| Page 20 of 35 |
|
|
 Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:00 Post subject: |
|
 |
| maxiepaxie wrote: | | Well you can't alter a Clone unless you or someone made a mini-image... Because the MDF/MDS would be useless and it wouldn't work anymore if you removed things. |
Well I mean is there any chance of ripping all the protected data out and compressing stuff then it could fit to dvd5RW till the crack is out? Just like with SCCT dummy padding files.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:02 Post subject: |
|
|
Total disappointment. Everybody was wondering if Avalanche would wise up and implement the next-gen features in the full version. Looks like they failed. Hell, they couldn't even put in AA/AF in the demo. Couldn't even remap keys. This is Avalanche's first game and it shows. I encourage everybody to download this game instead of buying it. They don't deserve a penny from PC gamers. Some of the not-so-smart PC gamers are saying "Well, it looks way better than GTA." as if that redeems itself. San Andreas came out a LONG time ago. This game looks a tiny bit better than that which is pretty much saying it looks bad. After seeing comparison shots of 360/PC we shouldn't have to resort to "Well....at least the PC version looks better than a game that came out two or three years ago." If you're interested in how bad you're getting jipped you can take a look at this
http://www.digitalphotos.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/JustCause/JCcomp.avi
That's a video comparison of Xbox 360 and PC on full settings. I don't own a 360 nor do I want to. I shouldn't have to. I own a PC. I'm supposed to be able to go to my video settings and change whatever I want. If I have a high end PC I should be able to turn on the exact same features that 360 has. If I have a low end PC I can turn all settings to low and have the game look as horrible as it does right now. Avalanche said in an interview "No Microsoft didn't bribe us to leave out HDR in the PC version." Well, if it's not a marketing scheme for Microsoft, then it must just be sheer stupidity. I'm hoping after they realize their PC sales are sucking they'll release a patch with all the "next-gen" features. The demo was pretty awful, but I'm downloading the full version right now to see exactly how bad it compares. Will there be widescreen support? Up to 1920x1200? AA/AF? Will there be a slider to make the awful shadows less pixelated? Somebody should just take a screen of the video settings tab in the game. I be the only thing they added was an AA/AF toggle, if that. Okay I'm hungry so I guess I'm done for now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| Freakness wrote: | | maxiepaxie wrote: | | Well you can't alter a Clone unless you or someone made a mini-image... Because the MDF/MDS would be useless and it wouldn't work anymore if you removed things. |
Well I mean is there any chance of ripping all the protected data out and compressing stuff then it could fit to dvd5RW till the crack is out? Just like with SCCT dummy padding files. |
the extra crap is a bunch of language files. and its all in cab files. so unless you want to edit cab files hen no, you cant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:05 Post subject: |
|
|
| totallymichael wrote: | Total disappointment. Everybody was wondering if Avalanche would wise up and implement the next-gen features in the full version. Looks like they failed. Hell, they couldn't even put in AA/AF in the demo. Couldn't even remap keys. This is Avalanche's first game and it shows. I encourage everybody to download this game instead of buying it. They don't deserve a penny from PC gamers. Some of the not-so-smart PC gamers are saying "Well, it looks way better than GTA." as if that redeems itself. San Andreas came out a LONG time ago. This game looks a tiny bit better than that which is pretty much saying it looks bad. After seeing comparison shots of 360/PC we shouldn't have to resort to "Well....at least the PC version looks better than a game that came out two or three years ago." If you're interested in how bad you're getting jipped you can take a look at this
http://www.digitalphotos.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/JustCause/JCcomp.avi
That's a video comparison of Xbox 360 and PC on full settings. I don't own a 360 nor do I want to. I shouldn't have to. I own a PC. I'm supposed to be able to go to my video settings and change whatever I want. If I have a high end PC I should be able to turn on the exact same features that 360 has. If I have a low end PC I can turn all settings to low and have the game look as horrible as it does right now. Avalanche said in an interview "No Microsoft didn't bribe us to leave out HDR in the PC version." Well, if it's not a marketing scheme for Microsoft, then it must just be sheer stupidity. I'm hoping after they realize their PC sales are sucking they'll release a patch with all the "next-gen" features. The demo was pretty awful, but I'm downloading the full version right now to see exactly how bad it compares. Will there be widescreen support? Up to 1920x1200? AA/AF? Will there be a slider to make the awful shadows less pixelated? Somebody should just take a screen of the video settings tab in the game. I be the only thing they added was an AA/AF toggle, if that. Okay I'm hungry so I guess I'm done for now. |
wow man. how about actually playing the final before bitching and moaning? as i said before its a huge improvement over the demo. and it runs and looks beautiful. just look at the screens i took on the previous page. and you CAN remap the controls and there IS HDR
lol how can someone who hasnt even played it yet say "total disappointment" thats nforce for ya. 
