| Page 7 of 17 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 1st Oct 2006 16:59 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 1st Oct 2006 17:11 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 1st Oct 2006 17:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Again, the thing that bothers me...
If you are so certain the game is going to suck for you and you're not going to play it, please shut up and leave this topic, nobody gives a fuck about you.
Belive it or not, there are actually people who like the 'new' NFS series... if you don't, that's okay, just don't post here the same shit over again (this game sucks etc).
Thank you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Sun, 1st Oct 2006 18:09 Post subject: |
|
|
| ELIZ wrote: | | Mr_Miagi wrote: | Again, the thing that bothers me...
If you are so certain the game is going to suck for you and you're not going to play it, please shut up and leave this topic, nobody gives a fuck about you.
Belive it or not, there are actually people who like the 'new' NFS series... if you don't, that's okay, just don't post here the same shit over again (this game sucks etc).
Thank you. |
he's right 
like it -> discuss
don't like it -> fuck off
at the end this is just a game for fuk sakes  |
Nah, criticizing something is allright to a certain level, but coming in here, insulting those who like it, that's shit!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 1st Oct 2006 20:15 Post subject: |
|
|
any new news about the demo ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 1st Oct 2006 20:18 Post subject: |
|
|
| ike_pl wrote: | | any new news about the demo ? |
probably 2 weeks before full release,like it was with MW
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ForHim
Posts: 85
Location: Somewhere out there
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Oct 2006 14:15 Post subject: |
|
|
Game is going to be good. I'm almost 30 years old and now and again it is nice to play a bit of arcade. No other arcade game out there, beats the racing in NFS. The downhill drifting in Carbon is absolutely going to blow your mind. rFactor and GTR2 can take a lot out of a person when playing with the steering wheel.
Really looking forward to this. The wife should enjoy it as well. Cheers m8's and please take it easy man.
MSI NEO4 Platinum | AMD 4200+ X2 Dual Core | XFX 7900GT | 2x 1gb Kingmax DDR400
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
m00nb0y
Posts: 71
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lutzifer
Modzilla
Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Oct 2006 18:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| Parallax_ wrote: | | Mr_Miagi wrote: | | Parallax_ wrote: | | Ok mr. gameplay-junkie, the gameplay in NFS Carbon sucks. Why? Because it's the fucking same as NFS Underground 1/2 and Most Wanted. Capiche? |
And you know it becouse... ? |
Anybody who have read a miniscule information about this game or seen a video of it would now. |
even so, i kinda liked underground 1&2 and most wanted even more, as it did tone down the stupid visual tuning stuff. And if you cut out the semi-stupid story, the races still where / are fun. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Oct 2006 22:16 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jinx112
Posts: 60
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Oct 2006 22:18 Post subject: |
|
|
I too like the nfs series! It has always been an arcade racer, okay maybe not porsche unleashed, but the others have. And for all the people whining about it being crap console arcade game, just dont play it, the current series arent suppose to be about realism, and honestly its more fun on the consoles (just like figthing games).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Oct 2006 22:18 Post subject: |
|
|
512 might be enough but 1 gig of ram would be better.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Oct 2006 22:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| kobi_game2 wrote: | | 512 ram enough ? |
i too got 512ram and i can say you know very long load times toooooooooooooo long
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 00:12 Post subject: |
|
|
Hm... I think a 1GB is the recommended minimum for gaming today, especially with Vista poking around the corner...
I remember I couldn't run NFSU2 properly with 512MB, so let alone Carbon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 00:45 Post subject: |
|
|
| lnatan25 wrote: | Hm... I think a 1GB is the recommended minimum for gaming today, especially with Vista poking around the corner...
I remember I couldn't run NFSU2 properly with 512MB, so let alone Carbon. |
Vista will need at least 2gigs to run smoothly
Carbon 1 gig recomended,with 512mb probably playable on medium/low 800*600
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 00:49 Post subject: |
|
|
| ELIZ wrote: | | lnatan25 wrote: | Hm... I think a 1GB is the recommended minimum for gaming today, especially with Vista poking around the corner...
I remember I couldn't run NFSU2 properly with 512MB, so let alone Carbon. |
Vista will need at least 2gigs to run smoothly
Carbon 1 gig recomended,with 512mb probably playable on medium/low 800*600 |
LOL i will play 1024x768 and low i think thats going to work with my 512mb ram
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 01:06 Post subject: |
|
|
| ELIZ wrote: | | lnatan25 wrote: | Hm... I think a 1GB is the recommended minimum for gaming today, especially with Vista poking around the corner...
I remember I couldn't run NFSU2 properly with 512MB, so let alone Carbon. |
Vista will need at least 2gigs to run smoothly
Carbon 1 gig recomended,with 512mb probably playable on medium/low 800*600 |
Uh. I could swear RAM mostly influences loading times. 800*600 because of too little ram is stupid in my opinion, get a better graphics card with 256 or even 512 ram and you are gonna be fine even on 1280*1024.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 02:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| Xenthalon wrote: | | ELIZ wrote: | | lnatan25 wrote: | Hm... I think a 1GB is the recommended minimum for gaming today, especially with Vista poking around the corner...
I remember I couldn't run NFSU2 properly with 512MB, so let alone Carbon. |
Vista will need at least 2gigs to run smoothly
Carbon 1 gig recomended,with 512mb probably playable on medium/low 800*600 |
Uh. I could swear RAM mostly influences loading times. 800*600 because of too little ram is stupid in my opinion, get a better graphics card with 256 or even 512 ram and you are gonna be fine even on 1280*1024. |
well it will use your virtual memory then,MW used 400mb,vram will be slower so expect slowdowns,loading also depends on speed of ram,if u can afford 512mb vcard wich will cost new one at least 150euro wich is completely useless with 128bit,then u can spend exta 50-70 on extra ram,aslo depends on your ram price etc.
in anyways 512mb is not enough to play new games & operate winxp,unless u using '98
at the end it all comes down to how game engine is optimized,we all know how MW was optimized.so pray for better perfomance due to night 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 02:42 Post subject: |
|
|
Higher resolution doesnt have shit to do with how much RAM you got.
The textures/models/sounds/crap are always the same size and gets loaded at the same intervals regardless of the resolution. Doh!
RAM = loading times, doing stuff simultaneously without the comp having to re-load shit, and having more space to stream ingame stuff to eliminate stutters.
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 RAM: 4gb Kingmax DDR2 800mhz Video: Asus GeForce 250GTS 1gb Sound: Asus Xonar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 10:27 Post subject: |
|
|
| Baleur wrote: | | The textures/models/sounds/crap are always the same size and gets loaded at the same intervals regardless of the resolution. Doh! |
When you think about it, that was so wrong to say |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 11:01 Post subject: |
|
|
This game is dark again and I hate that bullfuck! But the new tuningbullshit is fucking great! I play this fucking game of course but I defenetly know it's not the motherfucking best NFS bullgame!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 12:12 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah but hey =D
Yeah! The tuningbullshit is fucking with great skill! ^_^
And for the record, vista runs smooth as silk since the latest updates, even with just 1gb ram.
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 RAM: 4gb Kingmax DDR2 800mhz Video: Asus GeForce 250GTS 1gb Sound: Asus Xonar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 17:56 Post subject: |
|
|
It is expected it will run even better in the next few builds just before RTM. But it still has more RAM requirements because of all the running processes.
[EDIT] Reading your specs... WTF are you complaining? You have 2GB of RAM. Jeez, I wonder why...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Oct 2006 15:18 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 7 of 17 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
Great sense of homour man. 
