?
Edit: seems like it -.-
Last edited by deelix on Sat, 11th Nov 2006 01:57; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 11th Nov 2006 01:56 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 45 of 55 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