why is it so important to look exactly like the 360 version? the game is fun period. stop being such a gfx slut and focus on the shit that matters. GAMEPLAY.
and whoever is running that pc version must have a pile of shit rig or is running soem old beta copy, because i have everythign maxed out @ 1280x1024 and it doesnt run choppy like that.
and now this Just.Cause-RELOADED - its not a dvd5 like some of you hoped.
Last edited by |IcedFreon| on Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:16; edited 8 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:05 Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't the copy-protection stored in the first few megs of the image anyway, so it won't make a difference if you remove some files? Isn't that the reason mini-images are so damn small?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:13 Post subject: |
|
|
This game is a piece of shit,bloody Boiling Point rip-off,unrealistic shooting,bad AI,graphics also not so good....... shit like El Matador. All recent games from Eidos are bullshit.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:20 Post subject: |
|
|
| |IcedFreon| wrote: | | totallymichael wrote: | Total disappointment. Everybody was wondering if Avalanche would wise up and implement the next-gen features in the full version. Looks like they failed. Hell, they couldn't even put in AA/AF in the demo. Couldn't even remap keys. This is Avalanche's first game and it shows. I encourage everybody to download this game instead of buying it. They don't deserve a penny from PC gamers. Some of the not-so-smart PC gamers are saying "Well, it looks way better than GTA." as if that redeems itself. San Andreas came out a LONG time ago. This game looks a tiny bit better than that which is pretty much saying it looks bad. After seeing comparison shots of 360/PC we shouldn't have to resort to "Well....at least the PC version looks better than a game that came out two or three years ago." If you're interested in how bad you're getting jipped you can take a look at this
http://www.digitalphotos.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/JustCause/JCcomp.avi
That's a video comparison of Xbox 360 and PC on full settings. I don't own a 360 nor do I want to. I shouldn't have to. I own a PC. I'm supposed to be able to go to my video settings and change whatever I want. If I have a high end PC I should be able to turn on the exact same features that 360 has. If I have a low end PC I can turn all settings to low and have the game look as horrible as it does right now. Avalanche said in an interview "No Microsoft didn't bribe us to leave out HDR in the PC version." Well, if it's not a marketing scheme for Microsoft, then it must just be sheer stupidity. I'm hoping after they realize their PC sales are sucking they'll release a patch with all the "next-gen" features. The demo was pretty awful, but I'm downloading the full version right now to see exactly how bad it compares. Will there be widescreen support? Up to 1920x1200? AA/AF? Will there be a slider to make the awful shadows less pixelated? Somebody should just take a screen of the video settings tab in the game. I be the only thing they added was an AA/AF toggle, if that. Okay I'm hungry so I guess I'm done for now. |
wow man. how about actually playing the final before bitching and moaning? as i said before its a huge improvement over the demo. and it runs and looks beautiful. just look at the screens i took on the previous page.
lol how can someone who hasnt even played it yet say "total disappointment" thats nforce for ya.
