| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
 Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 16:38 Post subject: Recommend me a digital photocamera |
|
 |
Between 150 and 350 euro's
Using the camera for making pictures about bullshit, parties maybe some artistic photos.
Any recommendations?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 16:41 Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm i will try to find something, my cousin is like expert with thoose stuff.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 16:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| Razacka2 wrote: | | Hmm i will try to find something, my cousin is like expert with thoose stuff. |
 allrighty |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 16:52 Post subject: |
|
|
you want a big one or a little one?
asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 17:01 Post subject: |
|
|
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P200 7.2 Megapixel, it takes excellent pictures and within your price range.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 17:15 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 17:26 Post subject: |
|
|
| nouseforaname wrote: | | you want a big one or a little one? |
doesn't really mather.
Aslong as its not running on AA-bateries  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 18:57 Post subject: |
|
|
| nouseforaname wrote: | if you're going to get one of the compact sony cameras, get one with image stabilization ... 
I think sony calls it 'super steady shot' or something like that. really helps when you're taking pictures indoors without flash |
that looks pretty cool |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 19:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| SycoShaman wrote: | | nouseforaname wrote: | if you're going to get one of the compact sony cameras, get one with image stabilization ...
I think sony calls it 'super steady shot' or something like that. really helps when you're taking pictures indoors without flash |
that looks pretty cool |
That's a CyberShot T30, anyhow, here's a site that sorts digital cameras by price range. Their reviews are pretty good.
http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/digital-cameras/higher-price_ratings.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 19:35 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 19:36 Post subject: |
|
|
cheers Will lookinto it.
It's for my birthday so moehaha
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bigperm
Posts: 1908
Location: Alberta,Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 22:50 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 22:56 Post subject: |
|
|
| Bigperm wrote: | | I have a Cannon Powershot A610 and i love it. Its a bigger camera, but i tend to lose small things. |
even better, A710 .. has image stabilization, 6x optical zoom ... takes AA
http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/digital-cameras/canon-powershot-a710_reviews.html
| Quote: | | The A710 IS is Canon's first point-and-shoot to offer image stabilization, for reducing jitters and blur in deep zoom photos. When Canon debuted the A700, the 6x optical zoom was a new frontier for point-and-shoot cameras. It was very popular, but it wasn't quite perfect. Though not as susceptible to shaking and jittering as smaller, less sturdy cameras, the A700's larger-than-average zoom still could have used some support. Well, with the A710 IS, Canon has done just that, bringing back the popular feature set and design fo the A700, while adding advanced image stabilization technology. The IS, the fantastic 7.1 megapixel sensor and ability to take 16:9, wide-aspect still photos, make the A710 IS a truly superior camera for casual users looking for some easy-to-use power. |
asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 23:15 Post subject: |
|
|
| nouseforaname wrote: | | Bigperm wrote: | | I have a Cannon Powershot A610 and i love it. Its a bigger camera, but i tend to lose small things. |
even better, A710 .. has image stabilization, 6x optical zoom ... takes AA
http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/digital-cameras/canon-powershot-a710_reviews.html
| Quote: | | The A710 IS is Canon's first point-and-shoot to offer image stabilization, for reducing jitters and blur in deep zoom photos. When Canon debuted the A700, the 6x optical zoom was a new frontier for point-and-shoot cameras. It was very popular, but it wasn't quite perfect. Though not as susceptible to shaking and jittering as smaller, less sturdy cameras, the A700's larger-than-average zoom still could have used some support. Well, with the A710 IS, Canon has done just that, bringing back the popular feature set and design fo the A700, while adding advanced image stabilization technology. The IS, the fantastic 7.1 megapixel sensor and ability to take 16:9, wide-aspect still photos, make the A710 IS a truly superior camera for casual users looking for some easy-to-use power. |
|
Nothing beats my Nikon D50, still one of the best cameras money can buy 
http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/digital-cameras/nikon-d50_reviews.html
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 23:17 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 23:33 Post subject: |
|
|
aaaaaaaah, so many choises 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 23:37 Post subject: |
|
|
Best value for money SLR out there, no competition
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 23:54 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 30th Sep 2006 00:21 Post subject: |
|
|
| nouseforaname wrote: | | compubrain3000 wrote: | | Best value for money SLR out there, no competition |
wouldn't doubt it ... if I needed to buy one, you can bet I wouldn't be shelling out $$$$$$$$$ ... $500 CAD is pretty affordable for that camera.
but shit ... the lenses aren't so cheap  '
'
I only have a dsc-w5 ... it cost me almost $500 over a year ago... does the trick except for the blurriness in indoor shots, and with the zoom. that's why I would want one with the image stabilization
a wide angle lens for mine is about 100-150 bucks 
 |
That's a good cam, i have the 7.2 Megapixels Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P200. It too has blurriness in indoor shots, you've got to be very still while shooting. It's the only flaw i see in the camera. Tend to loose a lot of pictures to blurriness 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Sat, 30th Sep 2006 00:28 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 30th Sep 2006 00:39 Post subject: |
|
|
| nouseforaname wrote: | | compubrain3000 wrote: | | That's a good cam, i have the 7.2 Megapixels Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P200. It too has blurriness in indoor shots, you've got to be very still while shooting. It's the only flaw i see in the camera. Tend to loose a lot of pictures to blurriness |
thats why I would think cybershot + image stabilization = teh pwn!  some pics can turn out so great and then others are shit I see it as the feature that defines new point and shoot cameras |
That would make Cybershots nearly perfect, if it works as advertized that is  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 30th Sep 2006 00:51 Post subject: |
|
|
| nouseforaname wrote: | | compubrain3000 wrote: | | That would make Cybershots nearly perfect, if it works as advertized that is |
do you have problems with yours?
I actually started with a DSC-P92 about 4 years ago (and an extended warranty) ... it stopped working for no reason after 2 years, so they gave me the w5 in return because the model was replaced and this one was the same megapixel rating. good deal, but would have been shit without a extended warranty ...
hehehe this review calls it 'top of the line' ... what difference a little time makes
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_reviews/p92.html |
Mine is fine, had it for about 2 years with no problems. Good thinking with the warranty though |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Oct 2006 11:07 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WaldoJ
VIP Member
Posts: 32678
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Oct 2006 14:37 Post subject: |
|
|
post your first picture please!!!!!!!!!!!!
out of focus or what not even if it's shit! POST IT!
| Sin317 wrote: | | I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