why is it so important to look exactly like the 360 version? the game is fun period. stop being such a gfx slut and focus on the shit that matters. GAMEPLAY. |
I'm sorry, but the new screenshots aren't any different than the demo screenshots. And they are still bad. My post was entirely about the graphics. So yes "total disappointment" is right. I played the demo. It wasn't that fun, but my post wasn't about how fun or not fun the game is. But believe it or not graphics do have a big part in a game. When looking at the 360 version then going back to the PC version it makes it seem cheap. I'm sorry if me saying Avalanche messed up by not implementing features that a PC could easily handle for no reason at all is offending you. I'm not hear to talk about "this game totally suxxorz. and if you play it then you're a faggy fag gay". I'm simply stating the truth. That Avalanche totally messed up. They could easily have the same graphical features in the PC version as settings that can simply be turned on/off, but they didn't. And PC gamers that dish out way more money on hardware to play games than console gamers shouldn't have to settle for less because a studio isn't very smart. I'm a gfx slut. Sorry.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:22 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:23 Post subject: |
|
|
all i know is i played for a couple hours and had good fun. the demo sucked yes. but the final is great. and i dotn give a damn if it looks just like the 360 version or not.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vortex66
Posts: 629
Location: Døñ't løøk ßåçk
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:23 Post subject: |
|
|
way to go reloaded
HOODLUM - Definite Supremacy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:26 Post subject: |
|
|
Posted: 21 Sep 2006 08:05 pm
| |IcedFreon| wrote: | | and now this Just.Cause-RELOADED - its not a dvd5 like some of you hoped. |
Posted: 21 Sep 2006 08:22 pm
| Dm242 wrote: | | Just.Cause-RELOADED |
and the point of saying it again and almost 20 minutes later was?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:30 Post subject: |
|
|
seemed like the right thing to do... or i ... thought it was just released, my apologies. . .
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Brisk
Posts: 1557
Location: Dutch...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:42 Post subject: |
|
|
i cant be bothered to go into the cab files edit/rebuild and all that shit just to rip some language files
someone else can do it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| totallymichael wrote: | | |IcedFreon| wrote: | | totallymichael wrote: | Total disappointment. Everybody was wondering if Avalanche would wise up and implement the next-gen features in the full version. Looks like they failed. Hell, they couldn't even put in AA/AF in the demo. Couldn't even remap keys. This is Avalanche's first game and it shows. I encourage everybody to download this game instead of buying it. They don't deserve a penny from PC gamers. Some of the not-so-smart PC gamers are saying "Well, it looks way better than GTA." as if that redeems itself. San Andreas came out a LONG time ago. This game looks a tiny bit better than that which is pretty much saying it looks bad. After seeing comparison shots of 360/PC we shouldn't have to resort to "Well....at least the PC version looks better than a game that came out two or three years ago." If you're interested in how bad you're getting jipped you can take a look at this
http://www.digitalphotos.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/JustCause/JCcomp.avi
That's a video comparison of Xbox 360 and PC on full settings. I don't own a 360 nor do I want to. I shouldn't have to. I own a PC. I'm supposed to be able to go to my video settings and change whatever I want. If I have a high end PC I should be able to turn on the exact same features that 360 has. If I have a low end PC I can turn all settings to low and have the game look as horrible as it does right now. Avalanche said in an interview "No Microsoft didn't bribe us to leave out HDR in the PC version." Well, if it's not a marketing scheme for Microsoft, then it must just be sheer stupidity. I'm hoping after they realize their PC sales are sucking they'll release a patch with all the "next-gen" features. The demo was pretty awful, but I'm downloading the full version right now to see exactly how bad it compares. Will there be widescreen support? Up to 1920x1200? AA/AF? Will there be a slider to make the awful shadows less pixelated? Somebody should just take a screen of the video settings tab in the game. I be the only thing they added was an AA/AF toggle, if that. Okay I'm hungry so I guess I'm done for now. |
wow man. how about actually playing the final before bitching and moaning? as i said before its a huge improvement over the demo. and it runs and looks beautiful. just look at the screens i took on the previous page.
lol how can someone who hasnt even played it yet say "total disappointment" thats nforce for ya.
why is it so important to look exactly like the 360 version? the game is fun period. stop being such a gfx slut and focus on the shit that matters. GAMEPLAY. |
I'm sorry, but the new screenshots aren't any different than the demo screenshots. And they are still bad. My post was entirely about the graphics. So yes "total disappointment" is right. I played the demo. It wasn't that fun, but my post wasn't about how fun or not fun the game is. But believe it or not graphics do have a big part in a game. When looking at the 360 version then going back to the PC version it makes it seem cheap. I'm sorry if me saying Avalanche messed up by not implementing features that a PC could easily handle for no reason at all is offending you. I'm not hear to talk about "this game totally suxxorz. and if you play it then you're a faggy fag gay". I'm simply stating the truth. That Avalanche totally messed up. They could easily have the same graphical features in the PC version as settings that can simply be turned on/off, but they didn't. And PC gamers that dish out way more money on hardware to play games than console gamers shouldn't have to settle for less because a studio isn't very smart. I'm a gfx slut. Sorry. |
direct9c is not capable of that xbox360 effects but directx10 is  so STFU ... the same was with farcry but then they relased a 1.33 patch that enabled PS3.0 effects so the same wil be made when they will relase Vista and dx10 and dx10 Gfx cards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:43 Post subject: |
|
|
Just Cause PS2 > Just Cause PC.
LAWLZ.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:48 Post subject: |
|
|
| Hfric wrote: | | [direct9c is not capable of that xbox360 effects but directx10 is so STFU ... the same was with farcry but then they relased a 1.33 patch that enabled PS3.0 effects so the same wil be made when they will relase Vista and dx10 and dx10 Gfx cards |
Xbox360 is not running DX10 and never will. DX9 is more than capable of running the shit in Just Cause. The developers just suck ass if they did not enable them in the full version. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:51 Post subject: |
|
|
| pogácsa wrote: | | maxiepaxie wrote: | [NUKED]-Just.Cause.CLONEDVD-iTWINS
REASON-dvd9.and.wasnt.labeled
|
and what does it mean, exactly?  |
uh lol it means exactly what it says....its advd9 and isnt labed as such theres no other way of explaining it
| Parallax_ wrote: | | Hfric wrote: | | [direct9c is not capable of that xbox360 effects but directx10 is so STFU ... the same was with farcry but then they relased a 1.33 patch that enabled PS3.0 effects so the same wil be made when they will relase Vista and dx10 and dx10 Gfx cards |
Xbox360 is not running DX10 and never will. DX9 is more than capable of running the shit in Just Cause. The developers just suck ass if they did not enable them in the full version. |
its not dx9 or dx10. 360 has its own API. so constantly comparing 360 and pc gfx is fuckign retarded and this isnt the console thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Brisk
Posts: 1557
Location: Dutch...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:58 Post subject: |
|
|
`THIS IS NOT THE XBOX360 SECTION. PLS STFU ABOUT FUCKIGN XBOX GRAPHICS THNX
@Brisk it got nuked minutes ago. and unnuked. nothign wrong with the game jsut not labled dvd9. SO ALL YOU NOOBLETS DONT WORRY THE GAME IS FINE, IT A SHEEP NUKE.
Last edited by |IcedFreon| on Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:59; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 21:59 Post subject: |
|
|
sorry, I dont know, what DVD9 means
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Brisk
Posts: 1557
Location: Dutch...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 22:02 Post subject: |
|
|
Xbox 360 graphics are waaaaaaaay better.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NoFace.
Posts: 259
Location: Streets
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 22:09 Post subject: |
|
|
OMG!!! Demo suxx...Game suxx...play 2 Hours...deinstall...cancel my Order on my Shop!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 22:09 Post subject: |
|
|
| |IcedFreon| wrote: | `THIS IS NOT THE XBOX360 SECTION. PLS STFU ABOUT FUCKIGN XBOX GRAPHICS THNX
@Brisk it got nuked minutes ago. and unnuked. nothign wrong with the game jsut not labled dvd9. SO ALL YOU NOOBLETS DONT WORRY THE GAME IS FINE, IT A SHEEP NUKE. |
We're not 360 fanboys. At least I'm not. I'm simply talking about the PC version and complaining about it's lack of features that the 360 so happens to have. I think for the things I've said it's much more reasonable to be in the PC section than the 360 section. If there was a "Talking shit about Avalanche for being idiots and not implementing the same features the 360 has as settings that can be toggled on/off." section I would definitely post it in there. Maybe you should talk to the moderator about getting one. Hey watch me go and STFU. It's gonna be off the chain.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 21st Sep 2006 22:15 Post subject: |
|
|
Oh yeah and....
| |IcedFreon| wrote: | and it runs and looks beautiful. just look at the screens i took on the previous page. and you CAN remap the controls and there IS HDR
lol |
From the screens it's pretty obvious that there's still no HDR. And on a few other posts people confirmed that there's definitely no HDR setting in the full version.
Edit: Some people confuse that overdone haze/bloom effect with HDR.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 20 of 35 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
